Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 22, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Music > 2008 > February (Web-only) |  
Imperials Embroiled in Lawsuit Over Name
One of Christian music's most popular singing groups is entangled in a legal battle that puts father and son on opposing sides.



The Imperials, one of Christian music's most popular singing groups in the 1970s and early '80s, are currently embroiled in a complex legal battle over who owns the group's name — and who gets to reap the profits from that name.

Armond Morales, who in 1964 cofounded the group that went on to win four Grammys and 13 Dove Awards, and his wife, Bonnie, are being sued for the Imperials name by a younger group that includes Armond's son, Jason Morales.

That younger group — four singers who say they're now the "real" Imperials — claims that when the elder Morales signed an assignment of trademark in 2005, he transferred ownership of the name to the four singers in the current lineup.

Armond Morales, 75, told Christianity Today he did not consult an attorney before signing the assignment, and now says he was pressured into signing away more than he bargained for, and perhaps more than he owned the rights to.

"They have set out to really put me out of business and have no connection with the Imperials, which was my life," Morales said. "I've been devastated by this."

The younger group filed a lawsuit in June 2007. Armond's attorneys drafted a countersuit in September 2007, claiming that the younger group fraudulently got him to sign the 2005 agreement. But the elder Morales said he decided to drop the countersuit due to financial limitations.

A Nashville judge ordered the two sides to mediation in hopes that they would settle out of court.

Luke Anderson, an attorney representing the younger group, said he believes the case will end up in court later this year. Anderson said his clients "remain wishful [for a settlement], but also skeptical that this matter will settle at this point."

CT obtained a copy of the 2005 assignment of trademark agreement, which not only stipulates that the elder Morales would pass the Imperials name on to the younger group, but also that he would give up his right, title, and interest to the Imperials trademark.

The 2007 lawsuit seeks to have Armond Morales stop using the name "the Classic Imperials" — a name that he and other singers have used in performances in recent years. The younger group also wants Armond to hand over any money he's earned with the Classic Imperials.

'Not Keeping His Word'

The younger group is suing the elder Morales under the corporation name of MOSH, an acronym derived from their last names (Jason Morales, Ian Owens, Shannon Smith, and Jeremie Hudson). Even though he is a 25-percent shareholder in MOSH, Jason Morales, 35, told CT, "I have legally rescinded myself from the business part of it," implying that he's not taking an active part in the lawsuit against his father.

Jason Morales deferred further questions to business partner Smith.

"We're suing [Armond Morales] because he's not keeping his word," Smith said. "He's hurting our business on a regular basis. We felt like we were forced to start litigation or shut the group down."

Smith said it boils down to the 2005 agreement: "Our whole standing to be the Imperials is rooted in the assignment of trademark that Mr. Morales signed."

Armond Morales says the younger group verbally told him he could sing using the Classic Imperials name, but that stipulation was never included in the 2005 written agreement.

Armond told CT that MOSH does not want him to claim to have won Grammy and Dove Awards that the Imperials won as a group between 1969 and 1984. The younger group now makes that claim, even though none of them were members of the group at the time. The younger group also now bills itself as a "Gospel Music Hall of Fame Inductee," even though none of the current members were with the Imperials at that induction a decade ago.




E-mail this pageE-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 134 comments.See all comments
Mark from Indiana   Posted: March 12, 2008 4:49 PM
it's all really a moot point anyway. If a bunch of kids bought the Beatles trademark, does that make them the real group? Even if they sang all the old songs? NO. When u consider these punks' motivations, it all comes down to selfishness anyway. You can give me all the baloney about "wanting to carry on the Imperials tradition", etc, and it's still rationalizing nonsense. The only reason they would have done this is to capitalize on the name. Especially when u consider they lay claim to past achievements of the original group. This is deceitful and full of sin. This kinda crap is the very type of thing that is wrong with CCM today. I'd question whether these guys are living a Christian life at all. I wouldn't walk across the street to listen to these guys. Let them gain popularity on their own merits, instead of notoriety of being known as Christians tearing each other up in courts. You can't buy a ministry, but a company. This shows where their hearts lie.. I'm ashamed of them.

michelle   Posted: March 12, 2008 2:39 AM
I know that his dad might have went back on his word, don't get me wrong that is wrong, but suing them isn't any better and 2 wrongs does not a right make! and yes what about Seniority his dad Deserves better. That said, no one is perfect, but since they are in the public eye they should consider being better examples. and I am not holding a grudge but geesh! also his dad deserves credit because not only is he his father and got him started out he raised the boy! he owes all he knows to God and his parents and if they want to come back and use the name they should go ahead and actually say it would be better if we legally shared the name for both groups

Michelle   Posted: March 12, 2008 2:29 AM
Yes I believe that the younger generation of the two should be More grateful, it sounds like his dad hit hard times and needs his band back but either his son or the band minus the son is being greedy and my parents have told me that christians should not sue other people let alone family. I mean it sounds like they are highly ungrateful because they won't let the oringnal imperials use the name that they gave to them as a gift and his son and the others Should want to return the favor I mean why is it such a big deal that his father use the name "the classic imperials" because thats what they were His son and his band should have made an announcement that they will be sharing the name, I mean after all they do share last names and what ever happened to honor thy father and thy mother? or respect your elders I guess that is gone with the wind with the younger generation of imperials Even if they fall on hard times, you don't sue your family thats all their is to it forgive

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com