3 Reasons Not to Confront by E-mail
Our church uses email regularly for announcements, prayer updates, and notes between staff. But one thing we no longer do with email is handle conflict. We learned the hard way. Email is not suited for dealing with conflict. Here are a few reasons why:
1. E-mail doesn't convey emotion well. Face-to-face, you can gauge emotion by watching body language. But with email or instant messaging, readings of emotional tone are often wrong. People read into things what they think you feel.
During one heart-to-heart online conversation, being a fast typist, I responded quickly to each of my friend's posts. I noticed she became defensive and the conversation ended. It was weeks before I realized she had been offended by the speed of my replies. She interpreted my rapid posts to mean I was angry. After making peace, we agreed to talk in person next time.
2. Email is a read-and-reply culture. If you are angry, it's all too easy to "vent and send" before investigating the facts.
At our previous church, one of our volunteers heard about a budget issue that made him angry. He immediately fired off a harshly critical missive regarding the church's leadership. While every member has a right to raise questions, his email was inflammatory and based on misinformation. Checking the facts beforehand would have kept his message out of the "outgoing" folder.
3. Online conflict spreads like wildfire. It's too easy to forward email to lots of people, many of whom may not need to get involved. Add to this the varying frequency that people check email, and soon no one knows who has seen what, which only adds more fuel to the fire.
I was surprised one Sunday morning to learn of a heated, critical email generated by a key leader. I was even more shocked to learn who had received it. Current leadership, past leadership, and others who were completely uninvolved in the issues-all were blind copied. Fortunately, the situation was contained and the author issued a personal apology to the entire distribution list-but only after a face-to-face visit from the pastor. Some things are best handled in person.
Now, when an incendiary email comes across my desk, I fire off a non-defensive reply, but with an invitation: "I'd be happy to get together with you to talk about this issue. Give me a call, and let's set up a time."
log in
To view the rest of this article, you must be a subscriber to LeadershipJournal.net. Activate your online account for complete access.
Related Training
from BuildingChurchLeaders.com
Owning Your Mistakes
Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Today!
- One risk-free issue
- Instant access to all Leadership Journal web content
- OFFER DETAILS
rating & comments
Average User Rating:
Patricia
Yes, I've been on the receiving end of some of those angry e-mails. In fact, the person who sent it was a fellow elder who was e-mailing a member of the congregation about his dissatisfaction with how I handled something. He preceded to rip me and another elder along with our superintendent and then cc'd me on the e-mail so he wouldn't be "accused of talking behind our backs". How do you like that? It was very hurtful. But I did call him and apologize for anything I had done to upset him. He offered one of those half-hearted apologies like, "Yeah I guess I should apologize too", but he never named what he was apologizing for and told me before the conversation was over that he had a problem with me (never named specifically what the problem was). Hard to worship with people like that and look them in the eye when you're aware of just how vicious they can be.
bev murrill
I agree.. I have been on the receiving end of such emails, and I've sent them myself in other days. The other side of that is that I've also sent emails and answers that were absolutely innocuous but they were perceived differently than I had meant when I wrote. Truly, emails are a gift, but there are times when nothing beats a face to face conversation ... but in our fast paced life, that's not always easy.
Eugene C. Scott
Marshall: I have comitted these on-line sins and been sinned against too often. They have always required face to face pennance to correct. Thanks for the reminider. I think Facebook falls into this category too. It seems to me hand-written (or even typed) letters are far better a conveying emotion on the page than are emails or Facebook posts. I wonder why. Even blog posts seem to do a better job of it if well written. What is it about email specifically that miscommunicates emotion.
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
