A Collaborative
Partnership of:
The Lausanne Movement
and
Christianity Today

The Global Conversation

The Conversation Begins

A Warm Invitation

A response to Mark Chan's 'Sowing Subversion in the Field of Relativism'

To facilitate a truly global conversation, we ask Christian leaders from around the world to respond to the Global Conversation's lead articles. These points of view do not necessarily represent Christianity Today magazine or the Lausanne Movement. They are designed to stimulate discussion from all points of the compass and from different segments of the Christian community. Please add your perspective by posting a comment so that we can learn and grow together in the unity of the Spirit.

As I ventured out on my prayer walk early one morning, I became aware of the earliest sounds of a waking world. In the midst of a cacophony of noises—birds, chickens, cows, and the occasional automobile in the distance—my ears also tuned in to the sounds of religious devotion. First the drums, cymbals, and chants from a nearby temple; then the distant strains of the Muslim maulvi's rising call to prayer from the mosque; and finally the sounds of worship from our own Bible College chapel as early risers gathered for morning devotions. Several burning questions that had haunted me for much of my life returned to me again.

Does God only hear the sounds of prayers from our chapel, and close his ears to the cries of the faithful Muslim worshipers and Hindu devotees? My closest neighbors and friends throughout my childhood were not Christians. Two of my close family members through marriage came to our family from other faiths: one, as a devout Muslim and the other, Zoroastrian. (One is today a radiant believer, the other has still not made a public profession of faith.) Much of my time in the early years of my ministry was spent on the streets and slums of one of the most densely populated cities in the world, Mumbai, and for the last four years I have lived in another of the world's most populated cities, Kolkata. As I walked and prayed, I reflected on how I struggle to respond to sincere seekers who ask questions like: If Jesus is the only way to God, what about my Hindu parents and grandparents who never had a chance to hear about him, and my ancestors who lived and died before Jesus was born?

My entire life's work has been devoted to communicating the gospel of Christ effectively to those who have never heard. Yet as I watch tens of thousands streaming in and out of a crowded train station or milling through the streets during festival seasons, it troubles me deeply as I realize the vast majority of them have never heard and may never hear the gospel. Will God send all of these millions to hell automatically just because I or others like me fail to tell them about Christ?

This response is meant to complement rather than critique Mark Chan's competent treatment of the contemporary assault of relativism on the notion of absolute truth, a foundational assumption of evangelical faith. As Chan's sound summary illustrates, relativistic pluralism is logically a house of straw built on epistemological sinking sand.

The average person, however, is attracted to the pluralistic response for socially pragmatic reasons rather than its logical appeal. Claims of superiority or finality in any religion seem to threaten peace and the delicate balance of social harmony in multicultural contexts. Religions which make absolute claims are seen as seeking to eventually eradicate every other religion from the face of the earth. If other religions take action to defend their survival, communal strife and social discord seem inevitable.

1 | 2 | next page
The Conversation Continues: Readers' Comments
Displaying 1 - 5 of 42 comments | See all comments
a very helpful description of the challenges and realities of living in a pluralist world. I would have loved a bit more reflection on the specific Asian context and lessons learnt over generations living with pluralism. The 'shock' of post-Christendom in the West is still being processed by churches here as they begin to get used to being on the margins. I suspect many are longing to 'go back' to 'simpler' times when Christianity was as the centre. Others fear the future. It would have been great to hear more on what they can learn from the long experiences of Asian brothers and sisters.
Patrick Mitchel, Ireland
March 17, 2010
6:12a
I agree with CD from USA, the same challenge has been throughout Christian history. The difference is in the resources used now a days to face it. In the Old Testament we see Moyses learning from God how he should convince the hebrews who were living amongst people who worshiped so many different gods and also Pharaoh about this Only God who was all powerfull and wanted His people out of Egypt. He didn't teach Moyses about intelectual arguments nor Paul used other then the Power of God (the Gospel) to convince his audiences. The Holy Spirit is the One to convince the pluralist and any other sinner about the Truth. God only needs men and women commited to Him and to His Kingdom who are ready to lose (when necessary) and take risks for Him, the rest of it is all with Him, as it has been throughout History.
Carminha Speirs, Brazil
March 15, 2010
3:29p
Challenges to the claims, "Jesus is the truth", "no other name" is not something new. Throughout history of Christian movement/mission, these challenges were there. The issue is that Christians like to be respectable and accepted in the pluralistic society/world. We want to tone down a bit about these claims concerning Jesus Christ and Gospel/Evangel.
CD, USA
March 07, 2010
9:32p
Excellent help from Chan And McAllister (I have not yet read the others). McAllister in particular addresses Western trends, and I think we need to look at this a little more deeply. How much of the current reality is Western-initiated and superimposed on the rest of the world? Is it possible that we are projecting on non-Western Christians our own struggles over this issue? If they had initiated the dialogue, would they address it the same way? I understand Chan is Asian, but as an evangelical theologian, he seems to be part of that noble circle of internationals who grapple with issues considered priority to that group of people. Nothing wrong with that, but it may miss some realities that are outside that rather small and specialized circle. I am not saying that pluralism and relativism is only a Western concern. I am asking whether the degree of concern and the approach to the issue are not overly Western, responding to a Western awakening to the issue?
Alex Araujo, USA
March 05, 2010
12:44p
Thank you for sharing these thoughts. We are at a key turning point in how we view truth - our truth lens. We have spent much of the last century in a time of great progress but also significant arrogance about truth. In the later part of this century we have seen the move that the author is talking about to world without absolute truth. The key as the author described is a third way - a human context to truth. I call it "the truth we know and the truth we are learning." My wife and I have written a book about this and it has been an amazing journey to see how God is building off a foundation of absolute truth within a community of humble learners. Thanks for bringing this topic front and center!
Jon and Mindy Hirst, USA
March 03, 2010
9:21p

Submit Your Comment

Your Name
Your Country
Your E-mail
Your Comment

The Conversation Video
The Conversation Begins
Selected writers respond to Mark L. Y. Chan from around the globe.

As I ventured out on my prayer walk early one morning, I became aware of the earliest sounds of a waking world. In the midst of a cacophony of noises—birds, chickens, cows, and the occasional automobile ...

Read MoreRead More

I am grateful for Mark Chan's article, which aptly describes our global realities. Working with an apologetics ministry both internationally and in the U.S., I resonate with much that Chan writes. In ...

Read MoreRead More

My lips were watering as I read Mark Chan's erudite article. For me, Singapore conjures up memories of outdoor banquets by sunset, with my table laden with the best the hawker stands have to offer: Thai ...

Read MoreRead More
The Lausanne Movement

For More Conversation

Religious and Non-Religious Spirituality in the Western World

A call to move from confrontational styles to a relational form of outreach that missiologists call a critical incarnational approach.

Christian Witness to New Religious Movements

Lausanne Paper from a 1980 Consultation.

Mission Among Young People in "Secular" Europe

By Jonny Baker

New Religions, Subjective Life Spiritualities, and the Challenge to Missions in the Post-Christian West

By John Morehead