Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 23, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2009 |  
Angels & Demons
| posted 5/15/2009




Angels & Demons

Our rating: 2 Stars - Fair

Your rating:  

MPAA rating: PG-13
(for sequences of violence, disturbing images and thematic material)

Genre: Thriller

Theater release:
May 15, 2009
by Columbia Pictures

Directed by: Ron Howard

Runtime: 2 hours 18 minutes

Cast: Tom Hanks (Robert Langdon), Ewan McGregor (Camerlengo Patrick McKenna), Ayelet Zurer (Vittoria Vetra), Stellan SkarsgÄrd (Commander Richter), Armin Mueller-Stahl (Cardinal Strauss), Pierfrancesco Favino (Inspector Olivetti), Nikolaj Lie Kaas (Assassin)

Related: Talk About It/Family Corner


It may have been boring and heretical, but the film version of The Da Vinci Code was also one of the biggest international hits of all time when it came out three years ago—bigger than The Passion of The Christ, bigger than the Narnia movies, bigger even than at least one of the Star Wars movies. So it was pretty much inevitable that Tom Hanks and director Ron Howard would reunite for an adaptation of the other Dan Brown novel that features Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon. (A third novel is now due to come out later this year.)

Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon
Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon

It was also pretty much inevitable that reporters looking for a story—and the filmmakers, looking for publicity—would try to stir up some controversy around the sequel, which is called Angels & Demons. But for most people, the new movie could be fairly easy to ignore, and not just because there have been fewer calls for boycotts and the like this time.

For one thing, the new story just doesn't push the same kind of buttons that the old one did. The Da Vinci Code made bogus claims about Jesus himself, and thus had something to offend Christians of every denominational stripe. But Angels & Demons focuses entirely on the relationship between modern science and Roman Catholicism—and thus many people, especially non-Catholics, may be inclined to just yawn and shrug the movie off.

Those who do see the film could very well find their eyes rolling within the first few minutes. As the story begins, the Pope has just died, and cardinals from around the world have come to the Vatican to elect his successor—and a voice-over, possibly that of a reporter, gravely informs us that Catholics around the world "now find their church at a crossroads, their ancient traditions threatened by a modern world." Really? The church has never come to this "crossroads" before? And how does the death of one man expose the church to this "threat"? Is not the conclave that brings the cardinals together a sign that the church's "ancient traditions" are carrying on pretty much as they always have?

Ayelet Zurer as Vittoria Vetra
Ayelet Zurer as Vittoria Vetra

Four of these cardinals, we are told, are considered front-runners for the papacy—and they are kidnapped right away by a character known only as the Assassin (Nikolaj Lie Kaas), who will go on to torture and kill them in excruciatingly painful ways. In the original novel, this villain was a member of the Muslim Hassassin sect and saw what he did as payback for the Crusades, but for some reason the filmmakers have turned him into a Danish hitman who does what he does purely for the money. Apparently, after indulging in certain stereotypes when it came to Catholics and albinos (remember the killer monk in the previous movie?), the filmmakers figured they had to be sensitive and draw the line somewhere.

Anyway, the Assassin issues a statement to the Vatican and its police, claiming to speak on behalf of the Illuminati, a secret society that supposedly included many top artists and scientists from the Renaissance and beyond. In his statement, the Assassin reveals that he will kill one cardinal per hour in a public place, before destroying the Vatican (and presumably much of Rome) with a piece of antimatter (yes, antimatter) that he stole from already brought the CERN particle-physics laboratory in Switzerland. Fortunately, the Vatican police have Robert Langdon (Hanks) in from the U.S. to help decipher the symbols that could lead to the Assassin's hiding place, and they have also brought in Vittoria Vetra (Ayelet Zurer), a scientist who was working on the antimatter just before it was stolen.

Thus begins a frantic search for the "Path of Illumination," a series of buildings, sculptures and engravings that the Illuminati supposedly hid in plain sight all over Rome so that the free-thinkers of their day could meet with them in secret, far from the church's punishing eye. To follow the clues, Langdon must make a few trips to the high-security Vatican archives, drive at high speeds through crowded Roman streets, and occasionally dodge bullets when he and the cops who join him happen to get too close to the Assassin. And because everyone is racing to beat the clock before the bomb goes off and takes both Rome and all of the Catholic church's top leaders with it, Langdon's adventures in this film are inherently more dynamic and engaging than the rather dull comings and goings of The Da Vinci Code.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 27 comments.See all comments
Wraith   Posted: June 25, 2009 8:25 PM
I found this movie only mildly entertaining. Ultimately, I saw it like one of those rail shooters in video games that used to be popular before 3d came into its own in video games. You are driven along an inexorable path that is while a bit twisty it essentially does not leave room for creativity and often satisfys plot issues with ridiculous, unlikely solutions...alll. the...way... to the end.

GK   Posted: June 20, 2009 4:28 AM
Hanks is a devout member of the Greek Orthiodox church so its not like this was an unbeliever as the star role. But a member of the second oldest sector of Christianity (after the Ethiopian Orthodox Church)

Henry   Posted: June 05, 2009 8:32 PM
I am puzzled by the reaction of some Catholic commentators to this film. It is nowhere near as foolish as Da Vinci Code and in some parts does try to maintain some sort of balance. I haven't made my mind up about the solution of wisdom over vitality that the Cardinal and the Camerlengo represent. While I admire some of the heritage that the Catholic Church retains, others are due for an examination. The wisdom is to know what. Just as long as you remember that Angels and Demons is National Treasure on an intellectual budget, you'll do fine.


Choose a star rating for this film:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com