Philip Yancey’s “Sin” [Mar. 6] did it again. With remarkable freshness he plows through theological conventionalities regarding the purpose of divine law, finds the coherent thread of both OT and NT, and shares his own self-authenticating experience that affirms his biblical conclusion: God’s laws are primarily descriptive, not prescriptive.
HERBERT E. DOUGLASS
May I respectfully correct a misconception of a Hebrew verbal construction in Yancy’s otherwise fine treatment? The Hebrew in the Ten Commandments is doing far more than merely “giving a description of what a holy people will look like.” A more accurate statement would have been: “The Hebrew in the Ten Commandments is giving strong divine commands as to what a holy people must and must not do.”
DR. KENNETH L. BAKER
Capital Bible Seminary
Yancey has egregiously offended all George MacDonald lovers by prematurely dating his death! Had he died in 1858, many great works would never have been written. MacDonald died at Ashtead, Surrey, in 1905.
Medical ethics: A complex issue
I was delighted with the two articles on medical ethics in your March 6 issue [“Life-defying Acts,” by Ed Larson and Beth Spring, and “The Inevitability of Death,” by Rob Roy MacGregor]. I share the concern expressed by the authors that the evangelical voice has been notably absent from discussions about decisions to limit treatment. The two articles presented a reasoned and balanced view of a complex issue.
ROBERT D. ORR, M.D.
I was surprised that the eventual determining factor in the sustain-life controversy was ...1
Already a CT subscriber? Log in for full digital access.
Have something to add about this? See something we missed? Share your feedback here.
Subscribe to Christianity Today and get access to this article plus 65+ years of archives.
- Home delivery of CT magazine
- Complete access to articles on ChristianityToday.com
- Over 120 years of magazine archives plus full access to all of CT’s online archives
- Learn more