
Before 'Transforming' Your Neighborhood, Talk to Your Neighbors

Since early in the history of the Sunday conversations, we have been actively involved in a number of neighborhood groups in Englewood and across the larger Near Eastside neighborhood. Church members have invested their time in these groups, and we have opened our building for neighborhood meetings. In 2007, the Near Eastside was identified by the city as a re-development zone. In other Indy neighborhoods, this has been the first step on the fast track to gentrification. Together with our neighbors, we agreed that while there were many facets of our neighborhood that could use significant investment, the last thing we wanted to do was drive out our neighbors who already had roots in the Near Eastside.
So we hosted a six-month-long series of meetings to ask how our neighborhood could flourish in ways that would minimize or eliminate gentrification. These neighborhood-wide conversations were recorded to form a "quality-of-life plan" that identified seven key action areas that the neighborhood wanted to develop: Family Strengthening, Education, Public Safety, Affordable Housing, Business and Economic Development, Livability, and Leadership and Neighborhood Connections. Within each of these areas, we identified immediate and long-term goals for developing the neighborhood. This Quality of Life plan continues to guide the neighborhood in making decisions about what development projects should be undertaken and how they should be funded.
Among our new conversation partners are churches in our own neighborhood. In 2003, we got to know Mano de Amistad, a Spanish-language church that was meeting in the school next door, the same building that would later be given to us. Not long afterward, we invited them to use our building for their meetings, and we continued to get to know them and to seek opportunities to work together. The two congregations merged in 2009, and we continue to converse and grow together, although we still have a long way to go, considering for instance that we presently have two services separated by language and the culture and history of their participants (e.g., style of music, order of services).

We Want Your Common-Good Stories: Introducing Our Second Essay Contest

Top Urbanists Agree: Casinos Ruin Cities

Here's to the Misfits


Comments
PHIL/CAROL MIGLIORATTI
This conversation is at the heart of the Denver 2012 Leadership Consultation (brief presentations followed by table dialog; afternoons in 20+ Affinity Consultations; praying thru the "We love" statements of the Cape Town Commitment > http://www.missionamerica.org/Brix?pageID=23832
Chris Smith
As a related followup, there is a wonderful piece in the NY Times today on the broader neighborhood of which Englewood is a part: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/realestate/commercial/near-eastside-secti on-of-indianapolis-benefits-from-super-bowl-bid.html
Beth Laue
My husband and I pastored this church Englewood for 17 years from 1958-1975. I am so thankful to read this great article on how that small group of people learned how to change and adapt all that was there to continue to be more than useful to the community. It is amazing. I was there more than a year ago and came away feeling joyful with the way God was using some of the same people that we knew when we were there, to keep God's vision alive for that neighborhood. Our 3 children were all born there and 2 of them went to school 3. May God continue to bless all who are following God's guidance in this special spot of Indianapolis!
Samuel J. Lima
This is a great article! It reinforces my belief in an open and public community development process (as an urban and architectural designer, I use the Charrette process to get input from communities). I believe churches should always be involved in the shaping of their neighborhoods, but for this to happen, two criteria must be met: 1. The church must be in a neighborhood. Many churches since the 1950s have abandoned neighborhoods and built anew on cheap land in car-centric, disconnected locations, effectively isolating those who can't drive (this includes children) and ensuring a homogenous middle class congregation. 2. The church must be at work outside its walls to know the needs of its neighbors.
Add your comment *