All Comments for: The Ironic Faith of Emergents | Christianity Today

Free Newsletters:

RSS Feeds |

Audio |

Twitter

Home > 2008 > September

Christianity Today, September, 2008 |

The Ironic Faith of Emergents

McLaren shows us not only where 'post-evangelicals' are going, but also how they get there.

Scot McKnight | posted 9/26/2008 11:11AM

The experience of "ironic faith" is pervasive—though rarely noticed—in the work of McLaren and other emergents. The irony is that they have deconstructed the very thing they were most committed ...

[Reader Reviews]

Average User Rating:

Rate and Comment on this article

Displaying 1 - 25 of 25 comments.

Page: 1

Show All

Kai	Posted: October 02, 2008 2:18 PM


Wow, I consider myself in this camp, but can't really relate to what it written here. I'll have to write a full response on my blog.

Rahab Klingensmith

Posted: September 30, 2008 11:18 AM

I believe whole heartedly that what is becoming a deleama in Our Christian View and thinking is by not allowing others humanistic views on God , and the Bible. Example: Lacking the realization of the post-modern heremenutical interpretations of the Bible; and learning to have a respect for a persons views as experienced. God does not lay out a red carpet for others to judge a individuals walk with Christ. Another example: Sciences verses God- there is nothing wrong with this concept,other than keeping God dead center. Reading some others comments on experiencing Christianity in a light of Anxiety, and a continual presentation of "a lack of integrity" ..."Quote: as C.S.Lewis writes.In Mere Christianty-"These poor folks will be led to a glimpse of God through a dirty telescope, and dirty lenses attached...hummmmm. I' d rather suggest ..keep your eyes fixed on "the Truth"; and God promises He will throw all the extras later--love & more.... like my buddy writes about!

Jonathan

Posted: September 30, 2008 2:59 AM


Can't find a better and more 'balanced' understanding of emergent than this. Kudos. And to Jim have some curtsy. Your views a far too judgmental. It does say in the bible that God is the one who judges and not man. Look in Romans. So before that appreciate and learn some of the things being said. If you listen enough you might understand.

Nick	Posted: September 29, 2008 8:49 PM

Emergents are no different then anyone else who has faced the question "Who do you say that I am". They just want their own way. Scot McKnight is wrong when he thinks there is no returning for emergents. Mark Driscoll is a great example. He traveled with the founders of the movement and then came to his senses. He story is at www.equip.org Thankfully, Jesus is the owner of the Lambs Book of Life. polycarp might be interested in these sites. www.thesimpleway.org http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfY-i2iXxQ0 h ttp://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/02/local/me-smiths2

Potifer

Posted: September 29, 2008 6:26 PM

What is horrible about Emergent teachings is what it is doing to families and friends of those easily persuaded. Emergent group leaders and elders encourage some to build a "wall" between themselves and friends and family who question the ideas of the leaders. They are trying to create a utopia on earth and those who argue are judgemental, old fashiioned, conservative. (the worst) Soldiers are mindless killers and excusing partial birth abortion is o.k. if you like the canditate. The Bible is subjective because it was interpreted wrong until they came along. They promote the Hollywood idea of Christians. They want it to be normal that a p.k. can be obsessed with the "Sopranos" and make a profit selling books at a Christian bookstore. The devide they are causing is even promoted in CT. now. I guess if you can convince a group of people that the Bible is wrong then anything and everything goes. This is more like Sun Yung Moon and the moonies

Rhonda

Posted: September 29, 2008 2:39 PM

This could have been written by all the founders of emergentvillage.com: Pied Piper You With your masquerading And you Always contemplating What to do In case heaven has found you Can't you see That it's all around you So follow me Hey, come on, babe Follow me I'm the Pied Piper Follow me I'm the Pied Piper And I'll show you where it's at Come on, babe Can't you see I'm the Pied Piper Trust in me I'm the Pied Piper And I'll show you where it's at Girl Don't be scared to move Hey, babe What are you tryin' to prove It ain't true That your life has kicked you It's your mind And that's all that's trickin' you So step in line Come on, babe Follow me Come on, babe Trust in me Come on, babe Can't you see Come on, babe Follow me I'm the Pied Piper

Emergent abroad

Posted: September 29, 2008 2:00 PM

Thank you CT for recognizing that the Emergent movement is not a fad but a Reformation occurring in the Church. It's clear that few here truly understand where Emergent-thinking Christians are coming from. If I hadn't discovered McClaren and other forwarding writers, I would have had no choice but to abandon Christianity. I have been a follower of Christ for 30 years (yes, Jim, I am "saved", but thank you for your concern). In "traditional" evangelical churches I felt suffocated. They stressed adherence to doctrines that are untenable in this age (6-day literal creation, no women in leadership) and yet never preached about consumerism or poverty. Jesus's message was not that we must check of a list of doctrines to be saved; he said "follow me." Now I attend a house church with a group of other emergent-thinking Christians. We have seen new believers come to Christ in our community in England, and yes, the Holy Spirit is alive and well among us.

