Jump directly to the content

From the Newswires

'Jesus Said to Them, "My Wife..."'

Manuscript fragment apparently from the 300s suggests debate over whether Jesus was married.
'Jesus Said to Them, "My Wife..."'
Copyright: Karen L. King 2012

A newly revealed piece of papyrus offers evidence that some early Christians believed Jesus was married, according to a Harvard Divinity School professor.

A fourth-century codex in Coptic quotes Jesus referring to "my wife," Karen King, a scholar of early Christianity, said on Tuesday. It is the only extant text in which Jesus is explicitly portrayed as betrothed, according to King.

King is calling the receipt-sized slip of papyrus "The Gospel of Jesus' Wife." She believes it was originally written in Greek, and later translated into Coptic, an Egyptian language.

The fragment says, "Jesus said to them, 'My wife...,'" according to King. The rest of the sentence is cut off. Another segment says, "As for me, I dwell with her in order to..." The speaker is not named.

The fragment contains just 33 words spread across 14 incomplete lines—less a full-fledged gospel than an ancient crossword puzzle.

"Christian tradition has long held that Jesus was not married, even though no reliable historical evidence exists to support that claim," King said in a statement released Tuesday by Harvard. "This new gospel doesn't prove that Jesus was married, but it tells us that the whole question only came up as part of vociferous debates about sexuality and marriage."

Tuesday's surprise announcement seemed ripped from the pages of Dan Brown's 2003 novel, The Da Vinci Code, which sold millions of copies—and irked the Vatican—by suggesting that Catholic leaders had covered up Jesus' marriage to Mary Magdalene. King said that she does not believe that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. "At least, don't say this proves Dan Brown was right," she told The New York Times.

But in another novelistic twist, King presented her research on Tuesday in the Vatican's front yard, at a Coptic Studies conference held at the Catholic Church's Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum in Rome.

The Vatican has not yet responded to her research, King said at a news conference on Tuesday.

King acknowledged in her research paper that "nothing is known about the circumstances of its original discovery or early ownership." The earliest clue about the fragment's history is a letter from the 1980s hinting that a German Egyptologist believed that it offered evidence that Jesus might have been married, according to King.

An anonymous collector brought the yellowed and tattered fragment to King, a respected historian of early Christianity, and asked her to help analyze and translate it in 2010.

"I didn't believe it was authentic and told him I wasn't interested," King said. After cajoling, however, King relented and agreed to have the fragmented examined by scholars.

Upon examination, a papyrologist, a scholar of early Christianity at Princeton University and a Coptic expert at Hebrew University in Jerusalem all consider it likely to be authentic, according to King.

"On the basis of the age of the papyrus, the placement and absorption of the ink on the page, the type of the handwriting, and the Coptic grammar and spelling, it was concluded that it is highly probable that the fragment is an ancient text," King writes in her research paper.

King said further tests will be made on the chemical composition of the ink. King's research paper will be published in the January 2013 issue of Harvard Theological Review, a peer-reviewed journal.

Jesus' reference to "my wife" in the fragment comes amid a discussion of family with his disciples, according to King. He also refers to "Mary" and "my mother." The scholar did not rule out the possibility that Jesus was speaking metaphorically. Christian tradition, for example, calls the church "the bride of Christ."

King said on Tuesday that a fellow scholar suggested that Jesus may have been delivering a homily. Such questions may never be definitively answered. The small fragment contains very little context, King acknowledged.

Darrell Bock, senior research professor of New Testament studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, says the belief that the church is bride of Christ was held by both orthodox and Gnostic groups.

"In Gnostic Christianity, there was a rite called the bridal chamber in which the church was seen as the bride of Christ," he said. "The whole thing could well be metaphorical with a disciple representing the place of the church. If that is the case, then it is not even a claim that Jesus was married in real life to a single person."

