Jump directly to the content
Jump directly to the content
'Guard Your Heart' Doesn't Mean Christians Can't Date
Kevin Simpson / Flickr

'Guard Your Heart' Doesn't Mean Christians Can't Date


Mar 4 2013
Finding wiser lessons in Proverbs 4:23.

When I was a single gal, I dated a number of men for a variety of reasons. For some, my reasons were well thought out and prayed over. For others, my reasons were foolish, and my motives were dubious.

In one instance, I hesitated when a young man began to pursue me. He was actively involved at church, but we were in very different stages of spiritual maturity and I lacked a peace about dating him. I dragged my feet in responding to his advances for quite awhile. Eventually a friend advised me to stop floundering and "just go for it." And so I did.

Less than a year later, our relationship went up in flames, leaving me broken and depressed. I wished I had listened to my instincts, and I wished I had followed the Spirit's leading, which had burdened me with a gnawing sense of caution both prior to and during the courtship. Although God used that relationship to grow me, the memory is marked by godly regret. God's redemption does not validate my foolishness.

Not all of my failed relationships were such a glaring mistake. Some were simply the result of mismatched souls. Those relationships were painful, but there was no one to blame, per se. Others were the clear result of foolishness, even sin. I deliberately ignored God's leading or rejected scriptural counsel, and as a result I suffered emotional fallout.

These latter bouts of personal folly came to mind after reading the popular post "I Stopped Guarding My Heart Ten Years Ago" in Prodigal Magazine. In it, Emily Maynard describes a childhood church culture that was nearly obsessed with counseling young women to "guard their hearts." She concludes that this teaching is a lie and produces only shame. Maynard writes:

At the root of any balanced, healthy, true relationship, at the heart of every heart, is vulnerability. And vulnerability can't exist when you are focused on living out a particular set of rules. The rules for "Guarding Your Heart" are both fear based and ambiguous and, as with most relationship rules, ultimately produce shame, not health. They breed shame because we can't live up to the ideal put for us: that we can be whole people while avoiding the potential for pain. Shame and vulnerability are antithetical concepts; they cannot coexist.

In contrast with this relational rigidity, Maynard chooses to be vulnerable in her relationships for the sake of authenticity. She vows never to withhold the word "love" whenever she feels it, and therefore embraces a fully alive existence in which her heart is completely "unguarded."

Comments

Displaying 1–10 of 27 comments

Esther Asher

March 28, 2013  6:26pm

@janet w. I totally agree. The article would have been better if it did not use the phrase from the biblical text in such a limited way. It's a bit of a concern that pastors/writers used the phrase as well in the way it's been described. As suggested, more proper use of hermeneutics is clearly needed. It's a great article though on opening one's heart to loves and hurts in a mature, Christian way.

Report Abuse

audrey ruth

March 09, 2013  9:17pm

I do think there is a Biblical balance here -- that of guarding one's heart as the Lord teaches us to do. Young women/girls are often very romantically-minded, have very romantic ideas about guys for a number of reasons (books, movies, etc), and sometimes don't view them as clearly as they should. I think the main problem young Christian women may have is that of ignoring the protections the Lord established in His Word, including that of "not being unequally yoked with unbelievers". I've known many girls/young women who have experienced shipwreck of their lives because they were ignorant of this, or lost sight of it in the excitement of romantic attraction. Another common downfall results from confusing lust as love.

Report Abuse

Jeremy Poe

March 09, 2013  3:48pm

“To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything and your heart will be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact you must give it to no one, not even an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements. Lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket, safe, dark, motionless, airless, it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. To love is to be vulnerable.”

