Speaking Out
Show All History
God promises to forget our sins. Google, not so much.
Tim Challies | posted 3/08/2010 10:02AM
In 2006, AOL made an epic misjudgment. As part of a research project headed by Dr. Abdur Chowdhury, AOL made available to the public a massive amount of search data, releasing the search history of 650,000 users over a 3-month period. That totaled some twenty one million searches. Before releasing the data they anonymized it, stripping away user names and replacing them with numbers. Yet because of the nature of the data, people very quickly linked real people to abstract numbers--a massive violation of privacy and confidentiality. Within days AOL realized its mistake and withdrew the data. But already it had been copied and posted elsewhere on the internet where today it lives on in infamy.
Some searches were dark and disturbing, others unremarkable in every way, and still others strangely amusing. Often you could reconstruct a person's life, at least in part, from what they searched for over a period of time. Consider this user:
shipping pets 2006-03-01 16:36:48
does ata ship pets 2006-03-01 17:10:35
shipping pets 2006-03-01 21:33:30
continental.com 2006-03-01 21:34:53
pet shipping 2006-03-01 21:35:11
cat with broken bones diarreah and looks like blood 2006-03-04 03:14:52
broken bones in cat 2006-03-04 03:31:53
cat has broken bones above base of tail vet said it will heal on its own 2006-03-04 03:32:53
cat broken bones and diarreah 2006-03-04 03:58:24
do cats menstrate 2006-03-04 14:09:09
cat health 2006-03-04 14:10:22
cat has broken bones wasn't bleeding before but now is and now she can't defecate too 2006-03-04 14:16:35
mucous blood diarreah in cat 2006-03-04 14:22:47
The moral of this particular story seems to be that you don't want to pay for cheap shipping for your new cat.
This AOL data raised an endless number of questions and concerns. Primarily, it brought awareness to the fact that search engines know you better than you might like. Actually, they probably know you better than you know yourself in some ways--you forget what you search for; they don't. We may like to think that our searches are just searches, harmless and pointless inquiries known only to us. But the fact is that search engines keep all of that data and they keep it forever. Google has recently begun to strip personal identifiers from the data after a certain time period has elapsed, but from the AOL searches we can see that this is sometimes still not enough.
Here is an AOL user whose searches tell a sad story (for sake of space I have stripped out a large number of searches):
body fat calliper 2006-03-01 18:54:10
curb morning sickness 2006-03-05 08:53:23
get fit while pregnant 2006-03-09 18:49:37
he doesn't want the baby 2006-03-11 03:52:01
uou're pregnant he doesn't want the baby 2006-03-11 03:52:49
online degrees theology 2006-03-11 04:05:24
online christian colleges 2006-03-11 04:13:33
foods to eat when pregnant 2006-03-12 09:38:02
baby names 2006-03-14 19:11:10
baby names and meanings 2006-03-14 20:01:27
physician search 2006-03-23 10:20:04
best spa vacation deals 2006-03-27 20:04:09
maternity clothes 2006-03-28 09:28:25
pregnancy workout videos 2006-03-29 10:01:39
buns of steel video 2006-03-29 10:12:38
what is yoga 2006-03-29 12:17:31
what is theism 2006-03-29 12:18:30
hindu religion 2006-03-29 12:18:56
yoga and hindu 2006-03-29 12:32:05
is yoga alligned with christianity 2006-03-29 12:33:18
yoga and christianity 2006-03-29 12:33:42
abortion clinics charlotte nc 2006-04-17 11:00:02
greater carolinas womens center 2006-04-17 11:40:22
can christians be forgiven for abortion 2006-04-17 21:14:19
can christians be forgiven for abortion 2006-04-17 21:14:19
roe vs. wade 2006-04-17 22:22:07
effects of abortion on fibroids 2006-04-18 06:50:34
abortion clinic charlotte 2006-04-18 15:14:03
symptoms of miscarriage 2006-04-18 16:14:07
water aerobics charlotte nc 2006-04-18 19:41:27
abortion clinic chsrlotte nc 2006-04-18 21:45:39
total woman vitamins 2006-04-20 16:38:16
engagement gifts 2006-04-20 16:57:04
engagement rings 2006-04-20 16:58:37
mom's turning 50 2006-04-20 17:51:13
high risk abortions 2006-04-20 17:53:49
abortion fibroid 2006-04-20 17:55:18
benefits of water aerobics 2006-04-20 23:25:50
wedding gown styles 2006-04-26 19:37:34
recover after miscarriage 2006-05-22 18:17:53
marry your live-in 2006-05-27 07:25:45
RSS Feeds
Audio
Twitter
1 of 2
share this page
E-mail
Print
Post
Average User Rating:
Displaying 1–3 of 7 comments.
See all comments
Andrew Thornquist
Great article. Our searches are a simple reflection of our thoughts.
Mac D
Rex, I am not proposing that our internet searches don’t matter before God, my comment was in relation to Adrian’s comment, not directly to the point of the article. I should have been clearer and I apologize. But if you read NS and Myron’s comments, I was speaking in that vein. Search engines can’t tell everyone’s story because the data can be interpreted differently, or does not tell the whole story. Because of that, when I stand before the judgment seat, I will be more fearful (thankfully I am in X) of the record of my thoughts and attitudes than I will be of my search engine records. I believe the former is much more disgraceful than the latter.
N S
I find this a very interesting subject. As someone already pointed out, though, search engine histories are not completely revealing - there could be multiple users on one computer. In addition, there could be a myriad of reasons for searches. Just because someone searches "atheism" does not mean he/she is searching for philosophical answers. Or if someone searches "abortion", it doesn't mean that she's having one, it could be on behalf of somebody else, or it could just be for information/interest's sake. It could be for a school assignment. I have searched many things that I might be embarrassed for people to see and make assumptions about, not because they're "wrong," but because they don't actually apply to me.