Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 16, 2012

Home > 2012 > JanuaryChristianity Today, January, 2012
The Village Green
Is Cage Fighting Ethical for Christians?
Observers weigh in on participating in or watching sports and violence.




It's Imprudent

Joe Carter is a Marine Corps veteran and an editor at The Gospel Coalition.

A century ago, a novel called In His Steps convinced generations of Christians that Jesus would, among other things, oppose the sport of prizefighting. That novel became the ninth best-selling book of all time, and the book's thesis found new life in the "What Would Jesus Do?" movement.

Today, instead of wearing "WWJD?" bracelets, young men wear T-shirts emblazoned with "Jesus Didn't Tap," a reference to yielding to one's opponent in combat sports. Some modern churches use mixed martial arts as ministry opportunities to attract young men.

Ministries that focus on "ultimate fighters" are giving young men a deformed view of biblical masculinity. During the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus praised the meek, a word that in the Greek refers to taming wild animals: The lion is able to lie down with the lamb precisely because he is not given over to his hyperaggressive nature.

It is difficult to square the Good Shepherd of the Gospels with the hypermasculine ideal of the cage fighter. It takes an incredible leap of logic to conclude that since Jesus was a carpenter he would have enjoyed watching Christian men kick and beat each other until one is forced to "tap out."

The term "martial arts" is derived from the Latin for "arts of Mars," the Roman god of war. Preparation for war has historically been the primary purpose of martial arts training and is its most legitimate context.

During my time in the military, I participated in the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program, a course intended to develop a "warrior ethos." Such training was both necessary and ethical. If the Christian tradition can support the concept of just war, then we should also accept the legitimacy of training warriors in the martial arts.

Are there other contexts in which combat sports can be morally licit? Perhaps, though I believe there is one situation where they cannot be moral: when viewed as entertainment.

When the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), the world's largest mixed martial arts promotion company, started in 1993, the selling point was that anything could happen in the "no-holds barred" matches—even death. Indeed, two fighters have died since 2007.

It was only after the sport was threatened with a nationwide ban and Sen. John McCain labeled the UFC events "human cockfighting" that the promoters began to tone down the bloody nature of the events.

As a result, the relatively tamer "sport" has gained unwarranted legitimacy and a mainstream following. The basic nature of the fights has not changed. The purpose of cage fighting is still to punch, kick, and pound a man or woman into submission.

This isn't the type of submission that Jesus is calling us to. Whether or not it is ethical is debatable. What is clear is that it is not prudent.

Our bodies are not our own, and they were bought with a price, Paul says (1 Cor. 6:19-20). We are called to responsibly steward our bodies and glorify God with them—not to spend our leisure time watching fighters pound each other to a bloody pulp.

It's like life

Ted Kluck is a former football coach and missionary, and author of The Reason for Sports: A Christian Fanifesto (Moody, 2009).

I'm a boxer. I've written one boxing book—Facing Tyson: 15 Fighters, 15 Stories—and am working on another. I'm also managing a Christian heavyweight boxer with whom I pray, study Scripture, and also fight, frequently. Just the other day we were in the ninth round of a ten-round sparring session, and he opened a wound on my face from which I bled profusely. He then held a towel to my face and helped me stop the bleeding. We're great friends.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 42 comments

Andrew

February 05, 2012  6:17am

I really dislike when people use scripture out of context to make their point. Think of David giving thanks to God for giving him strength to bend a bow of bronze; Paul's references to persevering to the finish and how athletes train for competition; in the Garden of Gethsemene, remember how Peter cut off someone's ear? Jesus even told them beforehand to sell what they had so they could purchase a sword. And to say boxing trumps MMA is outrageous. Did you know wrestling is considered the oldest sport in history? And, wrestlers have been among the most successful fighters in recent past. Jacob wrestled the angel, or was it Jesus? Karate, kung-fu, judo, jiu-jitsu have long celebrated and revered histories, and the boxer among us chose to dismiss them as porn. Shameful! An adult volunteer vendor for the Boy Scouts at a UFC event told me the MMA crowd was much more civil and polite than the NBA crowd he usually serves. I saw more fan fights at football and basketball games. Craziness!

Surprise

February 04, 2012  1:12pm

I belong to the Society of Creative Anachronism (SCA), a non-profit in which combatants dress up in armor and hit each other over the head with ratton swords for the honor of becoming King (or Queen, depending upon your gender). Winning at all costs is frowned upon because honor is valued. For instance, when a fighter is struck, it is up to him or her to indicate whether the blow is injurious or fatal. Fighters who consistently fail to acknowledge a serious blow are ostrasized. My knowledge of WMMA is almost nil, but the few times I've been exposed to mixed martial artists' bouts, I was appalled by the contrast with SCA fighting. In cage fighting, the fighters pander to the misogyny and bigotry of the crowd; in SCA fights, the combatants are focused on one another. In cage fighting, the audience is uncivil and frankly crass; in SCA fights the audience is, for the most part, respectful. Am I wrong? Were my fleeting views of mixed martial artistry an aberration?

John

February 02, 2012  9:19pm

Boxing is for sissies and it has been dead for a long time. Comparing MMA to porn is about the dumbest thing that I ever have heard. You my friend are an idiot!

Caleb

January 29, 2012  8:56am

Overall, I was disappointed with the idle speculation, wild theorizing and overall ignorance displayed by much of this article -- particularly the first and third articles. Case in point -- MMA is akin to pornography because it lets viewers "live vicariously"? Appreciation of the skill and ability of the athlete is the point of every sport -- to make the leap from that to pornography is very odd and very illogical. Indeed, the entire article was riddled with logical fallacies and inconsistencies. I at least respect the second author for his intellectual consistency in not trying to create a non-existent distinction between MMA and other contact sports. I am a professional Mixed Martial Artist (which is the proper term -- not cagefighter), and God has used my profession to allow me privilege of sharing my faith in front of thousands of people. The sport of MMA is filled with sincere Christians who love the Lord and try to honor him through it.

Steve Skeetess

January 29, 2012  4:27am

"Boxing is the only legal activity with a specific intent to cause brain damage to another person". In fact there are two forms of boxing, amateur and professional and about neither is the above statement true. Amateur boxing, for example, has clear rules and equipment for the protection of fighters. Under the rules a referee can stop the contest at any time if, in his opinion, one fighter is outclassed, disadvantaged, hurt, or may be hurt by the other. Does motor racing have a 'specific intent' to cause crashes? Does football or rugby have a 'specific intent' to cause concussion? Does skiing have a 'specific intent' to cause broken bones? The vast majority of amateur boxing contests are won on points. This is because the emphasis is not on 'beating one's opponent senseless', nor 'damaging his brain', but exhibiting skill, technique and the ability to escape or execute a clean punch. Having an element of danger or risk, or players with evil intent, does not make a sport ungodly.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



When the Unsinkable Sank

When the Unsinkable Sank

Leadership lessons from the deck of Titanic

Faith that Sticks

Faith that Sticks

Intergenerational connections and parental involvement give kids a faith that lasts beyond high school.

more | current issue

Small Groups

Let God's Love Overflow

Small groups can serve...

Kyria

Sloth

One of the "seven deadly...

Preaching Today

The Spiritual Importance of Becoming an ...

Key issues to address...

Building Church Leaders

Dealing with the Big Questions

Allow interns opportunities...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper