Jump directly to the Content

Women

Opinion | Sexuality

Why 'Slut' Cuts to the Core—of All of Us

The furor over Rush Limbaugh's comments illustrates the power of a single word.

Are you a slut?

Have you ever been one?

Have you ever been made to feel like one?

Have you ever made someone else feel like one?

Have you ever called someone a slut, even if only in your mind?

Chances are that most of us fall into one or more of these categories.

It's funny how some words in our language are considered "swear" words and are regulated by the FCC, and other words aren't technically in this category, yet are viler than some of the banned words. Slut is one of those words. It even sounds ugly: a hiss that slides into a grunt and slams shut, case closed. It cuts deep in both sound and sense.

The word's long history in the English language has so many uses that it's nearly meaningless. Originally the term slut referred to a slovenly person (not necessarily female) and later came to be an acceptable name for a kitchen maid. But it's been used as an insult for a promiscuous woman for centuries. That still doesn't clear things up, however. In Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary, promiscuous meant "not restricted to an individual," making sex with more than one person, even, "promiscuous." Few today would adopt so strict a definition.

Now, over the past week, the word slut has made headlines, thanks to Rush Limbaugh's use of it (and then some) to disparage Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student appealing for government-mandated coverage of birth control. Don't get me wrong: The topic of what the government mandates and what our tax dollars pay for is more than fair game for public ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview
To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.
Already a CT subscriber? for full digital access.

Read These Next

close
hide this
Access The Archives

Member-Only Access

Subscribe to Christianity Today to continue reading this article from CT's digital archives.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? to continue reading.