Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > Movies > Commentaries > 2011
What Would Lewis Do?
The "proper" sequence of the Narnia books has been debatable. As for the films, a Lewis scholar predicts what the Narnia author would've chosen next.




"Perhaps it does not matter very much in which order anyone reads them," concluded C. S. Lewis in a letter—now famous among Lewis fans—dated April 23, 1957.

Lewis's correspondent was an 11-year old American boy named Lawrence Krieg who had written suggesting the seven Chronicles of Narnia should be read in their chronological order, with The Magician's Nephew first, rather than in their publication order as was indicated on the covers and the one Lawrence's mother preferred, with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe first.

Lewis initially seemed inclined to possibly accept Lawrence's proposal, though with qualification, writing: "I think I agree with your order for reading the books more than with your mother's." But given his later statement, that perhaps the order did not matter very much, it seems more likely that he was simply being gracious to a young admirer.

What is known is that all during Lewis's lifetime and for seventeen years after his death, the Chronicles kept their original publication order numbers. Then in 1980, these numbers were changed to the chronological order they bear today. Anyone buying a copy of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe now will find a number two on its spine and the following statement inside: "The HarperCollins editions of The Chronicles of Narnia have been renumbered in compliance with the original wishes of the author, C. S. Lewis."

Lewis scholar Peter Schakel finds the use of the word "original" in this claim puzzling and asks: "Does 'original' mean from the time at which The Magician's Nephew was completed? If so, why did Lewis not request the Bodley Head [his publisher] to include this renumbering in the new book, or in The Last Battle the following year, or have Geoffrey Bles [his later publisher] change the order in later reprints of the other books? If it had been a matter of importance to Lewis, surely his publishers would have complied with his wishes, or included the renumbering in the paperback editions that appeared a few years later."

Despite Lewis's kindly words to Lawrence Krieg, Schakel maintains that the order the books are read in "matters a great deal" and argues that the original ordering is preferred by "a number" of Lewis scholars, an understatement that should read "most" or "nearly all."

Schakel's argument is founded on common sense. One need not be a Lewis scholar or an English professor to see that The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe must be read first if we want to walk with and not ahead of the four Pevensie children as they hide inside the Professor's strange wardrobe and enter an enchanted land called Narnia. Reading this story first is the only way we can share their wonder.

Reading this book first is also the only way internal statements suggesting it is the first book make any sense, statements like this one made after the first reference to Aslan: "None of the children knew who Aslan was any more than you do." Readers who have already finished The Magician's Nephew will find these words from Lewis's narrator baffling.

Correspondingly, The Magician's Nephew needs to be read later, only after we have encountered the magical wardrobe, the mysterious lamp-post, the evil Witch, and the oddly sympathetic Professor. After The Magician's Nephew gives us the story of their origins, we can say with satisfaction and delight, "So that's where they came from!"

Walden's decision

After producing the first three Narnia films in their original publication order, Walden Media apparently intends to bring out The Magician's Nephew next, as the fourth film in the series. In their original order, this book was always listed as number six.

What might Lewis have said about Walden's decision to move the story up? Given that fact that Lewis died in 1963, we can only offer a conjecture based on the way the books would have been read in his day.

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe was published in October 1950. The Magician's Nephew came out in May 1955. Readers living during Lewis's time would have had to wait about four and a half years between the two installments. Once both books were available, however, someone who started the series with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and continued reading in order would have gotten to The Magician's Nephew much sooner.




Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!
[Reader Reviews]

Displaying 1–3 of 15 comments

Matt Sendon

February 24, 2012  7:43am

I'm just worried about how the original actors will have changed in the later release of the other books' film adaptations. Nevertheless, I'm very excited to see them all in film. :-)

Report Abuse

James Picard

August 01, 2011  9:39pm

Actually, the charecters of Aravis and Emeth kind of render the racism a moot point. If they can point this out and bring it up a lot in the mews confrences, they should be good. I mean, Aravis IS a Calormen, but she helped to save Archenland. I think it would work. However, I think it would be best if they do MN now, that way if it's a success, which it could very well be, they would be encouraged to make a new one. And personally, I think the film order doesn't matter. If you ask me you should read MN right after LWW, so it creates the most impact. That's what I did. And if they put up a disclaimer in the beginning of the film saying that it isn't meant to offend any one, they could probably make it. Me, I'm just happy that they are making films, and I can say I've been around to see them. Though I do hope that they don't forget MN isn't an action movie. A few scenes sprinkled around will suffice. But not the entire movie. But, I'm ready to give this one a try.

Report Abuse

astral purr

April 17, 2011  11:47am

They should be concerned with what makes the best movie. I'm sad to say that almost non of the books translates well as movies (apart from LWW). By far the best 'movie-book' would be The Horse and His Boy. They should take a break and make that next with a different approach from a new director.

Report Abuse

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]



Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working

The Conversation

The Conversation

A tribute to "The Reformed Journal."

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search




Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper