
Let Boys be Boys: Play-Fighting May Actually Be Good for Kids

Auditing America's Political Integrity

There's a part of me that wishes my two young boys would be satisfied with the same sorts of stories and toys that I enjoyed as a child: Anne of Green Gables, Beverly Cleary, and American Girls dolls. Instead, they love anything involving bows and arrows, pirates and cannons, whales and harpoons, and knights slaying dragons.
As a Christian holding to pacifist convictions, I feel sheepish admitting that while early on in our family life, I resolved not to allow our boys to engage in any sort of gunplay; over time, that rule has slowly disintegrated as my children weaponized various items: Legos, hobbyhorses, sticks, blocks, and, hilariously, a sheet of edible dried seaweed bitten carefully into the shape of a gun. It wasn't that they'd seen guns on television or in video games. I'm still not sure where the idea came from. I did notice that the relentless weaponization of everything actually waned once I stopped actively saying, "No guns!"
"Isn't a 'pacifist boy' kind of an oxymoron?" a friend recently asked. According to one study, 60 to 80 percent of boys played with aggressive toys at home, including guns, while only 30 percent of girls do. Whether this is in how they're wired or how they're socialized is tough to tell, but the difference is real, and the impulse for some parents and teachers to squash it is strong.
That's not a great idea, says Michael Thompson, Ph.D. and author of It's a Boy! Your Son's Development from Birth to 18. "Boys think, 'If you don't like my play, you don't like me.'" Furthermore, studies have never shown any link between playing with toy weapons in childhood (including neutral playthings—sticks, blocks—that have been "weaponized") and violence in adulthood.
When they zap imaginary monsters—or each other—with "space guns" that they've crafted from Legos, they're not acting on hate, or mental disturbance, or a desire to harm. They're playing. It certainly does seem that what my children do in play is in an alternate reality altogether. "Who is the only One who can give life?" I'll catechize. "God," they'll reply. "So who is the only One who should take a life?" I press. "God!" they say, with a barely suppressed of course. I asked my precocious seven-year-old why, if that's true, he still likes to play with guns. "That's why we play with toy guns, Mom," he says, neatly summing up Stuart Brown's entire theory of play "so that no one will get hurt!"




How marriages can survive deployment—with some help from the church.
Shannon Polson sought healing from her father's death by retracing his fatal journey into the Alaskan wilderness.
Examining the lies that sex is worth nothing or sex is worth everything.
Cultivating ideas and thinking deeply can be spiritual acts of love.
Love compelled our church to get involved with the immigration issue.
Why this task can't continue to be an afterthought for leaders.
Is it legal to transfer the pastor's title to his home to our church?
How to succeed at a church renovation project, despite two painful realities of construction.
Why 20something Katie Davis traded her suburban Nashville life for the Savannah-and a great big family-in Uganda
Learning to accept the unthinkable
Q&A with Constance Rhodes
© 2013 Christianity Today
About Our Ministry | Blog | Partner With Us | Careers | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Ad Choices

Comments
ANDY ROWELL
I too am close to being a pacifist but our kids (boy 7.5, boy 5, and girl 2.5) love wrestling, and Nerf swords and blasters. I think it is an important skill to learn how to wrestle without hurting others--best probably learned wrestling with parents (e.g. no hitting in the face or throwing balls in the face, not hitting too hard or with hard objects). Yes, sometimes someone gets angry and there are tears but this happens as often with block and train track building and stuffed animal pretending at our house as with Nerf weapons. Pacifism is closer to a posture of war than many suppose. It involves determined, cagey, aggressive, gritty, persevering, courageous assault. But rather than killing other people, it involves changing minds--breaching hate with love. Think Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Gene Sharp. I hope that by also filling kids' minds with stories of what it means to be true, good, and beautiful from good books, they will apply their feistiness to that one day.
Marshall Shelley
Competition is a powerful and needed experience for most people as they grow up. Winning and losing is an important lesson (and not letting initial losses prevent you from achieving eventual victories). Any sport: wrestling, softball, soccer, gymnastics, or chess (!) is about overcoming a foe in a fair way. Whether it's play guns or play karate or strategy war games, they are all extensions of competition. At times in business, education, art, entertainment, science, or any professional field, elements of competition have to be applied. And it's better to do them well than to do them poorly. Some of our tools for honing the competitive instinct include archery ranges, video games with zombies coming at you, and paintball. It's better to learn the rules of engagement in safe simulations like these than to not learn those things at all.
Tim Fall
You brought back a lot of fun memories for me, Rachel. When my two cousins (twins) and I would get together, we'd play army with a lot of shooting and running and falling down. Those two guys have grown up to be extremely cerebral and mild mannered, and I think most people would say that I am fairly restrained in my manner as well (the jury's still out on that cerebral thing with me, though). Back in my junior high health class, our teacher talked about the fallacy of gateway drugs because he said if you wanted to you could show that all those drug users started with chewing gum, which meant that all of us gum chewers were in danger of addiction to heroin. Same goes with kids and toy guns. There's no way these are the gateway to deadly violent behavior, as the studies you cited apparently show. I think we all really knew that already too, including the school officials who sent that poor 6 year old home. Tim (timfall.wordpress.com)
Ken Smith
I'm quite willing to believe that boys are hard-wired for this sort of thing. My wife is very strongly anti-violence, and as a result, our two young boys had never seen even a toy gun. But when they were three and one, we visited a friend's house for a birthday party, and they spotted a little toy M16 on the floor. My three-year-old immediately picked it up and started shooting his little brother, as if it were the most obvious thing in the world. They're a little older now, and have named their favorite games "Rough Tough" and "Bull Fighting", both of which basically involve knocking each other down by running into each other at full speed. But as I watch them engage in this sort of "violent" play (and occasionally partake in it myself), I very much get the sense that it's a very complex and subtle negotiation. They're figuring out how to do it (mostly) without hurting each other or getting hurt themselves. It's a very important set of lessons they're learning.
Adam Shields
(We need more than 100 character) In limiting play fighting, we also limit the ability to be a hero. Being a hero was very important to me as a child. There is probably no other area that where play lead me into christian life. But being a hero means giving yourself up for others. So comic books like God's Smuggler showed ways I could be a hero as a Christian. I won't speak for all men, but I at least learned from play fighting that the role of hero is important.
Adam Shields
As a former boy, I support the idea that boys should be allowed to be boys (and girls should allowed to play fight if they want as well.) I was very violent as a pre-teen. I got into fights all the time. But I was moving, I was trying to find my place, I was trying to learn how to control myself and my emotions. I have to think that this is similar to other ways that we want to prevent children from learning how to grow up. When we make decisions for our children we take away their ability to make decisions for themselves. I learned how to make decisions for myself and I am an adult that is very much against violence. I am not quite pacifist, but I lean pretty close. There is a similar idea here with video games. It is not quite the same, but most of the studies I have seen seem to indicate that there is very little relationship between playing violent video games and actual violence. In some cases violence is reduced.
Hannah Anderson
I also wonder with Rachel Simko if the environment and context isn't a key factor in how children engage and understand violence and whether or not they grow up to be violent people. Because despite not having the same pacifist leanings as the author, I am highly aware when my children's play turns from good vs. evil to simply mimicking destruction. My husband and I try to help our children frame even their play in terms of good fighting against evil--which in our house, more often than not, means freeing princess leia from the Death Star with everybody fighting their way out with laser blasters and light sabers.
Rachel Stephan Simko
I appreciate all the studies you include in this post, because it's something that I've been curious about for a while. I don't have boys (we're a girl family over her), but my twin nephews are reaching that age where they are picking up sticks and pretending they're guns. There are no play guns allowed in the house, but it just seems to be some sort of innate play that comes out of young boys. So what do you do? My older brother always played with fake weapons -- from guns to swords to bows to whatever -- and he grew up to be one of the most sensitive, empathetic people. It seems that play fighting is not the issue, but probably the overall environment in which one is raised. My parents were very loving people who lived out their Christian faith, and play fighting was just that: PLAY. There was no blurry lines between reality and fantasy when it came to play fighting, you know? But I totally understand our culture's uber-sensitivity. rachel (evenonesparrow.blogspot.com)
*