The first time I heard someone use the word “missional” I was confused. I knew about missions and missionaries, but missional? That was a new one for me. Even as I type this post, “missional” is underlined by a jagged red line. Apparently my spellchecker is confused too.
Missional was a term coined by a group of missiologists (another strange word) who were heavily influenced by the missionary and theologian Lesslie Newbigin. Upon retiring as a missionary in South India, Newbigin returned to his native England where he came to a rather depressing conclusion about western culture–it was post-Christian. As a result, he believed that Christians in the West had to start thinking like missionaries, looking for creative and authentic ways to incarnate the gospel in a culture estranged from the principles of God’s kingdom.
In many contexts the usage of the term has strayed far from its original meaning. As the term gained popularity, it has been used by just about everybody to mean just about anything. Author and missional leader Alan Hirsch offers a definition that clears some of the fog. He describes a missional church as “a community of God’s people that defines itself and organizes its life around the purpose of being an agent of God’s mission to the world. In other words, the Church’s true and authentic organizing principle is mission.” Anyone can call themselves or their church missional, but if mission (outward directedness) is not a core-deep value of their life or community, the term missional is being misappropriated.
Missional has become a buzzword in evangelical circles. Buzzwords can be annoying, but I believe missional captures a valuable insight. We can no longer put our heads in the sand and carry on with yesteryear’s methods. Like good missionaries, we must study our culture and live out the gospel in ways that are intelligible and compelling to our unbelieving neighbors.