Jump directly to the content

Despite Bible Studies, Pregnancy Center Wins Reversal of Denied Government Loan

USDA ruling says Care Net's voluntary Bible classes to clients should not disqualify it from receiving federal funds.

A hearing officer has ruled that a Christian pregnancy center should be allowed to apply for a government loan to renovate its building, even though the center routinely engages in religious speech.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) previously denied a Care Net pregnancy center's application to its Community Facilities Loan Program because the center wants to offer clients optional Bible classes in one of its rooms. But now the USDA Appeals Division has determined that Care Net is eligible for a loan to renovate its facility because its religious speech is voluntary.

The Community Facilities Loan Program cannot support inherently religious activities, though faith-based organizations are not automatically disqualified from receiving loans.

The pregnancy center fought the loan denial and filed suit against the USDA in 2012. The USDA argued that it was "unable to realistically separate the eligible activities from the inherently religious activities either by time or space, thereby creating an excessive entanglement between government and religion."

The judge remanded the case to the USDA Appeals Division, which found that Care Net "is not seeking government funds to subsidize religious education or instruction; rather, it seeks a government loan for capital improvements to a building," according to the Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Care Net in its suit.

Religion Clause highlighted the hearing officer's reasoning on the First Amendment issues:

Agency would have found Appellant eligible for the Program loan so long as Appellant keeps religious speech out of the building or segregated to a separate room – a literal religious gerrymander. Adopting Agency's approach would require any religious discussion, regardless of whether it were to be initiated by Appellant or its clients, to cease and for the participants of that discussion to pause, leave the facility or room, and travel elsewhere to reengage in the discussion. This effect is more than an incidental burden on a particular religious practice or belief: it is significant pressure, which will almost certainly cause clients to end prematurely or avoid any religious discussion altogether. Such a burden would facilitate a "chilling effect" on such discussion....

CT previously has reported on the rise of pregnancy centers, as well as on disclosure laws that affect them.

Related Topics:Abortion
Posted:June 19, 2013 at 11:40AM
Gleanings aggregates what others are reporting. Learn more.

Leave a Comment

Use your Christianity Today login to leave a comment on this article.
Not part of the community? Subscribe now, or register for a free account.
Recent Posts
Israeli Military's Call-Up of Arab Christians Labeled 'Intimidation'
Attempt at increasing recruits ten-fold occurs against backdrop of stalled peace talks, Hamas-PLO reconciliation.
James Dobson's Birthday Gift: Latest Court Victory Over Obamacare Contraception
In shadow of Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby hearing, judge rules in favor of Family Talk.
Bill Gothard Breaks Silence on Harassment Claims by 30 Women
(UPDATED) Popular seminar speaker: 'I have failed to live out some of the very things that I have taught.'
New Poverty-Fighting Alliance Launches
World Relief, Germany-based PartnerAid combine to grow programs, donor base.