The Rise, Expansion, and Fall of the Evangelical Left
The Evangelical Left's influence on "establishment evangelicalism" in the 1960s and 1970s, through leaders like Hatfield, is an important part of the collective identity not only of American evangelicals, but of global Christianity as well. While in the United States the priorities of the Evangelical Left have taken a back seat to those of the Religious Right in recent decades, Swartz makes a compelling case, particularly in his chapter on the Latin American evangelical Samuel Escobar, that the Left's priorities remain latent in the global South. The dissonance between the priorities of the Religious Right in America and the priorities of global evangelicalism was symbolized by the 1989 Lausanne II conference in Manila. While the Evangelical Left in America was still licking its wounds from the Reagan Revolution, its impact on the global evangelicalism of the Lausanne Movement was deepening. With justification, Ron Sider could claim that the "holistic concern for both evangelism and social action" that defined his group Evangelicals for Social Action was the accepted mainstream of the Manila gathering.
Far From Dead
The resemblance between the social action agendas of the Evangelical Left in America and the evangelical mainstream globally is not an accident. As Swartz tells it, the shared vision is a result of decades of sustained, intentional interaction between individuals and institutions representing both groups. Within these circles, shared concerns over environmental degradation, economic inequality, consumerism, and racial divisions have existed for decades alongside profound commitments to world evangelization and Christ-centered witness.
Seen from a global perspective, then, the demise of the Evangelical Left in American religion and politics is an anomaly open to change as American evangelicals come into deeper communion with their brothers and sisters around the world. Far from being dead, Swartz suggests that the deep stirrings for justice and peace that burst into the mainstream of American evangelicalism in the '60s and '70s have impacted and been impacted by the "New Christendom" of the global South. It is precisely this possibility that makes Moral Minority not only a stirring account of recent American history, but also a necessary tool for understanding our global Christian moment. Buy it, read it, debate it, disagree with it, but do not ignore it.
Gregory Metzger is a freelance writer from Rockville, Maryland.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 49 comments
See all comments
Paul Schryba
With respect to Saul Alinsky, the political 'right' uses him as well. 'Freedom Works', a tea party group, uses Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' to train its organizers. [http://www.freedomworks.org/news/albanys-freedomworks-manager-trains-group ] "FreedomWorks is the best in the business at grassroots organizing."—Glenn Beck, conservative radio and TV personality [http://www.freedomworks.org/about/about-freedomworks] So it is not just liberals who use a 'satanist'. And speaking of secular humanism, many in the political/religious right (including Paul Ryan) were influenced by the atheist Ayn Rand and her own brand of 'secular humanism. So it would seem that atheistic 'secular humanism' has its claws in the conservatives as well as the liberals.
Claire Guest
Jon, I've had the same thought as you about over-posting. But I do need to clear up some false accusations here: I've never said that Obama's mother and grandmother were communists - his mother and grandFATHER were staunch communists and reared him to idolize communists. Frank Marshall Davis was one such major Communist influence. Another false accusation is that Fox News has anything to do with my posts - in FACT, I am not a FN watcher. BTW - speaking of pejoratives, I have noticed that Fox News IS used OFTEN in a pejorative way in the very same manner as you use it - to dismiss information which is TRUE and VITAL to our nation's future. I know you'll find a way to heap scorn on that fact, but it IS a clear and undeniable fact. ALSO, you just love to play that "South card", don't you? There has been much-needed investigation into dead voters voting, people voting more than once, etc, in MANY states, including CO, NV, and IL (and more). Give that falsely biased card a rest, man.
Claire Guest
Jon, it is a clear, proven fact that Saul Alinsky cited Satan as his role model - nothing anyone can say about that can change that fact. It is also a fact that Alinsky has been a role model for Bill Ayers, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. This is not using Alinsky's name as a "pejorative" - it's just a fact.