Going Back to Your Home Church: To Go or Not to Go?

Returning to one's home church as pastor can be tricky.
Going Back to Your Home Church: To Go or Not to Go?

Those who would argue against going back to one’s home church may quote Matthew 13:57–58, “And they took offense at him [Jesus]. But Jesus said to them, ‘A prophet is not without honor except in his hometown and in his household.’ And he did not do many mighty works there, because of their unbelief.”

Others, like my friend Elmer Towns, encourage pastors to go back to their hometown. (His ideas inspired this article.)

Some may point to the fact that Jesus commissioned the disciples to begin witnessing in Jerusalem, in their home region, and move outward toward the nations.

There are certainly reasons to consider on both sides.

Four reasons to return

There can be a hometown advantage.

By going to one’s home church, a church that knows and loves the pastor-to-be, one can potentially lead the church to embrace ideas they normally might not embrace. Don’t miss the importance of the words “loves you.”

If you are hated, there will not be much hometown advantage! But if they do love you, then there will be a lot of relational capital that can be spent on leadership decisions.

Relational capital is important in any leadership position, but it is especially important in revitalization. The more people know you, the more people trust you. Relational capital gives the pastor home-field advantage. And if you are a sports fan you know teams love playing at their home stadium.

Contextual (or cultural) knowledge of the area and people.

Those who go back to their hometown—unless they have been gone for a very long time—already have a contextual, or cultural, knowledge of the area. That knowledge can be very helpful for a church in need of revitalization. So, what kind of contextual, or cultural, knowledge does one have of their home church and town?

They know the types of people the church is trying to reach. By coming back, they will have fresh eyes in looking at the same people.

Relational capital is important in any leadership position.

One returning to a home church may have many contacts and relationships in the community that have long existed. An outsider may not cultivate these relationships until years down the road.

They know the rhythms of the community. While some things may have changed since they last lived in the community, many things probably haven’t. Is high school football still the hottest ticket in town? Is the community party of “high society”? What is the center of business? Do most of the women work outside the home, and if so are they in profession or service industries? Are the schools good or struggling? Thus, they know where the hot spots are, the most attended community festivals, the big events, and some of the greatest needs in the community.

Institutional memory is an advantage to the returning pastor.

Possessing an institutional memory can also be a strong benefit for someone who plans to go back to the home church. An institutional memory is similar to insider trading, except being legal!

An institutional memory provides the hometown pastor with some insider knowledge that serves as advantages a pastor coming in from the outside may otherwise not have. Such advantage can lead to a more successful revitalization.

Someone coming back to a home church has a personal knowledge (and experience) of the church’s history. Knowing that pastor Jess was a jerk, or that pastor Pat was pushed out, or pastor Matt made these mistakes, is very helpful.

Institutional memory also provides insight as to how a church is structured.

Someone returning to a home church has a working knowledge of who the power brokers are. Understanding that Take-it-Easy Tom isn’t much for risk taking, or that Negative Nancy says no to everything, or Know-it-All Kris knows what’s always best for the church, or that Bell-Cow Bob thinks he speaks for the church can be vital information for the pastor who strategically plans out the revitalization process.

Institutional memory also provides insight as to how a church is structured. Again, barring no major changes since the perspective pastor was last in the church, chances are it remains a very similar place. Knowing the inner workings and processes of the church can prove to be invaluable as the pastor navigates much needed changes.

Returning home can be a catalyst for growth.

God could potentially use going back to one’s home church and hometown as a catalyst for growth. It would be certainly dependent on one’s past circle of influence, depth of relationships, and reputation, but going back could create a buzz among the members as well as others. The created buzz could lead people to invite their friends and family to come back and see and hear so and so who has come back to pastor. Going back home could be just the thing to create some much-needed momentum in the church as it seeks to be revitalized.

Yet, it is not always a great idea.

Drawbacks to returning

The pastor’s past can be an issue.

A pastor’s past could hinder a homecoming.

If the pastor has a tainted past, one full of mistakes and scars, it may not be the most prudent decision to go back and pastor the home church. Obviously this doesn’t mean that God doesn’t forgive one’s past, He certainly does, but some people may have a hard time seeing the pastor with a tainted past leading and preaching to others. Sometimes when people know the height of our stupidity and our mistakes, it makes it harder for us to lead.

The perception others have of the pastor

The perception others have of the pastor could be an obstacle to leadership. If people remember him as “little Joey” his leadership will be in trouble. If this is the case, there will be a perception problem.

The perception problem is that people would still see Joey as a kid, someone who is young and immature, which will hinder his ability to effectively lead the church. If people have a difficult time seeing one in a position of authority overseeing them and the direction of the church, it may be best for Joe(y) to not making a homecoming.

A current staff member who wants the position

A returning pastor will be wise to wait until the church makes a clear decision.

If a current staff member expresses interest in the pastoral opening, or if a group in the church is lobbying for one of the current staff members to be the next pastor, it may be an indicator that a homecoming will be a bad move. Not only does the possibility exist for the returning pastor's ministry to be stymied, but it can create a rift between the pastor and the staff member who wanted the position.

A returning pastor will be wise to wait until the church makes a clear decision on that staff member, or decline to pursue the opening.

My Thoughts

“To go or not to go,” that is the question! I’ve been asked it more than once.

First, let me say that you should do that the Lord calls. I’m simply trying to provide some thoughts to the process.

My view is that, as a whole, there is greater potential for one going back and revitalizing their home church, and it is a net positive.

Support our work. Subscribe to CT and get one year free.

More from The Exchange

Christianity Today
Going Back to Your Home Church: To Go or Not to Go?