Andrés

Posted: September 29, 2008 11:33 AM

Church in America: you are loosing the faith because you are no longer disciples of Jesus but of culture and believe you can interpret the faith without the Apostolic teaching (John 17:18-20, Acts 2:42, Ga 1:11-12, 1 John 1:1-4). You have also created a religion of Politics (left and right), Moralism (that becomes hypocrisy because the Bible shows real committed leaders that fail) and relevancy. Emergent is becoming another name for Liberal. Avoid the trap of neo-Catholics (what can be more bounded than full commitment to the teaching of ONE man) and "Liberal"/Emergent thinking and return to faith in Scripture and primitive Evangelical faith.

Jim	Posted: September 29, 2008 9:11 AM

'Emergents I know are sometimes wearied or put off by Paul, yet enthusiastic about Jesus and the Gospels. " Funny how the Apostle Paul was wearied by the Emergents and warned that they would come preaching lies and damning souls in our day. The emergent Jesus is an idol carved out of the minds of fallen men and women. It is a counterfit to the true work of God that is taking place outside of the insititution. The reason emergents can't find the truth is because they aren't born again. They have been blkinded by God and handed over to strong dellusion that they might be damned. Where the carcass of dead fundamentalism lies... there the emergent vultures will be. -Jim www.fleebabylon.com

That's Me!

Posted: September 29, 2008 3:02 AM

Chaplain McCoy, the problem is that emergents are tired of religion, because religion does not require faith. Those who act in the role of shepherd, are encouraging congregations to a gospel of Grace, while they function in a gospel of Mercy. The "Contradictory Gospel" causes confusion in that what leaders do is different from what they teach. I. as a "Christian", feel that I have been lied to repeatedly, once I dig into God's Word to determine what is really supposed to be going on. It is, as if, the only use people have for the Bible is to point out what my obligation is, according to God's Word, when one has sinned against me. But, they have much difficulty identifying their obligation when they are the offended. God's Word has no significance to them in their pain and offense. I do not believe the Scriptures are about Religion, but rather, relationship. What is being taught/demonstrated in churches today has little, if any, resemblances to the Life of Christ. That is sad!

Mark	Posted: September 29, 2008 1:41 AM

The idea that socialism is the fulfillment of the gospel emerged a long time ago. What we've learned from it, after retrying the idea countless times anew, is that it replaces love with guilty angst without remedy, ordinary faith and obedience become despised obstacles to humanistic solidarity, simple neighborly compassion gives way to grandiose social plans that care more about budgets than about actual people. It is, at bottom, the hope that Jesus may yet be seen and the world may yet be changed by that vision, without the fear of God and without holiness. The word for that is not "irony", it's "futility".

Chaplain McCoy, US Army Chaplain

Posted: September 28, 2008 12:48 AM

The increasing problem with emergents is their lack of realization of the post-modern hermeneutic which they utilize regardless of theological orientation. There is no rationale for theological bases because it is phenomenologically centered--thus taking away from bedrock items like SOLA SCRIPTURA and SOLA GRATIA. Who cares about stuff like that when the hermeneutic allows them to reshape conceptions at will or whim. I'm not impressed at all. Agree with D.A. Carson on this one who seemed as baffled as the rest of us that such a large percentage of the US population could drink the emergent coolaid so easily. When Luther saw the Turks poised to swallow Germany, he worried that Christians would need to know their faith. He wrote the Catechetical hymn "Lord Keep us Steadfast in Your Word, curb those who by deceit or sword would wrest the Kingdom from your Son and bring to naught all he has done." Perhaps it is time to pass out some books on Historical Theology to these folks.

David L

Posted: September 27, 2008 11:24 PM

The Emergent Church movement is yet another fad, further straying from the ecumenical (universal) faith that was once and for all delivered. I find it interesting that a poster would welcome one to the Roman Catholic Church. Roman Catholicism and it's straying from the faith is what caused the further divisions (who can blame the reformers?). At the end of the first millennium Rome and it's new, foreign dogmas were the equivalent to Protestantism's Emerging Church. I challenge people to learn about Orthodoxy and Orthodox Anglicanism, you will find a faith like that of C.S. Lewis.

Anonymous

Posted: September 27, 2008 4:27 PM

I find it interesting that almost all of the post-modern people I know are Westerners. Where is the multiculturalism? Also many people that like to talk about post-modernism have never studied or read much philosophy. Then you have the talk against meta-narratives. This is quickly followed by meta-narratives like every 500 years God changes the directions of the Church or that Jesus was an easterner , but Christianity was Westernized. Now through the Emergents it is being rediscovered.

