Exodus International's Alan Chambers Accused of Antinomian Theology
Photo by Alan Marler / APExodus International president Alan Chambers has, in the past week, explained the Orlando-based ministry's recent U-turn on reparative therapy to everyone from The New York Times to NPR to MSNBC's Hardball.
And while the organization's stance remains acceptable to most evangelicals, some scholars fear that Chambers's theological convictions—sprinkled throughout those interviews—have not.
"It's not that he is simply not saying the warnings [against homosexual activity] in Scripture. I could live with that," Pittsburgh Theological Seminary professor Robert Gagnon said of Chambers's recent comments. "It's that he is saying the exact opposite of what Scripture clearly teaches … . He's preaching an anti-gospel."
The theological heresy in question is antinomianism. The term was coined by Martin Luther to refer to those who believe that since faith is sufficient for salvation, Christians are not obligated to keep God's moral law.
Gagnon, author of The Bible and Homosexual Practice and a plenary speaker at Exodus's 2009 Freedom Conference, said that a June interview in The Atlantic shows that Chambers's views have veered. "Some of us choose very different lives than others," Chambers said of gay Christians in same-sex marriages. "But whatever we choose, it doesn't remove our relationship with God."
When asked to clarify whether or not that meant "a person living a gay lifestyle won't go to hell, as long as he or she accepts Jesus Christ as personal savior," he replied, "My personal belief is … while behavior matters, those things don't interrupt someone's relationship with Christ." In the course of the interview, Chambers made it clear that he believes that homosexual acts are sinful.
A 35-page response written by Gagnon called into question not only Chambers's soteriology, but also his ability to continue his 11-plus years of leading Exodus, which boasts some 260 affiliates domestically and internationally.
According to Gagnon, Chambers's statements unwittingly affirm that active homosexuals need only make an "intellectual assent" or "pray a prayer" to guard against eternal punishment, instead of stipulating the importance of repentance and change.
"I am not saying [Chambers] has to—in a sort of callous, unloving way—shout from the rooftops, 'You are going to hell,'" said Gagnon. "But he does need to make clear that there are these warnings [against homosexual behavior] in Scripture. It would be unloving and ungracious for him to assure people of things that Scripture does not."
Echoing the criticisms of "cheap grace" popularized by the late German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Gagnon said that Chambers's remarks "provide assurance to people that all is well when they live a life not led by the power of the Holy Spirit, but are led by the controlling influence of sin."
"In reality, all is not well," he said. "[Chambers] unintentionally deceives people into extending this philosophy of 'cheap grace' in their life, which puts them at risk of not inheriting the kingdom [of God]."
Defending his public remarks, Chambers told Christianity Today, "If someone tells me that they have a saving relationship with Jesus Christ—in the way I understand it and have experienced it—they still know Jesus regardless of what types of behavior they've chosen to be involved in."
"I don't know how anyone could call grace cheap when it cost Jesus everything," said Chambers. "I find it disheartening that we [evangelicals] are so inconsistent and over-focused on one group of people over another. We aren't talking about this in any other subculture of people except this one [the LGBTQ community]."
Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 31 comments
See all comments
Nelson Banuchi
Chambers said, ""I don't know how anyone could call grace cheap when it cost Jesus everything." Grace is not cheap, we agree, because of the person who sacrificed his life to demonstrate it. However, believers cheapen it when they assert that deeds are irrelevant of deeds in the Christian life as far as one's relationship with God and their eternal destiny are concerned.
Bob Bobo
'I find it disheartening that we [evangelicals] are so inconsistent and over-focused on one group of people over another. I agree that many organizations have demonized gay lifestyle to the point of legalism, as if this sin is greater than other sin. But the problem with his quote is; a christian who commits adultry knows its sin. They do not look for a scriptual out,lets them carry a torch stating its not sin and God's ok with it. Being christian they struggle living a lie, feeling condemnation from there own heart and hiding their shame. I empathize with a christian who struggles with their alternative life style. But, since they can't believe how they feel could be so condemmed by a loving God, they attempt to change the scripture so they can have Jesus and their partner (s) too. I agree with Exodus's chariman that we need to love people in these situations, and let God judge. But I have more respect for gay people who reject the bible rather than change it.
Glen Waugh
Gentry has made too many assumptions in this article. The article is about homosexuality and modern thought, NOT homosexuality and the teaching of Scripture against it. FIRST, "antinomianism" is NOT unbiblical or dispensationally in error (See Rom. 6:14 & Acts 13:38&39). Chambers is right, but he's also wrong. In Eph. 5:25, Paul does not refer to the church's relationship to Christ as just a group of people and Christ, but he is directed to use the analogy of a "normal" husband and wife relationship. Paul presents examples of the proper way for lust to be controlled (1 Cor. 7:8-10). "shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? let it not be!" (Rom. 6:15). The homosexual relationship as an extramarital relationship is sin and even if the Scriptures didn't remind us of such, our conscience would and has been doing so for millenia.