Jump directly to the content

Why the New Planned Parenthood Controversy Raises Old Questions


Feb 3 2012
The world is waking up to a conflict pro-life women have faced for years.

If you've been paying attention to recent events involving Planned Parenthood and Susan G. Komen for the Cure, you probably have whiplash by now.

First, Komen—the world's best-known breast-cancer-fighting organization—decided to stop giving funds to Planned Parenthood. Two reasons were given: Komen's policy against supporting organizations under investigation, and the fact that PP does mammogram referrals rather than actual mammograms. Said Komen founder Nancy Brinker, "We have decided not to fund, wherever possible, pass-through grants. We were giving them money, they were sending women out for mammograms. What we would like to have are clinics where we can directly fund mammograms."

That story was greeted with a storm of protest by the pro-choice movement, and loud cheers from pro-lifers. Many of these pro-lifers, who had long been deterred by the PP connection from giving to Komen, started opening their wallets and checkbooks for the organization for the first time.

Then, this morning, Komen released an apology. Their official statement read, in part: "Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political …. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities."

(The investigation in question deals with, among other things, covering up and even enabling the exploitation of minors—an accusation that has dogged Planned Parenthood for many years. If that's not criminal, I'm really not sure what is.)

While pro-choicers celebrated, many pro-lifers rushed to stop their checks. But wait, say some—it's not quite that simple. The Post's Greg Sargent wrote early this afternoon, "I just got off the phone with a Komen board member, and he confirmed that the announcement does not mean that Planned Parenthood is guaranteed future grants—a demand he said would be 'unfair' to impose on Komen."

Pro-life activist and blogger Jill Stanek added on her own site, "[Komen's] statement represents nothing new …. Nancy Brinker had already stated they would continue to fund Planned Parenthood's existing grants through 2012 (one through 2013) …. This is Komen's attempt to get the abortion mafia off their backs."

To add a comment you need to be a registered user or Christianity Today subscriber.

orSubscribeor
More from Her.menutics
Longing for a Watchman

Longing for a Watchman

Lessons on religion and racial justice from Harper Lee’s latest novel.
The Feminist Fight Against Abortion

The Feminist Fight Against Abortion

Hearing from the progressive and pro-woman Christians siding with life.
Amen to Women in Politics

Amen to Women in Politics

From a complementarian who celebrates female government leaders.
Trusting the Church After Abuse

Trusting the Church After Abuse

How I found comfort in continuing the conversation.
Include results from Christianity Today
Browse Archives:

So Hot Right Now

Gay Marriage, Abortion, and the Bigger Picture

Living out God’s will requires us to look beyond single issues.

What We're Reading

CT eBooks and Bible Studies

Christianity Today
Why the New Planned Parenthood Controversy Raises Old Questions