Guest / Limited Access /
Page 3 of 3

Hobby Lobby is an important affirmation of the aims of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. But it is a narrow and in some ways precarious decision, subject to the whims of future legislators or a slight shift in the Court's current composition. And it is not a First Amendment decision. We should be glad for Hobby Lobby, but we shouldn't lose sight of the unanimous decision in McCullen, and its reminder that when it comes to the roots of our religious liberty, the First Amendment is what matters the most.

John Inazu is associate professor of law at Washington University School of Law, an expert on the First Amendment freedoms of speech, assembly, and religion, and the author of Liberty's Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (Yale University Press, 2012).

Article edited slightly to clarify that whether HHS's contraceptive mandate is "generally applicable" has not yet been specifically litigated.

Read These NextSee Our Latest
RecommendedThe Secret Shame of Abortion in the Church
The Secret Shame of Abortion in the Church
A more public discussion of abortion stories can lead the way to healing.
TrendingHow Libya's Martyrs Are Witnessing to Egypt
How Libya's Martyrs Are Witnessing to Egypt
Murders spark largest outreach ever amid new freedoms and new threats.
Editor's PickLSD, Revolution, Buddhism, Then Jesus
LSD, Revolution, Buddhism, Then Jesus
The conversion of an original Jesus freak.
Comments
View this article in Reader Mode
Christianity Today
The First Amendment Decision Nobody's Talking About