Jump directly to the content

Feature

Contemporary Music: The Cultural Medium and the Christian Message

What kind of Christians do contemporary services produce?

On a recent Sunday, I found myself visiting a Protestant megachurch. Entering the "worship center" was eerily similar to being ushered down the aisle of a movie theater: floor lighting, padded chairs, visual effects shown on two large screens, and music over the speaker system.

A band appeared on stage to begin the service with live music. It was dark, and I thought I heard the audience singing along, but it was impossible to tell. And although I was seated in the front row, I sensed that the congregation was almost superfluous to the activity on stage. As in most forms of entertainment, the audience functioned as passive onlookers, participating only in an unseen, intensely personal way.

While the band played, song lyrics flashed across the two big screens, with words like great, God, and high figuring prominently. The musical performance was outstanding, even if the vocabulary was extremely limited. If the songs aimed at an emotional response, they were probably successful, but like so much contemporary worship music, they lacked any element of substantive teaching.

Immediately after the singing, without any announcement, much less Paul's words of institution (1 Cor. 11:23-26), the elements of the Lord's Supper were hurriedly handed around. Again, I was amazed at the blandly efficient nature of this activity. We could have been passing pretzels and soda pop. No one offered any guidance whatsoever on the sharing of this critical ordinance or sacrament. It seemed a strictly vertical encounter between each individual and God.

Next came the sermon, offered by a capable person who worked very hard to relate while teaching some biblical content. A simple outline appeared on the screen so that we could follow the train of thought. So did the relevant Bible passages, lest anyone could not find them in an actual Bible. I noticed that the illustrations came almost solely from popular movies and television. Then the service ended as abruptly as it began, with a few announcements over the speakers and a cordial "thank you" to the congregation. No benediction or closing prayer—not even a person to give it. The house lights came on, and it was time to leave.

Protecting the Pearls

To say that the service was religiously "dumbed down" is not quite right. In fact, I wish that were the case, since the goal of comprehension sometimes demands that complex ideas be simplified. No, it seemed rather that the presentation aimed at finding a theological and cultural lowest common denominator in order to attract and engage the greatest number of people. As a result, there was no need to be a Christian to understand most everything that was said or sung.

While church leaders rightly want Sunday services to be accessible, they should also be asking about the limits of this strategy. Ironically, a common complaint 20 years ago was that churches alienated visiting nonbelievers with too much Christian jargon. This was a legitimate criticism. But now it seems the impulse toward accommodating the surrounding culture has pushed churches into making the opposite mistake. Has a passion for inclusiveness deluded churches into supposing that doctrinal or liturgical particularity threatens their mission to a religiously pluralized world?

The apostolic and post-apostolic churches—those nearest to the New Testament era—took a different approach. Modeled after the Old Testament tabernacle, the church was where believers encountered the "Holy of Holies." Thus worship could not be open to everyone. The churches of the third and fourth centuries observed what was called the disciplina arcana (the rule or practice of secrecy) with regard to worship gatherings. This was to ensure that only baptized Christians partook of the Lord's Supper and confessed the church's creed. Hippolytus, a third-century theologian, kept a list of vices and professions that would disqualify one from baptismal eligibility. In a great many churches, the un-baptized, even catechumens preparing for baptism, were dismissed before the church celebrated the Eucharist and confessed its creed.


More from Christianity Today

La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012

¿Hacia dónde vamos?—Una palabra para los creyentes hispanos sobre forjar un futuro.
Jesus' Elevator Speech

Jesus' Elevator Speech

Or was it his inaugural address? There's a difference.

The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Box office news, Benedict Cumberbatch, Cannes, and AFI honors Mel Brooks.
Divine Rehab

Divine Rehab

Whatever your addiction, God's grace is the only hope for a way out.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 78 comments

Jim Robb

July 07, 2011  1:09pm

There are no facts in this article about what kind of Christians are produced by contemporary services, music, worship styles, etc. As in too many Christianity Today articles, it is an essay packaged as journalism. Where are the sociological studies comparing theological knowledge, devotional habits, and good works of groups from from traditional churches versus contemporary? Why not bring some facts to bear -- if there are any?

Report Abuse

Sabrina Messenger

July 07, 2011  12:37pm

Quite frankly, I think that none of the CCM songwriters or singers can top King David. I'd like to know what is wrong with sticking to what is traditional and true? Too much of the contemporary worship seems to be all about showmanship and not much about worship. We've made people like Amy Grant and Michael W Smith into "Christian Rock Stars" and the attention should not be on them or any other human singer, but on the Lord himself. A few years back, I attended a songwriting conference in L.A. and sat in on the session for Christian/Gospel music and was completely put off. It seems that nowadays CCM has a closer walk with Nashville than with "thee." It's time for churches to get back to their roots and stop with the 'trendy Christianity.'

Report Abuse

Shawn -

July 06, 2011  4:46pm

@Jeya, It most certainly is that God wants the heart of the individual, but consider how the article makes a clear point about the hyper-individualistic consumerism nature of contemporary services. God indeed wants the heart of the individual, but I believe He wants the heart of His people more. So many of our congregations are severely lacking in community. @Michael: To some degree you are correct, praise is about God, not us, in that He is the focus. However, on the flip side completely disagree as well. God does not require our praise for His well-being. Praise, just as prayer, is an alignment of our hearts with His and so its purpose IS the worshiper. What's more, worship is not singing, that's praise. Worship is the life that we live in His name.

Report Abuse
See All 78 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Forgiving Iran

Forgiving Iran

Long before I knew the true God, he helped me release my hatred.
A Man Without Breath

A Man Without Breath

Philip Kerr’s new novel centers on the Katyn massacre.

Generation Whine

Generation Whine

Embedded reporting from the Millennial front.

more | current issue

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping