Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 24, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2009 |  
Public Enemies
| posted 7/01/2009



Christian Bale as Special Agent Melvin Purvis
Christian Bale as Special Agent Melvin Purvis

Mann was one of the first directors to embrace digital technology. Working with famed cinematographer Dante Spinotti, Mann employs HD (as well as quite a bit of shaky cam), a method I feared, from the trailers, would be far more distracting than it really was. I was concerned that the HD cameras would jar me from the immersion of the period, calling attention to the equipment used to produce it rather than be the world it reproduces. Instead, the digital format gave the film an odd sense of hyper-reality. The amount of detail and depth of field is breathtaking. Most noticeably employed in night scenes (not coincidently the occasion of several of the gun battles), the digital medium gave it a greater air of authenticity, one more level of veracity that made the incandescent muzzle flashes, singing bullets and sickening collisions with either wood or human flesh that much more frightening.

The gunfights are extraordinary
The gunfights are extraordinary

Most firefights are shot with an aesthetic nod to what looks most glamorous and evocative. But this is the director of Heat and its seminal cinematic heart—a firefight on a crowded L.A. street—which is still the standard by which all gunfights are judged. Here, Mann trades aesthetics for claustrophobia and pandemonium. There is nothing exhilarating about being in a Mann shootout. They are terrifying, primal, visceral experiences.

Public Enemies is exactly what you'd want and expect from a gangster movie. Mobsters hang off car running boards, bags of loot in one hand, chattering Tommy guns in the other. This movie isn't all that different than the ones James Cagney used to make, though the R-rated world is a lot tougher and more realistic. Like all Mann's films, there are lulls of peace punctuated by fits of extreme and brutal violence. Gangsters don't crumple bloodlessly like in the olden days, they are hewn where they stand, leaking crimson like human sieves. 

Mann isn't interested in making a historical film so much as a psychological one. While Public Enemies sticks mostly to history and never plays especially fast and loose with the facts, details are secondary. His leads are not moral archetypes but highly skilled professionals with deeply flawed emotional cores. Mann, a perfectionist and modern auteur in a way that very few directors today are, strives to strike a balance between glamorizing his famous subject and painting him as the sociopath he obviously was. He places his men (for while there are women in his films, his is a deeply phallocentric world dominated by hyper masculine superstars) in crisis situations and then stands back to see how they will react. Public Enemies is his most ambitious project to date, a film in which he shows complete mastery and control over each and every element of the production. Technically and artistically, Public Enemies is a sterling film, a supremely mounted epic of the sort few are willing to undertake anymore.

Talk About It
Discussion starters
  1. Do the ends ever justify the means? Why or why not?
  2. Who are some contemporary examples of cult of celebrity? Are they worthwhile examples? Do you feel that the film glamorized evil?
  3. Though the villain, Dillinger is also loyal and selfless. How do we reconcile the fact that sometimes the "bad guys" act with greater honor than the "good guys?"
  4. Do you see a resonance with the villain/hero's attack on the banks during the Great Depression and our nation's current financial crisis? Is Mann trying to suggest something?

The Family Corner
For parents to consider

Public Enemies is rated R for gangster violence and some language. The language is, for the most part, slight. There is one brief, tame and non-nude love scene and one scene of a woman in the bathtub though her nakedness is obscured by the murky water. Public Enemies earns its R rating almost exclusively because of its pervasive violence—dozens of characters die in a hail of gunfire.



Related Elsewhere:


E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 8 comments.See all comments
marianne   Posted: July 12, 2009 3:56 PM
thank you so much for these reviews and the ''parent corner'' isn't just for parents, i want to guard what my friends and i see and we're 20!!

ntc4ume   Posted: July 11, 2009 6:43 PM
would any true christian go to a movie glorifying a evil man. ????? Better yet WWJD.

Judy   Posted: July 10, 2009 6:09 PM
I usually love Johnny Depp movies, but this one was soooooo slooooow and boring....what about a plot...the story of Dillinger could have been so strong and how about the love angle...barely there. I was extremely disappointed and would give it a zero star...Don't waste your money or time


Choose a star rating for this film:

Choose star rating:  
Name: 

Comments:1000 character limit 
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com