The New Conversion: Why We 'Become Christians' Differently Today

The New Conversion: Why We 'Become Christians' Differently Today
It is not an overstatement to say that evangelicals are experiencing a "sea change"—a paradigm shift—in their understanding of conversion and redemption, a shift that includes the way in which they think about the salvation of God, the nature and mission of the church, and the character of religious experience. Although there is no one word to capture where evangelicals are going in this regard, there is a word that captures what they are leaving behind: revivalism.
Revivalism is a religious movement heir to both the 17th-century Puritans and the renewal movements of the 18th century, but one that largely emerged in the 19th century. It was broadly institutionalized in the 20th century in the conservative denominations in North America as well as in parachurch and mission agencies that then in turn spread the movement within North America and globally. For evangelicals up until at least a generation ago, the language of conversion was the language of revivalism; it shaped and in many ways determined their approach to worship, evangelism, and spiritual formation.
Evangelicalism is certainly not monolithic; the points at which evangelicals differ among themselves is significant—both Baptists and Pentecostals see themselves as coming under this umbrella, along with Mennonites, and then also Calvinists and Wesleyans. But for all their diversity, the way in which they spoke of conversion and redemption was remarkably similar. Evangelicals took for granted that the language and categories of revivalism were the language and categories of the New Testament. Conversion was viewed to be a punctiliar experience: persons could specify with confidence and assurance the time and place of their conversion, by reference, as often as not, to the moment when they prayed what was typically called "the sinner's prayer."
The focus of conversion was the afterlife: one sought salvation so that one could "go to heaven" after death, and the assumption was that "salvation" would lead to disengagement from the world. Once converted, the central focus of one's life would be church or religious activities, particularly those that helped others come to this understanding of salvation that assured them of "eternal life" after death. Life in the world was thought to hold minimal significance. What counted was the afterlife. And if one had "received Christ," one could be confident of one's eternity with God. Conversion was isolated from the experience of the church. Indeed, it was generally assumed that a person would come to faith outside of the church and then be encouraged, after conversion, to join a church community.
Typically evangelicals approached evangelism through the use of techniques or formulas by which a person would be introduced to spiritual principles or "laws" on the assumption that if these principles were accepted as "true," a person would offer an appropriate prayer and thus "become" a Christian.
Baptism, it was insisted, was subsequent to conversion and essentially optional. For although baptism was thought to be perhaps important, true spiritual experience was considered a personal, interior, subjective experience and thus not sacramental. Evangelicals have typically had a deep distrust in sacramental actions, insisting that they do not have redemptive significance.
Further, the church was often defined as in the business of making conversions happen; its life and mission were oriented toward getting more people converted through whatever means possible. Successful congregations were characterized by numerical "conversion growth."
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).











Comments
Displaying 13 of 27 comments
See all comments
herman powell
For those who think we become christian differently today, consider this: HUH! The way people are converted is as immutable as Jesus Christ and His Word. He is the paradigm, or standard, we look to and learn from. Christianity is not a cross pollination of different ideas or religious ignorance. If you want to learn about christian conversion I recommend an excellent article by A.W. Pink, on Justification. Would someone please define revivalism and, other theological traditions for me?
Wesley Woods
this article is showing how Christians are influenced by those of other traditions now more than ever. the pastor that i had at college saw in the teachings of Jesus shifts of thinking that he calls "Soul-Shift". it is nice to see how the church is starting to recognize that Jesus came to do more than die in our place, but he came to show us how to live. the revivalism model created Christians who eventually stopped influencing every aspect of culture leaving us with the culture we face today. the younger generation is seeing how if we do not have an influence on culture all we are doing handing it over to satan to influence just making it harder to share the gospel with them.
PETE DAYTON
Spot on with this analysis ! I fully concur with where we are, especially here in our Western culture. I am a product of a Damascus Road type experience and Billy Graham's 4 Spiritual Laws and sinner's prayer in 1978. I remember bumper stickers that said, "I Found It!", while not knowing what those people found. Notice the emphasis on "I" not "God found me". My daughter of 30 years, on the other hand has no recollection of such a conversion, saying "I've just always believed". I also note that Muslim believers have come to Christ through dreams of Christ and witness of Christian friends and following up on the references to Jesus in the Koran. The sweeping nature of the Pentecostal world-wide movement results in multitudes of converts, even if through a heretical misinterpretation of the Gospel (i.e. prosperity). What I am saying is God has in the past and in the future will use a variety of means to draw His people to Himself ! Then the real battle begins!