In 'Cars 3,' Humility Finishes First over Generational Conflict

The classic Pixar franchise returns with a refreshing look at what it means to pass the torch onward.
In 'Cars 3,' Humility Finishes First over Generational Conflict
Image: Courtesy Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Cars 3 opens in the same way as the original Cars, with Lightning McQueen, the central character, sitting in his trailer before a big race. As usual, McQueen is prepping for the race with a little motivational self-talk: “Focus. Speed. I am speed,” he says to himself. “One winner, 42 losers. I eat losers for breakfast.” After this line, however, the scene goes in a different direction; McQueen follows up with, “Wait. Did I really used to say that?” It’s as if he still can’t believe that he used to be such a jerk.

It’s a clear signal from the start that, all these years later, McQueen remains a nice car. The lessons he learned in the original film are still with him. Free of ego, he has the same rundown sponsors and lives in the same rundown town (the economic boom viewers saw in Radiator Springs at the end of Cars having apparently been a passing one), yet he is at the top of his industry—a racing superstar.

The problem that McQueen has in Cars 3 has less to do with the out-of-control ego of the original and more to do with something far more intractable: He is getting old. A good percentage of his demographic can relate, as many of the parents who took their kids to see Cars when it was first released in 2006 are now approaching middle-age right along with McQueen himself.

Getting old isn’t fun, whether you are a human being or an animated racecar, and it’s not long before McQueen’s legacy is threatened as he is outrun by the next generation of cars. Thanks to enhanced technology and data-driven training, these cars are fast, and McQueen doesn’t have a chance against them. In short, then, Cars 3 turns out to be a story about millennials and gen-Xers—and since seemingly everything in culture has become about intergenerational disconnect, it makes sense that the film explores the same territory.

The good news is that, when the film does cover familiar sociological ground, it takes the conversation in a different direction, avoiding the tropes of the characters’ surprise at discovering that young folk having something to teach their elders and that old folks are useful to have around. Instead, the story takes for granted that things inevitably change, that communication between generations is difficult, and racecars—even the best ones—get old and have to figure out their next move.

What is especially distinctive about Cars 3 (beyond the obvious fact that it ignores the travesty that is Cars 2 and returns our beloved Mater both to being a supporting character and to Radiator Springs—two places in which he shines) is that nothing is especially distinctive. The movie is standard narrative fare, presented in a thoughtful, visually compelling way. Cars 3 is not trying to be innovative, and that is the central part of its appeal, especially for a parental audience (and arguably their children) worn down by the trend of reinventing the wheel when it comes to storytelling.

Instead, Cars 3 simply and in generally charming fashion looks at what it means, exactly, to consider one’s legacy. McQueen is offered a couple of options: Does he want to preserve his superstardom—his brand—at its peak? Quit racing while he is still valuable, in consumer terms? Or does he want to think about pressing on, staying on the track even when it is impossible to win?

McQueen answers this question by looking to the past. He looks toward the legacy of his mentor, Doc Hudson, before going beyond Doc Hudson to the community of mid-20th century cars that taught him. And, in a refreshing twist that pushes the story past sentimentalism, McQueen also looks toward the future—not in the sense of his own future, but the future of racing as represented by Cruz Ramirez, the young trainer assigned to McQueen by the fancy sponsor who bought out McQueen’s rustbucket former patrons.

Cruz Ramirez is not necessarily driven by technology, but she is driven by cutting edge methods, encouraging McQueen to motivate through visualization and even managing to get him on the car version of the yoga mat in her training studio (with a “carmaste” poster on the wall). McQueen, being an old dog, isn’t interested in learning new tricks, and sure enough, he drags Ramirez outside to experience the breeze and grit of a dirt track and a sandy beach. The most enjoyable extended scene of the movie ensues when these expensive racecars find themselves in a Crazy 8 demolition derby. For anyone from a rural community, where demolition derbies have real cultural status, the scene is a reminder that watching Crazy 8 racing offers some of the highest quality, lowest common denominator entertainment around—and, it turns out, an animated Crazy 8 race is just as fun to watch.

Not entirely unexpectedly, McQueen ends up transferring his outsized ambition and intense desire to continue to win races, even at his advanced age, to Cruz. The best part, though, is that he does so without sublimating her own ambition and her own dreams of her career. It is a lovely depiction of each generation bringing the best of themselves to their interactions—and, more importantly, a depiction of legacy-building not often seen: the tricky part about transference.

This is a topic close to the heart of Christian families especially. How do parents pass on the culture of a timeless faith to their children while still allowing their children to belong to their own generation and express their faith accordingly? Such transference—not of regeneration, but of the beauty of a life built on faith—can only take place in an atmosphere of mutual respect. As children grow up and ask questions, expressing to their parents, their teachers, and pastors all the specific difficulties of coming to faith in their own place and time, their parents must take these difficulties seriously, just as they expect their children to respond to the parents’ callout to history. “A liking for history has never been common among the young,” the historian and social critic Jacques Barzun wrote. “It is a mature taste that calls for some experience of life.”

In Cars 3, McQueen understands this intuitively. The lessons of history, of Doc Hudson and his generation, of McQueen and the citizens of Radiator Springs, can be passed on to Cruz and her generation of racecars, technological dominance notwithstanding—but only if the willingness to cede the dais is passed on as well.

S.D. Kelly is an editor for Christ and Pop Culture. She lives with her family in coastal Massachusetts, where she runs a community nonprofit.

December
Subscribe to CT and get one year free.
Christianity Today
In 'Cars 3,' Humility Finishes First over Generational Conflict
hide this This premium article was unlocked for you by a CT subscriber.
Subscribe now and get every issue.

Spread the love: Use the share icons below to unlock this article for a friend.