Do You Desire to be Told of Your Faults?’

John Wesley and his friends were appalled at what the Church of England had become. In the words of Wesley historian Kenneth Collins, the church “had grown quite comfortable with and had been compromised by broader cultural trends.” In addition, Wesley was concerned that “the articulate and well-constructed theologies” of his day “left men and women in their sins under the most grievous bondages.”

In late 1738 and early 1739, under the influence of Moravian pietists, the Wesleys began forming small groups for mutual accountability. These groups, called “bands,” comprised about six people and made radical demands on the lives of believers—though no more radical than the gospel. Here are the 1744 Rules of Bands.

* * *

The design of our meeting is to obey that command of God, “Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed” (James 5:16).

To this end, we intend:

1. To meet once a week, at the least.
2. To come punctually at the hour appointed, without some extraordinary reason.
3. To begin (those of us who are present) exactly at the hour, with singing or prayer.
4. To speak each of us in order, freely and plainly, the true state of our souls, with the faults we have committed in thought, word, or deed, and the temptations we have felt since our last meeting.
5. To end every meeting with prayer suited to the state of each person present.
6. To desire some person among us to speak his own state first, and then to ask the rest, in order, as many and as searching questions as may be, concerning their state, sins, and temptations.

Some of the questions proposed to every one before he is admitted among us may be to this effect:

1. Have you the forgiveness of your sins?
2. Have you peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ?
3. Have you the witness of God’s Spirit with your spirit that you are a child of God?
4. Is the love of God shed abroad in your heart?
5. Has no sin, inward or outward, dominion over you?
6. Do you desire to be told of your faults?
7. Do you desire to be told of all your faults, and that plain and home?
8. Do you desire that every one of us should tell you, from time to time, whatsoever is in his heart concerning you?
9. Consider! Do you desire we should tell you whatsoever we think, whatsoever we fear, whatsoever we hear concerning you?
10. Do you desire that, in doing this, we should come as close as possible; that we should cut to the quick, and search your heart to the bottom?
11. Is it your desire and design to be, on this and all other occasions, entirely open, so as to speak everything that is in your heart without exception, without disguise and without reserve?

Any of the preceding questions may be asked as often as occasion offers; the five following at every meeting:

1. What known sins have you committed since our last meeting?
2. What temptations have you met with?
3. How were you delivered?
4. What have you thought, said, or done, of which you doubt whether it be sin or not?
5. Have you nothing you desire to keep secret?

Copyright © 2005 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere:

See also today’s related article, “Our Uniquely Undisciplined Moment” | Formal accountability has been a core part of church life from its earliest days.

Previous articles in this series include:

How Discipline Died | The church should stop taking its cues from the state. (July 22, 2005)

Shaping Holy Disciples | Mark Dever says church discipline is not about punishment or self-help. (July 25, 2005)

Spheres of Accountability | The dynamics of discipline in the megachurch. (July 26, 2005)

Keeping the Lawyers at Bay | How to correct members while staying out of court. (July 27, 2005)

Healing the Body of Christ | Church discipline is as much about God as it is about erring believers. (July 28, 2005)

More articles on church discipline from CT include:

To Judge, or Not to Judge | Christ commanded us not to judge others, but aren’t there times when common sense or prudence requires it? (June 29, 2005)

The Evangelical Scandal | Ron Sider says the movement is riddled with hypocrisy, and that it’s time for serious change. (April 13, 2005)

Canterbury Crackup | Eschewing church discipline has come back to haunt Anglicans. A Christianity Today editorial (Dec. 03, 2004)

Weblog: Debates on Debates on Church Discipline | Catholic bishops will issue statement on Communion as a Matthew 18 lawsuit is reinstated against a Texas Bible church. (June 18, 2004)

Articles from our sister publication, Leadership Journal, include:

Taking Church Membership Seriously | Why it’s time to raise the bar. (April 18, 2005)

Church Discipline Really Works (pt. 1) | When you make it loving and redemptive. (Jan. 24, 2005)

Church Discipline Really Works (pt. 2) | How to find courage (and avoid lawsuits) when confronting sinning believers. (Jan. 31, 2005)

Mark Dever’s Nine Marks site has a section on church discipline.

Albert Mohler, president of Southern Theological Seminary, wrote a series on church disciple. It is available on his website:

Should a Church Discipline Members Over Politics? | None of us wants to see churches identified as “Republican Baptists” and “Democratic Baptists.” Such partisan identifications violate the autonomy of the church as the Body of Christ.
Mohler also covered this topic on his radio show.

The Disappearance of Church Discipline–How Can We Recover? Part One | The decline of church discipline is perhaps the most visible failure of the contemporary church.

The Disappearance of Church Discipline–How Can We Recover? Part Two | The disappearance of church discipline has weakened the church and compromised Christian witness.

The Disappearance of Church Discipline–How Can We Recover? Part Three | Spiritual leaders of the church are to confront a sinning member with a spirit of humility and gentleness, and with the goal of restoration.

The Disappearance of Church Discipline–How Can We Recover? Part Four | When should the church exercise church discipline?