Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2010
The Next Three Days
Despite an entertaining finale, Paul Haggis' latest asks us to leave logic and morals at the door.






The Next Three Days

Our rating: 2 Stars - Fair Your rating:
Your Comments: see all

MPAA rating: PG-13
(for violence, drug material, language, some sexuality and thematic elements)

Genre: Action, Drama

Theater release:
November 19, 2010
by Lionsgate

Directed by: Paul Haggis

Runtime: 2 hours 2 minutes

Cast: Russell Crowe (John Brennan), Elizabeth Banks (Lara Brennan), Brian Dennehy (George Brennan), Liam Neeson (Damon Pennington), Olivia Wilde (Nicole)

Related:
Talk About It/Family Corner


At the center of Paul Haggis' The Next Three Days, a remake of the 2008 French film Anything for Her, is a moral dilemma. When community college English teacher John Brennan's wife is wrongfully accused of murder, he must decide whether to exceed the law and break her out of prison, or to let injustice prevail. But when he chooses the former and people start dying and human life is devalued, the audience is put in a similar predicament: We are forced to either cheer the protagonist on despite his tainted ethics, or play against the storyline for the sake of what is right. Haggis provides no commentary—nor consequences for John—and muddles morality for the sake of a thrilling story.

The pretentious filmmaker seems more concerned with love than ethics. He wants to portray the powerful bond between husband and wife and, in turn, the extremes to which such love can drive a man. But Haggis fails to make the relationship between John (Russell Crowe) and his wife, Lara (Elizabeth Banks), convincing. Instead of taking time to develop their romance, he opens his film on the night that Lara allegedly kills her boss and wastes the next hour following John as he develops his plan to free Lara, spending too much time on tiresome details. There are very few moments in which we see or feel their unreserved love. Thus, it's difficult to believe John would become a criminal—a killer even—and risk everything, including his young son, because of it.

Russell Crowe as John, Elizabeth Banks as Lara
Russell Crowe as John, Elizabeth Banks as Lara

Early in the film, during a lecture on Don Quixote, John tells his students that "rational thought destroys the soul." It's supposed to speak to John's circumstances, as he is driven to irrationality by his love for Lara. Instead, it further exhibits Haggis' failure to dramatize the romance and make use of the show-don't-tell technique.

The same classroom scene, moreover, underlines an irony in the story—the absence of logic, which makes John's words seem more like Haggis trying to justify plot holes than anything else. From start to finish, The Next Three Days is filled with narrative contradictions that add to its preposterousness. For example, during the breakout sequence John and Lara play elevator tag with Pittsburgh's finest, as if the machines couldn't be shut down in seconds by hospital security. And later, after nearly getting in a terrible car accident, the couple takes a break on the side of the highway with the city's entire police department on their tail, an implausible moment that Haggis contrives just to display reconciliation between the two.

Luke (Ty Simpkins) meets with his mom
Luke (Ty Simpkins) meets with his mom

But the most absurd aspect is the premise itself. Regardless of how much he loves his wife, there's no way a normal, intelligent person like John could ever reach the decision he does as a solution to his problem. Plus, there's no reasoning behind his ability to go from scholar to action hero overnight.

In spite of a solid performance, Crowe can't even make sense of this outlandish story. Though sometimes failing to mask his Australian accent, he brings underplayed emotion and sincerity to his part, playing a man in what has to be the most difficult moment of his life. But his character is too poorly written to illustrate any real human complexities that we can learn from or relate to, in the end making Crowe wasted talent. Ditto for Liam Neeson, who plays an ex-con who gives John inside tips on how to properly execute a prison break because, well, he accomplished it several times before, Neeson isn't on screen enough to even establish a persona, and when he is, the veteran star turns with no distinction.

Nicole (Olivia Wilde) and John
Nicole (Olivia Wilde) and John

All that to say, the actual breakout sequence, which makes up the final thirty minutes, is a really entertaining ride. From intense shootouts, to quick car chases, to split-second decisions, the finale is gripping. Haggis has a way with suspense and thrills that leaves you almost breathless. Sadly, it's not enough to redeem the rest of the movie. Because Haggis leaves logic and morals at the door, and asks us to do the same, the film's outcome seems ultimately in vain.




Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!
[Reader Reviews]

N S

June 13, 2011  1:31pm

I just watched this movie and also felt it was underrated. I thought the director's choice of Quixote was perfect for the movie, and I interpreted the classroom scene differently. The disappearance of rationality - the failed justice system - Crowe believes gives him license to create his own reality. The whole film was really quite a ride. Yeah, their relationship could have been developed a little better, but sometimes filmmakers believe "developing a marital relationship" involves just adding drama and arguing, which I can do without. And which is not necessarily realistic, either.

Report Abuse

John M

December 03, 2010  5:05pm

This is a very underrated film. I'm not a film officianato, one who knows about camera angles, lighting, etc. What I do know is that this is a compelling story. The viewer is hooked from the start and never "spits the bit." This film is suspenseful throughout. You are never bores and it builds to an extremely satisfying. I do not understand the few times this film is offered for viewing at so mant theatres. I give it four and half stars.

Report Abuse

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]



Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working

The Conversation

The Conversation

A tribute to "The Reformed Journal."

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search




Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper