Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 25, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2008 |  
Doubt
| posted 12/12/2008



But this doesn't diminish the film's triumphs too much. Cinematographer Roger Deakins apparently hasn't set down the camera this year—his other 2008 releases include the beautifully shot movies The Reader and Revolutionary Road—and at this point I'd happily watch grass grow, as long as he was behind the camera. Doubt, with its black-clad figures set against rich greens, blues, and brick reds, is exquisite in its simplicity. This is a period piece, set in a distinctive time in the Catholic church when nuns wore Victorian-style bonnets and ate in silence while the priests dug heartily into a raucous dinner, and Deakins' stills of this time could be framed and hung in a museum alongside the Dutch masters.

Sister Aloysius suspects Father Flynn of molesting a boy
Sister Aloysius suspects Father Flynn of molesting a boy

Amy Adams is the weakest member of the cast, not because she's a poor actress but because she is once again playing Amy Adams—I hope she's given the opportunity to break out of the doe-eyed role soon. On the other hand, Viola Davis, in a riveting turn as the student's mother, has only one scene, but it turns out to be the moment where the foundations shift, and she works in emotionally stunning contrast to Sister Aloysius.

We've seen the protean Hoffman play scary, brilliant, creepy, lovable, and pathetic before, but this is one of his most likeable characters. Here he gets to play someone that, depending on your opinion of his honesty, might embody all of those, that swings between kind benevolence and anger—for either his reputation, or for righteousness's sake. But despite his firm standing in the upper echelons of contemporary actors, he's not quite a match for Streep here. She's a bit like that symbolic cat—prowling for one wrong move, hissing and spitting and snarling, with unblinking eyes and a taste for blood—but this guise is stretched so thinly over a concealed vulnerability that cracks are beginning to show, and those moments are startling for how they challenge what we believe about her character.

Doubt is not going to please some moviegoers. True: the symbolism is a bit heavy-handed. True: not a whole lot actually happens onscreen. True: it's a little infuriating to be left scratching your head about what really went on. But to the engaged viewer, Doubt brings assumptions about people and circumstances to the surface, and then challenges those assumptions with uncertainty and, yes, doubt. Nobody loses, but nobody wins, either.

Talk About It
Discussion starters
  1. Do you think Father Flynn did anything wrong? Why or why not? Is his guilt or innocence the main point of the story? Discuss.

  2. Father Flynn tells Sister Aloysius, "We are the same." Assuming he is telling the truth about his confessions, how would John 8:2-11 apply to this story?

  3. If Father Flynn is lying, and has something to hide, are Sister Aloysius' actions justified?

  4. Mrs. Miller tells Sister Aloysius, "You know the rules, Sister, but that don't cover it." What does that mean? Read Matthew 5:21-48. What is Jesus' response to rules?

  5. How do we interpret this story in the light of Romans 2:1-6?

The Family Corner

For parents to consider

Doubt is rated PG-13 for thematic material. The story deals with implied pedophilia and homosexuality, but nothing is shown and the characters talk very obtusely about these subjects, so they're mostly troubling in light of more recent church scandals. While there's little subject matter that's patently offensive, the themes are inappropriate for younger children, but it would make good discussion fodder for older teens and up.

What other Christian critics are saying:
  1. Plugged In
  2. Crosswalk
  3. Catholic News Service
  4. Past the Popcorn



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 4 comments.See all comments
Marnie   Posted: July 19, 2009 8:24 AM
I think doubt is mostly always an element in any kind of sexual scandal since there are rarely any eye witnesses and most people are torn between accusing someone without evidence vs. saving future children from harm. Our courts will not convict someone on circumstantial evidence even though everyone might be 'certain' that the accused is guilty. I am 'certain' that OJ killed his wife. I am 'certain' that Ted Kennedy was responsible for Mary Jo K. death. I am not saying he murdered her but that his actions led to her death. I feel that you ignore gossip at your own peril. Gossip can be overly exaggerated but there is always something to it. The young person believes in 'innocent until proven guilty' whereas the older person has too many experiences that contradict that stance. And so.... I believe that this movie is about the doubt we feel about gossip and also about how difficult it can be to be a whistle blower.

Christy   Posted: June 24, 2009 10:48 PM
I like plays and this film based on a play maintained that tightly-constructed, literary, dialogue-focused essense of stage drama. Meryl Streep was amazing and I give her four stars. She made a cold, harsh woman into a protagonist you could not hate. I appreciated that the movie did not seem to be trying to rail on the Catholic church for its clergy sex abuse problems, so much as just using the Catholic church as a context and setting to explore the themes of doubt and certainty and its consequences. It could have been very anti-religious, but it wasn't. Not a really inspiring or moving message, but engrossing and thought-provoking.

Nathan Guinn   Posted: April 11, 2009 12:55 PM
This movie was simply brilliant. I think the entire cast (Amy Adams included) did a fantastic job of relaying a story that makes you use critical thinking in order to deduce an outcome. We never know what really happened, but that's what makes the film all more better; we're left with nothing but an unfinished ending and our imaginations.


Choose a star rating for this film:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com