Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2011 > JulyChristianity Today, July, 2011
Politics
Jesus: Democratic King
Our most cherished democratic values are grounded in Jesus' sovereign authority.




Christ is our king. But Americans don't do kingship. The last time we had a king was in 1776. We threw him out after a real tea party. And we put firm safeguards in our Constitution to ensure no new king would ever rise here again. We admire kings and queens from afar, in Victorian books, BBC movies, and televised royal weddings. But at home we don't deal with kings and queens.

So for many democratic citizens today—in the United States and worldwide—the Bible's talk of kings and kingdoms can be mystifying. But such talk, if we read the Bible carefully, actually makes a great deal of sense even in our political setting.

A Strange Sovereign

The Bible teaches that Christ the King is infinitely more powerful than any ruler on earth, even the Roman emperor or the Jewish King Herod, who were the supreme rulers of Christ's day. These earthly kings ruled only for a lifetime. Christ rules eternally. These earthly kings ruled only over a limited territory. Christ rules everywhere. These earthly kings had only political power. Christ has power over all creation. He orders the waves to be still. He turns water into wine. He feeds five thousand from one boy's lunch bag. He heals the sick. He restores the disabled. He drives out demons from their tormented hosts. He summons corpses from their graves. And when Christ rose from his own tomb, he made resurrection and eternal life available to all who believe in him. This was no ordinary king.

But for all this infinite and eternal power, Christ's incarnation as king is modest, understated, sublime, and sacrificial. Christ was born not in a palace but in a stable, close to the ground, surrounded by animals and shepherds. He did not travel with a legion of soldiers, as the Roman emperor did, but wandered about the countryside with a dozen men of humble origin. He dined not in elegant splendor with the rich and the powerful but with tax collectors and prostitutes, Samaritans and sojourners, the down and outs of the day.

Christ did not clatter into Jerusalem, as King Herod did, sitting in a splendid chariot bedecked with gold and jewels and drawn by twelve strong horses with shiny silver saddles. Christ plodded into Jerusalem on the back of a donkey who had never been ridden or broken. Christ did not enter Jerusalem through the main wide gate at the end of the straight road. He came through the smaller back gate, having descended the Mount of Olives and passed through the Valley of Death, which was known as Hell. Christ did not come to Jerusalem to attend a royal feast, as becomes an heir of the house of King David. He came to preside over a simple last supper with his friends, prefaced by his self-humbling act of washing their feet, even those of the one who would betray him.

When later arrested on trumped-up charges by local authorities, Christ did not claim sovereign immunity as any higher power of the day would have. His simple defense was, "My kingdom is not of this world." Even Pontius Pilate recognized this was no ordinary king.

While Christ's kingdom is not of this world, Christ still rules in this world. But, in extraordinary defiance of every handbook on royalty, Christ rules through fragile, weak, and sinful people. Christ appoints us to be his royal witnesses and ambassadors on earth. "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's own people," Peter wrote to the new Christians (1 Pet. 2:9, NRSV). Each of us is called to represent and reflect, to embody and embrace God's royal prerogatives and divine rights on earth.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 25 comments

Joseph Li

August 03, 2011  5:53pm

Lord Jesus is king of kings, but we his subjects frequently forget our royal position, and become weak and silent in the face of our belief challenging situations. We keep silence on things that make our King very unhappy such as laws that embrace abortion and samesex marriage. We make all excuse to excuse our inaction and lack of courage. All love without the love of Jesus is futile because the grace of God is not in it.

Roger McKinney

August 03, 2011  2:13pm

Red, You’re right. Freedom does not require democracy. Freedom requires the rule of general principles, such as the rights to life, liberty and property, as opposed to the arbitrary rule of men. Under the rule of principles, everyone must be treated equally under the law. Democracies can be as tyrannical as dictators if the majority ignores the natural rights to life, liberty and property. US democracy did that with black slaves, Indian removal and Japanese imprisonment during WWII. Those groups have enjoyed precious little liberty in the history of the US. Democracy does not ensure freedom; it can ensure tyranny of the majority. All democracy does is make it easier to replace a bad leader. But if the majority turn bad, the majority can terrorize minorities as much as a dictator.

Red Well

August 03, 2011  1:08pm

Never trust a modern lawyer to do political theory, much less political theology. Clearly Christianity introduces "radical equality" into society and contributes to modern democracy: much of our understanding of human rights is based in New Testament value for individuals. But Witte is confusing the Reformation with the early church. If, for instance, democracy is self-evident in scripture, why have democracies existed in "Christendom" for only 200 years? Wouldn't democracy also have arisen in the Orthodox Church? Many American founders considered Christianity essential to republicanism, and Christ's teachings offer a compelling basis on which many modern notions of equality and democracy rest. But to imply that Jesus was in favor of political democracy muddies both His teachings and our political system.

Roger McKinney

August 02, 2011  12:50pm

Christ created a government – the nation of Israel. The law and constitution are in the Torah. Of course we can’t apply many of the laws because they were written for a particular historical situation, but we can distill the principles behind the laws and apply them. Israel under the judges would be like the US today with only the court system and no executive or legislative branch. There would be no taxes and no standing army. Tithes, as always, were given voluntarily. People enforced only the civil/criminal code; God took care of enforcing the religious, moral and poor laws. Judges weren’t chosen by popular vote, but by elders, which would make Israel a republic and not a democracy. That’s a lot more freedom than Americans have today. Of course, Israel gave up their freedom for king.

Rev. Robert Morris

August 02, 2011  11:50am

Attempts to support a particular form of government from the Bible make me nervous, and this article especially so. To equate the "freedom" Paul speaks of in Galatians with American notions of civil freedom goes far astray, and is the backbone of the unsavory marriage of 'American Exceptionalism' and Christianity. The freedom of the Spirit is freedom from the power of sin and vice, not external government oversight or regulation. Christianity has lived under the Roman Imperium, 'divine right' Kingship (justified from Scripture), the oligarchy of the wealthy and powerful, and in republics and democracies. God's concern in Scripture is with equity and justice, and democracies are only one way to achieve that. The idea of an ultimate spiritual sovereignty inherent in each person is hard to justify by a Gospel which teaches us that we are radically "members of one another." I'm a proud American, but I don't want the Gospel confused with my particular form of government, however good.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper