Rise of the Planet of the Apes

Everything inside of me wanted to like this prequel. I've always appreciated the original Planet of the Apes and the depth that Rod Serling brought to its script. Plus, I had more recently begun to think that James Franco, the star of the film, really knows how to act. The young actor showed signs of early De Niro for his Oscar-nominated performance in 127 Hours, making us laugh and cry in just one scene. Unfortunately, after watching Rise of the Planet of the Apes, my hopes remain unsatisfied. The prequel doesn't just fail as mindless entertainment with unconvincing visual effects, a clunky script, and a lackluster plot. It disrespects its predecessors by ignoring the philosophical implications that made their subject so pertinent.
Set in San Francisco, the new film centers on a young scientist named Will Rodman, played not so convincingly by Franco. Will is consumed by finding a cure for Alzheimer's disease because his father, Charles (an uninteresting John Lithgow), suffers from it. In doing this, he and his team of scientists test a special drug on apes that, as the opening sequence depicts, actually works.

James Franco as Will Rodman
The project predictably comes to a quick end when an experiment goes wrong and leaves Will and his ailing father at home with a baby chimpanzee named Caesar, who turns out to have human-like intelligence inherited from his lab-raised mother. Will, growing more and more frustrated by his dad's condition, decides he has nothing to lose and proceeds to test the drug on Charles. And it works.
After this breakthrough, the film transitions from bland to cheesy within minutes. Will, Charles, and Caesar are one big happy family. They play together. They eat dinner together. Will and Caesar even communicate with each other through sign language. The scenes are clearly intended to depict their increasing bond, but they actually cause the relationship to seem more contrived, invoking substandard movies like Congo and Buddy.
Of course, all good things must come to an end. After an accident occurs with Will's disgruntled neighbor, Caesar finds himself locked up in a government-run facility with other apes. At first he doesn't fit in because of his intelligence and unfamiliarity with his kind, but eventually he takes over and builds an army of primates. This army, composed of gorillas, orangutans, and chimps, including one ineptly named Cornelius, plans to not just escape but to, well, take over the world.

Caroline (Freida Pinto) and Will, after the apes go ape
While the motivation of the apes, particularly Caesar, never becomes apparent, their breakout and attack on San Francisco lead to the action-packed finale promised in the trailer. This final thirty minutes also seems to be the very reason that director Rupert Wyatt made the film because he obviously put no effort into anything leading up to it. Alas, though, his anticipated climax does nothing innovative or thrilling. It merely follows a pack of angry apes as they run around the city and eventually make their way to, as predicted, the Golden Gate Bridge.
Wyatt shoots all of us this with no indication of space and scope. The battles move too quickly to see, and the ongoing close-ups put us, frustratingly, right in the midst of the action. This style of filming worked better in his first movie, The Escapist, an indie picture also about a prison break, but here it makes us feel like we're watching TV. As a result, the film never takes on the sort of epic quality that made the original Planet of the Apes boast of grandeur.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 29 comments
See all comments
Dean Smith
I have never read such a blatantly spiteful review of a film in my life, you (Roark) systematically trash every good aspect of this movie, in order. I have a sneaking suspicion this was religion-motivated....Obviously, was a tale of morality breeches - cruel testing on animals, profit-driven pharmaceutical science crossing ethical boundaries, inappropriate holding and domestication of primates, and playing with God's delicate balances of life on Earth. It addressed it all. Your claims about the CGI being less than top-notch: You are obviously trying to discredit the special affects, contrary to their high quality. The CGI in this film were some of the best and most cleverly used effects I have ever seen. They were mind-blowing how close the real-life they were, especially in the facial expressions on the Caesar and the other apes. Just those expressions alone worked better at telling us what the main character (Caesar) was thinking and feeling, than any words could ever.
Anonymous
Mr. Roark, your review reminds me of some of the negative responses that fans had to JJ Abrams' take on Star Trek. There were Trekkies who didn't like it, and from the way some of them responded, I cannot help but wonder if they were intent on despising the film from the moment they arrived in the theater. Similarly, the tone of your review has left me curious. I caught myself wondering if you were determined to regard this movie in a negative light simply because of its newness.
Travis Holmes
I'm not gonna lie this guy is a total moron. Yes the movie does have a couple of minor plot holes and some of the effects seem rushed... But your whole arguement about grandeur and weighty themes is total BS. This movie isn't about humans in an ape world... it's about apes in a human world. More specifically, how Ceasar percieves the human world. Notice Ceasar made several gestures of good will towards humanity and avoiding killing as much as possible even when the humans were killing his kind and when his kind was killing humans. It's a movie centered around Ceasar. What was the whole closeups during the action sequence arguement anyway. How did you want it filmed.... Plant a camera on top of the bridge, film the bridge sequence from there and call the movie Planet of the Ants. Anyways... I'm sure you'll keep driving the car you bought 12 years ago, use your AARP card everywhere you go, vote Republican everytime without thought, and still don't know how to use the pinpad at checkout.