BG	Posted: September 27, 2008 1:39 PM

Emergents demonstrate that as per usual, human beings get caught up in their limited vision of seemingly contradictory ideas. Our minds cannot embrace what we believe to be contradictory, so we construct elaborate belief systems where we emphasize one aspect over another. But there are no contradictions for God. Sovereign God and free will? Love and Anger? Good and Evil? Three persons and yet one? Love Jacob and hate Esau? One way to God and yet perfect justice for all? Jesus and Paul. Earthly Kingdom and Heavenly Kingdom? Paul and James? Faith and works? Peace and war? Yes, yes, yes...! Like so many who've come before them, Emergents to want to get rid of any conflicts they aren't comfortable with by diminishing them or jettisoning them. But the Bible never lets one do this. You must learn to live with the seeming contradictions and know they are not contradictions at all, but are God's way. Say yes to them all and you will begin to see that way.

Tata	Posted: September 27, 2008 12:48 PM

As one who is aware of the phenomenon of languages in non-western languages and having studied in the west, I believe language is very important. Take for instance the penal substitution for which Dr. McKnight is so unwilling to let go. Understanding that language cannot be cast only with the western penal language. Who says that all the world has to understand Atonement within the western penal language system? That's intellectual colonialism. I am not here saying that we need to throw away penal substitution but I am saying the language may not mean the same thing to non-western people who also have their penal systems, although very few are known due to western imperialistic imposition of Euro-American penal system everywhere. And, when we get into substitution from within its OT background and the overarching Pauline or NT writers' perspective I doubt we can conclude the same thing that has been taught for decades in evangelicalism.

MikeknaJ

Posted: September 27, 2008 12:45 PM


In choosing to de-ephasize or even reject Paul and his teachings, is one not almost guilty of having their own Jesus Seminar-like event, dropping black and white balls into baskets as we pick and choose which sections of Scripture we believe to be relevant and true? That's a dangerous road, my friends.

JohnW

Posted: September 27, 2008 12:07 PM

Mr. McKnight, I relate to each one of the 8 areas given as the orgins of ironic faith. Honestly, they seem valid to me. I would add another area: the tendency towards right wing authoritarian thinking amoung conservative evangelicals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_authoritarianism). This tendency is well documented by numerous valid studies over the years. This type of thinking is demonstrated by the overwhelming support of evangelical voters for President Bush in the 2004 election and their continued support of our occupation of Iraq and the so-called "global war on terror" initiated by the Bush administration. About 25% of the population are said to be right wing authoritarian followers-this is about the same percentage as still support the Bush administration. I reject right wing authoritarian thinking as being lazy and wrong headed, does this mean I can not be a christian?

Polycarp

Posted: September 27, 2008 11:55 AM


What confuses me here is that Emerging Churches are like UFOs. I have heard a lot about them but I have never actually seen one. Is there an Emerging Church Finder somewhere? All of this talk seems like mere theory to me. I need to see one for myself and not just hear about it in cyberspace.

John	Posted: September 27, 2008 11:33 AM


Thank you for a reasonable look at a stream of Christianity that I have mostly gotten to know through accusatory and anxiety filled voices.

Jim	Posted: September 26, 2008 7:44 PM


As I said in my post in the other board about the book review, the emergents completely ignore and/or deny the third person of the Trinity. Where is the Holy Spirit in the "conversation" of emergents? By whose power are we to live our new lives in Christ?

Lynn Berntson

Posted: September 26, 2008 6:48 PM


The problem with Scott's ideas is no attachment to scripture. It is like discussing Romans chapter one with no reference to it. I don't care for terms such as emergence. post evangelical, Calvenism, Armenianism, etc. Again, they are distant conversations with very little biblical attachment. It is however a touch of the philospher mind and take up much space. Lynn

Journeyman

Posted: September 26, 2008 5:25 PM

McKnight closes by referencing a post modern approach to language. Essentially, language creates a reality as contrasted with the belief language reflects reality. If language creates reality, then institutions using experts set about to shape and control individuals. In this view Christian faith does not communicate what God has spoken, but what institutional leaders and their experts have created. It would indeed be ironic if the language of the Emergents as espoused by McLaren and Pagitt the becoming institutional leaders and their experts was to become a language (or story) shaping and controlling individuals. The effort to deinstitutionalize one story could become an institution in itself.

Larry

Posted: September 26, 2008 4:31 PM

Who is guilty of syncretism, emergents who express their faith in post-modern fashion, or more traditional Christians who express theirs in terms of modernity and the Enlightenment? The emergents, and I count myself among them, are generally much more aware of their biases and assumptions and that all of their confessions and professions are contextual. Traditional evangelicals are far more likely to have combined their faith with Enlightenment epistemology, AKA "foundationalism", most without even realizing that they have done so.

Johnny Johnston

Posted: September 26, 2008 4:23 PM

I am amazed that Christianity Today is giving any credibility to emerging or emergent. Your mast head says you are a magazine of evangelical conviction. Where is the conviction of people like McLaren and McKnight? The truth does not change no matter how many authors say it should. Jesus is the truth. Please don't stray from the truth of the ages! If it's true it's not new and if it's new it's not true! We don't need any new truth from anyone. Jud 1:3 Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.

Page: 1

E-mail this page

Write CT

Print this article

Post a comment