Pastors

New Business Meetings Format

An alternative format may restore the effectiveness of your congregational meetings.

Do you struggle to get members to church business meetings, either because of hectic schedules, a growing but less interested membership base, or both? Several solutions exist, ranging from an open-meeting format conducted over several days, to forming a select voting class of members, to hosting an electronic meeting.

None of these options is cut-and-dried. Without careful planning, one misstep can tarnish the results of any vote.

“Most churches aren’t thinking about it until after a problem develops,” says Frank Sommerville, a Texas-based attorney who works with churches and nonprofits. “That’s the sad part—you then have to go back and redo everything.”

Sommerville, a contributing editor of Your Church magazine and Church Law & Tax Report, recommends three steps before planning any type of business meeting:

  1. Review the state’s nonprofit corporation statute;
  2. Review the church’s articles of incorporation;
  3. Review the church’s bylaws.

This will let you know what types of meetings are allowed, and what steps must be followed in order to conduct them. They also will refresh collective memories on a variety of other key items, including the notice required for meetings, a member’s minimum age to vote (some churches allow 16-year-olds to become members, but in most states, non-profit corporation statutes don’t allow them to vote until they’re 18), and what constitutes a quorum.

In instances where the church’s articles or bylaws conflict with the state nonprofit corporation statutes, Sommerville says, the church is required to follow the state nonprofit corporation statute unless the articles or bylaws set a higher standard.

Looking for an alternative to the traditional business meeting format?

Sommerville says the most straightforward approach is the open-meeting format hosted during a period of days. Electronic meetings typically require too much (for instance, some states require 100 percent of members to agree to an electronic meeting); a voting class of members is less difficult, but typically requires amending church bylaws first.

Presuming the church’s articles and bylaws don’t prohibit them, open meetings offer the opportunity for more members to participate because polls are held open longer, Sommerville says.

“Most states allow you to have a meeting over an extended period of time,” he says. “There’s just a right way and a wrong way to do it.”

But there are two notable drawbacks to this approach: floor amendments and additional nominees can’t be added during the meeting. “All you can do is just go in and cast your ballot,” Sommerville says.

Copyright © 2009 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Also in this issue

The Leadership Journal archives contain over 35 years of issues. These archives contain a trove of pastoral wisdom, leadership skills, and encouragement for your calling.

Our Latest

From Our Community

For John Jenkins, CT “Has Been Courageous”

Pastor John Jenkins shares how CT has made an impact on his life.

Public Theology Project

Chatbot Companionship Will Make Our Loneliness Crisis Worse

People want relationship without tension. Genuine intimacy requires more.

I Have a Social Disability. I’m Also a Leader.

David Giordano

God calls ministers who are afraid to make eye contact—not just ones who sparkle with personality.

What Broke the Evangelical Women’s Blogosphere

Jen Hatmaker’s trajectory illustrates the fraught world of spiritual influencerhood and the disappearance of the messy middle.

The Russell Moore Show

Ken Burns on the American Revolution

A legendary filmmaker invites us to consider how the American Revolution can teach us how to get along with each other.

News

Kenyan Churches Fight Extremism with Dancing

Pius Sawa

A youth pastor struggles to prevent young people from joining terrorist cells.

Review

The ‘Never Again’ of ‘Nuremberg’ Comes with a Warning

Myles Werntz

The new film asks how the Holocaust happened: and whether it could happen again.

Review

In Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein,’ Monster Is More Compelling Than Maker

The Guillermo del Toro adaptation brings unique perspective—but fails to match the depth of its source material.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube