Do the Church Fathers, the Founding Fathers, and Catholic Saints Really Go Together?

Do the Church Fathers, the Founding Fathers, and Catholic Saints Really Go Together?
America's Roman Catholic bishops just completed the "Fortnight for Freedom," a two-week period intended to "support a great national campaign of teaching and witness for religious liberty." As evangelical and Catholic leaders have spent the past year opposing the Obama administration's so-called contraceptive mandate, the timing, motives, and agenda driving the "Fortnight for Freedom" have prompted widespread commentary. Rather than scrutinizing the Fortnight's agenda, Protestants could examine deeper questions than what took place on the surface.
It's important to consider the Fortnight's placement on the calendar—the significance of the Fortnight's dates, June 21 to July 4—to understand the nature of religious freedom and the relationship between what to some mixes like oil and water: the Christian tradition and American liberty.
It's worth considering whether the church fathers and the founding fathers enjoy a deeper conceptual affinity—precisely around the meaning and foundations of religious freedom—than many people (including perhaps the bishops) have noticed.
A feast of martyrs vs. the Fourth of July
The Fortnight for Freedom began on June 21, marking the vigil of the feasts of Saint John Fisher and Saint Thomas More. Fisher and More were both executed because they refused to endorse Henry VIII's claimed supremacy over the English church. The vast majority of English nobles and bishops endorsed the supremacy, while Fisher and More stood virtually alone. Though urged to use mental reservation to endorse the succession while denying its legitimacy in their hearts, the men were convinced that they could not do so without violating their consciences and endangering their salvation. As More declared,
I could not meet with the Works of any one Doctor, approved by the Church, that avouch a Layman was, or ever could be the Head of the Church.
Fisher was executed on June 22, 1535, and More was executed on July 6, 1535. In 1970, the Roman Catholic Church declared that they should share the same feast day, so every June 22 More and Fisher are honored as martyrs for the church. They are honored for standing up for a simple idea, though one that has proven consistently controversial and dangerous throughout history: the church cannot be true to itself if it does not enjoy independence from the powers that be.
The other bookend of the Fortnight for Freedom is the Fourth of July, for the obvious reason that this marks Independence Day—the birthday of American liberty. On that date in 1776, of course, the American Continental Congress unanimously adopted the Declaration of Independence drafted by Thomas Jefferson. If June 22 stands for the right of the church to be independent, July 4 stands for the right of every people to be independent. It stands for the right of political self-government, and of course the Declaration of Independence roots the right of political self-government in the permanent and universal rights of all human beings.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
June 22 and July 4, then, would seem to have little to do with each other. They represent paradoxes: liturgical vs. the civic, ecclesial independence vs. political self-determination, martyrdom vs. life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 7 comments
See all comments
John Owen
A briiliant essay. Timothy Shah acknowledges the intolerance of Thomas More and the heresy of Thomas Jefferson, yet finds common ground between secular liberals and orthodox Christians in Tertullian, of all places. I only would add a historical point that tells us a great deal about who favors tolerance. Christians tend to favor tolerance when they are a minority experiencing or fearing persecution. Not only Tertullian but the 17th-century Huguenots, Baptists (in England and New England) and, yes, 19th-century American Catholics wrote cogent defenses of religious toleration. And, on the other hand, it seems that liberals are fully capable of intolerance when they hold power.
Welby Warner
The original mission of the church has become subverted by the popularity of sophisticated and undefined terms such as "Religious Freedom". When I first began reading articles about what was called religious freedom I wondered if christians had abandoned the bible as a source of authority for faith and action. The subversion of the church was written about by C.S.Lewins in "The Screwtape Letters" but in more recent times has been written about by Os Guinness in "The Gravedigger File". It is described as showing how the "modern world squeezes the church into its mold". If research is done on the articles about religious freedom, it will be hard to find one that is not describing what the author calls the religious freedom of organizations. Very little can be found about the religious freedom of individuals. Consider the criticism of the catholic bishops of the Nuns taking a bus tour to highlight the forgotten cause of advocating for those in need, as Christ taught us to do.
Christopher Fitzgerald
I found this article very thoughtful and it triggered me to higher thought. I am moved to suggest that maybe we christians are missing the mind of Tertullian (and those of his age) and especially the mind of Christ concerning the issues, ideas, and insistencies of our time. Should we be viewing these times as the fearless God we say we serve and belong? God does not fear our free agency regardless of our stupid choses. Jesus did not fear man's choices. he simply insisted upon being "the way the truth and the life". We christians have the authority and ability to lead in a higher way. Thanks for the words...