Report Abuse

Jeremy Poe

March 09, 2013  3:48pm

I'm a dude. I've been single for all my life. I've only been on a few "dates." I never even kissed another girl. And its not because I didn't ask anyone out or "guard my heart." Its because I've been rejected 18 times in a period from my 9th grade year to now. As much I regret some of the pursuits, they are all humbling, teaching me to wait and keep my head up knowing that this could mean several things. -I am to be single because the Lord wants me to. (OR) -The lady the Lord has for me is a hundredfold better than the last. I will be a better husband, father, and companion because of the trials I've experienced through the rejections. And lastly, as I mentioned earlier, humility.

Report Abuse

audrey ruth

March 06, 2013  4:47pm

Great article! One thing that comes to mind is the Biblical injunction to "be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers". I wish I had understood the import of this when I was a young adult. I did not realize then how utterly I could trust God with my whole life, every detail of it. God was merciful to me in many ways, and I thank Him every day for that, but like so many others I've had to deal with consequences which were painful to the extreme. This is an article I'll pass on to young adults I know. IMHO, it's great not only for girls but also for guys.

Report Abuse

Aidan Herman

March 05, 2013  8:48pm

So much for the use of sound "hermeneutics" in this article - it is all absent.

Report Abuse

Tim Fall

March 05, 2013  5:23pm

Sharon, enough people have discussed the main point of your article, so I thought I'd touch on your opening about sometimes dating for dubious motives. My cousin once dated a guy in High School because he was the first guy in school to have an 8 track player in his car. As I said, she once dated him, as in only went out on one date with the guy. I doubt he ever really understood why she wouldn't say yes to a second date. But when I asked her about it she said, "Why should I go out with him again. I've already seen his 8 track player." One of my favorite cousins! Cheers, Tim

Report Abuse

Devon torchiana

March 05, 2013  4:53pm

I found this article to be incredibly wise. I think I often struggle with balancing guarding my heart and being vulnerable enough to move a relationship forward. It's easy to hold back out of fear and argue that I am only guarding my heart. In the past I have fallen into the trap of giving too much of myself to men who didn't deserve it, and now I find myself having to re-learn what healthy emotional intimacy looks like. Thanks for your insight - I appreciated your presentation of connecting with others and maintaining healthy boundaries. I blog about faith and life and love at http://hopefullydevon.blogspot.com/

Report Abuse

JANET W

March 04, 2013  6:48pm

In response, I would counsel them to heed 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres." I would also encourage a person in such a relationship to disengage physically. One would be surprised at how effective physical space is in allowing a person to better love a difficult person. However, I would caution against "guarding one's heart" as this is essentially an unloving act. Instead, I would suggest having a realistic view of the person and the relationship, without rancor. I have found that the only way for me to truly love is to have as clear a view as possible of the other person and of myself. Difficult people are sometimes gifts to us, and can teach us much on the nature of love.

Report Abuse

Sharon Miller

March 04, 2013  5:13pm

Janet W, to push a little further on this, how would you counsel people who have emotionally abusive or manipulative parents, or who find themselves in emotionally toxic relationships? When it comes to their hearts, how should they respond?

Report Abuse

 *

1000 character limit

* Comments may be edited for tone and clarity.

See All 27 Comments
To add a comment you need to be a registered user or Christianity Today subscriber.
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register
More from Her.menutics
Suburbia Needs Jesus, Too

Suburbia Needs Jesus, Too

A woman's take on the New Radicals.
Angelina Jolie's Breasts and the Bravery of Letting Go

Angelina Jolie's Breasts and the Bravery of Letting Go

Refusing to let beauty become a trap.
Auditing America's Political Integrity

Auditing America's Political Integrity

The IRS scandal, Benghazi incidents, and the disappointment of dishonorable leadership.
Stay Sexy or Else? Well, Please Forgive These Mommy Hips

Stay Sexy or Else? Well, Please Forgive These Mommy Hips

When the joy of sex gets replaced by the fear of not being sexy enough.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Include results from Christianity Today
Browse Archives:

So Hot Right Now

Are Women Really Saved through Childbearing?

Mother's Day, infertility, and redemption.

Follow Us

What We're Reading

CT eBooks and Bible Studies