Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 10, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > News & Miscellaneous > 2009 |  
Is Hollywood Anti-Catholic?
Angels & Demons, Catholicism and the "Last Acceptable Prejudice"
| posted 5/12/2009


"Copernicus was surely one of the greatest lights of his time, but was he not censured and excommunicated for his admirable scientific discoveries?" So wrote nineteenth-century anti-Catholic polemicist Charles Chiniquy in his influential 1886 diatribe Fifty Years in the Church of Rome.

He wasn't—but it's a typical misconception. Nor did Pascal or even Galileo suffer the sanctions Chiniquy describes. (Galileo, whose almost unique case is certainly a black mark in church history, was not subjected to flogging and dungeon imprisonment—only house arrest.)

Cumulatively, such historical misconceptions and distortions form patterns out of almost nothing, creating an anti-Catholic canard pitting the Church against scientific inquiry and scholarship. "That's insidious. That's one of the great black legends about the Catholic Church," said Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, in a phone interview. "You wouldn't even have the universities today if it weren't for the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages."

A scene from 'Angels & Demons'
A scene from 'Angels & Demons'

This urban legend gets an upgrade in Dan Brown's book, Angels & Demons, the predecessor to The Da Vinci Code. "Outspoken scientists like Copernicus" were not just excommunicated, but "murdered by the church for revealing scientific truths," according to the book.

The claim is even more strongly put in the film version of Angels & Demons, reworked as a sequel rather than a prequel to the 2006 Da Vinci Code and opening in theaters this week. "The Catholic Church ordered a brutal massacre to silence them forever," declares Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks), referring to Copernicus, Galileo and the rest of their fellow conspirators in Brown's version of the Illuminati, here a secret society "dedicated to scientific truth."

For Donohue, it's another all-too-typical example of how the Catholic Church is routinely subjected to slurs and attacks in the media that other groups are spared. "You can't even put an inoffensive depiction in a cartoon form of Muhammad," he said. "They simply won't even print it."

As if confirming Donohue's point, the film version of Angels & Demons scrubs the religious and ethnic identity of an Arab Muslim assassin from Brown's book, much as the Muslim villains of Tom Clancy's The Sum of All Fears were recast in the film version as neo-Nazis. In the new film, the assassin is played by Danish actor Nikolaj Lie Kaas as a non-religious professional who sells his services to the highest-bidding fanatics of any religious persuasion—"Christ, Allah, Yahweh," it's all the same to him.

Anti-Catholicism: Changing with the times

"The Last Acceptable Prejudice" is the provocative subtitle coincidentally shared by a pair of unrelated books released in the same month of 2003, Philip Jenkins' The New Anti-Catholicism and Mark S. Massa, S.J.'s Anti-Catholicism in America. As the name of Jenkins' book suggests, the old brand of anti-Catholicism promoted by Chiniquy has long since become a marginal phenomenon. But anti-Catholic attitudes—like the Copernicus slur—haven't gone away. They've just changed with the times.

Rome's foes today "aren't debating transubstantiation, they're debating transgender," said Catholic film critic David DiCerto. "They aren't debating the real presence [of Christ] in the Eucharist, they're debating the real presence of humanity in the womb. It's much more the hot-button moral issues than the hot-button theological issues."

Derrickson on the 'Emily Rose' set
Derrickson on the 'Emily Rose' set

What does "the last acceptable prejudice" mean in practical Hollywood terms? Director Scott Derrickson (The Exorcism of Emily Rose, The Day the Earth Stood Still), a Christian, prefers the term "stereotype" to "prejudice," but doesn't mince words about the upshot: Media images of Catholics, he said, are often "unqualified portrayals of Catholics as sexually repressed killjoys, corrupt moneygrubbers, maddening hypocrites, fanatical criminals, medieval moralists, and predatory child rapists." As examples, he cited George Carlin's scandalous Cardinal Glick in Dogma, Nicole Kidman's crazed Catholic mother in The Others and John Standing's depraved Bishop Lilliman in V for Vendetta.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 27 comments.See all comments
Dtmccameron   Posted: June 20, 2009 3:45 AM
All things considered, wouldn't Bishop Lilliman in "V is for Vendetta" been an Anglican? It makes little difference, I suppose, as men in collars are still getting slandered...

Rikk   Posted: June 19, 2009 6:24 AM
I am constantly surprised at how many Christians and even Catholics are ignorant of the culturally transformative effects of Early and Medieval Christianity (not to mention the conspiracy theorists who seem to thrive in a certain part of the world and for whom no amount of counter evidence will ever suffice). While I realize that this is "just a movie" it is not atypical of much common perception. We wouldn't tolerate this kind of blatant and bigoted misrepresentation of any other movement. Please read at the very least the recent and accessible works of e.g. Rodney Stark, The Rise of Christianity; For the Glory of God; and The Victory of Reason and then perhaps Richard Rubenstein, Aristotle's Children. As a Protestant and an Evangelical Charismatic, is it high time, even if only in the interests of honesty and Christian fairness, that the other extraordinary side of the story be told.

FLOCHI   Posted: May 20, 2009 5:37 AM
WE SHOULD JUST PRAY FOR THEM


Rate and Comment on this article:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com