Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 24, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2008 |  
Revolutionary Road
| posted 12/29/2008




Revolutionary Road

Our rating: 3 Stars - Good

Your rating:  

MPAA rating: R
(for language and some sexual content/nudity)

Genre: Drama

Theater release:
December 26, 2008
by Paramount Vantage

Directed by: Sam Mendes

Runtime: 1 hour 59 minutes

Cast: Kate Winslet (April Wheeler), Leonardo DiCaprio (Frank Wheeler), Kathy Bates (Helen Givings), Michael Shannon (John Givings)

Related: Talk About It/Family Corner


It is fashionable these days to look back upon the '50s and '60s as a time when there was cool fashion and a lot of smoking and martini drinking, covering up for deeply unsettled, Stepford Wives-esque lives of quiet desperation. The AMC show Mad Men revels in this milieu, sometimes to an excessive extent. Were people really this suppressed, oppressed, and unhappy in their cookie-cutter suburban lives? Did Manhattan businessmen really have "swell" afternoon romps with secretaries while their wives baked cakes with the children at home? It's all very convenient and elegant to portray the postwar American ideal as an ill-founded, flashy farce covering up for the ugly truths of life, and it's made Mad Men a pop culture hit. But it's a little too convenient, too expected. And although it has many virtues, Revolutionary Road ultimately comes across as a little bit too cynical for its own good.

The film, directed by Sam Mendes (American Beauty, Road to Perdition) and based on the 1961 novel by Richard Yates, drops us into the lives of April and Frank Wheeler, a couple living an idyllic existence in the Connecticut suburbs of New York City in the 1950s. They have two kids, a house with red shutters, and some really nice neighbors. But the predictability of it all bores them, so one day they decide to drop everything and move to Paris "for something different." April will get a job working at the U.S. Embassy, while Frank just writes and reads and thinks about what he wants to do with his life. Their escape plan is soon thwarted, tragically, by their mutual realization that their move to Paris is really just a last-ditch effort to save their marriage. The rest of the film plays out like a slow burn, intricately and painstakingly unraveling the Wheelers' marriage before our eyes.

Leo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet as Frank and April Wheeler
Leo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet as Frank and April Wheeler

In many ways, it's American Beauty set four decades earlier. Both films are about marriages that were once loving, once pristine, but are now falling apart. Both films are highly visual, slick masterpieces of technique and photography (Roger Deakins' work here showcases some of the best cinematography of 2008). Both films feature melancholy piano scores by Thomas Newman, oodles of slow zooms, and highly composed mise-en-scene. But while Road does have a bit more subtlety and complexity than Beauty, it has far less empathy and, well, hope. It's a beautiful film, but remarkably bleak. 

Much heralded as the first on-screen reunion of "Kate and Leo" since Titanic ten years ago, Revolutionary Road features the pair of actors in considerably weightier, world-weary circumstances than their "I'm the king of the world" antics aboard the ill-fated ship. Like Jack and Rose, April and Frank are star-crossed lovers doomed to an unhappy end. Unlike the former couple, however, the Wheelers hate each other. Or, I should say, the Wheelers sometimes hate each other. Sometimes there is love between them, a little affection and hope (seen largely in flashbacks). But most of the time they are quietly loathing or resenting one another. It's considerably less fun to watch than the "my heart will go on" kitschy romance of Titanic

April and Frank in happier times
April and Frank in happier times

Which is not to say that DiCaprio and Winslet are not highly compelling. This film is nothing if not a showcase for their formidable talents, and they are more than up to the challenge of playing tortured, well intentioned but ultimately doomed victims of dashed dreams. They have some truly great scenes together—alternatively throwing chairs at each other and laughing uneasily—including a climactic, passive-aggressive breakfast scene ("Would you like scrambled eggs or fried?") that will make you shiver with tension. Winslet especially is impressive here—displaying a frighteningly intense, full-bodied performance that is sad, maddening, and downright scary. Hers is the more complicated character, frequently unloading lines of confounding brilliance ("You're the most beautiful and wonderful thing in the world: You're a man!") or revealing immense emotions in the act of whisking an egg.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 8 comments.See all comments
Joe   Posted: September 20, 2009 6:37 PM
Not rated
Brett, this movie was not about male/female matrimony, nor was it about post war America, nor was it about community. It was about something far greater. I'm surprised you didn't pick up on it. This film was about truth, and the pain it brings when people don't want to hear it (recall the old man turning down his ear piece at the end). The insane guy represented the truth. Every time he spoke, he spoke the truth. When the Wheelers first heard the truth from him they liked him because they felt someone shared their view; but when the truth was turned on THEM, Mr. Wheeler wanted to kill him (note Mrs. Wheeler only seemed to be nervously placated). Ultimately Mrs Wheeler literally PIERCED the truth and the filmmaker made sure we could not miss the blood. Hence, I believe this was a film about Jesus Christ. And that is why there was not a single mention of Him or God or religion throughout the movie. -Joe at www.joesacramento.com

Cribbster   Posted: September 07, 2009 10:32 PM
Yes, I very much liked this movie. But I gotta say, Rob, you very much confuse the inclusion of an abortion in the movie as Hollywood's support of it. Richard Yates, who wrote the book on which the movie is adapted, was a wonderful, insightful writer, and his characters tended to be quite tragic. It would be reductive and simply wrong to say "Revolutionary Road" supports abortion. I think the director, Mendes (and Yates, presumably), leaves it up to the audience to judge the two main characters. It is not necessarily the storyteller's job to take a position on such things. I often prefer it when they don't.

HHHmmm   Posted: July 28, 2009 1:27 AM
I don't think the movie was about saving a marriage, I think that was just at the surface. The character of the crazy son (John I think his name was) holds the key to the entire movie.


Choose a star rating for this film:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com