Jump directly to the content
Jun 22, 2011

How to Offer Criticism: Part Five

I have been attempting to encourage healthy, honest dialog, and fruitful criticism in the Christian community through this series on how to criticize well.

Here is a look back at previous posts:

  1. Critique What One Actually Believes
  2. Critique Fairly and Charitably
  3. Wait
  4. Check Your Motive and Goal

Today, I'm wrapping it up as we focus on the need to admit when we are wrong.

#5 Admit When You Are Wrong

We all engage in criticism, and because we are fallible human beings there will be times when we make mistakes in our criticism of others. So, beware of the person who is constantly criticizing others, yet never admits when they have got it wrong. And more importantly, keep a close watch on yourself. When was the last time you admitted that you missed the mark in your evaluation of another, or lacked balance and charity in your remarks?

It's tempting to justify ourselves when we begin to sense that we have blown it here. Instead of owning up to our mistake we will justify and obfuscate, never simply saying, "I was incorrect in my views." For some, they get more angry when you show they are wrong rather than apologizing and moving on.

An example of a man who handled this issue well is David Hesselgrave. In the book MissionSHIFT, which David and I edited, the contributors intentionally critiqued the one another's views. That was the point of the book. With the exception of the three grand essays, each author responded to someone else. Thus, Keith Eitel critiqued Chuck Van Engen. And then I critiqued Keith Eitel, and then David Hesselgrave (because he is the godfather of missiology) critiqued us all. This is a good thing, but in the critique of Ralph Winter that David Hesselgrave gave, he referred to Ralph Winter's reliance on Gregory Boyd's view of "microbial evil" and the necessity of kingdom work overcoming the forces of darkness as represented by disease and poverty in war. However, Gregory Boyd is best known perhaps as the proponent of the theologically view called "open theism." Thus, when David Hesselgrave wrote his critique, he specifically mentioned open theism and indicated that Ralph Winter agreed with Boyd's views on open theism.

The reality is, Winter did agree with Boyd on some issues but not on open theism, considering it deeply problematic theologically.

Thus, you'll see that David Hesselgrave and I put out a corrective letter in missiology journals and publications and even here at the blog. Now, could a case be made that some of Ralph's writings are so reflective of Gregory Boyd that they may also have been influenced by the view of open theism? I think that argument could probably be made. But instead, David wrote a very gracious and appropriate open letter apologizing and correcting the view.

I wonder, of the professional critics that you know, how many have said, "I was wrong, I overstated, I caricatured, or I misunderstood the views of somebody I critiqued." If the answer is no one, you may have a contentious man rather than one who is trying to point to the truth of Christ.

I know of one very prominent and regular critic who simply goes from critique to critique, from movement to movement, from person to person. In many ways, criticism is what he has become known for-- sometimes right, or at least enough right that there is some validity to his claims, but often riddled with error that never gets corrected. Now, the first time this happens, people assume it was a mistake. The second time, we might wonder if there is a pattern. The third time we should recognize that such critics enjoy criticism more than they enjoy the truth. My advice; walk away from such critics. They love contention more than the cause of Christ. Controversy is their goal.

Criticism is never an easy thing. Yet, it is a helpful thing when done properly. The difficulty is that some blogs and pulpits show a greater love of criticism than godly correction which works against Christ-centered unity. We should value, but not celebrate, criticism.

My hope is that we might still be discerning critics of one another, but that we can change the tone and work towards better accuracy in that criticism. 

There is one other post I'd like to offer concerning criticism, and that is how to receive it. I get a lot of it, and I'll share my thoughts on how to take it like a Christian in the next post.

Support our work. Subscribe to CT and get one year free.

Related Topics:None
Posted:June 22, 2011 at 12:00 am


Please read our comment policy before you weigh in, and then feel free to comment on Facebook.

More From This Blog

Teams in Mission: Are They Worth It? (Part One)

Teams in Mission: Are They Worth It? (Part One)

TEAM missionaries research teamwork.
When Failure Isn’t an Option: How to Press Forward in Sharing Jesus Even When We Stumble

When Failure Isn’t an Option: How to Press Forward in Sharing Jesus Even When We Stumble

Failure and repentance secure for us a more ample conception of the grace of God.
Is Orality Really Effective in Sharing the Gospel?

Is Orality Really Effective in Sharing the Gospel?

o·ral·i·ty: the quality of being spoken or verbally communicated
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: What Does Evangelism Look Like in Your Day-to-Day Life?

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: What Does Evangelism Look Like in Your Day-to-Day Life?

As you go, wherever you go, make disciples of all people.

Follow Ed Stetzer

Exchange Logo

Dr. John Sorensen, President of Evangelism Explosion International, a ministry that has trained millions of Christians around the world to share Christ, discusses the state of evangelism, research on evangelism trends, as well as myths and methods of evangelism.

Cast: Ed Stetzer

Read ED Stetzer's Books

See All

Follow Christianity Today

Christianity Today
How to Offer Criticism: Part Five