Even Boy Scouts' Postponing Decision Is Controversial
The Rev. Susan Russell, a gay rights activist and a priest at All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena, Calif., said the Episcopal Church has been calling on the BSA to be open to gay members and leaders since 2000.
"And now the Boy Scouts 'need more time' to send the message to young gay American kids that they are just as loved, valued and important as their straight friends and neighbors?" she asked. "The time is now to end discrimination against our kids."
The Rev. Mike Schuenemeyer, the United Church of Christ's executive minister for gay and lesbian concerns, expressed a similar reaction to the BSA delay.
"Their decision today is a failure of leadership to do what is right," said Schuenemeyer, whose denomination called for a policy change in 2003. "It is time for the Boy Scouts to change their policy."
Some denominations have alternative programs for boys. The Southern Baptist Convention, which was already retooling its own Royal Ambassadors program when the Scouts' policy was first floated, wants the Scouts to stick with its current policy.
"We're pleased that apparently it's not going to be left in the hands of a few powerful corporate board members but rather they're going to allow all of the charter organizations to have a vote," said Roger Oldham, a spokesman for the SBC Executive Committee.
Alvin Townley, an independent national Scouting advocate, said there's no question that the diverse opinions of faith groups will weigh heavily on the deliberations of Scouting's leadership.
"Certainly Scouting wants to honor the opinions of our religious charter partners—who actually 'own' Scout units — and as you can imagine, those churches, synagogues, and mosques have widely differing views on where Scouting should go," said Townley, author of Legacy of Honor: The Values and Influence of America's Eagle Scouts.

God Among the Roma

Grieving with the Good Friday God

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 8 comments
See all comments
Jim Ricker
Steve Skeete made the central point that needs to be the focus of the discussion for those that think the BSA should keep the ban in place (at least for the leaders). Pedophiles are pedophiles, some are heterosexual and some are homosexual. We see this with school teachers (how many times do we see male and female teachers abusing minors in the news?) and in all of life. The orientation doesn't matter when it comes to policy because the policy is made to maintain the safety of the kids no matter what the sexual orientation of the pedophile is. This is also why the "Two-Deep" leadership has been instituted in recent years - in order to help maintain safety and ensure that the Scouts are not alone with ANY leader. What we should NOT do is put people in a position where there is a far greater likelihood of abuse happening when we can avoid it. No one has ever called me a prude but lets be adults here, we should NEVER, KNOWINGLY put people into that position.
Jim Ricker
Hi Audrey, Once, many years ago, the BSA was an organization that was based on the Christian basics but that is no longer the case. The BSA affirms God yes but, the god that one affirms in Scouting is the god of that person's choosing. As a current leader, I've had to explain this to more radical atheists and believers alike over the past 4 years. The oath speaks to the general concept of god, not the god of the Scriptures.
J Thomas
Rick knocked it out of the park.