Homeless Shelters Face Sharp Cutbacks
If you happen to be a homeless man on the South Side of Chicago, there are precious few places to go during the day to escape snow or rain or heat—the public library, the train station, and, until recently, Roseland Christian Ministries Center.
"For 20 years, we had a drop-in center," said Joe Huizenga, the ministry's director of development. "It was aimed at men in the Roseland community—homeless folks who have some sort of mental disability, maybe veterans who couldn't find services. Roseland had a high number of homeless and displaced men who had nowhere to go during the day."
Roseland Christian Ministries, which also runs an overnight shelter for about 80 women and children, worked with the Chicago Department of Human Services to staff the drop-in center. Doors were open from 9 A.M. to about 10 P.M. every day; about 80 to 100 men walked through them to find lunch, dinner, and a place to belong.
"It was just somewhere to go, something to do," Huizenga said. "It would give them a sense of community and belonging."
The benefit to the community was two-fold, he said. In addition to sheltering and feeding the men, the center worked for containment.
"The children and elderly folks who lived in the neighborhood didn't have 80 to 100 folks with drug addictions and mental illnesses on the street," he said.
The state paid Roseland $300,000 a year for staff and food supplies. Three years ago, the budget was slashed to $190,000. Huizenga cut the hours and number of meals. Doors were open just five days a week, from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. Only one meal was served.
A year later, the state completely eliminated Roseland from its budget. A church in the suburbs stepped forward to help, giving enough money to staff the program for a few months. The hours were even shorter, from 2 P.M. to 5 P.M. each weekday. But it was not enough, and in June, Roseland had to shut the doors to the men's daytime shelter.
It is a story that's playing out in hundreds of places across the country this year. Since 2008, the recession has shrunk state budgets. At least 31 states have projected shortages for fiscal year 2012, a sum of more than $86 billion, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Some of those shortages are enormous. Nineteen states report gaps of 10 percent or more of their general-fund budgets. Alabama and Nevada have shortages larger than 30 percent.
Thirty states have raised their taxes, while 46 have cut services, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. And assistance for the poor is not exempt from cutbacks—31 states have restricted health insurance eligibility or reduced access to health care for low-income children or families. Thirty states have cut expenses for medical or home care for poor elderly or disabled people, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
"Human services isn't organized like, say, teachers," said Ron Baiman, director of budget and policy analysis for the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability. The services provided directly by the state and staffed by state workers can better maintain their funding than can community agencies and nonprofits, he said.
"Most of the actual services [in Illinois]—75 percent—are non-state-provided," Baiman said. "They're privatized, farmed out to nonprofits." This trend started in 2000 under the Bush administration, when many Christian charities and larger churches began signing government contracts to provide such services.
Since these faith-based groups are diverse and rely on multiple sources for financial support, it is harder for them to organize. They do not have a strong track record for moving legislation forward.

God Among the Roma

Grieving with the Good Friday God

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 21 comments
See all comments
Original Anna Anna
Yrs ago, the people with jobs showed up at Church. We had thousands of plant jobs in the 60s until the gov't & the environmentalists chased the plants out of town so the populace could have clean air, trees, rare bugs, etc. where houses & plants were. Than the gov't helped out & left us with judges letting drug sellers, gun sellers etc. do community work instead of jail. Now, we have empty houses, forests & mosquitoes, access to drugs, poor teachers (good ones left) & gov't housing & programs with nightly murder. Our new jobbers left with the plants going South. I should have gone too. But the kids still need lunches, education etc. which our Church does now all day, summer & winter. Our Church decided the way to help those in trouble was to expand our educational programs for children & adults. The public schools are a mess under State control now. Classes are about sex, not the 4 r's. The city has high birth rate with no fathers. We Thank God we have 500 members to do what we can.
A Hermit
Government social welfare programs and government regulation were result of the failure of 'big business' and the 'free market' capitalist system to care for the majority of the nation's citizens; to provide livable wages, worker safety standards, healthcare, and environmental protections. Christian charity was not enough make up for corporate greed. While government programs are not an answer to our societal problems (individuals making responsible, caring choices in and out of business and government is), nonetheless the majority of American citizens have been better off (materially) than they would be without the government programs. The decline of American jobs is very much attributable to the fact that American workers must compete with millions of poor in countries without the benefits we have who are working for bare survival.
michael prodigal1012
I for one am not going to look to the govt to fix a problem which Jesus said "would always be with you." I support food and clothing ministries in my area, and have tried to show a little leadership in getting others involved. Some of the discussion centered on churches and govt priorities. I don't expect the Spirit to lead a soulless entity like a govt, and I think too many of my brothers and sisters are too fat, happy, and selfish to hear that still small voice. If you spend more in a month on movie and game rentals/purchases than on food or other aid for the poor, you are selfish. If your car payment(s)/insurance per month is more than you conttribute in a year... I could go on, but if I made a couple people think, then good. And if you jump all defensive? And before I get slammed as 'judging', I did not ask you "go sell all and give to the poor", that would be radical. I just suggest your toys and games will burn up like the stubble they are, but your charity will remain.