If the reference is less metaphorical, Bock said, "It is one speck of a fringe text in a sea of texts that say Jesus was single. It, if authentic, is the exception, to the rule of texts we have on Jesus. Thus, in the end, even if it says what people are suggesting, it tells us only about a fourth century group's views, not anything about Jesus."

According to King, Jesus also says in the fragment "she will be able to be my disciple," another potential provocation for contemporary Christians. The Catholic Church, for example, has barred women from the priesthood in part because tradition holds that all of Jesus' disciples were male. Another segment of text says "Mary is worthy of it," according to King.

King said the fragment shows close connections to other texts written during the second century, especially the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, and the Gospel of Philip—none of which are part of the Christian canon of Scripture.

Additional reporting by CT staff.

Related Elsewhere:

Scholars' discussion of the fragment includes posts from bloggers Christian Askeland(Evangelical Textual Criticism), Mark Goodacre(NT Blog), Jared Calaway(Antiquitopia), Jim Davila(PaleoJudaica), Gary Manning Jr(Good Book Blog), and others.


More from Christianity Today

The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Box office news, Benedict Cumberbatch, Cannes, and AFI honors Mel Brooks.
Divine Rehab

Divine Rehab

Whatever your addiction, God's grace is the only hope for a way out.
Star Trek Into Darkness

Star Trek Into Darkness

Lots of explosions but not much heart makes this a film that will please most but might leave fans disappointed.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 18 comments

ERIK STUBBS

September 25, 2012  8:16pm

Abraham Lincoln was killed in 1865, but according to new information provided by Seth Grahame-Smith, it has become clear almost 150 years later that Lincoln was a Vampire Hunter. That's about as accurate as an alleged 4th century document that we know nothing about the owner, author, or place of origin, that one scholar has SPECULATED may have been copied from a late 2nd century, and only one scholar has translated (look at the beginning of any acceptable translation of the Bible to see the TEAM of translators). One also must ask if Ms. King brought the fragment back to her friends in the Jesus Seminar to allow them to vote with colored beads using the same ridiculous guidelines used with the canonical Gospels and the Gospel of Thomas to determine the probability that Jesus said any of the words.

Report Abuse

Greg Davis

September 25, 2012  10:55am

There are so many possibilities in interpreting this fragment. It amazes me when "scholars" choose the most ridiculous option as their favorite. Speaking of the need for Her.menutics! :-)

Report Abuse

Vijay Mathias

September 24, 2012  12:49pm

Complete idiocy and media sensationalism. It would be similar to if a fragment of paper were found in 2400, two hundred years after a war had destroyed most of earth, that read: "And President Obama said, '......I am a Muslim......My faith leads me to make peace with all Muslims....'. Would most people say that Obama admitted to being a Muslim on the basis of this document? He could have been saying, "you say that I am a Muslim, but I am not". Or it could be a novel someone had written in 2100 or a fictional defense written in 2010. We have far more historical evidence that Jesus was not married! Read the gospels, the early church fathers, etc etc. I don't think it would be something Christians would be ashamed of...the Bible clearly says Peter was married and Paul asks, "doesn't he have a right as well like Cephas?" I'm sure if Jesus were married, Paul would have first said, "like the Lord?"

Report Abuse
See All 18 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Forgiving Iran

Forgiving Iran

Long before I knew the true God, he helped me release my hatred.
Guilt Gone Wild

Guilt Gone Wild

The right kind of guilt can be healthy. But false guilt depletes your soul and ministry.

Training for "One Pitch" Preachers

Training for "One Pitch" Preachers

If you're stuck in a rut, this is how to mix things up.

more | current issue

Books & Culture

A Measure of Forgiveness

A Measure of Forgiveness

Memories of a British...

Today's Christian Woman

Amy Grant: How Mercy Looks from Here

Amy Grant: How Mercy Looks from Here

The Queen of Christian...

Small Groups

Mental Illness Is Mainstream

Mental Illness Is Mainstream

We must help the one...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping