Guest / Limited Access /
Page 3 of 3

Hobby Lobby is an important affirmation of the aims of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. But it is a narrow and in some ways precarious decision, subject to the whims of future legislators or a slight shift in the Court's current composition. And it is not a First Amendment decision. We should be glad for Hobby Lobby, but we shouldn't lose sight of the unanimous decision in McCullen, and its reminder that when it comes to the roots of our religious liberty, the First Amendment is what matters the most.

John Inazu is associate professor of law at Washington University School of Law, an expert on the First Amendment freedoms of speech, assembly, and religion, and the author of Liberty's Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (Yale University Press, 2012).

Article edited slightly to clarify that whether HHS's contraceptive mandate is "generally applicable" has not yet been specifically litigated.

Read These NextSee Our Latest
RecommendedLife Together, Again
Subscriber Access Only Life Together, Again
After Hobby Lobby, vibrant corporate life is needed more than ever.
TrendingInterVarsity "Derecognized" at California State University's 23 Campuses: Some Analysis and Reflections
InterVarsity "Derecognized" at California State University's 23 Campuses: Some Analysis and Reflections
Will students with actual beliefs be allowed to have organizations on campus?
Editor's PickTable Manners: Why We Take Communion Every Week
Table Manners: Why We Take Communion Every Week
It's a meal that often divides us. It needn't be that way.
Comments
View this article in Reader Mode
Christianity Today
The First Amendment Decision Nobody's Talking About