It's Not Enough to Find "The One"
Vision-Shaping Truths
That said, here is what I found helpful about The Sacred Search.
Thomas makes a critical point in simply saying that the most important aspect of discovering who you should marry is the convictions you have about marriage prior to ever entering a relationship. The sub-title says it all: What if it's not about who you marry, but why? That is worth the cost of the book. In particular, he is careful to question the common motive for entering a long-term, marriage-directed relationship: namely, emotion. I really appreciated how Thomas incisively critiqued, via Scripture, reason, and data, the dysfunction of letting emotion-driven infatuations govern lifelong choices, especially the one of marriage. This sets the stage for the remainder of the book, which advances the argument that big Biblical truths, while not emotion-less, are better arrived at by clear-headed, progressive decisions and thoughtful self-examination.
For instance, a major theme is that of character. One's spouse should be spiritually mature and emotionally healthy. If one is a serious Christian, then one should find someone committed to the mission and truths of gospel-driven life. From there, Thomas also suggests the wisdom of finding a spouse who shares secondary priorities as well, such as views on gender roles, parenting, and overall lifestyle. He also reminds us that the choices we make in marriage partners not only affect us, but future children, other family members, and our wider community.
The book ends with a tough challenge. Thomas invites readers to consider ending said questionable relationships that are not based in the truths for which he has been arguing. He states quite clearly that it is better to go through a messy dating break-up than enter into a lifelong marriage that is full of pain.
While I really appreciated Thomas's practical wisdom and penchant for clear-cut admonitions, let me identify areas where I would have preferred some additional nuance. First, Thomas makes a fairly large point that God does not have one person in particular set aside for us. He makes this point to discourage his audience from preoccupation with a specific person, rather than a godly and wise process of waiting and finding. However valid the ultimate point, it needs to be noticed that Thomas is making a significant theological claim. Now, when it comes to the prospect of God setting someone aside for us to marry, I would not suggest beating the drum of meticulous providence. But I would recommend against specific claims of how sovereignty factors into the big choices of life, one way or the other, just so no one gets sidetracked by a disputed point of theology. Thomas may end up distracting certain Calvinist-leaning young people, many of whom are spiritually and theologically predisposed to read this book and benefit from it.
The Latest in Movie News, May 23, 2013

God Among the Roma

Grieving with the Good Friday God

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).











Comments
Hugh Wetmore
Yes, Susan, our views do change - the key is to start on the same basis and sustain compatibility of views as we change and mature. 51 years ago when we married, we believed we both had found The Right Person to marry, the One-and-Only whom God had predestined us to marry. It has been a fulfilling and complementary partnership. But we don't believe that one-and-only story any more. Because it doesn't stand closer examination (by Reformed or Arminian standards). If just one person in human history made a mistake and married the 'wrong' person, the 'wrong' children would have been born and God's 'plan' for human history would have been messed up. Thomas is right - we must know WHY, and the Type of Person we marry. God is always sovereignly in control and works through the Choices of our human wills. He is redemptive, and any bad-choice marriage can be saved. I'm glad Thomas has written a book I can agree with so enthusiastically!
Steve Skeete
I agree that in marriage things and people do change. Good marriage counselling (which I believe all persons entering marriage should be encourage to acquire), will prepare, or at least alert persons, not only to this fact, but that all relationships go through difficult periods. For me, some vital marriage ingredients include commitment for the long haul and the willingness to work through tough times when you 'feel' like you want to give up or you can't go on. 'Til death do us part' and 'for better or worse' are still sensible prerequisites that call for far more resilience and strength of character than 'compatibility' or 'views' on difficult socio/politcal matters. Do we need another book on marriage? Sure! What about one that rises to its defense? Or one that defines it in a way that is true to the Bible, yet is designed to help those who struggle understand it? Certainly we need one that explains why this human institution has had universal acclaim and esteem, until recently.
Susan Gillespie
I'm surprised by the admonition to consider 'secondary characteristics' such as views on gender, parenting and general lifestyle. I've been married 34 years, and we have changed a lot on all of those things. I'd worry about making a strict decision on rigid 'agreements' like that - you're likely to be disappointed in many ways if you think such things will remain static during a lifetime. Better your intended should be intent on following Jesus (and yes, sadly, I realize that sometimes changes, too).