Jump directly to the content

Movies & TV

MoviesReviews, Interviews , News, Commentaries, My Top 5 Movies, Best-Of Lists, Filmmakers of Faith, Film Forum

Are Secular Television Shows with Moral Messages Good for Christian Children?

An author, the creator of 'VeggieTales,' and a professor weigh in.

They're Neutral

Carla Barnhill is former editor of Christian Parenting Today and author of The Myth of the Perfect Mother (Baker, 2004).

Before I rail about morality on television, let me be completely clear: I love television, always have, always will. But when I watch most television shows with my mommy goggles on, well, it's quite a horrific view.

I am an easygoing parent, but media is the one place I tend to skew toward the restrictive end of the permissiveness spectrum. There's something about a visual image that sticks with us in a more lasting way than a conversation or even words on a page. You can't unsee something, so my husband and I tend to be very protective about what our kids watch.

But here's where I tend to differ from many Christian parents I know: I'm not protective because I fear the moral damage television might do to my children. I'm protective because I want my children to stay children and not have to watch people being killed or hurt or harassed. I don't want them to see how awful people can be to each other—not yet. I'm protecting their outlook on humanity.

For us, the deal breakers are things like violence and sexual overtones. I have put the kibosh on Glee unless my teenager watches it with me so we can talk through the more suggestive storylines. But Wizards of Waverly Place? Dinosaur Train? The kids love them, they're sweet, and someone always learns a good life lesson—and that's enough for me. I'm not all that concerned about my kids finding an overtly Christian worldview on a TV show.

I find that so many evangelical parents tend to treat things like tv—and music and the Internet—as though the people creating material for those media somehow owe it to Christians to produce morally sound content.

They don't. They are businesses trying to make money. Now, many have become savvy enough to know that they make more money when they make both kids and parents happy, so many of them are trying to offer a product that entertains and teaches some moral value, like friendship, respect, and self-esteem.

But parents are naéve to expect their children's television viewing to be good for anything except entertainment. That's what television is for, nothing more, nothing less.

It's my job as a parent to develop my child's moral center. Television is not my parenting partner. I firmly believe that if I do my job well, then no TV show can strip away the core of who my children are and who they will become. But when a show—whether it's from Disney or Veggie-Tales—gives my kids a good laugh or a glimpse of how to build healthy friendships or a taste of what life is like in other families, then that's just gravy.

They're Damaging

Phil Vischer is the creator of VeggieTales, the voice of Bob the Tomato, and producer of the What's in the Bible? video series.

Over the last 30 years, children's television has gotten a tremendous amount of attention. What are the programs teaching? Nonviolence? Gender and race sensitivity? Great strides have been made since the days most kids' shows were either afterthoughts, or worse, half-hour commercials underwritten by toy manufacturers.

Today, most new kids' shows are created with advice from Ivy League educators and consultants. Every episode of key shows like Sesame Street, Blue's Clues, and Dora the Explorer is tested with kids to ensure they meet educational objectives.

But for all the educational strides being made and all the pro-social "vitamins" cleverly inserted into our kids' media diets, there is one ingredient sorely missing. There is no God on Sesame Street. No clue will ever point Blue toward his Creator. No matter how far Dora explores, she will never bump into the divine. The world of children's media, to put it bluntly, is as atheistic as a Richard Dawkins book club. And that missing ingredient will cripple our children if we let it.


Related Topics:
From Issue:
March 2012, Vol. 56, No. 3, Pg 42, "Entertainment Ethics"
More from Christianity Today
Los samaritanos del día de hoy

Los samaritanos del día de hoy

Jesucristo nos muestra que bajo la piel, todos somos parientes.
The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

New York’s revamped accessibility symbol began at a Christian college.
Sponsoring a Movement

Sponsoring a Movement

Former sponsored children like Moses Pulei pay it forward in their hometowns.
Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness

Amy Simpson challenges the church to step up its ministry to a vulnerable population.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Join the Conversation

Displaying 1–5 of 6 comments

Amanda Johnston

March 23, 2012  4:45pm

I find it rather hypocritical that Phil Vischer's website Jelly Telly endorses secular movies: http://www.jellytelly.com/2012/03/16/dr-seuss-the-lorax-movie-a-review/ He needs to maintain a consistent message across the board. Granted, the endorsement for "The Lorax" is written by a freelance writer, but it is on Vischer's website, which implies that he supports the review and, therefore, also endorses "The Lorax."

Report Abuse

Ronda Stewart-Wilcox

March 23, 2012  9:25am

Mr. Vischer is correct: The world of children's media . . . is a-theistic (no god). If we are not careful, we all call fall into the good-enough approach to media consumption and even life-living. But there is a real difference between good-enough and good-because-it's-God. We don't have to avoid all children's media, but, as with moral development, it is our job as parents to work out with our children the truth that there is something more than what this bit of entertainment is presenting and that More is God. So, I am also in agreement with Mr. Bacote, because if we take our jobs as parents seriously and don't let TV supplant us, but make intentional choices about what we and our children watch, when we watch, and how we watch and that we will discuss what we watch, then we have the opportunity to develop our children's moral discernment and to help our children discern the presence (or lack) of God in our entertainment.

Report Abuse

Ronda Stewart-Wilcox

March 23, 2012  9:19am

I agree with key points by each commentator. Carla Barnhill -- Protective because I want my children to stay children. At age 5, they don't need to know about the intricacies of sex. (At age 5, they had an age-appropriate knowledge that sex produces babies, but the emphasis was on mommies and daddies/husbands and wives do that.) At age 5, they don't need to see images of violence that I would try to protect them from in real life if such violence were happening in our vicinity. Ms. Barnhill wrote: "It is my job as a parent to develop my child's moral center." Yes! When TV can support that, great! When TV might tear that down, nope. And sometimes, watching (age appropriately) things that are "more of the world" give us an opportunity to talk about what is happening, why it's happening, and what we might or might not do in the same circumstances.

Report Abuse

ALEXANDER WEI

March 21, 2012  8:19am

With respect to Phil Vischer, children's media is not as atheistic as a Richard Dawkins book club. Such a club is anti-religion, proselytizing atheism. Children's media is functionally atheistic; they will generally not mention God and certainly won't promote belief in God, but won't advocate atheism either. There are even many atheists who take issue with how zealously Dawkins opposes religion.

Report Abuse

BJ

March 20, 2012  2:56pm

Excellent insights into moral formation

Report Abuse
See All 6 Comments
Use your Christianity Today login to leave a comment on this article.
Not part of the community? Subscribe now, or register for a free account.
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

A top economist shares the astounding news about that little picture hanging on our refrigerator.
Frankenstein's Cat, Part 3

Frankenstein's Cat, Part 3

Weighing the trade-offs.

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred Honor

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred Honor

The grand debate that led to independence.

more | current issue

Books & Culture

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred Honor

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, and Our Sacred ...

The grand debate that...

Today's Christian Woman

The Perfect Wife Scorecard

The Perfect Wife Scorecard

I just knew I was failing...

Small Groups

Silence and Solitude

Silence and Solitude

These spiritual disciplines...

Out of Ur

Superman: Sermon Notes from Exile

Superman: Sermon Notes from Exile

Why I wrote sermon notes...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping