Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 10, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Interviews > 2005 |  
Debunking Jesus?
Director Brian Flemming, a self-described "atheist Christian," is trying to prove that the historical Jesus never existed in his new documentary, The God Who Wasn't There.
| posted 6/07/2005


What if Jesus never existed? How much do Christians know about the origins of their faith? And are we willing to talk about it? These are some of the questions explored in The God Who Wasn't There, an irreverent Michael Moore-like documentary that premiered in Los Angeles last week and will tour the country at screenings sponsored by humanist groups. (It's also available on DVD here.)

Brian Flemming
Brian Flemming

Director Brian Flemming, 38, attended two Christian schools and says he committed his life to Christ several times before he eventually became a self-described "atheist Christian." His works include the controversial stage play Bat Boy: The Musical and Nothing So Strange, a mockumentary about conspiracy theories and the assassination of Bill Gates.

The God Who Wasn't There movie poster
The God Who Wasn't There movie poster

In the next few months, Flemming will shoot The Beast, a feature film about a Christian high school student whose archaeologist father gives her evidence that proves Jesus never existed. Flemming, who plans to release the film on June 6 of next year—that's 6/6/06—produced the documentary The God Who Wasn't There to explain the basis for this belief, and along the way he outlines the reasons for his own loss of faith as well.

Flemming spoke to Christianity Today Movies about the film from his office in L.A.

You refer to yourself as an "atheist Christian." What do you mean by that?

Brian Flemming: Once you're a Christian, I don't think you ever shake being a Christian, and personally I don't want to. When I realized that the first-century science that Christianity proclaims is basically completely wrong, that didn't mean Jesus was evil. It didn't mean Jesus was bad. Jesus is in many ways still a great character. As you see in the movie, when he calls for everybody who doesn't want him to reign over them to be killed, that's not the Jesus I'm talking about. But the Jesus that I hold in my mind as the Jesus who taught me my moral values in many ways, I don't want to lose that. I like Jesus. When I see a picture of Jesus that doesn't make me feel bad, it makes me feel good. I'm an atheist because I only believe those things that can be demonstrated and proved. I don't believe that faith is a good thing at all. But I'm a Christian in that I love Jesus.

Where did you first come across this idea that Jesus didn't exist historically?

Flemming: It was probably one of the older scholars, maybe G.A. Wells, who's written a few scholarly books on the subject. It was probably his work which led me to the more recent authors who have more up-to-date scholarship on the issue, such as Earl Doherty, who wrote the book The Jesus Puzzle, which remains today unrefuted. He has a theory about what early Christianity looked like and why there's all these odd anomalies with regard to the Christian version of the story, and he explains them all, and I think his theory makes the most sense of any theory I've ever heard about early Christianity.

Can you summarize briefly what some of those anomalies are?

Flemming: Yeah, for example—and this is in the movie—why doesn't Paul, in the documents that can be confirmed or somewhat confirmed as being from Paul, why doesn't he ever talk about a Jesus who recently lived? Why are there all these points where he's trying to make an argument and the context he's in cries out for him to say, "Oh and by the way, Jesus said this," and that would have settled the argument instantly? Why doesn't he pull that arrow out of his quiver? There are all sorts of things that don't make sense that are in the record, that you go, "Why didn't this person mention Jesus, because he died just a decade or two before this, supposedly, and he would have been in recent memory?"

And ultimately, why is the historical Jesus mentioned more and more as you get away from the historical period he was supposed to have lived? That is the reverse of what we would expect. We would expect all sorts of information right away. For example, in Scientology, there is a big effort under way to document the life of L. Ron Hubbard, because he's their messiah, and that will probably drift more and more and more into legend as time goes on. But with Christianity, it's the reverse. The figure is mythical and legendary at the start, and becomes more historical as time passes. And that just doesn't make sense, if he was a real historical person.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 10 comments.See all comments
Susan   Posted: October 13, 2009 2:18 AM
I think it was very good of you to take a look at this film before it came out. I think it is very important to teach young people that God can handle, more than handle, a little scrutinizing. We should never run from this stuff, but we should work to debunk it. Teens should realize that there are people out there that want to take their faith from them. They also need to know to look for Christian Apologetics and see that Christianity more than stands up to this sort of silliness. I also think it's pretty obvious that Mr. Flemming did not come to this issue with the "open mind" he claims. He just sought out "evidence" to reinforce his own bias. Especially since this is an issue of faith. His arguments about Paul are flimsy at best. Do NOT remove this from your archives, I enjoyed your rebuttals.

ejikplotnik   Posted: October 10, 2009 7:17 PM
The work that Brian has done with the God who wasn's there film is unprofessional, poorly researched, unethical and stupid! It is easy to notice his anger to God and Christianity in the film rather than any rational conclusions. I wonder how many classes had he finished at school? probably none...

Samuel   Posted: October 09, 2009 10:27 PM
Brian is wrong. Paul did speak of Jesus on earth, he just didn't see the need to talk about it much. "For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you. The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you, do this in remembrance of me. In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying "This cup is the new covenant in my blood: do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me." For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes." 1 Crinthians 11:24. 1 Corinthians is dated early, and it says everything. He lived, he died, he rose, and he will return.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com