Reports began emerging late last week that while China is not lifting its one-child policy - heavily criticized for leading to forced abortions - it is considering amending it based on the needs of Shanghai, which hosts a rapidly aging population and weakening workforce.
Shanghai's Population and Family Planning Commission has begun sending out officials and volunteers to pass out leaflets and offer emotional and financial counseling to families who might be willing to have a second child. More births would help even out the age proportion and bolster the city's economy. And younger people will be needed: Shanghai is home to more than 3 million people over 60, about one-fifth of its population. In 2020, those over 60 are predicted to make up one-third.
At the start of Communist rule in 1949, China's government encouraged population growth and even banned birth control. But the population outgrew the food supply, causing over 30 million deaths from starvation by 1962. The government instated the one-child policy in 1979, and for 30 years has kept a tight rein on the country's population (the world's largest) of 1.3 billion people by monitoring pregnancies, sometimes forcing parents to terminate them.
The one-child policy makes limited exceptions based on location, ethnicity, education, and so on. In urban areas like Shanghai, couples without siblings are permitted to have two children. Rural families (about 53 percent of China's population) are allowed a second child if the first is a girl. Couples who willingly have only one child get honors and benefits, while those who break the rules are punished with fines and property damages.
And everyone is well aware that boys are preferred to girls. With accessibility to ultrasounds in the 1980s, the number of aborted females skyrocketed. Prenatal gender screening was banned in 1994, but the damage was done: This April, a British Medical Journal study found there are 32 million more Chinese boys than girls under age 20.
Although China's policy shift seems rooted more in economic security than in ethical concerns over forced abortions and gender selection, the shift is nonetheless welcome. Many have waited a long time for the one-child policy to change.
Elissa Cooper is an intern at Christianity Today magazine. She has written about Pentecostal pastor Paula White for Her.meneutics.
or
or
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest
Comments
Mary
This is a meaningful article.
Gda
I seriously don't understand....people, do you SERIOUSLY think the population problem's gonna solve itself if we just hand the work to the good lord himself? Not that I'd expect you to agree with me but he gaves us brains to solve our own problems. Isn't it a bit of an insult to an intelligent creator if his creation refused to use his best creation? Not that I agree with forced abortion but I see nothing wrong with population control policy. Nothing.
Cecilia Yau
Besides the economic and ethical consequences, the one-child policy has also bred a self-centered but lonely generation. It is so much harder for parents to teach sharing, sacrifices and self- discipline which is self-limitation for the sake of others. As a consequence, those who come into contact with church and experience the body life with love can be very much attracted to it. This is an opportunity for church out-reach. As for female 'genocide', the Chinese have forgot -ten that the Chinese character 好 (which means good) is a combination of 'a daughter and a son'. The creation narrative shows woman was the last to be created and God concluded His creation with a sense of satisfaction--"very good". When human beings degrade what is "good' in God's sight,the tragic consequences boomerang.And that is an important lesson to be learned. Cecilia
Doreen Ashley
The capital of China is Beijing, not Shanghai.
*