This ad will not display on your printed page.

News & Reporting

  • Send to printerSend to printer
  • |
  • Close this pageClose window
October 28, 2020
The following article is located at: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2011/january/obama-admin-reverses-course-on-end-of-life-provision.html
News & Reporting, January 2011
Gleanings
Obama Admin. Reverses Course on End-of-Life Provision
Alicia Cohn | posted January 6, 2011

On New Year's Day, the government implemented new Medicare fee policies for physicians including a "voluntary end-of-life care" provision that would reimburse doctors for advising patients on end-of-life care. The following Tuesday, the Obama administration announced the revised regulations would remove the provision, effectively halting renewed controversy almost before it began.

The controversy threatened to re-ignite shortly after a memo from the office of Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon) became public. (Blumenauer wrote the original end-of-life provision.) The memo celebrated the inclusion of the end-of-life provision in the Medicare regulations, which were released November 29 with little scrutiny. "The longer this goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it," according to the memo. The memo advised proponents to keep the inclusion "quiet" in order to avoid "the ‘death panel' myth."

A similar provision was dropped from the health care reform bill before it passed in 2009. At the time, detractors such as Republican congressmen John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) protested funding end-of-life discussions between doctors and patients as the first step on a slippery slope toward "government-encouraged euthanasia." Sarah Palin also stirred controversy over the end-of-life provision in the health care reform bill calling it a "death panel" mandate.

The National Right to Life Center indicated similar concerns with both versions of the provision. "The danger is that subsidized advance care planning will not just discover and implement patient treatment preferences but rather be used to nudge or pressure older people to agree to less treatment because that is less expensive," Burke Balch, director of NRLC's Robert Powell Center for Medical Ethics, said in a recent statement.

Opponents accused the Obama administration of achieving their goal to implement Medicare funding of end-of-life care through regulation rather than legislation. However, former ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview
To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.
Log InSubscribe
Already a CT subscriber? Log in for full digital access.
Christianity Today

© 2020 Christianity Today