History

Upon Further Review…

Pope John Paul II reopened “the Galileo Affair” at a plenary session of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in 1979. He urged theologians, scholars, and historians to study the Galileo case more deeply and to recognize “wrongs from whatever side they come,” so as to “dispel the mistrust that still opposes a fruitful concord between science and faith.”

He appointed several scholars to study the case, including then-bishop Paul Poupard. After more than a decade of meetings, Poupard presented the group’s findings. He first defended the church’s actions. As Galileo had not yet “proved” the heliocentric system, he wrote in the October 1992 issue of the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano, the church was right to give biblical passages describing the earth as immobile more weight than Galileo’s theories. But Poupard also admitted that Galileo’s judges made an “error of judgment” by failing to distinguish Christian faith from “age-old cosmology,” and that they quite wrongly assumed Copernicus’s revolution would undermine the church.

On October 31, 1992, Pope John Paul II pronounced the church’s position in a speech to the Pontifical Academy. He admitted, albeit indirectly, that the church had erred on that day, 360 years ago, when it condemned the great Italian astronomer: “The majority of theologians did not recognize the formal distinction between Sacred Scripture and its interpretation, and this led them unduly to transpose into the realm of the doctrine of the faith a question which in fact pertained to scientific investigation.”

John Paul’s apology did not satisfy everyone. But major newspapers interpreted the pope’s speech as an exoneration of Galileo. Time will tell how well the speech will serve John Paul’s stated aim—dispelling the fog of mistrust that still obscures relations between scientists and the church.

—Steven Gertz

Copyright © 2002 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

Our Latest

Excerpt

From Dialogue to Devastating Murder

Russell Moore and Mike Cosper discuss Charlie Kirk’s alternative to civil war.

Come to Office Hours, Be Humble, and Go to Church

As a professor, I know you’re under pressure. Let me share what I’ve learned in 20 years in the classroom.

Being Human

Beyond Self-Help: Real Spiritual Formation with Dr. Kyle Strobel

Watchfulness, prayer, and the hidden saboteurs of your faith

The Russell Moore Show

Listener Question: Is Screentime with Grandparents Dangerous for My Children? With Jon Haidt

Russell and Jon Haidt tackle a listener question about allowing children to have screentime while visiting grandparents.

News

Brazilian Evangelicals Call for Reconciliation After Bolsonaro Convicted of Coup Plot

The former president received a 27-year prison sentence for orchestrating an uprising to take over the government after his defeat.

How Should Pastors Respond to Charlie Kirk’s Assassination?

After the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, how do pastors lead well in a fractured, reactive age? Here are five pastoral questions for this moment.

Charlie Kirk Is Not a Scapegoat

When we instrumentalize violence, we side with the accuser rather than with Christ.

Kingdom Friendship in a Divided World

What if the relationships that sustain pastors also showed the world a better way? This article launches a new series on the friendships that make ministry flourish.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube