FCC Sets 24-Hour Indecency Ban

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established rules for a 24-hour ban on “indecent broadcasting” by the nation’s radio and television stations, unless the broadcasters can prove an absence of children in the audience. The rules, released last month, forbid material that describes sexual or excretory activities or organs “in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards.” The ban would affect all local radio and television stations and the national networks, but not cable television. Violators would be subject to fines and a possible loss of license.

“The FCC is acting to protect children, plain and simple,” FCC chairman Alfred Sikes said in a press conference.

Prior to the new rules, indecent material was allowed between 8 P.M. and 6 A.M., hours believed to have fewer young listeners. However, according to Robert Showers, a partner in the Washington law firm Gammon and Grange, which submitted a legal brief to the FCC, a significant number of children are in the audience during that time. The brief cited Arbitron and Nielsen figures that show more than three million children watch television between 11:30 P.M. and 1 A.M.—more than the number of adults—and 5.4 million children listen to the radio sometime between midnight and 1 A.M.

Most broadcasting groups strongly oppose the ban, calling it censorship. They also charge that the FCC’s definition of indecency is impractically vague. FCC general counsel Robert Pettit refused to cite examples of indecency, saying rather that the commission will “have to see it first and judge it on a case-by-case basis.” How the FCC will enforce such a ban is also an unanswered question. In the past, the agency has come under fire from conservatives for failing to put teeth in its rules.

Congress called for the 24-hour ban in 1988, but a federal court barred enforcement while the FCC collected comments. The congressional measure will now be evaluated in light of the FCC rules. A judicial battle reaching up to the Supreme Court is expected.

Our Latest

The Bulletin

Venezuelan Oil, LA Fires Aftermath, and Revival In America

Mike Cosper, Clarissa Moll, Russell Moore

The global aftershock of military action in Venezuela, California churches rebuild one year after LA fires, and the possibility of revival in America.

What Christian Parents Should Know About Roblox

Isaac Wood

The gaming platform poses both content concerns and safety risks that put minors in “the Devil’s crosshairs.” The company says tighter restrictions are coming.

How Artificial Intelligence Is Rewiring Democracy

Three books on politics and public life to read this month.

Analysis

The Dangerous Ambition of Regime Change

The Bulletin

Is America’s appetite for power in Venezuela bigger than its ability to handle it?

News

Kenyan Christians Wrestle with the Costs of Working Abroad

Pius Sawa

Working in the Gulf States promises better pay, but pastors say the distance harm marriages and children.

Happy 80th Birthday, John Piper

Justin Taylor

Fame didn’t change how the Reformed theologian lives.

So What If the Bible Doesn’t Mention Embryo Screening?

Silence from Scripture on new technologies and the ethical questions they raise is no excuse for silence from the church.

The Chinese Evangelicals Turning to Orthodoxy

Yinxuan Huang

More believers from China and Taiwan are finding Eastern Christianity appealing. I sought to uncover why.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube