Jump directly to the content
magcover

Already a subscriber?

Home > 2012 > October Online Only > 3 Reasons Not to Confront by E-mail

Our church uses email regularly for announcements, prayer updates, and notes between staff. But one thing we no longer do with email is handle conflict. We learned the hard way. Email is not suited for dealing with conflict. Here are a few reasons why:

1. E-mail doesn't convey emotion well. Face-to-face, you can gauge emotion by watching body language. But with email or instant messaging, readings of emotional tone are often wrong. People read into things what they think you feel.

During one heart-to-heart online conversation, being a fast typist, I responded quickly to each of my friend's posts. I noticed she became defensive and the conversation ended. It was weeks before I realized she had been offended by the speed of my replies. She interpreted my rapid posts to mean I was angry. After making peace, we agreed to talk in person next time.

2. Email is a read-and-reply culture. If you are angry, it's all too easy to "vent and send" before investigating the facts.

At our previous church, one of our volunteers heard about a budget issue that made him angry. He immediately fired off a harshly critical missive regarding the church's leadership. While every member has a right to raise questions, his email was inflammatory and based on misinformation. Checking the facts beforehand would have kept his message out of the "outgoing" folder.

3. Online conflict spreads like wildfire. It's too easy to forward email to lots of people, many of whom may not need to get involved. Add to this the varying frequency that people check email, and soon no one knows who has seen what, which only adds more fuel to the fire.

I was surprised one Sunday morning to learn of a heated, critical email generated by a key leader. I was even more shocked to learn who had received it. Current leadership, past leadership, and others who were completely uninvolved in the issues-all were blind copied. Fortunately, the situation was contained and the author issued a personal apology to the entire distribution list-but only after a face-to-face visit from the pastor. Some things are best handled in person.

Now, when an incendiary email comes across my desk, I fire off a non-defensive reply, but with an invitation: "I'd be happy to get together with you to talk about this issue. Give me a call, and let's set up a time."

Angie Ward is a Leadership Journal contributing editor living in North Carolina.

Related Topics:ConfrontationCriticismEmotionsMistakes
Posted: October 22, 2012

Not a Subscriber?

Subscribe Today!

  • Monthly issues on web and iPad
  • Web exclusives and archives on Leadership Journal.net
  • Quarterly print issues

Print subscriber? Activate your online account for complete access.

Join the Conversation

Average User Rating:

Displaying 1–3 of 3 comments

Patricia

November 01, 2012  9:31am

Yes, I've been on the receiving end of some of those angry e-mails. In fact, the person who sent it was a fellow elder who was e-mailing a member of the congregation about his dissatisfaction with how I handled something. He preceded to rip me and another elder along with our superintendent and then cc'd me on the e-mail so he wouldn't be "accused of talking behind our backs". How do you like that? It was very hurtful. But I did call him and apologize for anything I had done to upset him. He offered one of those half-hearted apologies like, "Yeah I guess I should apologize too", but he never named what he was apologizing for and told me before the conversation was over that he had a problem with me (never named specifically what the problem was). Hard to worship with people like that and look them in the eye when you're aware of just how vicious they can be.

Report Abuse

bev murrill

October 31, 2012  7:44am

I agree.. I have been on the receiving end of such emails, and I've sent them myself in other days. The other side of that is that I've also sent emails and answers that were absolutely innocuous but they were perceived differently than I had meant when I wrote. Truly, emails are a gift, but there are times when nothing beats a face to face conversation ... but in our fast paced life, that's not always easy.

Report Abuse

Eugene C. Scott

October 31, 2012  7:21am

Marshall: I have comitted these on-line sins and been sinned against too often. They have always required face to face pennance to correct. Thanks for the reminider. I think Facebook falls into this category too. It seems to me hand-written (or even typed) letters are far better a conveying emotion on the page than are emails or Facebook posts. I wonder why. Even blog posts seem to do a better job of it if well written. What is it about email specifically that miscommunicates emotion.

Report Abuse
Use your Leadership Journal login to easily comment and rate this article.
Not part of the community? Subscribe, or on public pages, register for a free account.
Reader's Pick
Growing Grace for Mental Illness

Growing Grace for Mental IllnessSubscriber Access Only

One pastor's story mirrors a burgeoning response in the church.
Sister Sites