Have Crossover Artists Sold Out?
"They're more carnal than spiritual," one writer claims in a response to our recent commentary about the crumbling divide between secular and sacred music.
by Jim Pruitt | posted 8/01/2005
 1 of 2
Editor's note: Last week, we ran a commentary titled "Secular, Sacred, or Both?", a thought-provoking essay by Kate Bowman on the topic of Christian musicians "crossing over" to the mainstream. Bowman argued that the line between the secular and sacred, at least in the mind of many artists, is a blurry one—if it exists at all. The article prompted many reader responses, some of which you can read on our Feedback page. One reader, Jim Pruitt, had some major concerns with the whole idea of "crossing over," saying such artists have sold out. We're running Mr. Pruitt's letter here, with a few minor edits, as a "counterpoint" commentary to last week's article.
***
Professing to be wise, they became fools (Romans 1:22).
It's amazing what we can convince ourselves of when it furthers our own ambitions.
The commentary "Secular, Sacred, or Both" perpetuates the sort of self-justifying tripe which has been spewing out of contemporary Christian music (CCM) for the past decade: That we can love the things of the world and Christ at the same time. That we can enjoy the all the benefits of being a "star" and still demand the approval of God which He bestows on his humble servants.
Where is the sound doctrine and biblical basis for this argument? Why is it that you always find lots of rhetoric but little (if any) Scripture quoted in support of their position (other than a complete misunderstanding of Paul's "being all things to all people" and Christ eating with the sinners)?
It's all just an attempt to justify their attempt to have the world and Christ, too. And the problem is not what they're doing but who they are. Their passion is for themselves and their self-expression because that's who and what they love. You can't expect their music to reflect the depth of their commitment to God and their understanding of the world's fate, because their commitment is compromised. They're more concerned with winning the accolades of the world than saving them from hell.
It's just another symptom of our "me" society. It's all about me: I'm an artist (a word we use to try and puff up ourselves and make our meager gifts appear more than they are) … a musician … the purpose of my music is to express who I am and what I feel. Me, me, me.
They don't believe that the primary purpose of their music (not to mention their lives) is to enable fellowship with the Father and to bring glory to his name. They don't see their music as ministry because they don't see themselves as ministers. They are musicians first and Christians second. They're willing to compromise their Christianity in the name of their "art" (if I may use the word loosely), but they're not willing to submit their artistic expression to the Lordship of Jesus Christ to further the Kingdom of God. They believe that Christ was crucified, resurrected, and sits at the right hand of the Father to provide them with the opportunity to be "stars for Christ."
They're more comfortable with the musicians and "artists" of the world than with other Christians and Christianity because they are more carnal than spiritual. They applaud the world and curse the church.
"The greatest commandment is 'Thou shalt be relevant' and the second is like unto it. 'Thou shalt offend no one.' On these two commandments hang all of your effectiveness."
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Try an Issue of Today's Christian Woman Free!
|
 |
|
No credit card required. Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only. Click here for International orders.
If you decide you want to keep Today's Christian Woman coming, honor your invoice for just $17.95 and receive five more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The trial issue is yours to keep, regardless.
Give Today's Christian Woman as a gift
Buy 1 gift subscription, get 1 FREE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
