Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2011 > June (Web-only)Christianity Today, June (Web-only), 2011
Poll: Most Americans No Longer Want Government Promoting 'Traditional Values'
The recent recession and a movement favoring less government may contribute to recent poll numbers.




A new CNN-Opinion Research poll finds that a majority of Americans think government should not promote "traditional values," the first time in the past two decades that support for promotion of traditional values has been below 50 percent. The June poll finds that more Americans now believe that the government should stay out of the values business.

Since 1993, Gallup, CNN, and USA Today have occasionally asked whether people think "the government should promote traditional values in our society" or "the government should not favor any particular set of values." Just three years ago, only four-in-ten polled said government should not support any one set of values. In this month's poll, 50 percent said this. For the first time, a minority (46 percent) wanted government to push traditional values.

One possible explanation is the state of the economy. Those hit hardest by the recession showed a change in their support for traditional values. CNN's polling director Keating Holland noted that rural and blue-collar Americans may be a bellwether for the presidential election.

"Change among these particular groups suggests that economic worries are crowding out social issues," Holland said.

The recent recession is unlikely to be the only explanation, however. The economy has had many ups and downs over the past 18 years, but support for government promoting traditional values has remained consistently high.

The turn away from values-promotion may be part of a more general movement favoring less government. The poll found that for the past two years the public increasingly think "the government is trying to do too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses"; a shrinking number think "government should do more to solve our country's problems." Sixty three percent said government was doing too much, up from 52 percent when Obama was elected President. The current support for less government is the highest in the past two decades.

The shift in opinion does not mean that Americans like the current values in society. A January Gallup poll found that seven in ten Americans were dissatisfied with "the moral and ethical climate" in America. This was up from 62 percent a decade ago.

Another Gallup poll offers a glimpse at one reason some people may be less than thrilled at the idea of government promoting any values. In 2010, before the latest sex scandals, Gallup asked the public to rate the "honesty and ethical standards" of different types of people. Only nine percent said Members of Congress had "very high" or "high" ethical standards. Just 12 percent said the same for state officeholders, less than the percentage for lawyers (17 percent) and just slightly above car salespeople and lobbyists, each of whom received just seven percent.

Regardless of the latest public opinions, it remains to be seen if traditional values will remain important the upcoming presidential race. At Monday's Republican debate, candidates for the GOP nomination discussed their bona fides on abortion, marriage, and religion. Yet, not once in the whole debate did anyone mention the word "values."


Related Elsewhere:

Christianity Today covers political developments on the politics blog.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 37 comments

Greg Peterson

June 22, 2011  8:32pm

Did you read my post, Dan H? You wrote that I made stuff up. I said I first read that point in "Radical Jew; Paul & the Politics of Identity" by respected religious scholar Daniel Boyarin. I wrote the Christian Reconstruction movement seemed to embody the disgusting bigotry that non-Christians, thought of as not being one in Christ, are not really fully human. You then accuse me of "think(ing) that Rushdoony speaks [he's dead] for conservative/traditional Christians." I sure hope he didn't. I'm sure most "conservative/traditional Christians" would agree with me that he was revolting (on the unlikely chance they're familiar with him). "Some" isn't "all." If you don't think his movement had an out-sized influence in the religious-right, just because I said so, go read respected writer Rodney Clapp's "Democracy as Heresy" Christianity Today 2/27/1987, for starters. --You actually think religious-right leaders speak for conservative/traditional Christians? I hope not.

Dan H

June 22, 2011  5:58pm

@OA: Amen! You got that right, sister!

Original Anna Anna

June 22, 2011  3:58pm

Why the ideal that government IS promoting traditional values. We have half the population for their convenience killing the unborn when the Constitution does not give them the right to kill. The unborn gets no trial by its peers, no jury convicting them for a crime requiring death. Who is changing the definition of marriage if it isn't the government. This power isn't in the Constitution either. When the public votes on the change, the change loses. Orphans are being forced to be handed over to people who put how they do sex ahead of morals and ethics. Anything goes in sex is being taught to kids but religion can't even use the school building for meetings after hours when the building is owned by the public. The government is making so many laws to control what they think we should or shouldn't be doing and the laws have nothing to do with crime. Where are the "traditional" values in our government. You vote for them hoping they have traditional values and they end up being creeps.

Jennifer Smith

June 22, 2011  12:51pm

Let us remember that Quakers were considered heretics in much of the Christian world, even England in the 19th century. They were imprisoned for their faith in England and in Massachusetts under the Presbyterians. It's nice that Christians today claim them as "one of the club" but our ancestors would not have done so.

Dan H

June 21, 2011  10:58pm

Nice try, GP, but no cigar. You actually think Rushdoony speaks for conservative/traditional Christians? Really, GP? Is that the best you could come up with? You are truly grasping at straws. Typical of prog libs. And your source: "a Professor of Talmudic Culture at U. C. Berkeley". Yeah, he's a real reliable source. So I understand why you must equivocate, b/c you don't have any real facts to support your argument. Change of topic: Here's a question for you, GP, worth 25 extra points: What groups led the opposition to slavery in Britain in the 19th century? And no, it wasn't the Int'l Lesbian and Gay Assoc. (hint - William Wilberforce belonged to one of the groups.) If you said evangelicals and Quakers you are right! GP, you just earned 25 extra credit points! Congratulations.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper