Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 24, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2007 |  
Margot at the Wedding
| posted 11/16/2007



When Margot's husband Jim (John Turturro) comes calling, it looks for a moment like a savior has come to the scene. He seems to have some resilience through Margot's attacks, and when he comforts her he seems like some kind of guardian angel. But his faint light is squelched by the chaos that's beyond his control.

And poor Claude, while sympathetic, is just a variation on the pubescent victims in The Squid and the Whale. (What's with Baumbach's preoccupation with alienated teenage boys who leave pieces of themselves behind? In Squid, one boy smeared bodily fluids on the school lockers, and Margot's Claude leaves pieces of his skin in other peoples' rooms.)

Only Malcolm seems to have any sense of the depravity on display, and we find some comfort in his presence until Baumbach—as ruthless in his search for ugly secrets as Margot herself—targets him and leaves him weeping over his own failures. There's more hope for humanity at the end of the Coen Brothers' No Country for Old Men than there is here.

Sure, we can muster compassion for these characters. After all, Baumbach draws them with intricate detail, so we can see potential in almost all of them, and pity them for the damage they probably suffered in childhood.

Director Noah Baumbach has a mess of a movie on his hands
Director Noah Baumbach has a mess of a movie on his hands

We can also marvel at Baumbach's talent. His aesthetic is clearly influenced by the French New Wave films, especially the movies of Eric Rohmer. His sharp ear for dialogue—for the words people say, and the daggers they conceal within them—is a powerful gift. And his apprehension of the damage people do to each other, and how they do it, has served him well in the past, and may lead him to a masterpiece someday. Here, he's drawn out some of the finest acting we've ever seen from Kidman, Leigh, and Black. This extraordinary cast makes these characters convincingly caustic and complicated.

But alas, the accumulation of scenes in which characters degrade each other is ultimately exhausting. Why do we need to see Pauline have a rather messy accident in the middle of a walk in the woods? Is this some sort of helpful metaphor? Do we need any more reminders that these people are full of … well, do I really have to say it?

Many other directors have brought us into family clashes like this. Paul Thomas Anderson, Wes Anderson, and Woody Allen come to mind. But each of them have enough insight to glimpse the possibility of redemption. Or they find enough humor to relieve the tension and prevent us from wallowing in misery. Baumbach's focus on mean-spirited behavior is stifling.

At one point, Malcolm erupts in fury at the cruel and inhumane treatment that the people around him are demonstrating. When Pauline asks him to calm down, he declares. "This is the right reaction! Compared to everything else that's going on, this is right!"

In the same way, viewers will have a right to complain after Baumbach has shoved their faces into so much smelly behavior. In the end, Margot at the Wedding is a story told from a perspective that's as viciously condescending and critical as Margot's own worldview.

Talk About It
Discussion starters
  1. Do any of these family members show genuine love for the others? If you stepped into this mess, how might you try to "fix" it? How might Christian principles be a part of that?
  2. What is Claude learning from the way these adults treat each other? Who provides the best role model for him?
  3. Do you think Malcolm and Pauline should get married? What strengths do you see in their relationship? What weaknesses?
  4. What can you discern about the history of Margot and Pauline's relationship? What were their parents like? What do we know about Becky?
  5. At the end of the film, what has changed? Who has learned lessons, and what did they learn?
The Family Corner
For parents to consider

Margot at the Wedding is rated R for sexual content and language. The family members speak profanely and violently toward each other. Sexual misbehavior is frankly discussed. And there is one shocking act of physical violence.

What other Christian critics are saying:



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Kealani   Posted: April 26, 2009 4:55 PM
Exquisitely drawn bile.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com