Public Pressure Forces a Tennessee Cable TV Outlet to Drop the Playboy Channel

If material is proven to be obscene, it no longer falls under the protection of the First Amendment. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of citizens to decide what is obscene according to community standards.

Capitalizing on that right requires community-wide effort, but it can work. Just ask the citizens of Washington County, Tennessee, where public pressure brought about the demise of a Playboy cable television channel.

American Cablesystems, of Johnson City, Tennessee, began broadcasting the channel August 1 and voluntarily cancelled it December 1. General manager Robert Crowley said his company dropped the channel under pressure from local groups, primarily Tennessee Roundtable, a state affiliate of a national organization of conservative activists.

“I’ve never seen such a media focus across the country,” he said. “The religious group [Tennessee Roundtable] went at this like a politician would.”

After American Cablesystems began offering the Playboy channel, Tennessee Roundtable surveyed more than 3,000 citizens and found that 85 percent were opposed to the programming. The survey—shown to Washington County commissioners—was substantiated when a crowd of 800 attended a commissioners’ meeting to protest the channel. The county commissioners passed a resolution that said the programming was detrimental to the community and asked American Cablesystems to withdraw it. The company refused.

Next, Tennessee Roundtable videotaped Playboy programs and showed them to key businessmen, pastors, and citizens throughout the county. The viewers didn’t like what they saw. Richard Taylor, Tennessee Roundtable state director, said community response was remarkable. By November the company had lost almost half of its 800 Playboy subscribers. In addition, cable subscribers who weren’t receiving the Playboy channel threatened to cancel as well, although Crowley said few of them did.

Tennessee Roundtable publicly accused American Cablesystems of selling obscenity and said the company should be prosecuted. Because cable television does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, its content is practically unregulated. However, if a court rules that program content is obscene, the material cannot be broadcast. But without going to court, American Cablesystems voluntarily dropped the Playboy channel—an unprecedented and surprising move.

“The market would not bear that kind of product here,” Crowley said. “That’s free enterprise. We were becoming known as the company with the Playboy channel, and not as the company that offers 27 products. We have to listen to the community. If people don’t want a product, it comes off the shelf.”

Citizens have successfully challenged the Playboy channel elsewhere. Last spring a grand jury in Hamilton County, Ohio, charged a Cincinnati cable television company with possessing and pandering obscenity after it began broadcasting the Playboy channel. In an out-of-court settlement, the cable company agreed to stop broadcasting X-rated films on the channel.

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Our Latest

Being Human

Andrew Arndt: The Hidden Struggles of Public Figures and Why Real Community Matters

How do we identify coping mechanisms and begin a journey to wholeness?

The Russell Moore Show

Should I Leave My Church Over Calvinism and Arminianism?

Russell answers a listener question about whether a church’s differences over Calvinism and Arminianism mean it’s time to leave his church.

Was Abraham Lincoln a Christian?

In his younger years, Lincoln was a skeptic. But as he aged, he turned toward biblical wisdom—and not only when in the public eye.

Killing People Is Not the Same as Allowing Them to Die

And the church of Jesus Christ has to offer people a better way of thinking about life and dependence if we want to push against the horrors of euthanasia.

News

How CT Editors Carl Henry and Nelson Bell Covered Civil Rights

Michael D. Hammond

Trying to stake out a sliver of space for the “moderate evangelical,” the magazine sometimes left readers confused and justice ignored.

Review

This ‘Screwtape for Our Times’ Will Challenge and Confound You

The Body of This Death is difficult to classify, difficult to read, and absolutely worth your time.

Christian Athletes to Cheer on at the 2026 Milan Cortina Winter Olympics

Annie Meldrum

Competitors in speedskating, bobsledding, the biathlon, and hockey speak about their faith.

CT Reports from Nixon’s Trip to Communist China

In 1972, American evangelicals were concerned about religious liberty around the world and moral decline at home.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube