Eutychus and His Kin: March 1, 1974

It’Sa Too Bada, Guru

Among the numerous gurim (gurus?) who have left the Indian subcontinent to find fame and fortune in North America, the best known is Maharaj Ji (Hon. Great Dominion). A close reading of his official biography, Who Is Guru Majaraj Ji? (Bantam, 1973), could make one think that the guru, born in 1957, has managed to prolong the sixteenth year of his life beyond the usual 365 days (he is constantly cited as a [the?] fifteen-year-old perfect spiritual master).

Lest the reader think it a bit ostentatious of a fifteen-year-old to call himself Hon. Great Dominion, his mother, who presumably had a say in the matter, is known to his followers simply as Mata Ji (Hon. Mother). And the guru is hardly stingy with titles. When under the British Raj (Dominion), India reserved the title Mahatma (Great Soul) for the preeminent Indian leader of our century, Gandhi. But among the adherents of Maharaj, the title of Mahatma has been so widely awarded that it now appears to represent a kind of rank, such as cardinal or canon.

Maharaj Ji promises his followers quite a few desirable things, including Knowledge and Peace (slogan: A Millennium of Peace for People Who Want Peace). Not all gurim, however, are so mild. One who apparently won’t make it to the West is Punjabi Baba Baghel Singh, called by his followers “Mastnaian da sab too bada guru” (the greatest guru of the happy-go-lucky). According to the Bombay Current, Baba Baghel Singh and his deputy, Kudlip Singh, were reputedly killed in a run-in with Punjabi State Police. While Maharaj Ji as a matter of record has founded a magazine, a travel service, and a television company in America, stay-at-home Baba Baghel would appear, according to Current, to have taken things a bit too far in his Lai Kurti (Red House) movement, supposedly operating sixty “dens of ill fame” in the Punjab. After the Baba’s reported slaying, his followers marched through Alamgahr threatening death to all who refused to acknowledge him as an incarnation of the god Krishna, then went on a rampage and killed thirteen unresponsive spectators.

The mild Maharaj movement will doubtless appeal to religiously inclined Americans more than the ill-famed Lal Kurti. Even so, in view of the spreading Occidental interest in wisdom from the Orient, readers should probably begin now to orientate themselves in the promising science of gurology (study of gurim, not to be confused with gurolatry, worship of gurim). (Incidentally, contrary to an impression given by a well-known fortnightly magazine of evangelical conviction, Occidental sage Bill Gothard is not to be called a guru). Gurology now has financial as well as religious appeal, since the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare has begun underwriting, albeit in a small way, projects involving the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s “science” of Transcendental Meditation (as a cure for drug addiction). The content of guronic teaching can be called gurosophy, (wisdom of gurim). Legal questions relating to gurim come, of course, under the heading of gurisprudence. One sticky constitutional matter remains to be clarified, however: if Maharaj Ji claims tax exemption for his gurosophy as a religion, how can Maharishi Mahesh get federal funds for his without violating the Wall Between Church and State? A thorny issue in gurisprudence, indeed.

EUTYCHUS VI

How To Pray

Richard C. Halverson’s article “A Master Lesson on Prayer” (Jan. 18) was inspiring for the most part, but it appears to me that we still need to learn a good deal about how to pray. Much too often in formal prayers, not to mention hymns and creeds, we say things that have a “biblical ring,” but which we repeat without stopping to think what they mean. No doubt this is what Hamlet intended when he said, “Words without thoughts never to heaven go.”

Simsbury, Conn.

HENRY OBERMEYER

Unmolding Radio Church

I find “Radio Church: Is Anyone Listening?” by C. Benjamin Hale, Jr. (Jan. 18), very disturbing. He puts religious broadcasting programs in a mold, which is not true; they are very flexible and varied.

Just how would Mr. Hale succeed in converting the world by radio, as he suggested could be done? By rock music, instead of the “swelling music of the organ” by a Gabriel, a John Peterson, or a Handel? Or would he leave out the reading of Scripture, which is the very foundation of Christianity?

The suggestions he gives are good, but general, and I am sure most religious broadcasters have already taken them into consideration. Religious radio broadcasts have done me worlds of good in the past years; am I different than other people?

DORIS U. MOREY

Brinnon, Wash.

Hale’s article preserved your record of complete failure in presenting adequate material concerning broadcast evangelism. After reading the two pages devoted to the subject, I am at a loss to fathom the purpose.… He does make a case for purchasing Modern RadioStation Practices by Johnson and Jones. The article would in fact seem to be little more than a review in a religious context of the book. This was, in fact, a poorly written primer on religious broadcasting. Better are available.

TOMMY P. THOMPSON

Administrator, Mass Media Department

“The Lutheran Hour”

St. Louis, Mo.

No Ghost

I appreciated the coverage given the books on Bangladesh in your January 4 issue (Books in Review). Yet a correction is in order. The reviewer comments on the “polished” writing in On Duty in Bangladesh and Daktar/Diplomat in Bangladesh, intimating that this is because Jeannette Lockerbie is the “ghostwriter” of both. Although Mrs. Lockerbie is a best-selling author (Salt in My Kitchen, A Plate of Hot Toast), her daughter Jeannie wrote her own book. Jeannie is currently heading up the ABWE literature work in Bangladesh. And Dr. Viggo Olsen wrote his own book, having earlier produced a Muslim Bengali dictionary, among other things. Mrs. Lockerbie naturally had some influence on her daughter’s style—and she did contribute a personal touch to Dr. Olsen’s book by adding details based on her long acquaintanceship with the Olsens and two visits to Bangladesh. It should also be noted that although the reviewer gave only the equivalent of two short paragraphs to Daktar/Diplomat in Bangladesh, it is the only one to make the religious cloth bestseller list, going as high as number three. Despite the fact that it is an autobiography and a mission book, there are now over 50,000 in print, and it is still selling strongly. It has already been translated into German, and negotiations are under way for editions in other languages.

LESLIE H. STOBBE

Editor

Moody Press

Chicago, Ill.

Fitting

Just a few words to tell you how much I appreciated the article, “Thrice I Cried, Or, How to Be a Minister’s Wife If You Loathe It” (Jan. 18). I think we (ministers’s wives) as a group are especially eager to gather up every crumb of help we can get, and Meredith Wells’s article is both wise and practical. After being out of the manse for seven years, my husband and I are preparing for a return to it, and I have been rethinking my perspectives on the role and the duties of ministers’s wives, and how I, personally, fit into the picture.…

Meredith Wells’s article reinforces some of my own ideas on “How To Be.…,” and I greatly appreciate it. Now I know I’m not the only one out here who knows that I have to be me, living every day with Jesus, and with the people he has created. Many thanks.

(MRS.) LOIS SIBLEY

Warrensville Hts., Ohio

While the article is well written and interesting, and makes some good points, it seems deficient in many ways. Having been a minister’s wife for over thirty years, I especially question Meredith Wells’s “either-or-ness” about the whole subject. The only alternatives seem to her either to be an “assistant minister” or to be a drop-out from the situation. There are many alternatives which permit respect for one’s own personhood and yet involvement in the local church.… I personally believe that to be an authentic and loving Christian person in the congregation which my husband is serving is the best way for me to serve in that particular church. Love freely given transforms situations and people, and the dullest people can in loving encounter be discovered as full of interest and fascination. I can truthfully say that I have yet to meet an uninteresting person.…

As for listening to my husband preach, I’m thankful that this is for me a pleasure. Being able to concentrate in worship comes with really listening and with self-discipline. Helpful to me is lifting the people around me, and all those participating in the service, and particularly my husband as he preaches, up to God in prayer as I worship. This doesn’t distract, but enhances my worship and also my experience of community with others who are worshiping. Being the wife of an extremely dedicated minister hasn’t all been easy or fun, but it has helped me grow as a person, to learn a lot about people, including how lovable most of them are, and to believe more and more that the local congregation is “where the action is,” and that my one life can make a difference there.

ALICE W. CLEVELAND

Lakeland, Fla.

For Life

The editorial “Where Silence Is Guilt” in your January 18 issue expresses very well the feelings and the frustration of many of us in the pro-life movement. As you stated so well, all the Human Life Amendment legislation is bottled up in a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee chaired by Don Edwards. It is most discouraging to know that one man can wield so much power on such an issue and thwart the efforts of so many to overturn the Supreme Court decision.…

I want to thank you most heartily for the strong scriptural stand which you have taken in your magazine against permissive abortion, and I am sure this too will be of great benefit and influence to many.

LESTER MESSERSCHMIDT

St. Luke Lutheran Church

Dix Hills, N. Y.

Clearing Cataracts

Thank you for printing “The Christian and the Head-Spreader” (Feb. 1). It was greatly appreciated. The Bible is God’s inspired revelation to man, but sometimes people develop emotional cataracts that need to be accepted, removed, or altered before they can see the Christ clearly. Thus, those Christians in the mental-health professions can help those who are troubled to find the way to “the Way, the Truth, and the Life.”

JAMES D. MCGOVERN

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Coordinator

Cave Run Comprehensive Care Center Morehead, Ky.

‘Exorcist’ Thoughts

I couldn’t believe your review and editorial on The Exorcist (Feb. 1). Recent articles in secular news magazines and papers have not been all that favorable. In fact, even were I a film-goer, I would be scared to see this one.

Do you think the Apostle Paul, if he were writing to Christians today, would say, “We cannot wholeheartedly recommend that Christians attend the film”? Or, “Although the film cannot be called a truly Christian film, it does not deserve the strict boycott many evangelicals will give it …”? Rather, I think he would remind us, “Whatever things are true, honest, pure, lovely … think on these things.”

Neither complacent nor strong Christians should have any encouragement from a Christian publication to attend this kind of movie.

LORRAINE ACKLEY

Joliet, Ill.

I will look forward to more film reviews in your magazine because Ms. Forbes did a superb job of this one. I have read several other reviews of The Exorcist, but each of them left me unsatisfied about the one point which she handled so beautifully—the faith of Father Merrin. In reading the book, I could not help but be impressed by the depth of involvement and commitment of that man, and I wondered if any movie director could capture it. Your review tells me that Friedkin did not, and for that reason I will not attend the movie.

DOLORES I. GERKEN

Director

Tri-Parish Christian Education Center

Richmond, Va.

Ideas

A Call to Greatness

For the generation before World War I, “Protestantism” almost came to be synonymous with “progress.” Although the majority of pastors and parishioners may well have been basically conservative on theology, an optimistic, progress-oriented liberal theology dominated the theological faculties and came to prevail in many of the most fashionable pulpits.

World War I with the carnage and the worldwide upheavals it brought changed all that. There was a reaction against the unrealistic platitudes of liberal theology and a revived interest in the Bible as the Word of God. People talked about doctrine again and worked to recover the adulterated Reformation heritage. Among the scholars and teachers who became prominent in the years following World War I, there was a cast of intellectual giants such as has seldom been seen at one time on the stage of church history.

The most eminent name is that of Karl Barth, but there are others of similar stature such as Emil Brunner, Rudolf Bultmann, Paul Tillich, and Reinhold Niebuhr, as well as less prominent but also significant figures: Dietrich Bonhoeffer, cut off by a Nazi execution, H. Richard Niebuhr, Karl Heim, and Anders Nygren, to name but a few. With the exception of the “demythologizer” Bultmann, who will soon be ninety, all of them have passed from the scene. Their direct influence has waned, though their works will continue to be studied for decades. The renewal of “biblical” theology that neo-orthodoxy seemed to augur in the inter-war years has not come from the great faculties where those men taught. Barth and Brunner gave us elaborate dogmatic systems, while Tillich spun a pantheistic dream out of his own new terminology. Bultmann’s program, which has remained influential longer than the others’ work, has led those who adopted it to a withering skepticism about the historical foundation of the Gospel and has reduced the miracle of new life in Christ to a purely anthropological level—a new way of looking at existence.

The giants of the 1930s–1950s are now gone. And who will take their place? From Germany, the home of so much theological ferment and productivity in the past, we hear that serious theological work has been largely abandoned there. In the Anglo-Saxon world, some liberal theologians have settled for cleverness rather than wisdom, while the more perceptive among them, such as John B. Cobb, Jr., warn that liberalism is at a crossroads and in danger of losing all its momentum as well as its sense of direction.

The evangelical enterprise, by contrast, is flourishing. Evangelism is big. Conservative theological seminaries are growing. Evangelical publishing is one of the few bright spots in an otherwise shaky field. There is vitality among biblical Christians, in spite of—or perhaps in part because of—the great variety of denominational, doctrinal, and cultural emphases found among them. But what will all this vitality produce?

There was a man, only slightly older than Bultmann, whom God saw fit to call home in 1936, five years before Bultmann launched his now famous project of demythologization. J. Gresham Machen was one of the few evangelical scholars whom Bultmann felt obliged to take seriously and who could challenge him on his own ground. Machen is not without spiritual and theological successors: the names of Cornelius Van Til and Francis A. Schaeffer spring to mind. Yet almost every time that the theological conflict is joined, when evangelicals look for intellectual support it is to a previous generation—to Machen, or Benjamin B. Warfield, or even further back, to the Princeton professors of the last century.

A generation of giants has quit the field—some liberal, some neo-orthodox, some, like Tillich, defying classification. Who will succeed them? The liberals are disillusioned and tired; the evangelicals, vigorous and confident but busy. Yet if among all those evangelicals now teaching or studying theology, only one in our generation could have the vision, accomplish the work, and achieve the stature of a Machen or a Warfield, it would be a tremendous gain for the whole people of God for decades to come.

Evangelicals are producing men of the front lines—evangelists, missionaries, and pastors—who in their own field rival the great liberal and neo-orthodox luminaries of the past generation. But the theological stage is still vacant. It is time to work, to study, and to pray that God will give us teachers with the faith of the apostles, fathers, and Reformers, and with the energy and ability to produce new works to take their place alongside the great classics of our heritage.

Open Questions, Dangerous Notions

Among those suffering from the energy crunch, scapegoating is back in fashion. Right now the oil companies are getting it. But the Israelis and the Arabs will not be far behind. Either or both of them will no doubt become the objects of major and perhaps long-term criticism for the oil shortage. And the Western nations will show little willingness to admit to any culpability on their part.

It would be foolish to suppose that an enduring settlement has been reached in the Arab-Israeli struggle. Both the Arabs and the Israelis will continue to get plenty of sophisticated military equipment from the Soviets, France, the United States, and other nations. Whether a balance of power can be achieved is unclear. Among other unanswered questions are: Will—or should—Israel give up the territories it took in the 1967 war? Will the United States guarantee, by force of arms if necessary, the safety of the State of Israel, and if so, under what conditions of territorial adjustment? How long will the Arabs play their nasty game of oil blackmail?

To believe that the Soviets take détente seriously one must be woollyheaded or naïve. Détente Soviet-style is a ploy to gain military superiority—a momentary pause in the struggle to defeat “imperialism” and bring in Communism.

Among other dangerous ideas that we should not fall prey to are these: (1) that a long period of peace lies before us; (2) that it is better to lose freedom than to go to war to preserve it; and (3) that we can trust government—or other institutions run by sinful man—to deliver us from the evils that are so glaringly apparent in our world.

We Love Liberty

Defenders of religious liberty owe Wisconsin an expression of outrage. State officials upheld a fine levied against Friedrich W. Rau of Kenosha for failing to attend Sunday-morning union meetings. Their action denied the right to put church obligations above union obligations. It seems quite clearly to contradict a 1963 Supreme Court decision that a Seventh-day Adventist was entitled to unemployment compensation even though she turned down job offers, because the prospective employment required Saturday work. What would civil authorities do if a church fined absentees who argued that their presence was demanded at union meetings?

Smugglers Are Deceivers

A kind of hero image has settled upon some individual Christians and organizations for their smuggling exploits. These Christians hold themselves up to public praise for having cleverly outwitted border guards in order to get Bibles and other Christian literature into Communist lands. Some seem to show little regard for the ethical principles involved. They get financial support from Christians who readily rationalize the law-breaking: here is an anti-Christian state bent on wiping out the free world; why obey their laws? What they are really saying is that the end justifies the means.

A few of the Bible smugglers obviously have a twinge of guilt, however, and they are now saying that smuggling Bibles into Communist countries is legitimate because the countries do not have laws against such importation. It is gratifying to learn of this implicit appreciation for the biblical injunction to render unto Caesar the things that are his. Unfortunately, in the case of the Soviet Union, this argument does not apply. Every tourist coming into the country is required to sign a form saying he is aware that Soviet law requires him to declare, among a number of other things, “printed matter,” and that all objects not declared are subject to confiscation as contraband (see illustration). Therefore the Bible smuggler is already breaking the law by not presenting everything for inspection, and he cannot truthfully claim ignorance of the law.

Unquestionably, there is a dire need for the Word of God among people who live under Communism. But we should limit ourselves to legitimate means for meeting this need. Let’s not play into the hands of Communists and stoop to their underhanded tactics. By doing so we lend credence to their charge that Christians are hypocrites.

Christians should try to apply political pressure to force Communist governments to let the people have Bibles. And they should encourage tourists to take in declared Bibles. This is permitted; few are ever prohibited from taking in one or two Bibles, and some are allowed half a dozen. If every American tourist took in just one, that alone would mean thousands. There are, moreover, some organizations that are getting substantial numbers of Bibles into Communist countries legally. It is efforts like these that should be encouraged.

More On ‘The Exorcist’

In our highly relativistic, secularistic society, it is surprising that a realistic film portrayal of the power of evil spirits is the great box-office attraction that The Exorcist is proving to be. It is as though people have a hunger for something that portrays the reality of the spiritual, even of the evil elements of the spirit world. The film does presuppose, and correctly so, that evil spirits are real and that they must yield to the power of Jesus Christ. At the same time, it apparently promotes or caters to a fascination with evil that may involve its viewers in the evil rather than in Christ’s victory over it.

In some localities, no one under eighteen can view the film—yet the lead role is played by a fifteen-year-old girl, who will make a small fortune for it. Is she being exploited, or worse still, does the whole enterprise of making money from The Exorcist involve a kind of Mephistophelean contract with the devil?

While we do not call for a total boycott of the film, we feel that it is potentially degrading and harmful to viewers, and that a person who does not have a compelling reason to see it—for example, for critical or review purposes—should stay away.

Pious Platitudes About Genocide

In the shock and horror that followed the revelation of Nazi extermination policies in World War II, the fledgling United Nations Organization passed a convention on genocide, 55–0. President Truman sent it to the United States Senate for ratification in 1949, but the Senate has never been willing to vote on it. Most recently, supporters of the bill failed to muster the two-thirds majority necessary to throttle further debate—which has now degenerated into an anti-convention filibuster—and bring the matter to a vote. Outraged were the treaty’s supporters, including representatives of the American Jewish Conference, the American Baptist Convention, and the National Catholic Conference. Satisfaction was voiced by the non-partisan American Bar Association as well as by several right-wing groups vehemently opposed to the treaty.

It is not exactly clear what good an anti-genocide treaty would do. Do we really expect the U. S. S. R. to allow the U. N. to supervise its treatment of Jews, Christians, and other minorities? Or China to render an account of its actions in Tibet? Or even Uganda to face charges on its treatment of its East Indians? It would, however, provide a convenient tool for such powers’ intervention into the internal affairs of Western nations, where a relative scarcity of “genocidal” practices coincides with a comparatively greater willingness to answer to challenges and assaults by international tribunals. Furthermore, the treaty is so loosely worded that it could be interpreted as forbidding missionary work—“proselytization”—for after all, the attempt to win members of a particular non-Christian religious group to Christ potentially poses the threat of the disappearance of that group, and anything that tends in that direction, even the arts of persuasion, is forbidden by the treaty.

The anti-genocide treaty would have little or no influence on powerful forces inclined to genocidal behavior. And the potential nuisance factor, at least to those other nations, such as the United States, that make some pretense of trying to abide by international conventions, is very great indeed.

Two Crimes

The arrest of Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the kidnapping of Patricia Hearst were presumably unrelated events. Both persons were seized in their apartments and led away without any immediate explanation, and the resemblance between the two cases ends there. Yet they are worth discussing together if only because each relates to some basic reasons for the tensions that the world is experiencing today.

Solzhenitsyn, arrested by Soviet authorities in Moscow on February 12, had refused to heed a summons to report for questioning, and technically he can be faulted at that point. What is clear to virtually everyone, however, is that his real “crime” was his exposure of the illegalities and inhumanities of the Soviet system. Publication of The Gulag Archipelago apparently was the last straw. Kremlin leaders whisked him away and expelled him from his native land.

Miss Hearst was seized not by the police or the FBI but by a group of political radicals who claim to have the best interests of the masses at heart. Her “crime” is that she is the daughter of a prominent figure in the “ruling class.” Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of food was demanded as evidence of “good faith” in negotiating for her release. What a misuse of words. What kind of moral response can one expect from a small group that takes upon itself the right to threaten the life of one person so that the lives of others may be bettered?

There are many people in North America who deserve help, but extortion is a despicable as well as an unlawful technique for providing help. It is perhaps too much to expect that individuals steadfastly refuse to ransom kidnapped loved ones for the sake of the principle that to yield to extortion is to invite further extortion. But it could be made illegal for governments, government agencies, and businesses to pay ransom. This would deprive kidnappers of the possibility of holding not only individuals but larger groups or a whole nation to ransom.

Perhaps the Solzhenitsyn and Hearst “crimes” are more similar than is at first apparent. The Soviet government could not stand the fact that through his writing Solzhenitsyn has wielded so much power that he has attracted a large, sympathetic, and potentially dangerous audience in opposition to the Kremlin’s ruling class. Perhaps members of the Symbionese Liberation Army have been envious of the Hearst access to the masses. The point that they apparently fail to perceive is that they have the freedom in the United States to seek such access.

Under Marxism, whatever its form and wherever it has come into power, freedom of speech and action are taken away. No one is permitted to speak for or promote alternative systems, economic or political. Wherever Marxism is a minority in democratic countries, its adherents demand freedom because that is democracy’s principle. But when Marxists assume control they promptly deny freedom because that is not their principle.

Solzhenitsyn knew what was coming. The day before his arrest he met with Western newsmen and reportedly emphasized a point:

“O freedom-loving leftist thinkers of the West. O leftist laborites. O progressive American, German, and French students. For you all of this counts for little. For you my book amounts to nothing. You will understand it all when they bellow at you, ‘You are under arrest,’ and you yourselves trudge off to our [prison] archipelago.”

Advertising Kudos

Advertising can enrich or degrade us, depending on the moral intent and aesthetic sense of the creators. Christians should be taking the lead in producing ads that do their job while maintaining high moral and aesthetic standards. To encourage this, CHRISTIANITY TODAY has inaugurated an annual awards competition, which begins with the advertisements in this issue (see page 5).

Professionals in the field are deciding which advertisers will win the awards, but we are also interested in finding out what non-professionals think. We invite you to help us compare readers’ opinions to the judges’ opinions by filling in and mailing the coupon at the right.

Yes, Cain, You Are Your Brother’S Keeper

Among the most memorable words of Jesus are those in which he admonishes the hyprocrite first to “cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote of thy brother’s eye.”

The practical effect of this instruction, unfortunately, is often slight. Sometimes we fail to cast out the beam, and so we never get around to the mote, either. Other times we do manage to do away with the beam, but we think the passage minimizes the mote, so we again pass up the second step. But Jesus was not saying that we should forget the mote in our brother’s eye: he was simply declaring that the personal beam should be dealt with first.

Paul makes it quite clear that we should be concerned about the faults of others, and admonish as a way of being helpful. And modern secular man, without any conscious reference to the Scriptures, is realizing that there is something about human psychology that makes mutual chiding a good thing, if it is done properly. We need each other as a check on ourselves. Accountability to peers is a big factor in, for example, the success of Weight Watchers and Alcoholics Anonymous. Many churches have “sharing” times in which people cite blessings, but how many Christians ask fellow believers for help in overcoming failures?

Many of us recoil from having to be accountable to others. Pride and fear undoubtedly figure in. We need to realize that it is in our own best interests to be reviewed by others. They can not only help to identify problems we may not even recognize, but also help to propose solutions.

In a recent issue of the Christian Leadership Letter, an excellent service put out by World Vision, there is a discussion of the principle of accountability as it relates to individual Christians, churches, and religious organizations. The letter contends, “Holding others accountable and being held accountable is at the root of the life that is Christian.” That’s not only good theology but plain common sense. It is nothing short of tragic that today’s believers are so insensitive to this truth.

Theology

Cosmic Struggle

The following is a guest column by David D. Seel, medical doctor, Houston, Texas.

Returning to america after years abroad one lives for a time soaking up vivid impressions of abundance, material beauty, and progress. Sooner or later a little bell starts ringing in the back of one’s brain, insistent, persistent. It is a bell that calls us to beware the culture, to fear the direction toward which the stream of Western life is flowing, to swim once again against the current. And one need not have been away from America to sense the forces that are eroding traditional community values, family structure, and personal ethics.

The conflict is, in fact, universal. The disciple of Christ is involved in a battle of cosmic dimension: it is the conflict between the prince of this world and the forces of the Lord of Hosts. There is an inescapable intellectual struggle, a conflict of fundamental premises raging about us at every moment.

In order to understand the conflict, we must remember that the biblical perspective is that we exist in a universe that is not only natural but also supernatural. The prevailing thought pattern of our culture is naturalistic, the assertion that we can know only that which we can prove with our senses or with scientific data. According to naturalism, the universe is confined to that which we observe by using the discoverable laws of cause and effect.

Christians too believe in the uniformity of natural causes, but for us the system is not closed; God cannot be confined within it, nor can God’s image-bearer, man. There are two parts to reality: beyond the natural world there is a supernatural universe where love and goodness and ultimate values and absolute truth exist, and where God dwells. He is there. As Francis Schaeffer has emphasized, Christians are called upon to demonstrate in history that the supernatural world exists, and that God exists.

This was the reality that Abraham, Moses, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Paul, and Augustine perceived. It is not a mystical world of the imagination; it is not some twilight zone of the human psyche, but a real universe of personhood, and communication, and content—where truth and love are waging war with falsehood and apathy, where the Lord of Hosts encounters and demolishes the fortresses of Satan. This universe permeates and underlies our visible world, and the conflict in this supernatural sphere is the ultimate battle for men’s minds.

Occasionally, this supernatural universe has tangibly become part of the human experience. So it was on the Mount of Transfiguration when Moses and Elijah discussed with Jesus his forthcoming death in Jerusalem, an event to which they looked forward with gratitude and hope. Supernatural intervention occurred also during the dialogue on the walk to Emmaus, when the Stranger joined two minor disciples to reveal to them God’s plan for the ages. He sat down to eat with them, blessed the bread and broke it, and then vanished from their sight: the resurrected Christ! A supernatural event occurred also when this same Jesus blinded Saul of Tarsus on the Damascus road and spoke to him in the Hebrew tongue: “Why persecutest thou me?” Notice that in each of these encounters there was communication of truth, meaningful dialogue, and purposeful confrontation with the ultimate realities of the universe.

The disciple of Jesus Christ is to live basing his decisions on the reality of the supernatural universe. He is to struggle knowing that the ultimate strife is spiritual. And he is to carry on his fight with the weapons of God rather than by human methods. It is a struggle against the forces of darkness, against the principalities and powers that dominate our age, and is therefore a battle that takes place in the world of ideas. As Paul wrote:

We are not engaged in a human conflict; we are not involved in a worldly war. The weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses. We are destroying speculations, we demolish every proud obstacle to the knowledge of God, to bring every thought captive to Jesus Christ.

The words of Paul are so challenging that they border on fanatical bravado. Paul is boasting in his weakness again, knowing that only when he recognizes his human ineptitude can God take hold of him for some explosive new manifestation of His power.

Paul is speaking here of the conquest of peoples, of cultures, and of nations for Christ. He grasps the cosmic nature of the struggle against the forces of evil in the total universe, particularly in the sphere of thought and mind and spirit. This theme was taken up in 1912 by J. Gresham Machen:

The Christian cannot be satisfied so long as any human activity is either opposed to Christianity or out of all connection to Christianity. Christianity must pervade not merely all nations, but also all of human thought. The Christian cannot be indifferent to any branch of earnest human endeavor. It must all be brought into some relation to the gospel. It must be studied either in order to be demonstrated false, or else in order to be made useful in advancing the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom must be advanced not merely extensively, but also intensively. The Church must seek to conquer not merely every man for Christ, but also the whole of man [reprinted in Banner of Truth, June, 1969].

We have defrauded ourselves with aims too small and goals too simple. The universe is our arena. We perform before a stadium filled with the witnesses who have preceded us over the last twenty centuries. Every eye in heaven is observing us; all the angels hang upon each play on the field of our time. It is a cosmic struggle, and we cannot rest until we have fulfilled the purpose stated in Second Corinthians 10:5: “to bring every thought captive to Jesus Christ.”

Books

Significant Books of 1973

Using a three-column format in the front part of this issue enables us to publish what is by far the largest ever of our annual surveys of books on religion. Even so the writers had to be selective in their choices and terse in their comments. There were hundreds of books that we just didn’t have space to mention. With only a handful of exceptions we have confined ourselves to books issued in the United States for the first time during the last calendar year. Moreover, we have concentrated on books for the more serious reader, in keeping with our general essay style. By excluding such types as popular works of inspiration or biography, study manuals, and fiction we do not mean to deny their helpfulness. Advertisements for these books are in abundance.

We lead off this year with surveys on practical subjects, hoping to entice some readers into looking at the book evaluations who otherwise might skip them. Placing the surveys of books on the Bible further back does not mean any de-emphasis on the foundational importance of the Scriptures.

Perhaps a by-product of the energy crisis is that would-be wanderers who are “stuck” at home will take more time to read. We hope that Christians will use their limited reading time for the best books in their areas of interest. Our surveyors have tried to help them make such choices. We apologize for unintentional or unjustifiable omissions, and we cordially thank the publishers who cooperated most willingly in sending us review copies. The Book Editor welcomes suggestions for improving this annual feature.

If there are any remaining clouds of doubt in the minds of evangelicals that “the Church is back,” the literature of 1973 should blow them away like a strong west wind. Over seventy-five titles made the “finals” of my selection process, though not all seventy-five will appear in the following paragraphs.

In the process of elimination, those books that endured to the end generally had these qualities: the author’s apparent grasp of his material, reasonable comprehensiveness without damaging gaps, and usability in contemporary church life. With a word of appreciation to publishers who provided review copies, and a word of apology to any whose worthy entries may have been omitted for some reason, here is my proposed list of the better books of 1973 on the Church’s life and service.

AGE GROUP MINISTRIES Moody’s “Effective Teaching Series” introduced two new units last year following up on You the Teacher (1972). Larry Richards wrote the first and second volumes and is coordinating the series. You and Youth offers the teacher helpful material for his task as does You and Children co-authored by Richards and Elsiebeth McDaniel. The ideas are not new but are reworked and most practical, though the publisher over-advertises the books on the back cover. Similar but even more elementary is a four-volume series published by Standard, Teaching Preschoolers, Teaching Primaries, Middlers, Juniors, Teaching Junior Hi’s and Senior Hi’s, and Teaching Young Adults and Adults.

Strommen’s Bridging the Gap (Augsburg) is the only youth volume of consequence, and his studies are limited to self-report data from Lutheran youth. The book is church-oriented with a focus on pastors and parents.

Christian parents will welcome Gil Beers’s series “Learning to Read From the Bible” (Zondervan). Four titles are available: God Is My Helper; God Is My Friend; Jesus Is My Teacher; and Jesus Is My Guide. The books, prepared for children’s use, have solid bindings, attractive art work, theological summaries, word lists, and guidelines for use with the beginning reader.

BIBLE STUDY AND TEACHING It was a slow year for books on teaching/learning principles and techniques, though Larry Richards’s 69 Ways to Start a Study Group (Zondervan) has the sparkle and practicality we have come to expect from him. Sunday-school teachers will appreciate Successful Bible Teaching (Baker) by Sue Uys, but “a creative approach” is too strong a subtitle.

Media enthusiasts should welcome Multi-Media in the Church (John Knox) by W. A. Engstrom and Landing Rightside Up in TV and Film (Abingdon) by G. William Jones, although neither volume compares to the Getz book reissued by Moody last year. Using Biblical Simulations (Judson) by Donald Miller, Graydon Snyder, and Robert Neff is a genuinely fresh approach to Bible teaching. Perforated pages can be torn out to give each student his part. Evangelical teachers will need to rework portions of the eleven units because of their infection with negative critical assumptions.

This latter problem also qualifies our use of Mastering New Testament Facts (John Knox), a series of four programmed workbooks prepared by Madeline Beck and Lamar Williamson, Jr. Used with guidance, this set will be ideal for new converts’ classes or entering seminary students whose lack of biblical background places them at a disadvantage in classes.

CHURCH DOCTRINE, RENEWAL, AND WORSHIP Everything from how to choose a church board to how to conduct a local church self-study floats by in Leslie Parrot’s Building Today’s Church, a former Beacon Hill title reissued last year by Baker. Of less practical value but thoroughly documented in research is the fourth annual ALC/LCA “Yearbook in Christian Education,” How Persons Grow in Christian Community (Fortress) by William A. Koppe. Pastors and church leaders who want to confront their people with a biblical ecclesiology without frightening them with a sizable tome on systematics can give them John Mac-Arthur’s The Church, the Body of Christ (Zondervan), usable also for discussion groups, Sunday-school classes, and supplemental reading in college and seminary. It’s a great little book, warm and biblical, reflecting genuine love for the Church. So does Oswald Hoffmann’s God’s Joyful People (Concordia), which is less thorough than MacArthur but just as concerned with the reemergence of a vibrant communal love in Christ’s body.

Renewal books of merit were down to three last year, of which my preference runs toward B. J. Chitwood’s What the Church Needs Now (Revell). There is no slashing sarcasm in these pages; Chitwood offers a general overview of the renewal movement and discusses some often omitted matters such as church discipline. Unfortunately, the book is an overpriced hardback. Ralph Neighbor’s The Seven Last Words of the Church (Zondervan) is the record of how renewal came to West Memorial Baptist Church of Houston. Neighbor writes well and draws helpful principles from his experience, but I think he falls into the trap of the flagrant overstatement, so typical of renewal writers of two and three years ago (e.g., the church is “not anxious to observe the opportunities to repair the needs of people who pass us by”). Judson offers the creatively written An Exodus For the Church by William F. Keucher, who traces renewal motifs by comparing geographical points of biblical and church history (“A New Exodus From Egypt to Emmaus”).

In an interesting little booklet entitled Biblical Foundations For Christian Worship (Herald), Millard C. Lind finds the Old Testament basis for worship in the covenant and the New Testament basis in a “new theo-political structure.” New Ways to Worship (Revell) by James L. Christensen provides stimulating suggestions for a contemporary approach to worship services.

ORGANIZATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND LEADERSHIP Two Zondervan hardbacks make a contribution in this area, though their differences point up divergent approaches. Organization and Leadership in the Local Church by Kenneth Kilinski and Jerry Wofford lays the biblical foundation and then builds a treatment of organization. This is a very good book, and my only complaint is that the chapters too clearly show the expertise of each author. Management chapters are weak in theology and vice versa. Richard LeTourneau’s Management Plus speaks to the Christian executive in the business world; he develops eighteen chapters of general administrative theory and practice, then adds three chapters on “the spiritual dimension of leadership” like the wax on a floor.

Four paperbacks will be helpful to lay leaders in churches and other Christian organizations. Paul Madsen’s The Person Who Chairs the Meeting (Judson) and Effective Committees and Groups in the Church (Augsburg) by Ed and Nancy Barmann both deal with formal group work procedure, whereas Church Worker’s Handbook (Judson) by Godfrey Robinson and Stephen Winward and my own So You Want to Be a Leader! (Christian Publications) attempt to provide general guidelines for leadership development in the Church and are written for training classes as well as individual readers.

PASTORAL MINISTRY AND PREACHING With the renewed popularity of the Church comes a renewed interest in the pastorate, and some big names wrote for pastors in 1973. Well-known pastors Howard Sugden and Warren Wiersbe give young ministers practical advice in When Pastors Wonder How (Moody), eighteen chapter-topics based upon questions they have received in pastor’s conferences. Another practical overview comes from the Pentecostal tradition, The Effective Pastor (Gospel Publishing House), edited by Zenas Bicket. Bibliographer Wilbur Smith has been writing about books again, and the result is The Minister in His Study (Moody), particularly helpful to college and seminary students.

Lyle Schaller and Donald P. Smith speak to the matter of the pastoral role in relation to the laity in Schaller’s The Pastor and the People (Abingdon) and Smith’s Clergy in the Crossfire (Westminster). Neither author explores the biblical issues, but Schaller is more practical and closer to the life of the evangelical pastor. Marvin Judy disappointed me a bit with The Parish Development Process (Abingdon), since both his previous book and the title of this one seem to promise more than just an exegesis of the cooperative parish plan.

How long has it been since you’ve seen a really significant book on establishing new churches? Now we have four, led by Donald MacNair’s The Birth, Care and Feeding of a Local Church (Canon). MacNair is thorough on establishment, but the title is misleading, implying that he will deal with general parish nurture over the long haul, which he doesn’t. A more accurate title might be “The Conception, Delivery and Weaning of A New Church.” Two helpful paperbacks support the MacNair work: A Guide to Church Planting by Hodges and Building Town and Country Churches by Harold Longnecker, both from Moody, the latter being a retitled reprint. Missiologist Donald McGavran applies church-growth principles to North American ministry in How to Grow a Church (Regal).

Just when some had concluded that preaching was an anachronism in the media age we get some top books on pulpit ministry from evangelical authors. Both R. E. O. White in A Guide to Preaching (Eerdmans) and Lloyd M. Perry in Biblical Preaching For Today’s World (Moody) serve up traditional homiletics, though Perry does include ten pages on dialogical preaching. Pulpit Giants (Moody) by Donald Demaray presents a study of preachers rather than preaching, exploring the characteristics of twenty-five outstanding pulpiteers from Augustine to Stott.

Two other books on preaching are worth mentioning, though disturbing because of their theological poverty. Since adequate pulpit ministry must be based upon solid biblical foundations, both of these are playing ball with a broken bat. Merrill Abbey applies communication theory to preaching in Communication in Pulpit and Parish (Westminster); the early chapters on process are good but come at too high a price because the end result is too much McLuhan and too little MacClaren. Preachers who can sift through the chaff for some wheat will find creative sermonizing ideas in Experimental Preaching (Abingdon), twenty-one “relevant” sermons on everything from Christianity to “Clockwork Orange.” Editor John Killinger’s introduction lays the groundwork for the license that some contributors used and seems incompatible with his own books.

Objective bias leads one to proclaim Craig Skinner’s The Teaching Ministry of the Pulpit (Baker) “book of the year” in this category. I’m not alone. In his foreword Faris D. Whitesell says that the book “covers more territory and makes more useful contributions than any other book on preaching I have read in a long, long time.” Personally, I would have reversed the page allotments between the first two sections (“Perspective from History” outdrew “Perspective from Theology” by twelve pages), but no matter, Skinner has done expository preaching a service in this book. He tends to overwork authorities who agree with his position (one Lightfoot book gets more than one-third of the first-chapter citations), but that is probably as common to authorship as writer’s cramp.

PERSONAL CHRISTIAN GROWTH As the Church becomes more people-centered we will doubtless see more literature on individual renewal. Three titles I want to mention are devotional, intended for personal use of new Christians wanting to grow in the faith-life: Becoming Transformed by Orien Johnson (Judson), Let Yourself Grow! by Joe Ellis (Standard), and Kenneth Kinghorn’s Dynamic Discipleship (Revell). Two paperbacks deal with the psychology of Christian experience particularly as it relates to other people, and, though neither is genuinely scriptural in approach, I prefer Lloyd Ahlem’s Do I Have to Be Me? (Regal) to The Love Fight (Herald) by David W. Augsburger. Unique in this category is For Men Only (Tyndale), edited by J. Allan Peterson. Pastors who face the problem of matriarchal leadership in their congregations will welcome this collection of forty articles by male leaders. The strength is as variant as the articles, bringing together such men as Joel Nederhood and W. Clement Stone between the covers of one volume, and for a bargain price.

SPECIALIZED CHURCH MINISTRIES This category is a catch-all for some varied titles:

CAMPING:Family Camping—Five Designs For Your Church (H. M. Ham) by John D. Rozeboom.

MUSIC: Rethinking Church Music (Moody) by Paul W. Wohlgemuth.

CREATIVE CRAFTS AND ACTIVITIES:Take It From Here (Judson) by Glen Yoder and Creative Handcrafts, four volumes dealing with preschoolers, primaries, juniors, and youth (Regal) by Eleanor Doan.

CHURCH NURSERY SCHOOL:Weekday Ministry With Young Children (Judson) by Martha L. Hemphill.

SPECIAL EDUCATION:Help For the Handicapped Child (McGraw-Hill) by Florence Weiner (essential resource for churches with classes for handicapped).

CHRISTIAN HIGHER EDUCATION:HOW to Choose a Christian College (Creation) by Robert Webber.

Thus endeth another year in books on congregational life and ministry. And the Lord of the Church must be pleased that we are once again groping with the major matters of life and love in the body, that our sociological analysis has turned to redemptive concern, and that empty criticism can be replaced by focus on the proclamation of the truth. It was an encouraging year.

Christian psychiatrists and psychologists seem increasingly bent on developing a thoroughly biblical approach to counseling and evaluating secular thinking in the light of Scripture; this is a most welcome trend. In The Kink and I (Victor), Christian psychiatrist James Mallory reflects this trend by convincingly showing that neurotic problems or “kinks” can be fully resolved only in Jesus Christ. Heavily sprinkled with personal, amusing anecdotes, the book engagingly and warmly communicates profound thinking about the nature of man, his needs, and how to meet those needs. The only drawback is a rather rambling style, which sometimes makes it hard to catch the main points.

FOR PASTORS AND CHURCH LEADERS Gary Collins’s four-volume series “Psychology for Church Leaders” (Creation) gives busy pastors an easy-to-read summary of the insights of modern psychology as they relate to the needs of the modern church. Man in Transition discusses the needs of people during normal development, Fractured Personalities gives help in recognizing and understanding abnormal behavior, Effective Counseling is a useful introduction to standard counseling procedures, and Man in Motion discusses the psychology of individual differences, motivation, and interpersonal discord.

Helping the Helpers to Help by Ruth Caplan (Seabury) describes a model of professional mental-health consultation for the pastor; the many specific examples of consultant interaction should stimulate workable ideas for tapping local mental-health resources. Glenn Whitlock’s Preventive Psychology and the Church (Westminster) covers similar ground but adds a helpful section on crisis-intervention counseling, including material on handling suicide threats. Other useful books in this category include Counseling by Lars Granberg (Baker), fifteen brief, to-the-point articles by leading pastoral counselors on a wide range of subjects; Hospital Chaplain by K. R. Mitchell (Westminster), a narrative account of hospital work that should help those involved in this ministry to clarify their role and responsibility; and The Little White Book by Facius, Noer, and Stage (Harold Shaw), a hardhitting, brief account of the Christian position on subjects like morality, drugs, and the occult. Pastors might want to make the latter book available to their young people. A beginning text by James Hamilton entitled The Ministry of Pastoral Counseling (Beacon Hill) deserves mention.

FOR THE FAMILY Three “must” books stand out: Heaven Help the Home by Howard Hendricks (Victor), Christian Living in the Home by Jay Adams (Presbyterian and Reformed), and An Ounce of Prevention by Bruce Narramore (Zondervan). These, along with Larry Christianson’s The Christian Family, should be required reading in every home. Bruce Narramore’s reputation in this field is already established by his widely commended Help! I’m a Parent. Hendricks presents the biblical basics of a happy home in warm, humorous style and gives practical ideas for promoting family togetherness. Adams, in his characteristic shape-up, no-nonsense style, begins by pointing out that a Christian home is where active sinners live, then outlines principles that Christians must responsibly follow.

The Christian Home in a Changing World by Gene Getz (Moody) is an academic, almost impersonal study of the subject; Getz’s expository style is best suited for Bible-study groups. A brief restatement of standard but useful thoughts is offered by Richard Dobbins in Train Up a Child (Baker). Sex education in the Christian home is given excellent treatment in From Parent to Child About Sex by William Grant (Zondervan); a good section on sexual development in children supports his suggestions on what to say and when to say it. At least as good is Sex Is a Parent Affair (Regal) by Letha Scanzoni. Her helpful, scripturally based guidelines are punctuated with illustrative stories.

It is unfortunate that Sidney Craig in Raising Your Child Not By Force But By Love (Westminster) insists on a few non-biblical assumptions (e.g., children are basically good). Much of what he says penetrates into the real problems in many parent-child relationships, but some could overlook the good because of strong disagreement with his questionable positions. A more acceptable but less useful book entitled Why Can’t I Understand My Kids by Herbert Wagemaker (Zondervan) is heavy on the obvious—little that is new but some old ideas worth a rehearing. Solving Problems in Marriage by Robert Bower (Eerdmans) has good material, especially on the problem of communication. One could wish for a clearer statement of the biblical position on such matters as headship in the home and for a greater reliance on spiritual resources in solving problems such as the need to find self-acceptance and personal identity.

FOR WOMEN ONLY Two excellent books deal with biblical answers to the modern woman’s questions about her identity, purpose, and function. To Have and to Hold by Jill Renich (Zondervan) and The Total Woman by Marabel Morgan (Revell) both describe woman’s role in marriage. The former relies heavily on Scripture and presents a warm, interesting, mature discussion. Marabel Morgan sprinkles a few Bible quotations through the book and saves a clear gospel presentation for the last chapter. Her book will be criticized by some (not me) as too frank, flippant, and flamboyant. But the reasonably well-adjusted woman whose marriage is mediocre and dull is likely to react with productive enthusiasm to the wealth of practical ideas for generating happy sparks in her marriage.

GENERAL Paul Tournier’s latest work, Learn to Grow Old (Harper & Row), is a sensitive, personal, yet scholarly treatment of the subject appropriate for the aging or for those counseling with the elderly. Tournier’s contributions to a biblical understanding of people and their problems are helpfully summarized in The Christian Psychology of Paul Tournier by Gary Collins (Baker). By highlighting Tournier’s biography, synthesizing his ideas on theology and psychology, and critically evaluating his thinking, Collins does for Tournier what Clyde Kilby has done for C. S. Lewis.

Rollo May’s Power and Innocence (Norton) is often subjective and operates from a non-biblical base, yet is full of provocative insights about man’s need for self-esteem and the relation of that need to the feeling of power. A major work by Morton Kelsey entitled Healing and Christianity (Harper & Row) argues for a view of man as more than merely physical by tracing the history of healing within Christianity. Robert Webber offers practical help for the Christian young person in How to Choose a Christian College (Creation); specific facts about such matters as course offerings and majors in various colleges make this a useful tool. Although Karl Menninger in Whatever Became of Sin (Hawthorn) offers a diluted definition of sin, his emphasis on the reality of sin and guilt is a refreshing departure from the more common conscience-soothing approach of psychiatry.

Pastors would do well to take special notice of the “out of it” lonely people in their congregations by reading Marion Leach Jacobsen’s Saints and Snobs (Tyndale). Two books about alcoholism will be helpful for counselors or families involved with the problem: I’ll Quit Tomorrow by Vernon Johnson (Harper & Row) and The 13th American by Pastor Paul (David C. Cook). The latter is a true story of a minister’s successful battle with the bottle.

Two collections of essays are especially noteworthy. Dynamic Interpersonalism For Ministry, edited by Orlo Strunk, Jr. (Abingdon), consists of fifteen essays honoring Paul Johnson of Boston University School of Theology. Part One looks at the relationships between Johnson’s approach and related disciplines. Part Two examines the differing kinds and settings of counseling. Psyche and Spirit, edited by John J. Heaney (Paulist), collects classic and significant articles from a variety of sources to serve as a book of readings for a survey of psychology and religion.

Finally, one of the best-known teachers and writers in the field, Wayne Oates of Southern Baptist Seminary, has systematized his reflections on The Psychology of Religion (Word). (A companion volume on pastoral counseling is forthcoming.)

The paper shortage did not seem to affect the number of books published on evangelism and missions during 1973. Among these books two themes stand out. The first is related to the World Council of Churches meeting in Bangkok on the nature and meaning of salvation. In Salvation Today Arne Sovik (Augsburg) finds the mission of the Church within the creative liberation movements of our time. The Evangelical Response to Bangkok, edited by Ralph Winter (William Carey [533 Hermosa St., South Pasadena, Cal. 91030]), is a collection of articles describing why evangelicals were in conflict with the directions taken at Bangkok.

The second theme is the renewed interest in missions to the unreached peoples of the world. In December, 1972, leaders of the major denominations met in Chicago to consider the priorities of evangelizing the “frontier” people. The papers from the conference were published in The Gospel and Frontier Peoples, edited by R. Pierce Beaver (William Carey). In preparation for the International Congress on World Evangelization (to be held in July in Lausanne, Switzerland) came Unreached Peoples: A Preliminary Compilation (MARC [919 W. Huntington Dr., Monrovia, Cal. 91016]). The missionary outreach of churches that many still view as the object of missionary responsibility is documented in Missions From the Third World by James Wong, Peter Larson, and Edward Pentecost (William Carey).

REFERENCE BOOKS The use of computers has accelerated the production of directories and reference books concerned with missions and evangelism. These books are primarily useful for libraries and mission boards. Those interested in the translation of the Scriptures will enjoy The Book of a Thousand Tongues (American Bible Society); it gives examples of translations and other information for each language in which portions of Scripture exists. The William Carey Library published four directories related to missions: The World Directory of Theological Education by Extension by Wayne C. Weld, The World Directory of Mission-Related Educational Institutions by Raymond Buker, Sr., and Ted Ward, The World Directory of Religious Radio and Television Broadcasting by International Christian Broadcasters, and An American Directory of Schools and Colleges Offering Missionary Courses by Glenn Schwartz, who simply photoreproduced college catalogue pages and provides no evaluation. From Britain there is the UK Protestant Missions Handbook by P. W. Brierley (Evangelical Missionary Alliance [19 Draycott Place, London SW3 2SJ]), which lists most of the missionary sending agencies of the United Kingdom. Especially important was the Mission Handbook (MARC), edited by Edward Dayton, with data on more than 600 North American agencies plus interpretive essays.

MISSION THEOLOGY AND STRATEGY There was again a lack of good theological books. The majority again reflected the emphasis of revolution and liberation. Such books most naturally arise out of a revolutionary setting, as evidenced by the contributions of writers from Latin America. Through translation we now have The CommunityCalled Church and Grace and the Human Condition, both by Juan Luis Segundo (Orbis), and A Theology of Liberation by Gustavo Gutierrez (Orbis). From the American scene we have a counterpart in Liberation Theology by Rosemary Ruether (Paulist). In The Shape of the Question (Augsburg) Kent Knutson analyzes the mission of the Church in a secular age from the perspective of the viability of Lutheran Reformation theology. From the perspective of the anthropologist there is Verdict Theology in Missionary Theory by A. R. Tippett (William Carey).

Horace Fenton, Jr., head of the Latin America Mission, offers an excellent corrective to many Myths About Mission (InterVarsity). A similar attempt at clarification is Peter Wagner’s Stop the World I Want to Get On (Regal). Both books are good for awakening and focusing missions interest. A substantive call to return to the strategy of the Apostle Paul is Breaking the Stained-Glass Barrier (Harper & Row) by David Womack.

The Church Growth approach continues to produce the greatest number of works on mission strategy, and the man most responsible for this broad influence is Donald McGavran. It is most fitting, therefore, to take note of the essays published in his honor. God, Man and Church Growth, edited by A. R. Tippett (Eerdmans), stands as a testimonial to a man who has deeply affected missiology. A Manual For Evangelism/Church Growth by Vergil Gerber (William Carey) is designed to help the pastor or missionary analyze the growth (or lack of it) in his church. Conversational style marks How to Grow a Church by Donald McGavran and W. C. Arn (Regal). Church-growth studies of specific areas are ProtestantsinModern Spain by Dale G. Vought (William Carey), Brazil 1980: The Protestant Handbook by William Read and Frank Ineson (MARC), and The Unresponsive: Resistant or Neglected?, the story of the Hakka Chinese in Taiwan by David C. E. Liao (Moody). An important book dealing with the problems of the large cities is An Urban Strategy For Latin America by Roger S. Greenway (Baker). Winds of Change in the Christian Mission by J. Herbert Kane (Moody) is an honest book about real missionary problems, but the problems may be yesterday issues.

WORLD RELIGIONS Several books about non-Christian religions are of interest. Stories of the Hindus by James A. Kirk (Macmillan) is well written and useful. Three books on Oriental religions that should be of interest are Theravada Buddhism in Southeast Asia by Robert Lester (University of Michigan), Oriental Thought by Yong Choon Kim (Thomas), and Japanese Religion, edited by Hori Ichiro (Kodansha). For those interested in the Islamic world there is God and Man in Contemporary Islamic Thought, edited by Charles Malik (American University of Beirut). A valuable reference book by a leading authority is Dictionary of Non-Christian Religions by Geoffrey Parrinder (Westminster).

EVANGELISM In the area of personal evangelism there were again some “how to” books. Using the Sunday school for evangelism is discussed in Teaching For Decision by Richard Dresselhaus (Gospel). How to Win Souls and Influence People For Heaven by George Godfrey (Baker) is in the “made easy” tradition that sees evangelistic success in the use of the right techniques. In contrast, Witness Is Withness by David Augsburger (Moody) emphasizes the necessity of developing proper interpersonal relationships in evangelism. A balance between showing and telling is the theme of Do and Tell: Engagement Evangelism in the 70’s by Gabriel Fackre (Eerdmans). The same emphasis is in Evangelism For Today’s Church by Leslie Woodson (Zondervan). In Soul Winning in Black Churches (Baker) J. Herbert Hinkle, a black pastor, looks at the evangelistic work in black churches and suggests how black churches can get on with evangelizing. Roger Greenway discusses the critical issue of evangelism in the cities in Calling Our Cities to Christ (Presbyterian and Reformed); he analyzes the situation from a Reformed theological viewpoint and offers a comprehensive approach that includes both social ministries and proclamation.

Several other books on evangelism are worth noting. The evangelistic potential of youth is portrayed in The Reproducers by Chuck Smith and Hugh Stevens (Regal) and in an account of the large youth gathering in Dallas, The Explo Story by Paul Eshelman (Regal). A practical book on using the media is Dennis Benson’s Electric Evangelism (Abingdon).

It is a pleasure to announce that surpassing all the currently available Bible handbooks in form, content, and accuracy is the newly published Eerdmans’ Handbook to the Bible, edited by David and Pat Alexander with assistance from a panel of biblical scholars. This volume should be of interest to everyone who reads English—even to small children who cannot yet read, since it is full of superb color photographs and illustrations. The illustrations are excellently chosen to illustrate the biblical text, as are the numerous maps (168 in all). Twenty original, multi-color charts outline the history of Old and New Testament times, indicate the nature of biblical weights and measurements, line up Israel’s history with that of other ancient civilizations, and so forth. Teachers in particular should find the charts very useful. The body of the handbook provides the student with brief introductions to each book of the Bible and also a brief outline of and mini-commentary on its contents. Although the text is the work of Mrs. Alexander, she has made good use of the right authorities and has also had her work carefully checked by experts; therefore, the work avoids the normal weaknesses of one-man productions. As an added treat, there are more than fifty brief but excellent essays by a group of evangelical scholars who are, for the most part, closely connected to the British Inter-Varsity Fellowship. If you buy one book this year for yourself or a friend, this should be the one.

GENERAL Answers to Questions by F. F. Bruce (Zondervan), the well-known evangelical scholar, is a selection of replies to questions submitted by readers of a Christian periodical in England over a period of twenty years. The answers are arranged in two sections, according to topic and Scripture reference. If you have always wanted to know what Bruce’s views on Karl Barth, eschatology, fundamentalism, healing, typology, and women in the ministry are, you will find the answer here. Or if you simply wish to read illuminating comments by a lifetime student of the Bible on these and many other topics, you will find this book helpful. The answers concerning specific passages of Scripture serve as a commentary on many of the difficult texts that are sometimes skipped over in the normal commentaries. A book to help you dig into the Scriptures and come up with your own answers is How to Study the Bible, edited by John B. Job (Inter Varsity). Here are very simple introductions for the beginning Bible student on how to analyze a book or a smaller passage of Scripture, how to do a character study, how to study words, themes, and roots, and guidance concerning the Bible’s application to personal problems. This could be put into the hands of any young Christian or could be used as an adult textbook for a Sunday-school term.

Two well-known Bible dictionaries were released with major revisions last year. The New Harper’s Bible Dictionary (Harper & Row), originally prepared by Madeleine and J. Lane Miller, has been thoroughly updated under the direction of the publishers. It reflects a moderately critical stance in those articles where such distinctions are pertinent. An enlarged and better indexed Dictionary of Biblical Theology (Seabury), based on the French edition edited by Xavier Leon-Dufour, is representative of the best of Roman Catholic scholarship and will be a valuable aid for the theological student.

The popular Scottish Bible teacher William Barclay offers help for the layman with a new book, Introducing the Bible (Westminster). As usual, he shows real ability in putting very technical material into language that the non-specialist can not only understand but enjoy. Along similar lines is The Bible:AModern Understanding by J. Lindblom (Fortress). The author, now professor emeritus of Old Testament at the University of Lund in Sweden, deals with matters related to the canon, the texts and languages of the Bible, the literary genres of the Old and New Testaments, principles of interpretation, the relation of the two testaments to each other, and the religious message of the Bible. Although evangelicals will find some of Lindblom’s views a little too “critical” for their liking, none will fail to benefit from the mature reflections of a scholar who has devoted his entire life to the careful study of God’s written word. The Bible in the Modern World by James Barr (Harper & Row) is a rather different book. The author attempts to expound a view of the Bible that will allow it to continue to serve as a source of authority in the Church while avoiding what he regards to be the errors of both evangelicalism and liberalism. The result is a work that is quite superficial and not really worthy of the famous Manchester professor. Despite his assertion that he has studied the works of the evangelicals, he shows little acquaintance with any of the scholarly statements of the evangelical position that have appeared in recent years.

The Bible in Human Transformation by Walter Wink (Fortress) is a slim paperback by an angry young scholar who begins with the provocative statement: “Historical biblical criticism is bankrupt.” He launches an impressive attack on “objectivism” and pleads for an approach to the Bible that takes seriously what the Bible might say to the human situation. What he argues for is not a return to an acceptance of the Bible as God’s word of revelation to man but rather a new paradigm for biblical study based on the models of personal interaction as used by social scientists, especially psychotherapists. Although Wink’s protest is refreshing and may provide some valid criticisms of historical biblical criticism as it is practiced by those who believe that the Bible is merely a human book, it is unrealistic to think that his new paradigm will really supplant current critical methodology. A more effective corrective from the evangelical perspective will be found in The Challenge of Religious Studies by Kenneth G. Howkins (InterVarsity). Intended for young people who take religion courses at college, Howkins’s book gives stress to such basic issues as the place of miracles and the supernatural, the resurrection of Christ, the nature of biblical criticism, and the purpose and the use of the Bible. This is an excellent aid for the student of religious studies or theology.

BIBLICAL BACKGROUNDS A major release jointly from Baker and Canon is George A. Turner’s Historical Geography of the Holy Land. Departing from the usual plan of following the periods of biblical history, Turner chooses George Adam Smith’s approach of dealing with the land area by area. The intended audience is the scholar in need of reference, the student who needs a textbook, the preacher looking for a guide to exposition, and the tourist requiring expert information. A notable feature is the inclusion of historical data right up to the present time. Although the photographs are not so good as those of the Eerdmans’ Bible Handbook mentioned above and a few minor inaccuracies were noted, we predict a long and useful life for this volume. Charles F. Pfeiffer’s Pocket Atlas of the Bible (Baker) is truly pocket-size and contains a useful collection of historical data, maps, and photographs. It is a basic sketch of Israelite history into which were inserted occasional facts of Bible geography.

A fine addition to the “Studies in Biblical Archaeology” series edited by Charles F. Pfeiffer comes in the form of a work on The Archaeology of the Jordan Valley by Elmer B. Smick (Baker). A geographical survey of the Valley and a discussion of the origin of its name is followed by a historical outline of life in the Jordan Valley from Old Testament times through the Byzantine period. The amount of biblical history compressed into this relatively inaccessible area is surprising, and Smick’s study is as good a place as any to begin to study its history. Cities in the Sand by Aubrey Menen (Dial) offers a journalist’s-eye-view of some of the ruins of ancient cities in the Eastern Mediterranean world. It is not a scholarly work, but it is interestingly written and may serve to whet the appetite for further study.

BIBLE PROPHECY Once again the study of biblical eschatology has come to the fore in many Christian circles, and a spate of books has hit the bookstores. The most substantial in scholarship and in sheer bulk is the Encyclopedia of Biblical Prophecy by J. Barton Payne of Covenant Seminary (Harper & Row). Payne describes prediction of what from the prophet’s vantage point was in the future, and it is only this aspect of prophecy with which he is concerned. He sees predictions in the form of oracles, figures, symbols, and types. Fulfillments are similarly catalogued, with few possibilities overlooked. Following this, all the predictive prophecies of the Old and New Testaments are enumerated in order, with the total dealing with 737 matters, or 8,352 verses out of the total of 31,124, or 27 per cent of the whole Bible! If, however, the types are eliminated, the number drops by one-third. One of the first prophecies concerns Adam: “In the days of Adam’s eating fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, he should ‘surely die,’ ” fulfilled a bit later when Adam ate. The book is a marvel of statistics; we can only salute the author’s energetic capacity for such matters in seeing this massive volume to its conclusion. Perhaps he will undertake as a sequel a similar study of the important non-predictive elements in biblical prophecy.

While Payne was at work on all the prophecies, that indefatigable collector and correlator of the biblical “alls,”Herbert Lockyer, was producing yet another volume, All the Messianic Prophecies of the Bible (Zondervan). His work is divided into specific messianic prophecies and symbolic messianic prophecies, the latter incorporating those identified as “figures, events, and types” by Payne. Although we may balk at the author’s enthusiastic handling of some of the material and his readiness to find prophecies of Christ in the most obscure places, it is noteworthy that he calls for caution lest we “impose” rather than “expose” the Scripture.

A good introduction to the varying positions taken by evangelicals is A Survey of Bible Prophecy by Raymond Ludwigson (Zondervan), which the novice should read before reading books advocating only one position. Ludwigson discusses such topics as antichrist, Armegeddon, judgments, kingdom, millennialism (all kinds!), rapture, resurrection, and tribulation, in alphabetical order. This book will give perspective on the positions taken by different Bible students and will give aid to the bewildered reader who happens to confront some of the many books that treat the subject as if no legitimate differences of interpretation were possible.

MISCELLANEOUS An important comparative study comes from the pen of Leopold Sabourin in the book entitled Priesthood (Brill). He begins with a careful analysis of various ancient priestly orders, including in his study very primitive societies as well as the more advanced civilizations of Iran, India, Greece, and Rome. A special section is devoted to Israel’s nearer neighbors: the Mesopotamians, Canaanites, Hittites, Egyptians, and Arabs. Israelite priesthood is then observed, though in a less comprehensive manner than by the earlier study of A. Cody, A History of Old Testament Priesthood (1969). Finally, Jewish priesthood from the time of Jesus and the High Priestly role of Jesus (especially as outlined in the Epistle to the Hebrews) rounds out the monograph. Sabourin’s discussion of the perplexing questions surrounding Israelite priesthood fails to cover much new ground; for a more imaginative handling of the data one should read the essays in Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (see page 52).

An item that will interest those concerned with bibliographical research is an extensive Biblical Bibliography by Paul-Émile Langevin (Les Presses de L’Université Laval). Included in this 950-page work are numerous listings, primarily Roman Catholic, related to the study of the Bible. Popular as well as scholarly books are included, and all are arranged under useful headings and thoroughly indexed. This volume should be added to all theological libraries.

After the abundant materials of 1972, 1973’s Old Testament offerings may seem slender, but there are some works of real quality, particularly in history and backgrounds. Another plus for 1973 is the number of good devotional works, especially in the realm of commentaries. Again this year I am going to designate with a following asterisk (*) all those books suitable for a reader without a theological education. But enough of the preliminaries; onward to the books.

COMMENTARIES Pride of place among the year’s commentaries belongs to a two-volume work by A. A. Anderson in the “New Century Bible” entitled Psalms* (Attic). These volumes, which are dedicated to the author’s colleague, F. F. Bruce, begin with a fine introduction to current Psalm study, in language understandable by any intelligent layman. Anderson assumes a moderating position in such matters as the use of Psalms in enthronement festivals, after which he discusses special subjects like Hebrew poetry and the Psalm titles. The commentary itself concentrates on giving help in understanding the text, though each individual Psalm is seen first in whatever historical context seems possible for it. Scholarly positions are well represented, and use of the Psalms in the New Testament is reflected in the commentary.

Four other books on the Psalms appeared in 1973. Psalms 1–72* by Derek Kidner in InterVarsity’s “Tyndale Old Testament” series (TOTC) is a worthy addition to the literature on the subject. Kidner’s introduction is, if anything, better than Anderson’s, and readers will especially appreciate his sections on the “Messianic Hope” and “Titles and Technical Terms.” In the latter, each of those troublesome titles and terms often merely transliterated is clearly identified or described. Kidner’s addition to the TOTC keeps up the high standard being set by editor Donald Wiseman for the series. Psalms in a Minor Key* (Moody) by Carl Armerding (my uncle) is the fruit of a lifetime of inspirational preaching on thirty-three selected Psalms. The author is well schooled in the Hebrew text, but this work grows out of living in light of the devotional and practical lessons of these poems. Similarly devotional and practical is the fine little work by pastor Ray C. Stedman, Folk Psalms of Faith* (Regal). Nineteen Psalms are treated, some with strong Messianic flavor. Finally, a critical edition of an old commentary has been made available in J. Baker and E. W. Nicholson’s The Commentary of Rabbi David Kimhi on salms 120–150 (Cambridge). Current exegesis, which is rediscovering its roots in Calvin and Luther, could do well to use this volume as an introduction, particularly for non-Jewish scholars, to the works of a representative and imaginative rabbi of the late Middle Ages.

Turning to other parts of the Old Testament, we note the continuing stream of brief commentaries in the “Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible” (CBC). Robert Davidson’s Genesis 1–11*, though committed to standard documentary positions (albeit far removed from Well-hausian days), is marked by a commendable scholarly caution. His introductory section describing for the layman the ways in which scholars understand “myth” is a model of clarity. His handling of Genesis 1:1 (a crux interpretum) preserves the high theology of the chapter over against Near Eastern creation myths, a feature representative of the author’s handling of his material generally.

Exodus* by R. Alan Cole (InterVarsity) is another TOTC addition. The short section on the theology of Exodus is almost worth the price of the book, while the commentary itself will be found most useful. Wisely, the TOTC series has not attempted to reprint the biblical text, thereby permitting space for double the commentary available in the comparably sized CBC.

C. H. Mackintosh’s familiar Notes on the Pentateuch* (Loizeaux) has been reset in a single well-bound volume after nearly a century of sales in six small volumes. Two brief commentaries on the historical books are J. Robinson’s First Book of Kings* (CBC) and Peter R. Ackroyd’s I and II Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah* (SCM) in the “Torch Bible Commentaries.” First Kings is set in the framework of a Deuteronomic School of writings, composed in the first instance during the reign of Josiah and reedited during the exile. The introductory material is most helpful, but the commentary, though useful, is far too brief. Ackroyd, in the second book, first shows why the Chronicler’s work is a necessary theological supplement to the earlier accounts of the same material in Samuel-Kings, and then goes on to give what, for a small book, is a surprisingly complete layman’s commentary on the text of the RSV. That he places Ezra later than Nehemiah will be troublesome to some and is indicative of the author’s general attitude toward the historical problem of Ezra and Nehemiah. But the commentary represents current historical scholarship at its best and is a worthy supplement to Ackroyd’s own Israel Under Babylon and Persia (1970) in the “New Clarendon Bible” (Oxford).

Four brief volumes on Job have been issued recently. An intensely personal statement is David M. Howard’s How Come, God?* (Holman), in which the author’s experiences as a missionary with the Latin America Mission provide the framework for reflections on the experience of Job. Dave Howard learned both that there are no easy answers to some questions and that there is still no shortage of “Job’s comforters” for whom the pat answer, glibly offered, is the solution to any and all enigmas of life. Far less personal, though equally practical, is Robert N. Schaper’s Why Me, God?* (Regal). A third recent book on Job that we have not previously noted is a collection of essays edited by Nahum Glatzer entitled Dimensions of Job* (Schocken). Glatzer’s extensive introduction is not merely to the Book of Job but more to the point of how Job has been interpreted, first by classical Judaism and Christianity, and secondly by moderns. The bulk of the book consists of essays representing each tradition, from Martin Buber and Robert Gordis to Ernest Renan, Rudolf Otto, G. K. Chesterton, Sören Kierkegaard, and Archibald MacLeish. A final work on Job began as a prize essay in the English department at Harvard. Jon D. Levenson’s The Book of Job in Its Time and in the Twentieth Century* (Harvard) studies Job from the perspective of three recent writers, H. G. Wells, Archibald MacLeish, and Robert Frost. Levenson’s pessimistic conclusion is that none of the three, nor indeed any possible successor, can recreate either Job or Job’s God in the twentieth century, chiefly because Job’s theistic premises, which created the tension in the first place, are themselves generally discredited in the eyes of contemporary man. The essay will certainly provoke thought.

Isaiah 1–39* (CBC) by A. S. Herbert follows the format of the series and adds little to Isaiah scholarship. Introductory matters are well handled, though recent challenges to the late dating of some chapters (notably S. Erlandsson’s work on Isaiah 11; 13, and 14) might have been given more credence. Two very useful works on Jeremiah appeared in the year just past. In the TOTC series, R. K. Harrison’s Jeremiah and Lamentations* (InterVarsity) packs more into its slender frame than many a commentary double its size. Harrison takes seriously Jeremiah’s role in reenforcing the covenant ideals of Deuteronomy for his own time, and effectively links that prophet to the historical period in which he ministered. The short commentary on Lamentations beautifully expresses the theology of divine vindication highlighted by that book, and draws out the picture of Lamentations as a corporate counterpart to the individual complaint of Job. A second book on Jeremiah is not a commentary but an inductive self-study guide. F. Ross Kinsler’s Inductive Study of the Book of Jeremiah* (William Carey) was originally designed for use in Latin America, but the translation will be a great help to English-speaking readers as well. In over five hundred pages, solid help is given to the serious student interested in knowing the text of the prophet, and we applaud this endeavor, already being repeated for other books of both testaments.

On Daniel, a major commentary from a dispensational stance comes from the pen of Leon Wood. Daniel* (Zondervan) is the work of a trained Semitics scholar, a fact reflected in the careful handling of exegetical points in the text. Wood’s positions on critical matters are, as might be expected, staunchly conservative, if not at times a bit overly defensive. This book will inevitably be compared to the recent commentary of John Walvoord (Moody, 1971), a volume that takes the same basic theological stance. Walvoord is stylistically superior and hence better reading, but Wood’s independent exegesis in the original text probably makes his the more valuable of the two.

Nahum, Zephaniah, Habakkuk* by Hobart E. Freeman in Moody’s “Everyman” series provides a brief, better than average layman’s treatment of the Hebrew text, though it completely ignores critical questions. Freeman, who is clearly a premillennialist, generally avoids speculation on possible contemporary fulfillment and has given us a most helpful volume. An older work, The Visions and Prophecies of Zechariah (Kregel), is newly available in a reprint edition. The author, David Baron, was a Jewish Christian. He focuses on the messianic theme so prominent in Zechariah.

Rounding out the fare in the commentary section are two volumes of the CBC on the Apocrypha. John R. Bartlett writes on The First and Second Books of the Maccabees* while J. C. Dancy has contributed The Shorter Books of the Apocrypha*. The short, pithy comments will be greatly appreciated by those wishing a nodding acquaintance with these ancient writings. A coffee-table type of volume on The Maccabees* (Macmillan) by Moshe Pearlman is worth mentioning, especially for its illustrations.

SPECIAL BIBLICAL STUDIESGENERAL. Another brief introduction to the literature and themes of the Old Testament (see for comparison H. L. Ellison’s The Message of the Old Testament or Jacob M. Myers’s Invitation to the Old Testament) comes from the pen of Heidelberg scholar Hans W. Wolff. The Old Testament: A Guide to Its Writings* (Fortress) combines standard critical conclusions with contemporary German interests in biblical theology to make a most readable, though not always conservative, introduction.

WISDOM LITERATURE. Perhaps the most important work on biblical wisdom to appear for many years is the English edition of Gerhard von Rad’s Wisdom in Israel (Abingdon). A brief introduction to the sources of wisdom (court education) and its forms (proverbs and poetry) is followed by an extensive investigation of the essence of wisdom itself. The liberation of reason and its search for the rules by which reality is understood are set in the context of an Israelite commitment to God’s sovereignty as both Creator and Sustainer of the universe. It is this commitment of the biblical writers that, for von Rad, makes it so difficult for contemporary intellectuals to understand Hebrew wisdom. We simply do not, in our own rationality, share their presuppositions. Here is a book that meets a long-felt need for a major treatment of the subject.

A second book on wisdom is at once more superficial and more practical. Walter Brueggemann’s In Man We Trust (John Knox) is concerned to correct the claimed imbalance in both evangelical and neo-orthodox theology in which sin and salvation dominate. He sees in the more “worldly” emphasis of the wisdom writers a background of the same struggle we face today: the issues of power, freedom, and responsibility. Whether the wisdom traditions are incompatible with an emphasis on Pauline theology (as the author seems to believe) can safely be left for the reader to judge; in any case, the challenge to think through our preaching and activity in light of biblical wisdom is clearly needed.

PROPHETS. A helpful layman’s introduction to each biblical prophet is given by Eugene Skelton in Meet the Prophets* (Broadman). The book’s unique feature is a conversation with each of the prophets in which the message of the prophet is paraphrased in a graphic and penetrating style. A second volume from Southern Baptist circles is Eric C. Rust’s Covenant and Hope* (Word). Rust is much more the scholar, and his opening study of Hebrew prophetism is followed by chapters on Amos, Hosea, Isaiah of Jerusalem, Ezekiel, Deutero-Isaiah, and the post-exilic prophets. In the title of the book we have Rust’s conclusion as to the dominant themes of the entire prophetic movement.

Two scholarly studies in the prophets add to the considerable literature on the subject. A reworked dissertation (Louvain) by Anton Schoors entitled I Am God Your Saviour (Brill) is a form-critical study of the two main genres (according to the author) in Isaiah 40–55. The words of salvation and the polemic genres, which form the center of the study, are helpfully set in their context, and some attempt is made to relate them to the overall message of the prophet, something that form critics have been notably slow to accomplish. A second volume, also a dissertation (Catholic University), is Joseph Jensen’s The Use of ‘torâ’ by Isaiah (Catholic Biblical Quarterly). Jensen builds on earlier studies (e.g., William Whedbee’s Isaiah and Wisdom) and specifically here argues for the sense of “wisdom instruction” in the five uses of the term torâ in Isaiah of Jerusalem. Rounding out the prophetic offerings is Hans W. Wolff’s Amos: The Man and His Background* (Fortress), a translation of a book whose German title means “Amos’s spiritual home.” For Wolff this home is the wisdom circle of writers rather than the schools of the prophets, a contention that is given much support in the text of that prophet.

PENTATEUCH. Academic studies of the book of Exodus have long been concerned with the relation between the Exodus and Sinai traditions. While conservatives have never had problems seeing a relation between the two, and the same group of people involved in both, such a conclusion has been far from axiomatic among critics. E. W. Nicholson, in Exodus and Sinai in History and Tradition (John Knox), rehearses the evidence both for separating the two and for combining them, and finally draws his own conclusions. Neither form-critical nor traditio-historical evidence (so Nicholson) drives us to separate the original traditions, and from this a number of most satisfactory historical conclusions result.

In a less academic context there have been a number of new offerings in the general area of Pentateuchal studies. In the creation-evolution debate, two volumes argue for strongly fundamentalistic positions. In Jesus Christ Creator (Creation-Science Research Center) Kelly Segraves argues for a young earth, a universal flood, and a theistic, Christocentric creation. Scientific Studies in Special Creation (Baker) edited by Walter E. Lammerts brings together more than thirty essays from the pages of the Creation Research Society Quarterly. As in Segraves’s volume, the essays are more concerned with science than with Genesis, though there is some stimulating material for the biblical student in each. Very different from either is Richard S. Hanson’s The Serpent Was Wiser* (Augsburg). Hanson’s goal is to take a new look at Genesis 1–11, and this he does by turning to the categories of myth and drama to draw out the theology of the passages in question. It is only with difficulty that we can read Hanson and the previous volumes and remember that they are dealing with the same original text.

A fascinating study of Egyptian ways of death and embalming has been provided by John J. Davis in the slender book Mummies, Men and Madness* (BMH Books). The volume is a well illustrated and reasonably non-technical introduction to the subject, and concludes with a chapter relating the death of Jacob and Joseph to the Egyptian Middle Kingdom period.

Conservative as well as liberal ethicists today are asking, “Are the ten commandments still valid?” In God Speaks to an X-Rated Society (Moody), edited by Alan F. Johnson, a resounding “yes” is given by ten members of the faculty at Wheaton College. Although we may wonder how Wheaton faculty know so much about “X ratings,” we can only be thankful for this up-to-date and penetrating look at each of the ten commandments.

HISTORY OF ISRAEL Our leading work this year is a monumental five-volume Old Testament History* (Alba) by Austrian Redemptorist scholar Claus Schedl. Schedl’s work is much more than a history; it includes also an introduction to each book of the Bible (including the Apocrypha) as well as extensive material on such introductory subjects as creation. The first volume is marked by a somewhat curious system of numerology, though this does not detract from the worth of the set. The work is of special interest to evangelicals, for it represents moderate Roman Catholic scholarship, and the critical positions taken often (though by no means always) mirror those of evangelical Protestant Old Testament scholars.

Newly issued is the complete one-volume edition of Charles F. Pfeiffer’s Old Testament History* (Baker and Canon). Most of the volume was previously available in separately issued parts, all of which (unfortunately) remain virtually unchanged, supplemented only by new materials on the conquest and settlement. Pfeiffer’s approach is cautious; his book combines a clear text with helpful archaeological and historical backgrounds. The one-volume edition, unlike its predecessors, is beautifully laid out and supplemented with excellent photographs.

Two books for scholars, both of which deal with history, criticism, and the theological implications of both, are George E. Mendenhall’s The Tenth Generation (Johns Hopkins) and Frank M. Cross’s Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Harvard). Both men are former students of William F. Albright, and each one’s book will stimulate much discussion on the origins of Israel and her traditions. Mendenhall’s work is more directly connected with origins and stands as something of a reaction to much current scholarship. In place of traditional literary and form-critical methods, Mendenhall wishes to substitute the functional methodology that looks at things in a way consistent with the viewpoints of ancient man. The book that follows is a collection of essays designed to prove that Israel’s covenant-league, formed in the period of the Judges as a rejection of Late Bronze Age political values, was the great synthesis that provided a basis for all biblical ethics. The rejection of God as King in the monarchy, like the politicizing of Christianity under Constantine, ended not only Israel’s formative period but also her contribution to true religion.

Cross, in the second volume, sees in almost all of Israel’s cultic life a tension between the historical motifs of Exodus and Sinai and the mythical motif of royal kingship. He labels the so-called historical material of the Old Testament essentially “epic,” a theme with which he unifies his entire treatment. The scope of the work is broad. Subjects include everything from the religion of the patriarchs to the rise of the apocalyptic community at Qumran.

Two additional books cover aspects of history. The first, a detailed study of a putative secret chronological system behind the Old Testament, may go down as merely a historical curiosity. Nevertheless, Gerhard Larsson’s The Secret System (Brill) does present an intriguing thesis, drawn from the researches of one Knut Stenring, who asks us to believe that the present biblical chronology was a mysterious system used in the post-exilic period to tie together the disparate writings into an authoritative canon for the Jewish initiate. A second book, unlike the first, presents no claims but merely illustrates The Old Testament in Living Pictures* (Regal). David S. Alexander has combined some magnificent photographs with random excerpts from the biblical text in a volume that is a pleasure to peruse.

ANCIENT NEAR EAST Our top offering in this field is again a new volume of the revised “Cambridge Ancient History” (Cambridge). Edited by I. E. S. Edwards et al., Volume II, Part 1, The Middle East and the Aegean Region, c. 1800–1380 B.C., covers the period from about the time of Joseph to the eve of the Exodus (late dating). The patriarchs, wandering in Canaan and Egypt, were very much a part of that world, and both history and archaeology have gone far in illuminating the accounts in our books of Genesis and Exodus. This third edition of the familiar Cambridge history will be the standard treatment of the subject for years to come.

The latest in a series of valuable books from the members of the British Society for Old Testament Studies is called Peoples of Old Testament Times* (Oxford) and is edited by British Assyriologist Donald J. Wiseman. Designed for the educated layman (though a few chapters are a bit stretching), the book deals successively and succinctly with the Hebrews, Canaanites, Philistines, Egyptians, Amorites, Arameans, Assyrians, Babylonians, Hittites, Moabites, Phoenicians, Arabs, and Persians. The strength of current evangelical scholarship in the field is illustrated by the presence of at least four prominent evangelicals among the contributors.

A useful synthesis is found in Helmer Ringgren’s Religions of the Ancient Near East (Westminster). The author is a prominent Scandinavian biblical scholar and author of a study of Israelite religion, so it is not surprising to find that his interests run to religious parallels with the Old Testament. Chapters cover Sumerian, Assyrian and Babylonian, and West Semitic religion. Such favorite Scandinavian themes as cultic kingship emerge in the study, with the conclusions of the book generally a bit more cautious than we have come to expect from members of this school.

Two very technical monographs deal with periods of Egyptian history. In a reworked dissertation John D. Schmidt has provided a detailed chronological study of the reign of Ramesses II (Johns Hopkins). Although Israel is never mentioned, nor is the Exodus, it is during the time of this king (ca. 1290–1224 B.C.) that many scholars date the departure of the Israelite tribes under Moses. Much more directly concerned with biblical events is the massive work of Kenneth A. Kitchen, The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt (1100–650 B.C.) (Aris and Phillips). More than one hundred biblical citations are listed in the index, and a major emphasis of the book is its synchronism between Egyptian monarchs and the rulers of Judah and Israel from the years of David and Solomon through the fall of the Southern Kingdom. Particularly noteworthy is Kitchen’s categorical rejection of the two-campaign theory for the time of Hezekiah. The problem of Tarhaka’s age and his designation as “King of Kush” is resolved, and the single campaign in 701 B.C. (the most obvious conclusion from the text in Second Kings 19 and Isaiah 37) is considered fixed. It will indeed be difficult for any biblical scholar to hold such an alternate view in the future (cf. John Bright’s History of Israel, second edition, pp. 296–308, for the development of that position).

TOPICAL MONOGRAPHS Two short monographs come from Mennonite circles and discuss current topics in light of Old Testament data. The Christian and Warfare* (Herald) by Jacob J. Enz sees in Old Testament warfare two strains, the former the winning of victories without battle, as exemplified by the Exodus and the period of the Judges. The second, the pattern throughout the monarchy, glorified standing armies but forgot the Lord of Hosts. The business of the New Testament church, claims Enz, was demilitarizing Old Testament battle songs. This is a stimulating discussion, though its selectivity with regard to data will probably render it less than fully convincing. The second brief paperback from Herald Press is Millard C. Lind’s Biblical Foundations For Christian Worship*. This paper, written for a discussion of the subject in the Mennonite Church, views worship as essentially a political act, which is another way of saying that Old Testament believers were expressing God’s rule in their commitment to the covenant cultic system. The same principle is seen as evident in the New Testament community, where the rule of God is likewise to be the rule of the community.

Three additional monographs are written for a scholarly audience. The Cosmic Mountain in Canaan and the Old Testament (Harvard) by Richard J. Clifford works chiefly with Ugaritic and biblical materials to develop the idea of Zion as a mountain of the far north. El, Baal, and Yahweh are each seen as a resident king of a court situated on this “cosmic” mountain. The second volume, The Old Testament Sabbath (SBL) by N. A. Andreasen turns away from extra-biblical solutions to the problem of the origin of the Sabbath. The author seeks to show, through a study of the tradition itself as it develops within the Old Testament, what place the Sabbath had in Israel and its life. A third book picks up themes popularized in recent years by the work of G. von Rad, R. Smend, G. E. Wright, and F. M. Cross. Patrick D. Miller’s The Divine Warrior in Early Israel (Harvard) concentrates on the early poetry of Israel (see D. A. Robertson’s thesis at the end of this article) and discusses the mythological-theological conceptions associated with Israel’s early wars.

PREACHING A powerful and fresh volume, in the tradition of John Bright’s The Authority of the Old Testament (1967) and Brevard Childs’s Biblical Theology in Crisis (1970), is Elizabeth Achtemeier’s The Old Testament and the Proclamation of the Gospel* (Westminster). Achtemeier, who has taught at both Lancaster and Union of Richmond seminaries, agrees that the Biblical Theology movement failed in North America (see Childs’s book), but she faults not so much its methodology as the failure to communicate that methodology to the average pastor. In the face of all humanistic and popularistic alternatives, she calls for a return to an historically based and dynamic biblical proclamation of the Gospel, especially from the theology of the Old Testament. The book is an advance on both Bright and Childs in its more extensive illustration of the solution through sample outlines and sermons.

A second volume on preaching is really an attempt to formulate a set of theological values by which the entire Old Testament may be preserved and taught. In The Old Testament in Contemporary Preaching* (Baker), Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., first discusses the question of the validity of the Old Testament, after which he sets forth his “promise” doctrine as the unifying theme of Old Testament theology. Four lectures follow in which law, history, prophecy, and wisdom are seen as expressions of the promise theme. While we still await a complete Old Testament theology from Kaiser, this short book will serve as an introduction to his method and approach.

LANGUAGES J. H. Hospers has put all subsequent generations in his debt with A Basic Bibliography For the Study of the Semitic Languages (Brill). Volume 1 covers every phase (bibliography, philosophy, literature, cultural history, atlases) of the study of all the major Semitic languages except Arabic. More than four hundred periodicals, series, collective works, and manuals have been indexed covering Akkadian, Sumerian, Hittite, Hurrian, Urartian, Elamite, Persian, Ugaritic, Phoenician-Punic, Canaanite, Hebrew (down through modern), Syriac and Aramaic, Old South Arabian, and Ethiopic. A closing section deals with comparative Semitics.

A major work representing a lifetime study is Peter Walters’s The Text of the Septuagint (Cambridge), edited and published ten years after Walters’s death by David W. Gooding. The work has two parts, the first dealing with grammatical corruptions and the second with Semitisms in the Greek text. This work, though never completed, will form a valuable part of the preliminary research toward a new critical edition of the Greek Old Testament.

A Harvard dissertation by Kevin G. O’Connell entitled The Theodotionic Revision of the Book of Exodus (Harvard) is a detailed study of the state of various Palestinian revisions of the Septuagint in the first centuries B.C. and A.D. The work is a splendid addition to the technical literature available on early texts, not only in Greek but in the Hebrew from which the Greek versions were taken. A second dissertation in the same series by J. Gerald Janzen entitled Studies in the Text of Jeremiah discusses an old problem in light of new evidence from Qumran. His conclusions, based in part on a theory of local texts proposed by F. M. Cross, generally uphold the shorter readings of the Septuagint, though recognizing a host of exceptions dealing with individual problems.

More to the point for contemporary translators is The Hebrew Text of the Old Testament (Oxford and Cambridge) by L. H. Brockington. Arranged by book, chapter, and verse, this volume collects only the variations found in the third edition of Kittel’s Biblia Hebraica, which were adopted by the translators of the NEB.

A Yale dissertation entitled Linguistic Evidence in Dating Early Hebrew Poetry (SBL) comes from the researches of David A. Robertson. As a first attempt to consider systematically all the claims for early dating of such poems as Genesis 49; Exodus 15; Judges 5 and Deuteronomy 32, this study is certain to meet a need. Instead of selecting random examples from cognate literature, Robertson has done a careful comparative study of Hebrew forms themselves, with the cautious conclusion that only Exodus 15, Deuteronomy 32, and Job resemble early poetry, and only in the case of Exodus 15 is the evidence unambiguous.

Pride of place goes to The New International Version: The New Testament (Zondervan). Translated by a panel of evangelical New Testament scholars working under the sponsorship of the New York Bible Society, the NIV aims at being “idiomatic without being idiosyncratic, contemporary without being dated.” The result is a translation of the New Testament that is neither excessively literalistic (like the New American Standard Bible) nor paraphrastic (like The Living Bible). It is generally more idiomatic than the Revised Standard Version but not nearly so free as the New English Bible or Today’s English Version. The care with which the production was made, being reviewed at each stage of translation by numerous scholars and literary experts, should make it superior to most other recent translations. All who love the Word of God and rejoice in the current upsurge in Bible reading will want to wish the new version every success. Meanwhile we anxiously await the Old Testament, scheduled for publication three or four years hence, which will probably be the key to its general acceptance in the churches. Also appearing in 1973 was a thoroughly revised edition of The New Testament in Modern English, a widely respected translation by J. B. Phillips (Macmillan).

GENERAL The New Testament in Living Pictures: A Photo Guide to the New Testament by David S. Alexander (Regal) offers very beautiful and appropriate pictures to illustrate the historical and geographical setting of the New Testament writings. In view of the fact that all are in full color, the price is extremely reasonable. Each photograph is accompanied by a small map indicating the precise geographical location of the item photographed and also a biblical text and brief comment. This volume should be in every church library. Any student of the New Testament would find it useful.

Mastering New Testament Facts (John Knox) is the title of a four-volume study guide to the New Testament written by Madeline H. Beck and Lamar Williamson, Jr., designed to be used with Today’s English Version (=Good News For Modern Man). By working carefully through the New Testament with the help of a series of programmed reading, art, and activities tests, the beginning Bible student teaches himself the basic contents and message of the New Testament. Mastering New Testament Facts could well be used as a basis for youth and adult Bible classes and for catechism classes. The aim is to get the student into the Scriptures rather than to indoctrinate him with conclusions about them.

Four introductions to the New Testament for the layman that appeared in 1973 are In the Midst Stands Jesus: A Pastoral Introduction to the New Testament by Josiah G. Chatham (Alba), Beginnings in the New Testament by Howard F. Vos (Moody), The New Testament: A Guide to Its Writings by Günther Bornkamm (Fortress) and, best of all, The Message of the New Testament by F. F. Bruce (Eerdmans). The first is written from a biblically oriented Roman Catholic point of view; the second, from a conservative evangelical perspective; the third, with a liberal-critical orientation; as for the fourth, most readers know the treat awaiting them. Each is excellent in its own way, though each has the danger of becoming a substitute for the New Testament rather than a guide through its pages. Also for the layman is Personalities Around Paul by D. Edmond Hiebert (Moody), a Mennonite scholar’s discussion of the less familiar features of New Testament study.

For the serious theological student, four offerings stand out: David M. Scholer, A Basic Bibliographic Guide For New Testament Exegesis (Eerdmans); Werner Georg Kümmel, The Theology of the New Testament (Abingdon); Robert Morgan, The Nature of New Testament Theology (SCM); and Hans Conzelmann, History of Primitive Christianity (Abingdon). Scholer’s bibliography presupposes a basic knowledge of Greek and should find a welcome on the bookshelf of all serious students; librarians will find it a helpful check list for indicating the adequacy of their holdings in New Testament. Kümmel offers an exposition of the message of the Synoptic Gospels, Paul, and John. Although conservatives will think he has pressed the diversity of the various writers a little too hard, few will fail to benefit immensely from the profound insight of one of the leading biblical scholars of our day. Morgan’s work consists of translations of two classic German essays on the subject by Wilhelm Wrede and Adolf Schlatter, representing a radical and conservative approach respectively, together with a lengthy introduction. Careful study of the observations of Wrede and Schlatter will give the student a good idea of the similarities and differences of these two approaches. Conzelmann offers a brief introduction to early Christian history from a radical-critical point of view. Since the author rarely makes so much as an allusion to the opinions of conservative scholars, the reader will be well advised to compare his views with one of the more conservative New Testament histories by Reicke, Filson, or Bruce.

Of special interest to teachers of biblical languages will be William Sanford LaSor’s Handbook of New Testament Greek (two volumes, Eerdmans). LaSor uses the inductive approach to the study of Greek, based on the first seventeen chapters of Acts. The use of rather technical linguistic and grammatical terminology makes it more useful as a textbook than as a “teach yourself” guide. Compared to the traditional approach, the inductive approach has the advantage not only of getting the student immediately into the Greek Testament—the only purpose for which most theological students study Greek—but also of becoming progressively easier. After beginning with Acts, the student finds the rest of the New Testament a pushover! LaSor’s handbook includes all words used ten times or more in the New Testament, cross references to the New Englishman’s Greek Concordance (published last year by William Carey), and indexes to the Bauer-Arndt-Gingrich lexicon and Moulton-Geden concordance. Also of primary emphasis to Greek teachers and students is a new Greek-English Synopsis of the Four Gospels, edited by Kurt Aland (American Bible Society). This synopsis has been available for a decade without the English parallels. In its expanded form it will undoubtedly become the standard synopsis used by students.

COMMENTARIES Two works intended primarily for preachers lead the list of valuable new commentaries published this year. The first is an Exposition of the Gospel According to Matthew by William Hendriksen (Baker), a prince among Reformed expositors. The eighth volume to appear in the author’s “New Testament Commentary,” it is a storehouse of more than a thousand pages of exegetical information and homiletical hints. The discussion of the Synoptic problem in the lengthy introduction is as lucid an account as one could imagine of such a difficult subject. One longs for the day when would-be ministers of the Word in the pulpits of our land begin to give their congregations a diet of solid biblical exposition exemplified by this work! Briefer in scope but of the same high quality is the exposition of Colossians by Ralph P. Martin (Zondervan). Subtitled “The Church’s Lord and the Christian’s Liberty,” Martin’s work reflects the most up-to-date scholarship but also a pastor’s heart, concerned to bring the message of Paul’s letter to life for the reader. No gift you could give your pastor this year would make him happier than a present of these two books.

Other important commentaries published during 1973, the majority of interest primarily to theological students and scholars, include the following: ACommentary on the First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians by Ernest Best (Harper & Row), the latest addition to “Harper’s New Testament Commentaries” and by far the most thorough work to date in English on these letters; The Johannine Epistles by Rudolf Bultmann (Fortress) in the “Hermenia” series, a translation of the second edition of his German commentary in the Meyer series (1967), which makes no mention whatsoever of the famous commentary by Westcott (nor of the works of any other conservatives); Romans by Matthew Black in the “New Century Bible” (Attic), less technical than others that have been mentioned so far but none the less valuable; and An die Römer by Ernst Käsemann (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck]), an important and eagerly awaited commentary by Bultmann’s most famous disciple, for all who read German. At a more homiletical level and representing an entirely different approach from the volumes by Black and Käsemann, but nonetheless carefully exegetical and profoundly theological, is Martyn Lloyd-Jones’s exposition of Romans six entitled Romans: The New Man (Zondervan). (It is the third of his volumes on Romans.) The same can be said of John Stott’s exposition of Second Timothy entitled Guard the Gospel (InterVarsity).

A Translator’s Handbook on the Letters of John by C. Haas, M. De Jonge, and J. L. Swellengrebel and ATranslator’s Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Romans by Barclay M. Newman and Eugene Nida (both from American Bible Society) are inexpensive aids that will be of interest to all who seek to understand Johannine and Pauline idioms, not only to Bible translators, for whom these volumes were designed. Intended for the layman are Ray Summers’s Commentary on Luke (Word), Anthony L. Ash’s The Gospel According to Luke (two volumes, Sweet), and Earle McMillan’s The Gospel According to Mark (Sweet). Each of these is non-technical in format and conservative in conclusions but based on solid scholarship. Two commentaries on Acts intended for the general reader, each excellent in its own way, are The Acts of the Apostles by William Neil (Attic) and Church Alive by W. S. LaSor (Regal). Both authors are careful scholars who take Acts seriously as “a basically accurate account of what happened” (Neil) and who have a gift for making rather complex material easy to digest. Although the works themselves have been around for a long time, the appearance of the final three volumes in the Torrance translations of John Calvin’s New Testament commentaries, The Synoptic Gospels and the Epistles of James and Jude (Eerdmans), must by no means be overlooked.

THE GOSPELS Jesus and the Gospel is the appropriate title for a collection of essays by the distinguished director of the École Biblique in Jerusalem, Pierre Benoit (Seabury). Included are astute reflections on the “form critical” method, a discussion of the divinity of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels, a note on the date of the Last Supper, and other essays centering in the last days of our Lord’s life on earth. The author weds a mature scholarship with genuine piety and thus provides a model for those who accept both the supreme authority of the Bible and the validity of biblical criticism. Two other works written in a similar vein are Jesus’s Audience by J. Duncan M. Derrett (Darton, Longman and Todd) and Mark: Evangelist and Theologian by Ralph P. Martin (Zondervan). Derrett turns the searchlight of a profound knowledge of the world of the ancient Near East on the teaching of Jesus, this time for the general reader rather than the specialist, in an extremely original and refreshing work. Martin’s work is more technical, focusing on a review of current scholarship as related to the study of the Second Gospel and attempting to suggest the historical background that led to its being written. It is encouraging to find a major work like Martin’s in an inexpensive paperback edition and thus within the book budget of every Bible student.

Jesus by Hans Conzelmann (Fortress) offers in English dress a classic study from a major German theological encyclopedia. If you wish to understand the basic presuppositions and assumptions of Bultmannian criticism, this small book is required reading. It is unfortunate that the editors failed to include in their extensive bibliography the criticisms of Conzelmann’s approach by F. F. Bruce (see his “History and the Gospel” in Jesus of Nazareth: Savior and Lord, edited by C. F. H. Henry). Victory Over Violence: Jesus and the Revolutionists by Martin Hengel (Fortress) is a welcome antidote to the superficial use of the New Testament made by representatives of the “theology of liberation.” Hengel provides the reader with a balanced discussion of Jesus’ political stance and an evaluation of the work of those who have sought to identify him with the Zealots of his day. Jesus as Seen by His Contemporaries by Etienne Trocmè (Westminster) is a popular exposition of some of the chief features of the life and teachings of Jesus as understood by a French New Testament scholar. The author’s stress on the “mystery of Jesus” and his hesitancy to affirm historicity of the Gospels will not go down well with evangelicals; still, there is much of value in his work for all students of the Gospels, regardless of their theological views. Jesus on Trial by Gerard Sloyan (Fortress) and First Easter by Paul Maier (Harper & Row) focus on crucial events. The latter is especially suitable for laymen, combining historical scholarship with Christian faith and offering choice photographs.

BACKGROUNDS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT For nearly a decade now the scholarly world has awaited the revised edition of Emil Schürer’s justly famous The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus. Volume one, revised and edited by Geza Vermes and Fergas Millar (T. and T. Clark), has finally appeared! It deals with the history of Judaism from the time of the Maccabees to the Bar Kokhba rebellion (175 B.C.–A.D. 135). Working with numerous other experts, the revisers have done a splendid job, incorporating the results of some sixty years of scholarship since Schürer’s original version without losing anything significant of the original. The price is high, but so is the value, since the book is tightly packed and contains much foreign-language material. This work is a “must” for all university, seminary, and Bible-college libraries, as well as for the personal libraries of biblical scholars. The editors and publishers are to be congratulated for the production of such a magnificent volume. The second and third volumes, which will treat Jewish institutions and literature, are in preparation.

Two works of a totally different nature that provide the non-specialist with vivid but not always strictly accurate images of the milieu of early Christianity are The Jews in the Roman World by historian Michael Grant (Scribner) and When Jerusalem Burned by Gerard Israel and Jacques Lebar (Morrow). The first book is the more scholarly of the two, being written by one who specializes in interpreting the ancient world for the general reader; but the second, about the destruction of the Temple by the Romans in A.D. 70, makes by far the most exciting reading. “Exciting” is not exactly the word to describe Jesus and the Pharisees by John Bowker (Cambridge), but it is nonetheless an important work. It consists of translations of the major historical sources that shed light on the Pharisees, in particular as these sources in turn shed light on the pages of the New Testament, together with an introduction. These documents and accompanying notes will be of vital interest to all students of gospel origins. Representing the Hellenistic background to the New Testament is an important monograph by a younger evangelical scholar, Pre-Christian Gnosticism by Edwin Yamauchi (Eerdmans). The author surveys the various strands of evidence presented by scholars for the existence of Gnosticism prior to the advent of Christianity and for its influence on the thought-forms of the New Testament. His conclusions are basically negative in regard to the alleged influence of Gnosticism on the New Testament. This is by far the best introduction to the subject and is highly commended to theological students who are grappling with the topic.

MISCELLANEOUS Two important studies of Luke-Acts are Jacob Jervell, Luke and the People of God (Augsburg), and S. G. Wilson, The Gentiles and the Gentile Mission in Luke-Acts (Cambridge). The first is a collection of essays by the professor of New Testament at the University of Oslo, who places a series of interesting question-marks over many of the assumptions of certain contemporary Lucan scholars. His first essay demonstrates the absurdity of the suggestion sometimes made that Luke had no available traditions for Acts like those he used in writing the Third Gospel; Jervell points to the many places in Paul’s letters where he indicates that traditions concerning the founding of new churches formed a part of the early Christian preaching (kerygma). Although the author does not argue for an early date for Luke-Acts, nor even the Lucan authorship of this two-volume history of early Christian origins, his understanding of the theology of Acts and the problems facing the author certainly tends to favor an early date. The monograph by Wilson was written as a Ph.D. thesis at Durham University under C. K. Barrett and is published as a Society for New Testament Studies Monograph. The author has provided students of Luke-Acts with a valuable exercise in “redaction criticism” that will undoubtedly be the center of some debate among scholars in the future.

The Use of the Old and New Testaments in Clement of Rome by Donald A. Hagner (Brill) is not limited to the study of the New Testament, but it is a masterly work that makes an important contribution to our understanding of the New Testament canon as well as early Christian hermeneutics. The Old Testament in the Book of Revelation by Ferrell Jenkins (Cogdill) is considerably less technical but is also helpful in understanding the relation of the two testaments. Festschrift to Honor F. Wilbur Gingrich, Lexicographer, Scholar, Teacher, and Committed Christian Layman (Brill) is the unimaginative title of a volume of essays dedicated to the well-known co-translator and editor of the English edition of the famous lexicon by Walter Bauer. Of special interest are details concerning the origin of the Bauer-Arndt-Gingrich lexicon, further linguistic notes on Acts by H. J. Cadbury, a discussion of the terminology of the papyri and inscriptions as a background to Paul’s understanding of Law and Gospel in Romans (F. W. Danker), and provocative suggestions concerning the unfinished task of New Testament lexicography (O. A. Piper). Three fairly non-technical studies appearing in paperback are The Worship of the Early Church by Ferdinand Hahn (Fortress), an important study by a leading German Neutestamentler;Peter in the New Testament, edited by Raymond E. Brown, Karl P. Donfried, and John Reumann (Augsburg and Paulist), a jointly written Lutheran-Roman Catholic effort representing, for the most part, fairly extreme criticism; and Gifts and Ministries by Arnold Bittlinger (Eerdmans), a perceptive study of the New Testament concepts of charisma and ministry by a theologian who is within the so-called charismatic movement but who is also in dialogue with mainstream exegesis. This book has much to teach both charismatics and non-charismatics.

A leading Dutch New Testament specialist in our time who has contributed much toward a positive and constructive understanding of the Bible is W. C. Van Unnik. Unfortunately, most of his writings have been essays tucked away in the pages of journals, Festschriften, and sometimes rather obscure volumes of collected essays. Thus it is with sincere appreciation that we note the appearance of Sparsa Collecta, Volume One (Brill), which includes his major essays on the Gospels, the letters of Paul, and Acts. It is of interest that more than half the items included are on Luke-Acts, concerning which the author takes an essentially conservative approach. Van Unnik’s essays should be in all college and seminary libraries without exception, as well as in the personal libraries of scholars.

HISTORICAL CURIOSITIES The two most recent of the perennial attacks on Christianity to receive extensive notice in the media are The Secret Gospel by Morton Smith (Harper & Row) and The Jesus Scroll by Donovan Joyce (Dial). Although Smith is a professor of ancient history at Columbia University and would no doubt claim that his work is in a different category from that of Joyce, a journalist, most scholars would agree that the two books are cut from the same cloth. Having rejected the claims of historic Christianity concerning the origin of the Gospel, both seek desperately to find an alternative explanation of the historical data surrounding Jesus and the early Church. The hypothesis of each is so fantastic that the faith of believers can only be strengthened—if this is the best that can be done, why should anyone ever doubt the original version!

Morton Smith thinks he has found a fragment of a letter written by Clement of Alexandria, a Christian theologian of the late second and early third century. (This is the only point of his thesis that will probably be accepted by other scholars, though many would deny even this claim!) The alleged letter of Clement speaks of a longer version of Mark’s Gospel that was used in heretical circles. Smith argues that this longer gospel was the original one and contained secret teaching of the early Christians that was omitted from the abridged version. By a series of ingenious arguments, he goes on to reconstruct the true origins of Christianity. Jesus becomes a magician who taught his disciples secret rites (involving homosexual acts) and an essentially antinomian ethic. For those who wish to see for themselves the flimsy evidence upon which Smith has built his case, he has published a more technical work entitled Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark (Harvard University). The reader would do well to begin with the text of the fragment itself and then pass on to the comments of Smith, so that his interpretation is not colored by the author’s adroit reconstructions. If the reader is not himself equipped to evaluate the technicalities and feels overwhelmed by Smith’s erudition, he should find consolation in the fact that hardly any reputable scholar—there may be one somewhere, since it is usually possible to find a scholar to support almost any position, but I have not heard of him yet!—would concur with his conclusions. One wonders how long the author’s academic reputation can survive such sensationalism.

Donovan Joyce’s work lacks the scholarly apparatus of Smith’s, but his theory is equally fantastic. He tells of an alleged scroll found at Masada, the last stronghold of the Jewish rebellion after the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, by an archaeologist operating under an assumed name (who subsequently disappeared). The scroll—now in the hands of the Russians (who else?)—purportedly portrayed Jesus as a revolutionary who, by a clever trick, did not die on the cross but lived to write his own autobiography and died fighting the Romans at Masada at the age of eighty. This work too has doubtlessly fattened the wallets of both author and publisher and strengthened the prejudices of many people who have already rejected Christianity and who prefer to believe fantasies like this rather than to investigate the actual historical roots of the faith. It has done nothing to advance the cause of truth.

1973 was not a very systematic year. Its offerings in theology and closely related fields include a few sharply focused monographs and a number of imaginative books, some brief, some less so, attempting to couple or integrate two or more varied issues or aspects.

Without a doubt, the most impressive theological work of 1973 is Rousas J. Rushdoony’s Institutes of Biblical Law (Presbyterian and Reformed), a compendious treatment of a whole gamut of questions in governmental, social, and personal ethics from the perspective of the principle of law and the purpose of restoration of divine order in a fallen world. Rushdoony’s approach may be open to the charge that it does not adequately demonstrate that which is specifically new in the New Covenant, but this is a monumental work that should give invaluable help for constructive thinking and practical conduct.

GENERAL R. C. Sproul offers a brief and clear presentation of fundamental doctrines in The Symbol: A Contemporary Exposition of the Apostles’ Creed (Craig), useful as a forthright introduction to basic Christianity. In Story and Promise by Robert W. Jenson, Fortress presents what it calls a “one-volume dogmatics” that “leaves no element of the Christian faith untouched.” Indeed it doesn’t. Based largely on German speculation from Hegel to Heidegger.

The academic discipline of theology is ably introduced in The Living God (Baker). Editor Millard Erickson has collected thirty-three essays, mostly by twentieth-century writers, under the headings “What Theology Is,” “How God Is Known,” and “What God Is Like.” What distinguishes this volume is that the best of evangelical scholarship is included along with a good representation of the men with bigger reputations in the academic world. Illustrated with positions reflecting a middle-of-the-road Episcopalianism is a workbook (twenty lectures, questions and suggestions, bibliography) by Owen C. Thomas, Introduction to Theology (Greeno, Hadden). In Scripture and Confession: A Book About Confessions Old and New (Presbyterian and Reformed), edited by John H. Skilton, several Westminster Seminary professors deal with the historic and spiritual significance of creeds and confessions. Frederick Buechner’s Wishful Thinking: A Theological ABC (Harper & Row) is a dictionary of theological terms with free-wheeling definitions. In Shaping Your Faith: A Guide to a Personal Theology (Word), C. W. Christian presents another theological workbook, one that owes more to the evangelical tradition than Thomas’s but is surprisingly mushy on central doctrinal issues.

Moving over to the question of how God is known and what is known about him, another workbook, Robert P. Lightner’s The First Fundamental: God (Nelson), is biblically much solider, goes into considerable detail about the doctrines of God’s nature and his works, and yet is straightforward enough to be understandable to the interested layman. The most genial of the general works is without a doubt J. I. Packer, Knowing God (InterVarsity), a thorough, gracefully written, and well documented treatment of the way we know God, his nature and attributes, and his attitude toward us (the doctrine of redemption).

Students bewildered by the multitude of theologians passing as “biblically centered” (Christian uses this term to describe Barth, Brunner, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Tillich) will receive easily digestible, reliable help from Harvie M. Conn in Contemporary World Theology: A Layman’s Guidebook (Presbyterian and Reformed). Conn analyzes and criticizes men and movements from neo-orthodoxy to the theology of hope, and follows a few kind words for fundamentalism with some sharp remarks about “neo-fundamentalism” (dispensationalism) and more about “neo-evangelicalism.” Unfortunately, he has less to say on contemporary theologians we may like better, such as Van Til, Ramm, and Schaeffer. Basic issues such as the Bible, dogma, the doctrine of God, and the Church are dealt with from the perspective of moderate Anglicanism and in the light of what R. P. C. Hanson calls The Attractiveness of God (in drawing us into theological inquiry) in a book whose subtitle is Essays in Christian Doctrine (John Knox). In Body Theology: God’s Presence in Man’s World (Harper & Row), high Episcopal bishop Arthur A. Vogel uses truths of Christian doctrine and from spiritual experience to propose practical ways to live before and with God in a rapidly changing world.

PARTICULAR DOCTRINES If Thomas, Buechner, and Christian offer a weak approach to Scripture in the course of their systematic presentations, we find little that is better in Dewey M. Beegle’s updating of his 1963 work on inspiration under the title Scripture, Tradition, Infallibility (Eerdmans). He tries to preserve the substance of the biblical tradition by leaving several vexing questions slightly out of focus. Another Eerdmans title, Robert P. Roth’s Story and Reality, does not deal directly with the question of inspiration but gives so much weight to the literary and psychological story-aspect of Scripture that little is left for Scripture as truthful communication in propositional form. A significant book on the Bible’s place and authority is James Barr, The Bible in the Modern World (Harper & Row). Barr trenchantly analyzes the babble of confusion over the nature and reliability of biblical revelation, and exposes many flaws in the positions of widely celebrated non-evangelical theologians. As to those who hold to the absolute trustworthiness of Scripture (“fundamentalists”), Barr finds them naïve and occasionally more bound by dogmatic presuppositions than they like to admit, but on the whole closer to reality than their more sophisticated detractors. The “fundamentalists” can take heart, though: Christ and the Bible (InterVarsity) by John W. Wenham takes its cues from Jesus’ attitude towards the Old Testament and gives ample reason why his authority and the Bible’s reliability should be acknowledged.

Dealing more specifically with God and his works, James Daane takes up the question of The Freedom of God: A Study of Election and Pulpit (Eerdmans). Daane very capably discusses the Calvinistic, Reformed emphasis—sometimes excessive, he believes—on the eternal decrees of God and their conformity to human rationality. He also proposes some clarifications and modifications more in line with a biblical rather than philosophical picture of God’s sovereignty. Unfortunately, this significant work only touches upon the practical implications of election for preaching. Wolfhart Pannenberg’s The Idea of God and Human Freedom (Fortress) is a collection of essays including useful ones on myth in biblical and Christian tradition and on the atheist criticisms of Christianity. John Reumann, Creation and New Creation: The Past, Present and Future of God’s Creative Activity (Augsburg), is an eclectic philosophical-literary interpretation of the themes of creation, redemption, and the last things, revealing remarkable breadth of knowledge and considerable imagination in dealing with the theme.

Norman F. Douty followed his late 1972 book, The Death of Christ: A Treatise Which Answers the Question, “Did Christ die only for the elect?,” with Union With Christ (Reiner), a treatise on the nature of man and the two natures of Christ. Strongly based on the Bible and on wide reading, especially of Puritan and Reformed authors, Union With Christ also deals at length with the believer’s relationship to Christ in theological and experimental terms. What Douty says is orthodox, scholarly, and practical. Roman Catholic biblical scholar Bruce Vawter, in This Man Jesus: An Essay Towards a New Testament Christology (Doubleday), accepts the results of demythologization and attempts to preserve the reality and significance behind New Testament concepts by what he calls “remythologization.” His frequently valuable exegetical and theological insights do not compensate for the book’s clearly unsound presuppositions.

Also dealing with the person and work of Christ is A Process Christology (Westminster) by David R. Griffin, the most comprehensive, systematic, and thorough development of the implications of Whitehead’s process philosophy for theology. It shows that process theology need not eventuate in death-of-God ideas, and it is more intelligible than Tillich, less skeptical than Bultmann, more theological than White-head. In The Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Judson) Gerald O’Collins, S. J., surveys several modern critics of the bodily resurrection, capably refuting many of their arguments and generally if somewhat ambiguously putting forward a more or less traditional faith. Far less tolerant of modern theology and theologians is Resurrection! Essays in Honor of Homer Hailey (C. E. I. Publishing Company), essays by Church of Christ theologians edited by Elmer Fudge; they contain readily understandable and useful confrontations with the erroneous views of several cults.

John A. T. Robinson’s The Human Face of God (Westminster) is a pathetic rehash of the ex-bishop’s attempts to prove that Jesus was most remarkable but that there’s no need to worry about having to answer to him on Judgment Day. Ex-Jesuit Malachi Martin’s Jesus Now (Dutton) is an extremely curious attempt to write a history of world civilization and self-understanding in terms of various ages’ and movements’ supposed images of Jesus and of self; blasphemous in form if not necessarily in intent, it by no means lives up to its publisher’s claim of lucidity. Jürgen Moltmann’s The Gospel of Liberation (Word) is only a collection of topical sermons. Wilfried Daim, in Christianity, Judaism, and Revolution (Ungar), provocatively explores what he thinks to be unrecognized Jewish elements in Christianity, considers many instances of church opposition to social change, and hopes that Christianity will further the cause of a non-revolutionary socialism.

Two books on the Holy Spirit from an evangelical perspective are David M. Howard, By the Power of the Holy Spirit (InterVarsity), and Frank Stagg, The Holy Spirit Today (Broadman). Both authors maintain that the baptism of the Spirit takes place at conversion, while showing appreciation for Pentecostals and their convictions. Howard’s book contains much autobiographical material and deals at length with his and others’ experiences; Stagg’s concentrates more on the Bible. Speaking in Tongues: Let’s Talk About It (Word), edited by Watson E. Mills, contains scholarly, readable essays, the majority by Southern Baptists, on several aspects of tongue-speaking, including the relation of tongues to real language and the phenomenon of Pentecostalism among Roman Catholics.

With so many ecclesiastical officials and theologians tending to identify salvation with some form of politico-economic liberation, 1973 brought three noteworthy books on salvation as traditionally understood: Robert Glenn Gromacki, Salvation Is Forever (Moody), Leslie H. Woodson, Hell and Salvation (Revell), and John Killinger, The Salvation Tree (Harper & Row). Both Gromacki and Woodson clearly and straight-forwardly expound the biblical teaching on salvation, in the process refuting a number of fashionable misconceptions, and—as Woodson’s title indicates—both deal squarely with the reality of eternal punishment. Gromacki’s book goes into greater detail on the relevant Scripture passages, while Woodson includes a helpful treatment of universalism. Killinger, by contrast, jettisons the “simple” teaching of his childhood about salvation as a “temporal” (i.e., eternal) affair and sees it in “spatial” terms, with “change,” “revolution,” “group encounter,” and many other clever discoveries all part of it. Jacques Ellul, in Hope in Time of Abandonment (Seabury), gloomily paints the condition of a fallen, apostate world and suggests that the God in whom we rightly believe doesn’t promise any deus ex machina solutions to get his worshipers out of the mess they have created by disregarding him.

PARTICULAR MOVEMENTS Several Roman Catholic authors wrote on the Church in 1973. On the Church of Christ (Notre Dame) by the late Jacques Maritain is at once the most noteworthy and most conservative treatment of the Church’s place in theology. Dutchman Edward Schillebeeckx, in The Mission of the Church (Seabury), deals largely with the question of finding a place for an institution that is no longer sure of its raison d’être. F. X. Durwell addresses himself to the same problem, more specifically in the context of evangelism, in The Mystery of Christ and the Apostolate (Sheed and Ward), but his implicit universalism hamstrings his efforts. Juan Luis Segundo published the first two volumes of A Theology For Artisans of a New Humanity (Orbis): Volume I, The Community Called Church, and Volume II, Grace and the Human Condition, hailed as doing justice “to both the particularity of Christianity and the universality of God’s saving work” (John C. Bennett), but in fact characterized by the universalism so prevalent in the “theology of liberation” of which Segundo is an outstanding exponent. Karl Rahner’s The Priesthood (Seabury) deals more with the theme of priesthood in the life of Christ and of every Christian, and only secondarily with the institution. Joseph Powers, Spirit and Sacrament: The Humanizing Experience (Seabury), deals primarily with the inwardness of contact with the Holy Spirit and with Christ through the Eucharist, and relies more on speculation than on biblical authority or the Catholic doctrinal tradition.

William R. Jones, Is God a White Racist? A Preamble to Black Theology (Anchor) is the effort of a competent Unitarian-Universalist scholar to tell the white church how to change. He does this by describing the experience and ideas of a number of leaders who may all be black by race but whose theologies vary from the recognizably Christian to the indisputably pagan. This way of stating the question and organizing the discussion promotes confusion rather than understanding.

Carl F. H. Henry gathered sixteen other evangelical scholars representing various disciplines to write on Quest For Reality: Christianity and the Counter Culture (InterVarsity). The result is a good basis for critical reflection on long-term trends that submerge from time to time but are never far beneath the surface. Even more comprehensive is Os Guinness’s widely lauded The Dust of Death: A Critique of the Establishment and the Counter Culture—and a Proposal For a Third Way (InterVarsity). The “third way” is, of course, biblical Christianity.

In the area of comparative theology, Stuart P. Garver gave us Watch Your Teaching! A Comparative Study of Roman Catholic and Protestant Teaching Since Vatican Council II (Christ’s Mission), a valuable contribution to knowledge in an area where a generous optimism clouds many real problems. The New Man: An Orthodox and Reformed Dialogue (Agora), edited by John Meyendorff and Joseph McLelland, is an effort to resume the abortive Calvinist-Orthodox conversations of the sixteenth century and should help familiarize evangelicals with scarcely appreciated aspects of Eastern Orthodoxy. Donald G. Bloesch, The Evangelical Renaissance (Eerdmans), is a well written, subtle, and alert appraisal of the intellectual, spiritual, and social revival of conservative Protestantism. It attempts to place that revival in context with its heritage and hoped-for future. Contains a useful discussion of Barth and pietism. In Liberal Christianity at the Crossroads (Westminster), John B. Cobb, Jr., calls on his fellow liberals to tread a distinctive path without climbing back into traditional orthodoxy or sliding further into humanism.

PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY Passing over into the area where philosophy and theology overlap, Ninian Smart offers The Phenomenon of Religion in Seabury’s “Philosophy of Religion” series under the general editorship of John Hick. Smart’s work is a balanced, urbane attempt to understand and appreciate the contribution of “religion” in all its manifold variety to human culture, without subscribing to any particular convictions; he is reacting against the trivializing of religion by the linguistic analysts. Gerhard Ebeling, a pupil of Bultmann who has moved from exegetical to philosophical considerations, offers an Introduction to a Theological Theory of Language (Fortress), an eloquent testimony to the author’s fascination with words as events rather than with the question of reliably reporting events in words. Considerably superior to Ebeling’s reminiscent ruminations is Robert Allen Evans’s Intelligible and Responsible Talk About God: A Theory of the Dimensional Structure of Language and Its Bearing Upon Theological Symbolism (Brill), a carefully constructed, detailed examination of language, symbol, and reality, and of the way in which transcendent reality can validly be communicated. Highly theoretical, yet very useful in a context of discourse rather jaundiced by a decade of linguistic priggishness of the Flew-Wisdom variety. Wider ranging and more speculative, Rodney Needham’s Belief, Language and Experience (University of Chicago) comes to more pessimistic and paradoxical conclusions about the valid content of the language of belief and religious experience. Theology and Intelligibility (Routledge and Kegan Paul) by Michael Durrant is a careful philosophical exercise by which Durrant claims to prove that we cannot intelligibly speak of God as the “last” (chief) end of creatures or of the Trinity, but really shows us more about the limitations of “objective” philosophizing.

The nature of man is the subject of several inquiries. In an important book, The Struggle For Human Dignity (Nash), psychologist Leslie H. Moser attacks B. F. Skinner’s superficial understanding of human dignity as well as criticizing other contemporary threats from violence, economic and political oppression, and sexual obsessions. James B. Ashbrook, though nominally a Christian theologian, draws on a Babel of variant traditions, ancient and modern, in Humanitas: Human Becoming and Becoming Human (Abingdon). His attempt to present man as the image of God by relying not on biblical revelation but on anthropology, comparative religion, symbolism, literature, and art, among other things, is massive and impressive, but at bottom it is futile. Frank Stagg, the prolific New Testament scholar mentioned earlier, is on solider ground in attempting to unravel the Polarities of Man’s Existence in Biblical Perspective (Westminster), bringing biblical teaching and contemporary developments in philosophy and the sciences into dialogue, though at times he becomes mired in ambivalence. Humanism and Beyond (Pilgrim) by Robert A. Johnson describes the history and present prosperity of humanism, which he calls “the only faith of millions” today, and then patiently but firmly points out its inadequacy and the tremendous superiority of faith in Christ and in authoritative biblical communication. The most authentic and also the most readable of the books dealing with man’s nature is Charles Martin, How Human Can You Get? (InterVarsity). Martin specifically challenges the humanist view of man as well as the reductionist ideas of the “naked ape” school, and presents instead a sound, biblical picture of man’s unique position and promise. Written specifically against biologist Jacques Monod’s Chance and Necessity, Roman Catholic priest-psychiatrist Marc Oraison’s Chance and Life: Faith as the Living Reality (Doubleday) attempts to carve out some room for personality and meaning without rejecting Monod’s basic naturalistic position.

PARTICULAR THEOLOGIANS Wolfhart Pannenberg’s work and person were described twice, briefly and competently by Don H. Olive in the Word series “Makers of the Modern Mind,” and at greater length by E. Frank Tupper. Olive’s Wolfhart Pannenberg is sympathetic, at times moderately critical, and does not alert the reader to the significant points at which Pannenberg stands closer to the skeptical than to the evangelical tradition, especially in his views of Scripture. Tupper, in The Theology of Wolfhart Pannenberg (Westminster), a first-rate, dissertation-quality treatment, reveals incidentally how Pannenberg may appeal to wavering conservatives as an academically respectable and spiritually somewhat serviceable alternative to traditional orthodoxy.

Also in the Word series, Alan Gragg’s Charles Hartshorne is a concise, friendly, but moderately critical analysis of a philosopher who has greatly influenced contemporary theology. Arthur Koestler (Judson) by Wolfe Mays deserves mention as a short and very helpful introduction to one of our age’s most original thinkers. Because analytical philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein is so important to the anti-religious language philosophy movement, and has also been pressed into service for apologetic purposes by Christians such as J. W. Montgomery, Anthony Kenny’s basic, scholarly, and reliable study of his philosophy, Wittgenstein (Harvard), deserves commendation. William Young’s treatment of Hegel’s Dialectical Method (Craig) is a thorough if brief treatment of the man who deeply influenced philosophical, economic, political, historiographic, and theological development. Firmly grounded in Reformed theology, Young decisively rejects Hegel’s method and his results without overlooking his positive aspects.

Two books on Paul Tillich, one by his widow, Hannah, From Time to Time (Stein and Day), and another by a friend, Rollo May, Paulus: A Personal Portrait of Paul Tillich (Harper & Row), make it appear that it was not only his theology that represented a licentious travesty of biblical Christianity. Evangelicals are not the only scandalous religionists, though journalists sometimes give that impression. The Hebrew Humanism of Martin Buber (Wayne State University) by Grete Schaeder could be called a philosophical biography; it is an unusual piece of work imparting a great deal of information and insight about Buber’s religious and philosophical thought in the course of interesting narration. Although a Jew, Buber appears as a much better model for Christians in his approach to religious problems and in his personal life than the nefarious Tillich. In C. S. Lewis: Mere Christian (Regal), Ann Lindskoog in simpler fashion does something similar for admirers of C. S. Lewis, placing his work in the context of his personal life and giving the reader a good introduction to his unique contribution to Christian thought and life. There is a very helpful bibliography.

APOLOGETICS Following with the general trend of 1973 books to fall into more than one traditional area, many of the books mentioned in previous sections could just as logically have been considered primarily apologetic in intent. The most straightforward work of apologetics comes from a traditional Roman Catholic, John D. Sheridan. The Hungry Sheep: Catholic Doctrine Restated Against Conservative Attacks (Arlington) is interesting for what it says and also because it is written by a layman in an age when so many priestly works are more or less modernist. Paul Kurtz and Albert Dondeyne have edited A Catholic/Humanist Dialogue (Prometheus), in which the humanist contributors veil their intention, explicit elsewhere, to stamp out religion, and the Catholics minimize their differences with man-worship.

A really good book of biblical, Christian answers to traditional issues raised by science, philosophy, and experience is Pillars of Faith: Biblical Certainty in an Uncertain World (Baker), edited by Herman O. Wilson and Morris M. Womack. The ever-productive John Warwick Montgomery answers How Do We Know There Is a God? and Other Questions Inappropriate in Polite Society in a brief tract and edits the lucubrations of several young scholars from his courses at Trinity seminary in Christianity For the Tough Minded (both Bethany Fellowship). Calvin Miller’s A Thirst For Meaning: In the Face of Scepticism and Doubt (Zondervan) is an attractive, gracefully written essay in evangelical apologetics dealing chiefly with objections of a subjective and psychological nature. William M. Justice, Our Visited Planet (Vantage), brings a new freshness to the defense and exposition of basic doctrines.

Eastern Orthodox archbishop Anthony Bloom, in God and Man (Newman), gives solid material on apologetics, prayer, and discipleship derived from the central theme of the Incarnation of Christ. Roman Catholic Juan Arias’s The God I Don’t Believe In (Abbey) is passionate but universalistic, more humanist than biblical. Ladislaus Boros explores the question of the Hidden God (Seabury) in thoughtful reflections valid for apologetic or devotional use. Why Me? (Christian Literature Crusade) by A. J. Matthews is a simple but clear and helpful Christian answer to questions raised by the pervasive experience of pain and death. The Children of Darkness: Some Heretical Reflections on the Kid Cult (Arlington) by Richard S. Wheeler (one of the few Puritans still alive and well among the Congregationalists) is an argument on behalf of the Christian remnant and in defense of the contribution of Christianity to making society civilized and “human,” and secondarily an indictment of the unthinking cult of Juvenility.

A topic of vital interest in the apologetic dialogue is discussed in Evolution: Possible or Impossible? (Zondervan) by James F. Coppedge, an extremely valuable contribution in view of the reign of naturalistic evolution at most levels of education. Denis Alexander’s Beyond Science (Holman) is an important evangelical contribution to the unfortunate but perennial conflict that many perceive between God’s revelation in Scripture and in nature. Alexander interacts with the recent non-religious challenges to science. Critical Issues in Modern Religion (Prentice-Hall) by Roger A. Johnson, Ernest Wallwork et al. is a textbook by highly qualified academicians of indeterminate belief. A farther-ranging textbook of considerable objectivity, balance, and value is Geddes MacGregor, Philosophical Issues in Religious Thought (Houghton Mifflin). Traces of God in a Secular Culture (Alba), edited by George F. McLean, offers readings in process theology, existentialism, and linguistic analysis bearing on current theological debate. The Sense of God: Sociological, Anthropological and Psychological Approaches to the Origin of the Sense of God (Oxford) by John Bowker is a careful, tentative inquiry that ends with the interesting suggestion that scientific approaches to the understanding of religion and religious behavior should bring us back to, not dispense us from, asking about the reality of the object of faith.

Zen, Drugs, and Mysticism (Pantheon) by R. C. Zaehner, sympathetically examines alternatives to Christian belief popular today, especially among the young, identifies them as dead-end roads, and diffidently suggests giving some kind of Christianity another chance. Harvey Cox’s The Seduction of the Spirit: The Use and Misuse of People’s Religion (Simon and Schuster) is a theological autobiography.

ETHICS, GENERAL The field of ethics was highly productive in 1973, with several seminal books. Carl F. H. Henry edited a Dictionary of Christian Ethics (Baker and Canon), a very useful handbook covering the field and deserving of wide circulation as representative of informed evangelical reflection on topics from abortion to Zen. Certainly one of the most important theoretical books is that by a militant atheist, Walter Kaufmann: Without Guilt and Justice: From Decidophobia to Autonomy (Wyden). America’s most gifted anti-religious philosopher shows that not only guilt feelings but also the very concept of justice have religious roots, and proposes that as modern grown-ups we ought to do away with all three. Since the solution of autonomy he proposes founders on the fallen nature of man, Kaufmann’s book prompts readers aware of that nature to reconsider the necessity of faith for justice, even in a secular society. Beyond Right and Wrong: A Study in Moral Theory (Free Press) by Harry K. Girvetz analyzes the contemporary moral impasse in sociological terms and proposes that people by now ought to be mature enough to recognize the importance of the ethical. A wiser recommendation is made by David Baily Harned in a shorter book, Faith and Virtue (Pilgrim), concerned with showing the importance of virtue, the necessity of faith for virtue, and why Christians should work for stable, as well as just, social order. Several essays in Religion and Morality (Anchor), edited by Gene Outka and John P. Reeder, Jr., also explore their interrelationship and come to a positive conclusion, in effect recommending both. Bernard Häring, in Faith and Morality in the Secular Age (Doubleday), reaffirms in considerable detail the basic substance, uniqueness, and authority of the Christian faith, with a reasonably favorable assessment of the Protestant variety, and calls upon the Church to recognize contemporary secularism and learn how to present Christian imperatives undiluted across the cultural gap. J. L. Houlden, Ethics and the New Testament (Pelican), believes in a wide variation of ethical standards in the New Testament and seeks to go behind it to discern the teaching of Jesus himself.

Thoroughly secular views are put forward by Burton M. Leiser in Liberty, Justice, and Morals: Contemporary Value Conflicts (Macmillan); Leiser puts the case for a moderate libertarianism about as well as it can be put and at the same time fairly states the arguments against it. Kai Nielsen dreams of Ethics Without God (Prometheus) in an effort to further the illusion that morality does not require religious convictions.

Standing squarely on the contrary set of presuppositions, i.e., faith in the personal God who reveals himself clearly and authoritatively in Scripture, Harold Lindsell discusses The World, the Flesh, and the Devil (Canon) and how to avoid their traps; the book is a practical guide to Christian living. In The Christian Ethic of Love (Zondervan), Norman L. Geisler accepts the claim that love is the only absolute but then turns to biblical teaching about God and his will to define love, and subsequently deals biblically with familiar ethical problems. William Stringfellow offers An Ethic For Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land (Word), based on his demonizing of the state, particularly the American state, and his conspiracy view of American history. In God Speaks to an X-rated Society (Moody), edited by Alan F. Johnson, ten evangelical thinkers address themselves to the Ten Commandments, showing their continuing validity today. Leslie H. Woodson presents a theological/ethical workbook, A View From the Cornerstone (Moody), largely concerned with establishing a perspective for Christian thinking and priorities for action. In The End of the Taboos: An Ethics of Encounter (Fortress), Gérard M. Fourez, a Belgian Catholic, asserts his belief that we are at the end of prescriptive ethics (“taboos”) and his hope that somehow we can salvage some of their values in a fluid society.

PARTICULAR ETHICAL TOPICS Last year a very helpful reference book appeared, A Selected Bibliography of Applied Ethics in the Professions, 1950–1970 (University Press of Virginia), by Daniel Gothie. Among the professions treated are business, government, and health and social sciences.

The individual topics that received most attention in 1973 were what we might designate as the ethics of peace/non-violence and of lawful killing, including euthanasia and abortion, and the related field of ethics for medicine and science. Shalom: The Search For a Peaceable City (Abingdon) by Jack L. Stotts is more a meditation on the word “shalom” as popularized by contemporary ecclesiasts than an ethical program. John Macquarrie examines The Concept of Peace (Harper & Row) and concludes that violence remains an inescapable reality in which the Christian may sometimes have to engage. Frank Epp, a Mennonite scholar, offers A Strategy For Peace: Reflections of a Christian Pacifist (Eerdmans); it is less a restatement of the traditional peace churches’ position than a critique of the peculiar injuries done to peace by the United States and, to a lesser extent, Canada. In Peace and Non-Violence: Basic Writings by Prophetic Voices in the World’s Religions (Paulist), editor Edward Guinan gives us representative samples of non-violent protesters from Victor Hugo to Thich Nhat Hanh. And in Religion and Violence (Westminster), Robert McAfee Brown double-thinkingly concludes that a revolutionary but non-violent stance is appropriate for white, middle-class churches but not necessarily for others.

Turning from generalized to individual violence, we find that capital punishment received considerable attention. Elinor Lander Horwitz writes with dismay in Capital Punishment, U.S.A. (Lippincott) a history of the practice and description of modes; she seeks to arouse sentiment for abolition by association rather than by reasoned argument. William H. Baker in Worthy of Death: Capital Punishment—Unpleasant Necessity or Unnecessary Penalty? (Moody) gives a closely reasoned biblical presentation of the affirmative position. In a somewhat obscure essay, Cutting the Monkey-Rope: Is the Taking of Life Ever Justified? (Judson), John Galen McEllhenney evokes some imaginative biblical themes and argues in answer to his title question that it is not, though he curiously devotes himself most specifically to abortion and euthanasia rather than to capital punishment and war. Your Death Warrant? The Implications of Euthanasia (Arlington), edited by Jonathan Gould and Lord Craigmyle, shows that legal license to do away with the unwanted old and infirm may be closer than we think, and that the license may rather quickly be followed by the obligation. In The Soul, the Pill and the Fetus: An Examination of Abortion and Contraception in Relation to the Scriptural Concept of the Total Person (Dorrance), John Pelt offers new insight into the beginning of life and strongly urges strict limitation of abortion. Abortion, Society, and the Law (Case Western Reserve), a compendium edited by David F. Walbert and J. Douglas Butler, gives most of the standard arguments of lawyers and doctors in favor of abortion, one Jewish and two Catholic demurrals, and the text of the infamous Supreme Court decision. Politics, Medicine, and Christian Ethics: A Dialogue With Paul Ramsey (Fortress) by Charles E. Curran presents the famous ethicist’s strong opposition to abortion in the context of a much wider concern for the stewardship of human life, and is especially illuminating—and disquieting—in the discussion of medical ethics. Human Medicine (Augsburg) by James Nelson is a helpful introduction to medical ethics.

Is It Moral to Modify Man? (Charles C. Thomas), edited by Claude A. Frazier, has noted scientists writing on a variety of medico-ethical topics. Rather more theoretical and concerned with general principles is The Scientist and Ethical Decision (InterVarsity), edited by Charles Hatfield. The fourteen contributing scientists and scholars are all evangelicals.

Jay E. Dailey in The Anatomy of Censorship (Dekker) is outraged by any suggestion of censorship. Christians John W. Drakeford and Jack Hamm in Pornography: The Sexual Mirage (Nelson) are outraged by pornography. Twenty-two contributors to The Case Against Pornography (Open Court), edited by David Holbrook, present calm but impressive arguments. Also comprehensive and balanced, with the added advantage of an evangelical perspective, is Perry Cotham, Obscenity, Pornography, and Censorship (Baker). Drakeford and Hamm’s book is worth reading, though a bit shocking, and that edited by Holbrook makes a case for restrictions that ought to impress libertarians as well as Christians.

Turning to economic issues, Richard K. Taylor’s Economics and the Gospel: A Primer on Shalom as Economic Justice (United Church) is a noteworthy religious call for economic changes but is marred by dependence on leftist analysis and evaluation. Gary North, a Calvinist economist and forthright defender of the free market and of hard money, presents An Introduction to Christian Economics (Craig), particularly useful because of the paucity of biblically based thinking of any stripe on economic issues today and for its disquieting interpretation of currently popular tends, such as “controlled” inflation and state planning. Roberto Vacca, in The Coming Dark Age (Doubleday), gives us an alternative nightmare to that of Ellul’s Technological Society: the breakdown of technology and developed industrial life. He calls for the formation of committed communites akin to the early monastic orders to preserve cultural and spiritual values and scientific knowledge.

Writing from no evident religious perspective, George F. Gilder in Sexual Suicide (Quadrangle) shows many of the destructive and decivilizing aspects of the women’s liberation movement. He believes it is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature and of the value of human traditions and will, if uncorrected, turn society into a battleground and reduce civilization to a shambles. This is certainly one of the most important secular studies bearing on ethical and spiritual issues published in 1973.

Topics A variety of themes were treated through several centuries of Christian development. Woman in Christian Tradition (Notre Dame) by George Tavard is obviously timely and is competently done. The Lady Was a Bishop (Macmillan) by Joan Morris is a misleadingly entitled study of abbesses and some other women with church authority chiefly in medieval Europe. Nancy van Vuuren’s title more accurately reflects her tone: The Subversion of Women as Practiced by Churches, Witch-Hunters, and Other Sexists (Westminster).

Healing and Christianity (Harper & Row) by Morton Kelsey is a thorough, documented study of attitudes toward a subject both controversial and pervasive. The author’s own views are prominently displayed. The same can be said of The Story of Faith Healing (Macmillan) by Sybil Leek, a witch and psychic. She ranges the globe to demonstrate that healings occur in a wide range of religious traditions. For the Christian this confirms what the Bible teaches: healings do not necessarily validate the message.

A splendidly illustrated guide to The Holy Land (Holt, Rinehart, Winston) is provided by a leading authority, Michael Avi-Yonah. He focuses on its art and architecture, from the Canaanites to the modern Israelis. Moving from holy land to holy living, we find three books of note: Georgia Harkness dips through the centuries and around the world to provide material for a discourse on Mysticism: Its Meaning and Message (Abingdon). The book is chatty and comments on varieties of contemporary mysticism instead of just venerating the past. A Dominican, Philip Mulhern, gives a more systematic overview of monasticism in Dedicated Poverty: Its History and Theology (Alba). Naturally the focus is on Roman Catholicism, but Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestantism are mentioned. Aelred Squire, also a Dominican, gives guidance on prayer by Asking the Fathers (Morehouse-Barlow) what they have had to say about it over the centuries.

From a Roman Catholic perspective came a worthwhile survey of religious education in the West down through the centuries, The School of Jesus (Alba) by James Mohler. A more comprehensive study of the Roman church through the centuries is Pilgrim Church (Fides) by William Bausch. It is easy to read and very sympathetic to the Catholic side. (Interestingly, a book with the same title published several years ago surveyed groups over the centuries that have been persecuted by Rome.)

A fine study of the Christian view of history from Eusebius to T. S. Eliot with special focus on the Renaissance is The Grand Design of God (University of Toronto) by C. A. Patrides. Somewhat similar ground is covered on a semi-popular level and from the viewpoint of “process theology” by the prolific Norman Pittenger in Christian Faith and the Question of History (Fortress).

Books on Western occultism in one form or another have been streaming from the publishers in recent years. Few of them merit any notice. Occultism represents both pre-Christian and anti-Christian elements. In some respects it can be treated as another religion, like Judaism or Hinduism, but in other respects it is a deliberate perversion of the Christian faith and life. In any case it has been around as long as the Church has, and three books provide evidence for this. The best is John Montgomery’s Principalities and Powers: A New Look at the World of the Occult (Bethany Fellowship). Montgomery avoids the unwitting tendency of many evangelical writers on the occult to make the subject alluring. Yet he also provides his customary full documentation rather than simply denunciation. A standard older study, The History of Witchcraft and Demonology (Routledge and Kegan Paul) by Montague Summers, is now back in print. A lavish but not lascivious illustrated study of largely occultic practices from classical times to the present is to be found in Beyond Science: A Journey Into the Supernatural (Grosset and Dunlap) by C. A. Burland.

The opposing religions that are more “orthodox” than occultism are ably served by a very good reference book, A Dictionary of Non-Christian Religions (Westminster) by Geoffrey Parrinder. The five- to twenty-line entries on topics ranging from Adonis to Zombie will authoritatively tell most users all they care to know on those topics.

EARLY AND MEDIEVAL CHURCH The outstanding book in this area was Jean Daniélou’s Gospel Message and Hellenistic Culture (Westminster), the second volume of his massive “History of Early Christian Doctrine Before the Council of Nicaea.” Daniélou refutes the common assertion that Christian theology is the result of the Hellenization of the apostolic message. From an Anglo-Catholic stance O. C. Edwards tells in simple language How It All Began: Origins of the Christian Church (Seabury). A very useful collection of documents from the four centuries surrounding the birth of Christ was compiled by Howard Clark Kee; The Origins of Christianity (Prentice-Hall) provides sources that enable us better to understand various aspects of the Jewish, Greek, and Roman cultures in which Christianity arose. There is an academic movement that seeks to erase the traditional distinctions among apostolic, sub-apostolic, and heretical literature; for example, Joseph Tyson’s A Study of Early Christianity (Macmillan). Various versions of the faith were contending for acceptance in the beginning even as now. What is called “orthodoxy” happened to triumph, so it is contended, not because it was right but because it happened to obtain an informal majority or at least plurality. While such a view must be countered by sound scholarship, one cannot help observing the attractiveness it holds for those who have departed from historic trinitarianism, yet still wish to be considered Christian. A specialized study of the first two centuries appeared in English translation, The Worship of the Early Church (Fortress) by Ferdinand Hahn.

A very good overview of the eastern Roman Empire throughout the Middle Ages is available in Byzantium (Harper & Row), edited by Philip Whitting. The Monastic Achievement (McGraw-Hill) by George Zarnecki is a copiously illustrated survey. John O’Brien attempts to understand and explain but not to defend The Inquisition (Macmillan). Intended for the serious reader and not just the scholar, O’Brien’s book is not sensational but is extremely sobering. “Nothing was left undone to squeeze out the last bit of pain from the writhing victim,” he says. Contemporary crusaders for a return to Christian civilization need to be reminded that the Inquisition was for several centuries, at least, an inseparable element of the attempt to have Christianity regnant in society. The martial “achievements” of Christendom were demonstrated in a popular survey of The World of the Crusades (Harper & Row) by Joshua Prower.

Noteworthy specific studies include Friar Thomas D’Aquino: His Life, Thought, and Works (Doubleday) by James Weisheipl; Saint Francis: Nature Mystic (University of California) by Edward Armstrong; and The Becket Conflict and the Schools: A Study of Intellectuals in Politics in the Twelfth Century (Rowman and Littlefield) by Beryl Smalley.

THE REFORMATION Yet another general book on the Reformation appeared, The World of the Reformation (Scribners) by Hans Hillerbrand. Roland Bainton, whose skill at both enchanting and accurate writing has not diminished with age, presented us with Women of the Reformation in France and England (Augsburg) to complement an earlier volume on Germany and Italy. Another Bainton book was enlarged and revised by Eric Gritsch, Bibliography of the Continental Reformation (Archon). The entries are confined to books and periodical articles in English, and there are many helpful brief annotations.

A dozen previously published miscellaneous selections are collected by H. G. Koenigsberger in Luther: A Profile (Hill and Wang). The Massacre of St. Bartholomew and the European Conflict, 1559–1572 (Barnes and Noble) is studied in considerable detail by N. M. Sutherland. To match the collection on Luther, there also appeared a dozen miscellaneous studies on The Heritage of John Calvin (Eerdmans), edited by John Bratt. These essays were originally delivered at a lectureship at, appropriately, Calvin College. Many of the key writings of a major Reformer were translated by David Wright and published under the title Martin Bucer (Sutton Courtenay). The translator provided a long introduction to the man and a lengthy bibliography of works by and about him. A sixteenth-century figure who remained loyal to Roman Catholicism is treated in a major biography: St. John of the Cross: His Life and Poetry (Cambridge) by Gerald Brenan. John’s complete poems are given in Spanish with an English translation.

From mysticism within the mainstream of Christendom it is but a short leap to Mysticism and Dissent: Religious Ideology and Social Protest in the Sixteenth Century (Yale) by Steven Ozment. The author investigates one prominent anonymous writing and seven individuals, mostly Anabaptists in some sense, including Müntzer, Hut, and Denck. The Theology of Anabaptism (Herald Press) is systematically and sympathetically presented by Robert Friedmann. Writings by one of the Anabaptists are introduced and annotated by John Yoder in The Legacy of Michael Sattler (Herald Press).

Another survey of The English Reformation, 1529–58 (Rowman and Littlefield) appeared, this one by David Pill. There is a first-rate introduction to Puritans and Calvinism (Reiner) by Peter Toon and an interesting glimpse by John Leith at what went into the Assembly at Westminster (John Knox) and emerged as the English-speaking world’s most famous confession of faith. In addition there were five noteworthy books on prominent figures of one or another phase of the English Reformation: Cromwell: A Profile (Hill and Wang), edited by Ivan Roots; John Foxe and the Elizabethan Church (University of California) by Norskov Olsen; Studies in Richard Hooker (Case Western Reserve), edited by Speed Hill; God’s Statesman: The Life and Work of John Owen (Zondervan) by Peter Toon; and Heresy and Obedience in Tridentine Italy: Cardinal Pole and the Counter-Reformation (Cambridge) by Dermot Fenlon. The last named traces the career of an Englishman to illuminate developments in Italy.

MODERN CHURCH No comprehensive books on Christianity since the Reformation appeared; however, a few thematic studies crossed continental boundaries. Bernard Ramm’s The Evangelical Heritage (Word) is an attempt to explain evangelicalism rather than to give a detailed survey of the movement’s development. He does, however, develop his definition historically, concluding with a chapter on “The Future of Evangelical Theology.” The book merits thoughtful reading by both evangelicals and non-evangelicals. Last year brought a very competently done survey of English Biblical Translation (Andre Deutsch) by A. C. Partridge. Robert Torbet updated his standard work, A History of the Baptists (Judson); the book remains much more satisfactory for developments prior to 1900. Toward the other end of the denominational spectrum, José Sànchez reports on Anticlericalism (Notre Dame) in reference to Roman Catholicism. After a general overview he focuses on six Latin countries of Europe and America since the French Revolution.

J. Edwin Orr gives a documented accounting of evangelical awakenings around the world in The Flaming Tongue: The Impact of Twentieth Century Revivals (Moody). A different kind of impact is presented by Donald Treadgold in a two-volume study of The West in Russia and China: Religious and Secular Thought in Modern Times (Cambridge). For each country he traces the influence of Western ideas, especially religious thought, from the sixteenth century to the Communist revolution. A brief, popular-level survey, Bright Wind of the Spirit (Prentice-Hall) by Steve Durasoff, takes a world-wide look at Pentecostalism. It adds little to what is already available.

The first general secretary of the World Council of Churches, W. A. Visser ’t Hooft, published his Memoirs (Westminster); they serve as much more than autobiography and are a major contribution to the history of the ecumenical movement. A major, popular-level biography of an equally important ecumenical figure, Pope John XXIII, was published: I Will Be Called John (Reader’s Digest) by Lawrence Elliott. A review of what has been happening in Roman Catholicism since John with suggestions for its future is presented in The Remaking of the Church (Harper & Row) by Richard McBrien.

A different perspective from that of the historian but one that makes a major contribution to the portrayal of Christian life is made more accessible through a classified but unannotated bibliography of more than 1,000 items: Religion in Contemporary Fiction: Criticism From 1945 to the Present (Trinity University), compiled by George Boyd and Lois Boyd.

EUROPE SINCE THE REFORMATION Although subsequent religious movements have not had the abrupt rending impact upon Europe that the sixteenth-century upheaval did, the situation has been far from static. Blaise Pascal represented a concern for renewal within post-Tridentine Catholicism, and Christians of many varieties have profited from his writings ever since. Last year Charles MacKenzie added another to the many books about the great Frenchman, Pascal’s Anguish and Joy (Philosophical Library). The book is about both his life and his thought.

At the close of the long turbulence in England there emerged the group whose present descendants would never have warranted the descriptive nickname the founders received. Early Quaker Writings, 1650–1700 (Eerdmans) is a much needed compilation by Hugh Barbour and Arthur Roberts. The focus is on writers who are not nearly so well known now but were influential in their own time. An equally important study of William Penn and Early Quakerism (Princeton) by Melvin Endy, Jr., focuses more on Penn’s religious thought than do numerous other biographies. It offers a different understanding of Penn and early Quakerism that merits careful study.

It can be argued that the eighteenth century did more to shape subsequent Christian development than had the sixteenth. On the one hand there emerged a gradual break not just within the Church but from the Church. A translation of an important essay, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment: The Christian Burgess and the Enlightenment (MIT) by Lucien Goldmann, represents that break. On the other hand, the insistence upon personal conversion (rather than simply acquiescence to the state church and its current dogma) reached far beyond small “sects” to become a major current in active Christianity. Last year saw the publication of one of the best studies in English of German Pietism During the Eighteenth Century (Brill), by Ernest Stoeffler. Nine Public Lectures (University of Iowa) by one of whom Stoeffler writes, Nicholaus Zinzendorf, are introduced by George Forell, who succinctly demonstrates the crucial importance of the man and then lets him speak for himself.

One of the men who were greatly influenced by Zinzendorf both directly and indirectly was John Wesley. Six books about Methodism that deserve mention appeared last year. John Drakeford looks on a popular level at Wesley’s generally unfortunate, in the short run, trip to Georgia, 1736–37, in Take Her, Mr. Wesley (Word). It’s about his dilemma over marrying a certain Sophia (he didn’t). More substantive studies are: The Church of England, the Methodists and Society, 1700–1850 (Rowman and Littlefield) by Anthony Armstrong; John Wesley on the Sacraments (Abingdon) by Ole Borgen; John Wesley: A Theological Biography, Volume 2, Part 1 (Abingdon) by Martin Schmidt; The Methodist Revolution (Basic Books) by Bernard Semmel; and A Theology of Love: The Dynamic of Wesleyanism (Beacon Hill) by Mildred Wynkoop. The last named author, a Nazarene theologian, has made an important contribution to the understanding of biblical holiness as proclaimed by Wesley and by a vital part of the movement that bears his name today.

Three rather different studies of nineteenth-century England are a scholarly survey, Religion and Society in England, 1790–1850 (Schocken) by W. R. Ward; a scholarly biography, Cardinal Newman in His Age: His Place in English Theology and Literature (Vanderbilt) by Harold Weatherby, who finds Newman’s theology leading to modernism even though he remained professedly orthodox; and Searchlight on Spurgeon (Pilgrim Publications), in which Eric Hayden has taken numerous autobiographical references from Spurgeon’s sermons and arranged them in chronological order, interspersed with background and transitional information. It serves a purpose similar to that of the Newman volume in showing that Spurgeon has not always been interpreted correctly either.

The most important 1973 book on Christianity in continental Europe last century is the unabridged translation of Karl Barth’s Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century (Judson). Of course, as Germans are wont to do, Barth largely overlooks non-German theology; but for its purpose this volume is superb. Three studies of particular theologians are: Schleiermacher: Life and Thought (Fortress) by Martin Redeker; David Friedrich Strauss and His Theology (Cambridge) by Horton Harris; and Kierkegaard: A Biographical Introduction (Scribners) by Ronald Grimsley. Two detailed ecclesio-political studies are Revolution and Church: The Early History of Christian Democracy, 1789–1901 (Notre Dame) by Hans Maier and Church and State in France, 1870–1914 (Harper & Row) by John McManners.

The accelerating decline of practicing Christianity in twentieth-century Europe and the continent’s preoccupation with war is reflected in the relatively few books of recent history. Beauduin: A Prophet Vindicated (Newman) by Sonya Quitslund is about a Roman Catholic priest who was ahead of his time in ecumenical activity. True Patriotism (Harper & Row) is the third volume of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s collected works and consists of letters, lectures, and notes from 1939 until his death in 1945. A non-professional theologian whose influence may be more pervasive and last longer than that of any of the other post-Reformation thinkers referred to so far was the subject of two books in 1973: C. S. Lewis: Mere Christian (Regal) by Kathryn Ann Lindskoog seeks to introduce the whole range of Lewis’s writings in the context of his life, and C. S. Lewis: Images of His World (Eerdmans) by Douglas Gilbert and Clyde Kilby makes the context even more vivid through splendid photography of where Lewis lived accompanied by expert commentary.

Steve Durasoff gives a competent introduction to the Pentecostal movement in the Communist nations of Europe in Pentecost Behind the Iron Curtain (Logos). Two post-war ecclesio-political studies are Religion and Soviet Foreign Policy, 1945–1970 (Oxford) by William Fletcher and The Churches and Politics in Germany (Wesleyan University) by Frederic Spotts. Both studies are well written and well documented.

ASIA AND THE PACIFIC A popularly written but reliable book on the early and mid-nineteenth century efforts to evangelize the Pacific islands is Company of Heaven (Nelson) by Graeme Kent. The book covers the whole range of Christian denominations and is well illustrated. Much more recent activities are described in Indonesia Revival: Focus on Timor (Zondervan), a balanced assessment by George Peters, missions professor at Dallas Seminary. Genuine revival has occurred, but the author seeks to separate fact from fabrication and exaggeration. New Testament Fire in the Philippines (William Carey) is a descriptive study of the Foursquare Church in that land.

Missionary stories that are often exciting and inspirational regularly issue forth from denominational and certain non-denominational publishers. Among last year’s offerings two of the better ones were An Hour to the Stone Age (Moody) by Shirley Horne, about work in a portion of the Indonesian (western) half of New Guinea, and Daktar/Diplomat in Bangladesh (Moody) by Viggo Olsen, which combines autobiography with the account of medical missionary work in the former East Pakistan and the struggles connected with independence.

Japanese Religion (Kodansha), edited by Hori Ichirō et al., is a government-sponsored survey of the many religious groups including Christianity and is indispensable for those who are interested in ministry to the Japanese.

What was one of the first of the numerous books reflecting the “church growth” viewpoint is now back in print: Church Growth and Group Conversion (William Carey) by J. W. Pickett et al., originally published in 1936 is about peoples movements in central India.

The reopening of American contact with mainland China has been marked by three especially interesting books on nineteenth-century missionary contacts with that vast land. To China With Love (Doubleday) by Pat Barr tells of European and North American Protestant missionaries to China from 1860 to 1900. Two pioneering American missionaries had biographies: The Seed of the Church in China (Pilgrim Press) by Muriel Boone, who writes of her father, William J. Boone, and Peter Parker and the Opening of China (Harvard) by Edward Gulick. A biography of a Chinese Christian, Stephen Wang (1900–1971), also appeared: Stephen the Chinese Pastor (Tyndale) by Mary Wang. Wang was abroad when the Communists took control and was never able to return, so ministered to his compatriots around the world. There is a need for many more such biographies of non-Western Christians. China: Christian Students Face the Revolution (InterVarsity) by David Adeney is a brief look at how one group has fared with Communism in control.

Two books on southwestern Asia do not deal with Christianity but provide useful background for those concerned with the tiny Christian presence there. The Islamic World (Oxford), edited by William McNeill and Marilyn Waldman, is a helpful collection of sources from Muhammad to the present. The Coming Crisis in Israel (MIT) by Norman Zucker was not a prediction of the Yom Kippur war but a study of the continuing conflict between religious and secular elements in Israeli government and society. Christians are well aware how these conflicts affect evangelistic work.

AFRICA The most comprehensive book on Christianity in the continent was The Missionaries (Lippincott) by Geoffrey Moorhouse. It is not so broad as the titles suggests, however, since it is chiefly on Protestant missionaries who came from Britain to Africa during the last two centuries. But what he includes, Moorhouse, a professional writer, treats well. He does not solely lambast or laud, but gives a balanced assessment of the strengths and weaknesses, achievements and failures. The most important of the missionaries from the viewpoint of awakening interest by outsiders was undeniably David Livingstone. Coinciding with the centenary of his death was the publication of David Livingstone: His Triumph, Decline and Fall (Westminster) by Cecil Northcott, Livingstone (Putnam) by Tim Jeal, and Livingstone: Man of Africa (Longman), edited by Bridglal Pachai. The first is brief, balanced, and has good maps; the second is long and overly critical (but not more extreme in its way than were the earlier laudatory accounts in theirs). The third is a collection of essays. All are indispensable for Africa studies collections.

Specific studies of African Christianity in this century include: Born at Midnight (Moody) by Peter Cotterell, about southern Ethiopia; Lardin Gabas (Brethren Press), edited by Chalmer Faw, about northeastern Nigeria; The Prophet Harris: A Study of an African Prophet and His Mass-Movement in the Ivory Coast and the Gold Coast, 1913–1915 (Oxford) by Gordon Haliburton; Cross and Sword: The Political Role of Christian Missions in the Belgian Congo, 1908–1960 (Hoover Institution) by Marvin Markowitz; Basic Community in the African Churches (Orbis) by Marie-France Perrin Jassy, a study of indigenous denominations among the Luo of Kenya and Tanzania; Nigerian Harvest (Baker) by Edgar Smith, about a portion of Northern Nigeria; and British Protestant Missions (Longman) by A. J. Temu, about the first quarter of this century in Kenya.

A much needed corrective to overly optimistic reports about the progress of Christianity in Africa is provided in African Traditional Religion: A Definition (Orbis) by Bolaji Idowu. The preference by the author, a Nigerian professor, for the religion he describes does not lessen the value of coming to terms with what he relates. Of equal importance is The Historical Study of African Religion (University of California), edited by R. O. Ranger and Isaria Kimambo. Thirteen essays sample the range of religious expression on the continent.

LATIN AMERICA A Yankee Reformer in Chile: The Life and Works of David Trumbull (William Carey Library) by Irven Paul is a carefully documented biography of a nineteenth-century American Protestant missionary. Look Out! The Pentecostals Are Coming (Creation) is a catchy title for a serious book by Peter Wagner, a Fuller Seminary missions professor who served many years in Latin America. The phenomenal growth of Pentecostalism on that continent is reported, analyzed, and used as a basis for suggestions on evangelistic work in general. Of more specialized interest is Church and Power in Brazil (Orbis) by Charles Antoine.

NORTH AMERICA No book in 1973 even began to rival the scope of the previous year’s award-winning Religious History of the American People by Sydney Ahlstrom. However, as usual, studies of one aspect or another of American Christianity were published in great abundance. A second edition updated Winthrop Hudson’s Religion in America (Scribners), which is comprehensive but concise. American Religious Thought: A History (University of Chicago) by William Clebsch chose to focus on Edwards, Emerson, and William James as men who are still worth reading and who, in the long run, proved to reflect changing theologies. A meandering essay, Dissent in American Religion (University of Chicago) by Edwin Gaustad, tries to show diverse kinds of dissent and how American dissent differs from European dissent. Scores of dissenters are mentioned, with the inevitable omissions. Reinhold Niebuhr and Daniel Berrigan make it, but not Billy Sunday or Carl McIntire.

The most important book covering the whole period of American history is The New Heavens and the New Earth: Political Religion in America (Harper & Row) by Cushing Strout. The complex and persistent intertwining of religion and politics from the Puritans to the New Pluralism is set forth in highly readable yet well documented form. Somewhat similar ground is covered in The Idea of Fraternity in America (University of California) by Wilson McWilliams, but with a more explicit concern to show the inadequacy of widely varying views on the contemporary political spectrum, especially when compared with the more realistic view of human nature conveyed through the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Several studies cover larger or smaller groups from about a century ago to the present. Of widest interest should be George Dollar’s A History of Fundamentalism (Bob Jones University). Dollar is a fully qualified historian who freely expressed his own convictions but yet is able to talk about “The Prima Donnas of Fundamentalism” (one of his chapter titles) and to convey enough of the facts to enable readers to draw conclusions that differ from his own. His book is a reference tool as well as a history that will infuriate (or amuse) but will also inform.

Volumes two and three of Presbyterians in the South (John Knox) by Ernest Trice Thompson bring the story from 1861 to 1972 in about as complete a form as anyone could wish. Even more detailed proportionately is The Holdeman People: The Church of God in Christ, Mennonite, 1859–1969 (William Carey) by Clarence Hiebert. What the denomination lacks in size it compensates for in earnestness. A movement both large and earnest is the Mormons. Two volumes, Joseph Smith and the Restoration by Ivan Barrett and Ensign to the Nations by Russell Rich (both Brigham Young University), give detailed, documented accounts by insiders. The first goes up to 1846, shortly after the murder of Smith, and the second begins then with the epic migration to Utah and carries the story of worldwide expansion to the present. The Woman’s Christian Temperance Union published a brief chronicle of itself to celebrate its centennial, Heritage of Dedication by Agnes Hays.

Among studies confined to the colonial period, the most inclusive is Puritanism in America: New Culture in a New World (Viking) by Larzer Ziff. He portrays Puritanism as a revolutionary alternative culture (a counter-culture, if you please) to that which dominated the English-speaking world at the time. Ziff offers many needed correctives to the overly intellectualized portrayal of Puritanism stemming from the influence of Perry Miller. More specific studies to note are: The New England Mind in Transition: Samuel Johnson of Connecticut, 1696–1772 (Yale) by Joseph Ellis; The Ethics of Jonathan Edwards: Morality and Aesthetics (University of Michigan) by Clyde Holbrook; The Shattered Synthesis: New England Puritanism Before the Great Awakening (Yale) by James W. Jones; School of the Prophets: Yale College, 1701–1740 (Yale) by Richard Warch; Statism in Plymouth Colony (Kennikat) by Harry Wand; and (yes, there is something not on Puritanism) Religion and Trade in New Netherland: Dutch Origins and American Development (Cornell) by George L. Smith.

A fine study that covers both sides of the ocean and before and after the struggle for American Independence is Pilgrimage of Faith (Scarecrow) by Steven O’Malley. It is a scholarly investigation of several members of the Otterbein family and their role in German-speaking Reformed orthodoxy of the pietistic variety. Their influence was great in Europe and in America, both among those who remained simply Reformed and through Philip Otterbein, a co-founder in 1800 of the United Brethren in Christ (now largely part of the United Methodist Church). Another ethnic group is studied biographically in Segregated Sabbaths: Richard Allen and the Rise of Independent Black Churches, 1760–1840 (Oxford) by Carol George.

The Churches Militant: The War of 1812 and American Religion (Yale) by William Gribbin is a fine historical study, but parallels with more recent controversial wars come to mind. Gilbert Haven, Methodist Abolitionist: A Study in Race, Religion, and Reform, 1850–1880 (Abingdon) by William Gravely and Abraham Lincoln: Theologian of American Anguish (Harper & Row) by Elton Trueblood look at the greatest American travail through individuals caught up in it.

Communes have always been part of American life, and so has writing about them. Many of the books simply copy from one another, but a new contribution is made by Raymond Muncy in Sex and Marriage in Utopian Communities: Nineteenth Century America (Indiana University). The author, a professor at a Churches of Christ college, writes not to titillate but to inform with restraint. The one-sixth of the book devoted to Mormonism is a revealing contrast to the semi-official Mormon histories mentioned earlier.

An inspiring saga is narrated authoritatively in two volumes, Marcus and Narcissa Whitman and the Opening of Old Oregon (Arthur H. Clark Co.) by Clifford Drury. The Whitmans were pioneer missionaries who were also involved in gaining the Pacific Northwest for the United States instead of Britain.

The period from the Civil War to the First World War saw The Emergence of Christian Science in American Religious Life (University of California), which Stephen Gottschalk narrates and documents excellently. An equally good study of the larger New Thought movement of which Eddy’s church is the best known is Mind Cure in New England: From the Civil War to World War I (University Press of New England) by Gail Parker. The same time span saw also the gigantic swarming of peoples from the old world to the new. The response of one Anglo-Saxon denomination is portrayed in Immigrants, Baptists, and the Protestant Mind in America (University of Illinois) by Lawrence Davis. Evidence is marshalled to disprove both hostile charges of pure nativism and friendly claims of impartial welcome. Meanwhile, internal tensions, not related to immigration, were afflicting another large Anglo-Saxon denomination; David Harrell, Jr., tells authoritatively about The Social Sources of Division in the Disciples of Christ, 1865–1900 (Publishing Systems).

On the furthest frontier, Damien de Veuster, a Belgian Catholic, had a ministry to lepers from 1873 to his death from the disease in 1889 on the Hawaiian island of Molokai. Holy Man (Harper & Row) by Gavan Daws and A Man For Now (Doubleday) by John Beevers are about him.

We close out the nineteenth century with a commendation to Baker for reprinting in inexpensive format the finest biography of one of the foremost Christians of his time: Dwight L. Moody: American Evangelist, 1837–1899, by J. F. Findlay, Jr.

Contemporary American Protestant Thought: 1900–1970 (Bobbs-Merrill), edited by William R. Miller, collects essays from twenty-three authors; the essays are hardly representative of biblical and Reformational theology. A capably done history of the Pentecostal Holiness Church (which had some 70,000 members in the United States in 1973, its seventy-fifth year) by Vinson Synan is entitled The Old-Time Power (Advocate Press). One aspect of a much larger body is studied by George Kelsey in Social Ethics Among Southern Baptists, 1917–1969 (Scarecrow).

Sociological studies of current beliefs and practices include: Religion Among the Unitarian Universalists (Seminar Press) by Robert Tapp; Ethnic Diversity in Catholic America (Wiley) by Harold Abramson; Organizational Climates and Careers (Seminar Press) by Douglas Hall and Benjamin Schneider, based on studies of the priests of the Catholic Archdiocese of Hartford; and The Ministry in Transition (Pennsylvania State University) by Yoshio Fukuyama, based on the education and role conflicts of United Church of Christ ministers.

Alfred Hero, Jr., compares and contrasts numerous subdivisions of religious Americans and makes a major contribution with American Religious Groups View Foreign Policy: Trends in Rank-and-File Opinion, 1937–1969 (Duke). More narrowly focused is Hertzel Fishman’s American Protestantism and a Jewish State (Wayne State University).

In The Preachers (St. Martin’s) James Morris discusses nine men, including Billy Graham, Carl McIntire, and Herbert Armstrong, and one woman, Kathryn Kuhlman. Individual biographies and autobiographies include: Father Coughlin: The Tumultuous Life of the Priest of the Little Flower (Little, Brown) by Sheldon Marcus; Kahlil Gibran: Wings of Thought: The People’s Philosopher (Philosophical Library) by Joseph Ghougassian; The Religious and Philosophical Foundations in the Thought of Martin Luther King, Jr. (Vantage) by Ernest Lyght; Bishop to All Peoples (Abingdon), an autobiography by Arthur Moore; and The Story of My Life (Word) based on writings and sermons of Aimee Semple McPherson as edited and arranged by Raymond Cox.

Brief examinations of current activities, largely impressionistic but useful until the passage of time allows for more thorough investigation, include: The Fire We Can Light: The Role of Religion in a Suddenly Different World (Doubleday) by Martin Marty; The Evangelical Renaissance (Eerdmans) by Donald Bloesch; The Holy Spirit in Today’s Church: A Handbook of the New Pentecostalism (Abingdon) edited by Erling Jorstad; One Way: The Jesus Movement and Its Meaning (Prentice-Hall) by Robert Ellwood, Jr.; RevivalFires in Canada (Kregel) by Kurt Koch; and Catholic Charismatics: Are They For Real? (Creation) by Douglas Wead.

To conclude our section on North America we mention a few of the numerous books published on what seem to the authors to be, and usually are, exotic forms of Christianity and of other quite different religious traditions. Those Curious New Cults (Keats) by William Petersen is the best brief discussion of some sixteen such movements including witchcraft, Armstrongism, Scientology, and Maharishi Mahesh. A revised edition of Eric Lincoln’s classic The Black Muslims in America (Beacon) appeared. The Communal Experience: Anarchist and Mystical Counter-Cultures in America (Harper & Row) by Lawrence Veysey selects a few communes of a few decades ago to compare with some contemporary ones. Mystery, Magic, and Miracle: Religion in a Post-Aquarian Age (Prentice-Hall), edited by Edward Heehan, is a collection of ten essays. Going Further: Life-and-Death Religion in America (Prentice-Hall) by John Snook and A New American Reformation: A Study of Youth Culture and Religion (Philosophical Library) by James Drane suffer from trying to cover too much ground in too little space.

MISCELLANEOUS For the reader who has persevered to the end we have reserved mention of six books that do not fit into any temporal or geographical classification. They are the work of social scientists who have ranged widely in their quest to understand and describe religious behavior. The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books) by Clifford Geertz is a collection of essays over a fifteen-year period by a leading anthropologist. Beyond the Classics? (Harper & Row), edited by Charles Glock and Phillip Hammond, looks at developments since the seminal works of men such as Freud, Weber, H. Richard Niebuhr, and William James. Religion in Sociological Perspective (Wadsworth), edited by Charles Glock, is a collection of twenty-one essays. A Sociology of Religion (Basic Books) is a textbook by a British scholar, Michael Hill. Then we have a book whose title names two of the best-selling religious book topics today. Bryan Wilson’s Magic and the Millennium: A Sociological Study of Religious Movements of Protest Among Tribal and Third-World Peoples (Harper & Row) will not itself be a best seller but is an excellent book. Finally, Religion, Altered States of Consciousness, and Social Change (Ohio State University), edited by Erika Bourguignon, is a very important investigation of ecstasy—a feeling to which one who has read all these survey articles is now entitled.

Books

Choice Evangelical Books of 1973

From among scores of outstanding books by evangelicals appearing during 1973, the editors recommend these twenty-five works on general subjects to be especially worthy of consideration. Since Canon Press is our book publishing division, we have excluded its titles from this list (except for two volumes prepared under the direction of Baker).

Eerdmans’ Handbook to the Bible, edited by David and Pat Alexander (Eerdmans, 680 pp., $12.95). One of the few books of which it can truly be said that every family should have one.

Beyond Science by Denis Alexander (Holman, 222 pp., $4.95). A scientist tells of the limitations of his field and presents an able defense of the evangelical faith.

The Evangelical Renaissance by Donald Bloesch (Eerdmans, 165 pp., $2.95 pb). A good overview of contemporary evangelical thought that includes a long-needed appreciation of the contributions of the earlier Pietist movement.

The Message of the New Testament by F. F. Bruce (Eerdmans, 120 pp., $1.95 pb). Probably the best available introduction.

Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries by John Calvin (twelve volumes, Eerdmans, 4,281 pp., $75.80 the set). Begun in 1959, this new translation under the editorship of David and Thomas Torrance was completed last year with the volumes on Matthew, Mark, Luke, James, and Jude.

Psychology For Church Leaders by Gary Collins (four volumes, Creation, 789 pp., $19.80 and $11.80 pb the set). Begun in 1971, this set looks at normal human development (Man in Transition), counseling techniques (Effective Counseling), abnormal behavior (Fractured Personalities), and learning, emotions, and relationships (Man in Motion).

Contemporary World Theology by Harvie Conn (Presbyterian and Reformed, 155 pp., $2.95 pb). Two-thirds of the book looks at various non-evangelical theologies; the last third, somewhat less critically, examines several evangelical alternatives before advocating a comparatively staunch Reformed viewpoint.

A History of Fundamentalism in America by George Dollar (Bob Jones University, 411 pp., $6.95, $3.95 pb). Highly critical of this magazine, as one would expect considering the publisher, this is nevertheless a good survey of evangelicalism since 1875 in the baptistic-presbyterianish expression with categorizations of men and organizations into militant, moderate, and modified camps. Non-militants can learn much from it and can easily make allowances for the author’s own obvious preferences.

Dust of Death by Os Guinness (Inter-Varsity, 419 pp., $7.95, $4.95 pb). A highly commended interaction with a wide variety of contemporary challenges to Christianity.

To Turn From Idols by Kenneth Hamilton (Eerdmans, 232 pp., $3.95 pb). An excellent, well-written study of the perennial challenge to faith in God as it is expressed in modern forms that are not so crude as graven images but are more insidious.

Dictionary of Christian Ethics, edited by Carl F. H. Henry (Baker and Canon, 726 pp., $16.95). An essential work for public, school, and many personal libraries.

The Challenge of Religious Studies by Kenneth Howkins (InterVarsity, 150 pp., $2.50 pb). Although aimed at those who will be studying religion in secular universities, this book can benefit all who wish to know about the inter-relations of “objective” scholarship and Christian faith.

Organization and Leadership in the Local Church by Kenneth Kilinski and Jerry Wofford (Zondervan, 253 pp., $5.95). A pastor and a university professor of business collaborate on a practical guide to leadership in the local church.

Politics: A Case For Christian Action by Robert Linder and Richard Pierard (InterVarsity, 156 pp., $1.75 pb). A bipartisan appeal for Christians to be involved, where possible and expedient, in the running of the society of which they are a part. Based on Scripture, with due consideration for other views and suggestions for further reading.

The Kink and I by James Mallory, Jr. (Victor, 224 pp., $1.45 pb). A Christian psychiatrist’s anecdote-filled but solidly based guide to untwisted living.

Principalities and Powers by John Warwick Montgomery (Bethany Fellowship, 224 pp., $4.95). A foremost evangelical thinker presents a valuable, insightful book on the occult, setting it in both historical and theological perspective.

The New International Version of the New Testament (Zondervan, 573 pp., $5.95). A widely representative group of evangelical scholars combine the best of contemporary English style with fidelity to the Greek.

Knowing God by J. I. Packer (InterVarsity, 256 pp., $5.95). An excellent presentation of who God is and what he has done for us.

Encyclopedia of Biblical Prophecy by J. Barton Payne (Harper & Row, 754 pp., $19.95). A massive compilation, not without some interpretation, but important for both prophecy buffs and general students of Scripture.

The Evangelical Heritage by Bernard Ramm (Word, 180 pp., $5.95). A brief historical survey stressing the distinctives of evangelicalism and suggesting directions for its future.

The Institutes of Biblical Law by Rousas John Rushdoony (Craig, 890 pp., $18.50). A thorough, provocative study of the Ten Commandments along with other aspects of biblical law.

The Teaching Ministry of the Pulpit by Craig Skinner (Baker, 255 pp., $5.95). Useful both as an introductory text and as a refresher for preachers.

Historical Geography of the Holy Land by George Turner (Baker and Canon, 392 pp., $11.95). An authoritative guide from biblical times to the present.

Christ and the Bible by John Wenham (InterVarsity, 206 pp., $2.95). A well presented case for biblical authority based on the life and teachings of Jesus.

Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, edited by D. J. Wiseman (InterVarsity, c. 250 pp. each, usually $5.95 each). For the first nine years of its life this outstanding series produced only five volumes. Then in 1973 Exodus, Psalms 1–72, and Jeremiah-Lamentations were added, so it is fitting to call attention to the series at this time.

Theology

Thomas Aquinas—An Evangelical Appraisal

Pro and con from today’s perspective.

St. Thomas Aquinas died on March 7, 1274. This month, then, marks the 700th anniversary of that event, and is a fitting time to offer an assessment of Aquinas’s contribution to Christian philosophy and theology.

Most Protestant clergymen have a small, if not always accurate, core of information about Thomas. They know he lived sometime between Augustine and Luther; but so, of course, did all the other theologians and philosophers of the Middle Ages. They know he effected a synthesis between the philosophy of Aristotle and Christian theology. They know too that his philosophy became for much of the twentieth century the controlling influence on Roman Catholic thought. Most Protestants also recall that Aquinas developed a number of arguments for the existence of God. And a few may remember that his most famous writings are the Summa Contra Gentiles, an apologetic work in which he explained and defended his understanding of the Christian faith against unbelievers, and the massive Summa Theologica, left unfinished at his death. To this list most Protestants could also add that Aquinas was canonized (in 1323); after all, how else does a Roman Catholic become a saint?

Unfortunately, such “common knowledge” about Aquinas is not always accurate. For one thing, it is something of an oversimplification to say he synthesized Aristotle and Christianity. There were many more influences (Greek, Roman, and Arabic) at work in his philosophy than Aristotle. Then too, the theistic arguments that Protestants often borrow from Aquinas turn out to be quite different arguments (and weaker ones, at that) than those he himself seems to have proposed.

Aquinas appeared on the scene at a time when many of his contemporaries believed that Christianity was threatened by the greatest intellectual challenge in its history. That threat, the philosophy of Aristotle, was first introduced into the Christian world about A.D. 1200. Even if Aristotle’s philosophy had been properly understood and stated in accurate Latin translations, it would have been a potent enough challenge to medieval Christianity.

But the Aristotelianism of the thirteenth century came complete with interpretations by Muslim philosophers like Averroes (1126–1198), who confused a number of Aristotle’s doctrines with those of certain Neo-platonists. This form of Aristotelianism rejected the doctrine of creation, denied personal survival after death, and placed numerous limitations on the extent of God’s knowledge and power. It had previously been recognized as a threat to Islamic theology, and charges of heresy within Islam had already been placed against adherents of these views. The Roman church sought to counteract the influx of these new and dangerous ideas by banning the teaching of certain elements of Aristotle’s thought. But the ban was unsuccessful, especially at places like the University of Paris, where a group of Latin Averroists accepted Aristotle’s philosophy as true even though they recognized its incompatibility with Christian doctrine.

During the thirteenth century, intellectuals in the Christian world took a variety of positions regarding the new philosophy. (1) There were some (it may be helpful to regard them as the liberals of the thirteenth century) who followed Averroes in proclaiming the supremacy of philosophy over revealed truth. They maintained that whenever a clear conflict between faith and reason arose, reason must always be accepted over faith. (2) There were those on the other hand (the fundamentalists of their century, perhaps) who insisted on the supremacy of faith. They argued that wherever revelation teaches one thing and Aristotle the opposite (regarding creation, for example), Aristotle must be rejected. In any conflict between the two, faith is to be preferred to reason. (3) There were even some who appeared to maintain a double theory of truth. (Dare we label them the dialectical theologians of their age?) That is, some, like Siger of Brabant (whose position is open to a different interpretation), seem to have held that a proposition can be true in philosophy and its contradictory true in theology.

Paul Tillich often sounds like a twentieth-century Siger of Brabant. In his Dynamics of Faith, for example, Tillich insists that the meaning of truth for faith is something quite different from its meaning for science, history, and philosophy. As Tillich puts it, “The truth of faith cannot be made dependent on the historical truth of the stories and legends in which faith has expressed itself … [nor can faith] be shaken by historical research even if its results are critical of the traditions in which the event is reported” (Dynamics of Faith, Harper & Row, pp. 87, 89). In other words, faith is immune from difficulties raised in science, history, and philosophy because it belongs to a different domain.

To his credit, Aquinas would have no part of any of these moves to resolve the conflict between revelation and man’s claims to truth. He repudiated the double theory of truth. Two contradictory propositions, even if found in different areas like science and theology, cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense. If Aristotle should prove to be correct about a certain belief that contradicts Scripture, the Christian should not hedge or hide behind a dubious theory of truth but be honest enough to admit that Scripture is wrong. But also, the Christian should examine every alleged conflict between philosophy and theology. Perhaps he will find that the conflict is only apparent, or perhaps he will even discover that it is the philosopher who is in error. Aquinas went even further and insisted that faith and reason, properly understood, can never conflict. God’s word is true and what God teaches will always be consistent with whatever truth men discover.

So far, so good. But of course, everything Aquinas has said up to this point was maintained before him by St. Augustine. Aquinas broke with Augustine by insisting that there are really two different types of knowledge. There is the natural knowledge we find in philosophy, and there is supernatural knowledge, revealed by God and discussed by theology. Aquinas then introduced a sharp cleavage between faith and reason, after all. While faith and reason were not logically incompatible, they were psychologically different activities of the soul, each with its own specific domain. The domain of reason was all truth that man could acquire unaided by divine revelation. This domain, which Aquinas identified with philosophy, included all the scientific, ethical, psychological, and philosophical knowledge that man could gain through divine revelation.

There was one item of knowledge, however, that could be known by either reason or faith: the knowledge that God existed. If one had the interest to study them and the ability to understand them, there were sound philosophic proofs for God’s existence. But those unable to follow the philosophic proofs could know the existence of God by resting in the truth of divine revelation.

Coincidentally, Aquinas’s bifurcation of faith and reason provided him with one way of resolving some of the problems posed by Aristotle’s philosophy. This was the case with Aristotle’s teaching about the eternity of the world, a view clearly in conflict with the Christian doctrine of creation. Contrary to other Christian apologists of his day such as St. Bonaventure, Aquinas argued that human reason (philosophy) is incapable of discovering whether or not the world had a beginning in time. The doctrine of creation is a truth of faith, not a truth of reason. It can be known only by divine revelation. If Aristotle was wrong on this point (and, Aquinas suggested, Aristotle may only have been reporting the opinions of his predecessors), it was largely an error of overestimating the bounds of human reason.

Of course, not all the difficulties raised by Aristotle’s philosophy could be disposed of so simply (and I do not suggest that Thomas’s attempt was completely successful). Other problems required a drastic reinterpretation of the text of Aristotle. And so, Aristotle’s apparently clear renunciation of survival after death in De Anima was blunted by Thomas’s reinterpretation of Aristotle’s famous doctrine of the active intellect. According to Aristotle, there is an active intellect that alone makes knowledge possible and that is immortal and everlasting. The Averroists had followed Plotinus and denied the particularity of the active intellect in favor of a cosmic principle of intelligence. But Aquinas insisted that Aristotle meant to teach that each human being has a separate, active intellect that is immortal. Thus, given Aquinas’s restructuring of Aristotle’s doctrine, one could be an Aristotelian and still believe in the Christian doctrine of personal survival after death.

Some Roman Catholic historians of philosophy, such as Father F. C. Copleston, have raised doubts about the accuracy of Thomas’s interpretation. But Aquinas was not only attempting to show Aristotelians that their philosophy need not be incompatible with Christian truth; he was also trying to show non-Aristotelian Christians that they had nothing to fear from the new philosophy. And in a situation like that faced by Thomas, good public relations can easily outweigh bad exegesis.

Aquinas did not stop with his attempt to show that Aristotelianism could be made compatible with Christianity. He proceeded to build a remarkable system of thought in which answers were proposed to a wide variety of important problems in psychology, physics, metaphysics, ethics, and other areas of human knowledge. In other words, Aquinas was not content to relate the Christian view of God and the world to the view of the classical world. He was also concerned to relate his Christian world-view to the problems of his own time and meet head-on the challenges of competing theories. While I may be unable to recommend Thomas’s system, I can heartily endorse his ideal. Christians ought to be engaged in developing a view of life and the world as a whole, in showing the implications of Christian theism for every area of human knowledge.

Probably no aspect of Aquinas’s thought has had more influence outside Roman Catholicism than his arguments for the existence of God. Many Protestants have also relied either on Thomas’s statement of “The Five Ways” or on later modifications of these arguments. Critics of theism have often used Aquinas’s arguments as their foil in an effort to discredit the rationality of belief in God.

Unfortunately, many of these uses of the arguments have grossly misrepresented Aquinas’s position. Aquinas is thought to have argued that there must be a First Cause or a Prime Mover because it is impossible that there should be an infinitely long series of causes or motions. But Thomas specifically stated that philosophy was incapable of showing either the possibility or impossibility of an infinite series. It was precisely for this reason that Aquinas concluded that philosophy could establish neither the truth nor the falsity of the doctrine of creation in time. It is highly unlikely that Thomas would have ignored this very point that he had taken such pains to establish in arguing for something as important as God’s existence.

One way to distinguish the two interpretations of Thomas’s theistic arguments is to picture a very long row of toppling dominoes. Imagine too that we have the power to move back in time and follow the series of dominoes as they fall. According to one interpretation, Aquinas is thought to have argued that there must be something that causes the first domino to fall. Without such a First Cause (first, that is, in the temporal sense) or Prime Mover, the first domino would not have fallen, and if the first had not fallen, the second would not have fallen, and so on.

David Hume, in the eighteenth century, successfully demolished this type of argument for God’s existence. As Hume showed, even if God were the cause of the first domino’s falling, there would be absolutely no reason to believe that that First Cause is still around now. Presumably, Hume argued, theists are interested in establishing not the existence of a God who may have existed only at the beginning of things but an eternal God upon whom the continuing existence of the world depends. It was exactly this latter notion of God that Thomas’s argument (properly understood) was supposed to establish.

While Hume’s arguments were successful in undermining some theistic proofs, they were totally irrelevant to what Aquinas meant to say. Instead of Aquinas’s God being the First Cause in a temporal sense, he was the First Cause in an ontological sense. That is, God was the primary cause of the entire series of causes, the ontological ground without which the entire series of causes would not have existed. God is not merely the Being who moves the first domino. He is the Being who makes the dominoes, sets them up, and supports them in their existence. God is not simply a Cause that may have existed once and then disappeared. God is the eternal and necessary ground for everything that has being, for every causal relation, for every change that takes place. Thus reinterpreted, Aquinas’s theistic arguments successfully avoid many of the common objects to the cosmological argument. Unfortunately, for proponents of natural theology, even these reinterpreted arguments are open to serious objections (see Donald Burrill, editor, The Cosmological Arguments, Anchor, 1967).

The fortunes of Thomas’s thought waxed and waned during the centuries. There were periods of tremendous influence in countries such as sixteenth-century Spain. However, there has been nothing in the history of Thomism quite equal to the influence his thought achieved in the twentieth century. Much of this was due to various ecclesiastical declarations such as Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879), which urged Catholic bishops to “restore the golden wisdom of Thomas and to spread it far and wide for the defense and beauty of the Catholic faith.” Pope Pius X went even further and warned Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians against deviating from the thought of Aquinas.

The revival of Thomas’s thought in the twentieth century took three predictable courses. First, there were the dullards and mimics whom we find in every age and school of thought who followed lemming-like what was thought to be orthodox Thomism. There were philosophy departments in some Catholic colleges that never permitted their students the luxury of reading Kant, Hume, Descartes, Plato—or even Aristotle. Their only textbooks were the writings of Thomas and approved expositions of the Thomist system.

But there was, second, a group of Thomist scholars who led the way in applying the principles of St. Thomas to the new problems of this new century. Scholars like Etienne Gilson produced outstanding historical studies of medieval philosophy. Other scholars like Jacques Maritain proposed answers to a wide variety of contemporary philosophic and scientific concerns. Thomism underwent subtle mutations and accommodated itself to such twentieth-century movements as existentialism, phenomenology, and analytic philosophy. Nor has the revival of Thomism been confined to Roman Catholicism. Many Protestants have profited from reading the works of non-Roman scholars like C. S. Lewis, Eric Mascal, and Austin Farrer.

The third group comprises those who, like Bernard Lonergan, have rediscovered Thomas for themselves and gone on to work in the contemporary situation, developing new positions. However, as yesterday’s outstanding spokesmen for Thomism fade from the scene, Thomism appears more and more to be in a state of disarray.

There are at least two distinct ways to evaluate a system such as Aquinas’s. First of all, we can take the system as a whole and decide whether it is an adequate or true account of reality. No doubt, an important part of such a procedure for the Christian is to examine the compatibility or incompatibility of the system with scriptural truth. Second, even should one find it necessary to reject the system as a whole, he may still find within it moments of truth that are helpful and illuminating. Such moments of truth can be found more easily in some systems than in others. There are undoubtedly moments of truth in the writings of Heidegger, Sartre, or Bertrand Russell. The Christian will certainly find many more such moments in Aquinas. For example, the evangelical can learn a great deal from the sound critiques that contemporary Thomists have offered against the major anti-theistic movements of our century. While many Protestants could find nothing more important to do than defend dispensationalism, Thomist scholars were combatting the great errors of the twentieth century—subjectivism, relativism, secularism, pragmatism, positivism, and Marxism.

Even so, the difficulties of Thomas’s Aristotelianism are so great as to make the entire system unsuitable for a biblically centered Christian philosophy. Some of these errors could no doubt be adjusted or modified, much as Aquinas himself sought to rework elements of Aristotle’s philosophy. But there are two errors so significant that they render Aquinas’s system beyond any hope of salvage.

INTO WHICH ANGELS WOULD LOOK

blessings to shrive

the angels’ eyes

who cloud about us

wings riffling

among the leaves

(sigh of the wind

in a forest of living bones)

making do with thin

dry loaves moist

leaves that float

on the air

wingtips shave & carve

the light roaring down,

make forms that blaze

angelic

among the clouds

that gather to gaze

at our amazing bones

all split

by urgent buds

EUGENE WARREN

First of all, Aquinas’s system cannot be saved from the irremediable defects of Aristotle’s metaphysics. To be sure, Aquinas tinkered here and there with such problems as God’s relation to the world. But there are more fundamental difficulties of which this is only the peak of the iceberg. Interested readers can explore these metaphysical problems in Gordon Clark’s Wheaton Lectures (reprinted in The Philosophy of Gordon H. Clark, Presbyterian and Reformed, 1968, chapter two; see also Clark’s Thales to Dewey, Houghton Mifflin, 1957, pp. 141–44). While we cannot enter into the complexities of Aristotelian metaphysics here, we can look at some problems of his epistemology.

Both Aquinas and Aristotle were empiricists. Both believed that sensory experience is the basis of all knowledge. Both denied the presence of any innate ideas in the mind of man. Thus, if man is to know God, this knowledge must be built up from a patient analysis of sense data.

But if we can learn anything from the history of philosophy, it is that a blank mind, a mind devoid of innate ideas or rational categories, cannot know anything. The inevitable result of empiricism is the skepticism of David Hume. And the only way to rescue philosophy from such a skepticism is to require that logically prior to man’s sensation of anything is the presence in his mind of certain ordering principles or innate ideas. This capacity to organize sensations, to recognize in them the universal principles that alone can serve as the basis of knowledge, was explained by St. Augustine as one result of man’s creation in the image of God. (See my book, The Light of the Mind, University of Kentucky Press, 1969, or my article, “Some Philosophic Sources for Augustine’s Theory of Illumination,” Augustinian Studies, Vol. II, 1971.) These difficulties carry over into Aquinas’s theory of analogy and his doctrine of how man can know God and communicate truth about God. (See The Philosophy of Gordon H. Clark, pp. 149–51.)

But perhaps an article like this should not end on a negative note. There are at least three accomplishments of Aquinas that evangelicals should note with appreciation.

1. Aquinas provided wisdom and inspiration to numerous philosophers, theologians, and representatives of other disciplines who applied what they learned from him to the new problems and challenges of their own time. Many of these contributions can be useful to evangelicals who study and use them with discernment.

2. Thomas sought to develop a comprehensive and systematic world-and-life view. While it may be necessary to disagree with many features of his system, no one before him and few since him have developed any world view (theistic or secular) as complete as his.

3. Aquinas met the major intellectual challenge to the Christianity of his age on its own ground. Differences will arise over the exact way in which he answered that challenge, but evangelicals today should applaud his refusal to take refuge in pietism, fideism, or irrationalism.

Editor’s Note from March 01, 1974

Space pressures forced me to forgo making a personal comment on The Exorcist in this space last issue. A number of friends have asked me whether I will see the film. My answer is No! I feel it would add little to the knowledge about demons I have gained from Scripture. Seeing it would be unlikely to improve the quality of my Christian life; it might even impair it. For me the reviews of the film indicate the subject has not been treated adequately from the perspective of God’s revealed Word and can therefore deceive us and expose us to the wiles of the devil. Under particular circumstances some people might be helped by seeing the film. I don’t think I’m one of them, and I see no reason why I should view it.

I have been bemused by the fact that some religious liberals have condemned The Exorcist as pornographic even though they have found worse films acceptable. I suspect that their condemnation derives largely from an anti-supernatural bias and an unwillingness to believe in a personal devil and demons.

Theology

A Time to Keep Silence

Halford luccock once gave his readers permission to shriek every time they heard Christianity solemnly endorsed as a “bulwark against Communism.” It was nonetheless a phrase greatly beloved and much used by the Vatican during the pontificates of Pius XI and XII. Soviet foreign minister Georgi Chicherin, during the wary flirtation with Rome before 1927, repaid the oblique compliment. “Without Rome,” he declared, “religion would die.” Her propagandists of every nationality he held to be more effective than guns or armies. But ultimately the Soviets hearkened not unto the voice of the charmer, spurned papal suggestions of a concordat, and left the Vatican in the predicament that ensues when (in Martin Luther King’s words) “you can’t beat ’em, and they won’t let you join ’em.”

One year after Pearl Harbor, the journal La Croix, greeted by Pius XII as the organ of “pontifical thought,” commented: “It is very understandable that these states [Germany, Italy, Japan] should have agreed to establish a front against a danger which … is threatening civilization and our Christian ideals.” This unguarded utterance, that deserves more than a little shriek, should be kept in mind for what follows.

Ever since that rainy morning in October, 1962, when I entered St. Peter’s to report the opening of Vatican II for this journal, I have been interested in modern papal policies. Edmond Paris wrote a book on the subject which, for all its scrupulous documentation, was too hot a potato for any major publisher to handle. Now, however, Hodder and Stoughton has published Anthony Rhodes’s The Vatican in the Age of the Dictators 1922–45.

Rhodes, says the publisher’s blurb, had access to three significant new sources: German foreign-office documents captured by the Allies in 1945; British foreign-office documents recently made public; and Vatican documents relative to World War II. Equipped with this material, a Cambridge degree, a wide experience of Europe, and an old-world arrogance that uses “England” instead of “Britain,” the author sets out to deal with the pontificates and times of Pius XI (1922–39) and his successor.

It was a momentous period. In Italy, secret negotiations between papal agents and Mussolini put the dictator in power in 1922; in 1929 the Lateran Treaty effected a formal alliance between Fascism and the papacy that was in no danger later when poison gas was used against Christian Ethiopia. In Germany, Hitler was voted full rights in 1933 when Catholics were told that the Pope himself was “favorably disposed” toward Hitler; the concordat that year was carried out under the aegis of Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pius XII, who was in Munich during the rise of Nazism.

In Austria, the “Christian” chancellors followed one another, beginning with the Jesuit Mgr. Seipel and ending in 1938 with the country’s absorption by Hitler, when eight million Austrians swelled the ranks of German Catholics. In Belgium, Catholic Action nurtured a local Nazism that paved the way for Hitler. In Spain, the Vatican recognized Franco in 1937 and later decorated him with the Supreme Order of Christ. In France, Cardinal Baudrillart declared Hitler’s war “a noble undertaking,” and the hierarchy urged “collaboration.” In what is now Yugoslavia, 600,000 Serbian Orthodox and Jews were liquidated with the approval of clerical members of the Croatian parliament, including Mgr. Stepinac (later condemned by a civil court, but raised to the cardinalate by Pius XII), and 240,000 Orthodox were forcibly “converted” to Catholicism. And this, most of all, was the era that saw several million Jews murdered, without public protest from Pius XII.

That summary owes nothing to Anthony Rhodes, who tends to show impatience with criticism of papal policies not couched in his own terms. Rhodes believes that the rot set in with Pius XI’s decision to withdraw his church from politics so far as was possible, and to sponsor instead Catholic Action, a lay organization aimed at organizing and coordinating religious activity so as to “penetrate the life of the community.”

Nine months after Pius’s accession, Mussolini came to power. Before long the Pope abandoned Don Sturzo and his (Catholic) Popular party, leaving a clear field for the dictator. After the previous political strife, says Rhodes, Pius “believed the apostolic activity could be promoted better under a stable government and an all-powerful ruler.”

Rhodes thinks this was, “on the whole, mistaken.” He denies that the Vatican gave its blessing to the Abyssinian campaign but admits that the Italian bishops favored the war. The Pope was to clash with Mussolini over the education of youth, but after the 1929 agreement, which at once boosted Vatican finances and bound up a large proportion of them with the state, Pius said he had “given Italy back to God, and God back to Italy.”

Rhodes similarly narrates with a wealth of documentation how Hitler in 1933 so hoodwinked the Vatican that Secretary of State Pacelli, who thought he knew his Germany, had no criticism to make of him, and Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich said that Catholics could now join the Nazi party. That year the concordat again saw Pius’s withdrawal of support for a Catholic political party (the German Centre party); this silenced the only remaining challenge to Hitler, who had already eliminated the Communists. Confessional schools were theoretically permitted, but such was Nazi intimidation that from 65 per cent in 1933 the proportion of Munich children attending Catholic schools had by 1937 plummeted to 3 per cent.

Regarding Pius XII’s public silence when Jews were being massacred, Rhodes in one section gives the impression that to answer Rolf Hochhuth’s play is to “dispose of” the charges against Pius. The Pope may indeed have been all heart, but as Hochhuth’s character so poignantly asked, “Where is his voice?” Pius said he had “exercised restraint” in condemning Nazism “to avoid greater evils” (ad maiora mala vitanda), but what could have been more dreadful than what was happening? In Finland, Denmark, Bulgaria, Rumania, and the Ukraine, Hitler’s “Final Solution” was resisted, and the Vatican’s expectation of dire revenge was not fulfilled.

Rhodes’s book is most comprehensive, and deserves more than these few scattered references. Both he and Hochhuth show that the Vatican was obsessed by the menace of Russian Communism, against which Hitler was regarded as the only effective defense, but his more than the dramatist’s is a sustained indictment of policies that have more to do with upholding “the rights and prerogatives of the Catholic Church” than with true religion and undefiled. The Spanish centuries ago coined a cynical word for it: “God is stronger than the armies, and almost as strong as his Church.”

Theology

God and Caesar on Cyprus

The young Cypriot novice scribbled his first political slogan on the refectory kitchen wall nearly fifty years ago: Zeto i Enosis (“long live enosis” [union with Greece]). That his land should be free from British colonial rule was to become an obsession with Michael Mouskos, son of a shepherd farmer in the Mediterranean island nation of Cyprus (current population: nearly 650,000).

He entered the twelfth-century Kykko monastery before he was thirteen, completed his schooling in Nicosia, was made deacon in the Orthodox Church, and took the name Makarios (“Blessed”). In 1938 he went to Athens where, caught up in the German and Italian occupation, he graduated in theology, read law, and helped out in the fashionable Church of St. Irene. He was consecrated to the priesthood in 1946 (from which time he was not allowed to marry) and took over a parish in Piraeus, the port of Athens. Not for long, however: a grant from the World Council of Churches sent him for post-graduate study to Boston University.

This too was a short-term stay, for early in 1948 a telegram from Cyprus announced that the 34-year-old student had been elected bishop of Kition. That year, having stayed in Boston long enough to grow the obligatory beard, he went home to be consecrated at a time when the British yoke was felt to be increasingly onerous.

The church spearheaded the public demand for enosis. None was more zealous than the new bishop, and it came as no surprise when, on the death of Archbishop Makarios II, he was elected Makarios III. Initially he exercised a moderating influence on militant elements under Colonel George Grivas (later a general). But when Britain resisted self-determination for the island, and the United Nations and even Greece proved unhelpful, Makarios collaborated with Grivas, the five-year EOKA campaign began (the title translates from Greek as “National Organization for Cypriot Struggle”), and control slipped from the archbishop’s hands.

Further negotiations with Britain failed, and in 1956 Makarios, Bishop Kyprianos of Kyrenia, a priest, and a prominent Orthodox layman were seized and taken to exile in the Seychelles islands. They were there for a year, and Makarios was to spend nearly two years more in Athens before being allowed to return to Cyprus in 1959. When independence came in 1960, Makarios was the obvious choice for president, while retaining his archbishopric. To both offices, it should be noted, he was elected democratically by the people.

From the beginning both clergy and laity have protested his dual role. Bishop Kyprianos produced a memorandum for the holy synod charging that the dual role was against the Gospel (“no man can serve two masters”), canon law, and the public good.

Makarios was disarming: the presidency was only temporary, forced on him by circumstances. By December, 1963, Metropolitan Yennadios (or Gennadios) of Paphos, the senior bishop, had also challenged Makarios twice in synod, but pressure was removed that month when the confrontation between the Greek and Turkish sectors of the population caused a diversion.

Nevertheless the archbishop’s critics were to exploit this: the intercommunal strife, they charged, indicated the wrath of God. P.S. Ioannides, the prominent layman who had been exiled to the Seychelles with Makarios, published newspaper articles criticizing not the person of the president, but his policies, with special reference to the dual role. He was given a prison term for his pains (“you can’t criticize the president”). That meant also that he could not criticize the archbishop. Makarios had resolved the perennial church-state dichotomy by uniting both offices in himself.

His fellow bishops again sought his resignation in 1968, when a belated election was held, but Makarios again prevailed. He was reelected for a five-year term.

In March, 1972, with an eye to the next election, the exasperated bishops once more demanded their colleague’s resignation. Not only did he decline to accept the document they proffered, but the matter did not appear on the official record of the synod.

But this time the bishops had new grounds for complaint: Makarios had been gathering Czechoslovak arms clandestinely, and had, moreover, stored them in the archbishopric. They were evidently for use against Grivas, who was again organizing guerrilla activity in the name of enosis (union with Greece), to which Makarios was now giving little more than lip service, apparently seeking some accommodation with the nation’s Turkish minority. While the bishops made no secret of their enosis sympathies, they strongly affirm that these were secondary in their challenge to Makarios—that while they would prefer a pro-enosis president, their chief aim was to get Makarios to concentrate on his churchly duties, and to get a layman elected as president.

At the March meeting, Makarios temporized. “If you insist,” he told the bishops, “I will resign,” adding that he had no wish to divide the church. Their answer: “We insist.” Next day, however, a crowd of people gathered before the archbishropric where Makarios lives (he uses the presidential palace only as offices) and urged him not to resign. Their slogan, significantly, was not the familiar one of enosis but “Makarios and only Makarios.” Crowds don’t just happen, say his critics, sure that Makarios had instigated this one and that Communist elements formed the bulk of it.

Makarios went on the offensive. His senior adversary, Metropolitan Yennadios, was not allowed to return to his diocese—and Makarios’s supporters there made sure he didn’t. He went instead to Limassol to the home of his colleague Metropolitan Anthimos of Kitium. As they entered the bishop’s house a mob attacked them, and they were saved by the intervention of their own supporters. Three months later Makarios’s supporters in Paphos (the president’s own home region) voted Yennadios out of office because of his attitude toward his superior.

An uneasy truce saw Makarios continue as president until his term expired in February, 1973. Before then, however, there was a repeat performance of the earlier pro-Makarios demonstration, and again the allegations of Communist involvement. (The party does have a large following in Cyprus. In the 1970 elections, however, the Communists put up only nine candidates for the thirty-five vacancies, and all were elected. This self-imposed limitation and low profile apparently serve the party’s long-term Cyprus aims better at this juncture.)

So Makarios “yielded to importunity” and entered on a further five-year term. The bishops, thoroughly frustrated, met in March, 1973, and deposed him as archbishop. They held their action to be in accordance with canon law. In Orthodoxy, thirteen bishops are usually necessary, but Cyprus had only four diocesan bishops (including the archbishop) and has in any case been autocephalous since A.D. 478 (a constant source of pride in a different context). In any other country the intervention of the state would have enforced such a majority decision, but this was not possible where God and Caesar walked together and, as it were, traded hats at will. So Makarios rejected their claim to have deposed him, and the conclusion must be that he could not be deposed at all.

The bishops pushed on. Having given him one month in which to appear (a hearing would have required thirteen bishops), they then pronounced their decision “definitive and final,” pronounced his relegation to the rank of layman and to his baptismal name of Michael Mouskos, and appointed Yennadios as locum tenens in his place. Makarios hit back. Not only did he accuse them of attempting his “spiritual assassination,” but he chose to see in their action a plot against the safety of the state, and declared that “all necessary measures” would be taken against sabotage and to safeguard the position of the church.

Then, transferring his role from defendant to plaintiff, he called a synod of the Orthodox Churches of the Middle East to meet in Nicosia. Of the “big five,” the Ecumenical Patriarch in Istanbul and the primate of Greece did not respond. The three others, however, were based in the Arab world which Makarios (as president of the republic) had been assiduously cultivating. The patriarchs of Antioch and Alexandria came in person; the patriarch of Jerusalem ensured his representation. They were joined by other bishops, a quorum was obtained, and in July, 1973, proceedings began under the presidency of Patriarch Nicholas of Alexandria.

After deciding that they were a lawfully constituted assembly, the synod went to work on two tasks: to revoke the archbishop’s deposition (did he in some sense take it seriously after all?), and to try the errant bishops for conspiring against the archbishop, holding secret meetings, and provoking disunity. The first part was simple, especially as the three leading antagonists—bishops Yennadios, Kyprianos, and Anthimos—complained they were not consulted or asked to put their case, and Makarios was duly saved from being Michael Mouskos. Surprisingly, the synod invited the three to announce the revocation. Not surprisingly, they refused.

Before the second phase, the patriarch of Alexandria preached in Nicosia at a service in which fifteen bishops participated. There was no question of the forthcoming trial of the bishops being sub judice: the patriarch embarked on an impressive series of sonorous curses that consigned the three dissidents to anathema, of which the press carried full reports. To insult the archbishop meant imprisonment; to insult his fellow bishops was commendable and deserving of wide circulation.

A summons was made to the three (not by direct communication, they protested, but through the newspapers) to attend the synod meeting for judgment. Having been cursed on Sunday, they had no mind for a repetition on Wednesday, so they declined to attend, holding that the synod had no authority over the Cypriot Church.

On July 14 they were deposed, Yennadios for the second time. On the dual role of Makarios, which the three critics had held to be contrary to canon law, the synod ruled that Makarios’s assumption of the presidency in response to public demand “constituted an imposed duty which was not contrary to the spirit of the Holy Scriptures and canon law.” The machinery of the state, which had done nothing for the bishops, now swung into motion. All public offices were informed that the rebels’ signatures as bishops were no longer valid, and they were not allowed to conduct services.

One curious feature is that the now doubly-deposed Yennadios had been replaced two months earlier. The two other bishoprics were each divided in two: elections were subsequently held in three of the vacancies, and appointments made. The three deposed men were given the chance to stay in their sees as monks and guests of the government, but they refused this as humiliation.

The one see unfilled to date is part of the diocese of Kyrenia, previously held by Makarios’s old comrade in exile, Kyprianos, whose opposition the archbishop may regret more than that of the others. Moreover, this bishop commanded great loyalty among his clergy. Of 100 in his former diocese, says a spokesman, sixty-seven signified in writing their objection to his deposition. By violence, threats, and the withholding of state salaries, however, the Makarios machine forced them to renounce what they had signed. Only seven have held out; they are now dependent on the gifts of friends for maintenance. Makarios III had won the battle, had turned against his own boyish graffiti now that enosis no longer suited his purpose, and won’t have to rustle up that spontaneous crowd again until 1978. Moreover, guerrilla leader Grivas, 75, died late last month. Enosis may not live much longer.

Table Talk

Both President Richard Nixon and Vice-President Gerald Ford were busy with prayer breakfasts last month.

A revival atmosphere of sorts prevailed for awhile among the more than 3,000 who attended the annual National Prayer Breakfast at the Hilton hotel in Washington, D. C. Many of the nation’s legislators and government leaders were present. Senator Harold Hughes of Iowa, the main speaker, recounted his own conversion nearly twenty years ago, spoke movingly of the love and forgiveness of God (“the debt has been paid in the blood of the Saviour”), and had everyone at the tables hold hands and pray. In the simultaneous praying that ensued many pleas were uttered for national revival. After the last “amen” the crowd gave Hughes a standing ovation. President Nixon spoke briefly (“I pray that we listen to what God wants us to be as a nation”), and Vice-President Ford led in a prayer for God’s forgiveness and blessing nationally.

Ford was the guest of honor—and speaker—at several functions. At a prayer breakfast sponsored by the National Religious Broadcasters in Washington he acknowledged that aberrations, frustrations, and controversy may mar national life and be disturbing personally. But, he affirmed, “our faith will carry us through.” He told of a “new mood” he observes in America, especially among young people. The Jesus movement and similar expressions of spiritual awakening are largely the reason, he said. It all signals a return to the religious basics that undergird the nation, he believes.

Ford, an Episcopalian, is devout but is not outspoken about his faith. At a prayer luncheon attended by 1,000 in Grand Rapids there was no mention of God or Christ in his speech. But his son Michael, 23, a Gordon-Conwell seminarian, redeemed the occasion with a testimony of his own conversion. Then he led in prayer—for his dad (“bless him with discernment and good judgment … and may the Holy Spirit indwell in him”). Afterward, they embraced briefly.

Religion In Transit

The 2,000-member First Presbyterian Church of Chattanooga, Tennessee, voted to leave the Southern Presbyterian fold and to join the new National Presbyterian Church. It led the denomination in mission giving, and Pastor Ben Haden has a nationwide broadcast.

Paul A. Crow, Jr., 42, the first full-time general secretary of the Consultation on Church Union (COCU), will leave that post in April to become president of the Council on Christian Unity of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).

Danish film director Jens Joergen Thorsen now says his porno movie on the purported love affairs of Jesus will be filmed in an Arab oil state (he won’t name it). France earlier refused him entry, and Denmark withdrew a subsidy.

Pope Paul VI is suffering from leukemia, says Jesuit theologian Malachi Martin in an article in last month’s Intellectual Digest.

Members of the Sao Paulo, Brazil, Seventh-day Adventist Central Church, mourning the loss of nineteen of their young people who perished in a bus-truck collision, nevertheless by their faith and testimonies are exerting a powerful influence for Christ in the Sāo Paulo area, say observers. The bus was loaded with youths returning from a church youth congress in Gramado.

DEATHS

STEPHEN F. BAYNE, 65, Episcopal bishop and educator who was the first executive officer of the worldwide Anglican Communion; in Santurce, Puerto Rico, of an apparent heart attack.

DONALD H. MORRIS, 71, chancellor and former president of Abilene (Texas) Christian College, the Churches of Christ school; in Abilene, of a heart attack.

Theology

Exercises in Exorcism

When The Devils portrayed demon possession on the movie screen—and did it graphically—hardly a viewer’s eyebrow or a critic’s index finger was raised in protest or horror. That was 1971.

But for audiences, reporters, critics, priests, and theologians in 1974, the scenario seems different. The Exorcist, released just in time for the Christmas theater rush, has had more bad reviews and more publicity than any other film in recent memory. Last month it received four Golden Globe awards from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, among them the award for best picture of the year. Some people stand in line six to eight hours to see the film only to leave before it’s over. Ushers in the twenty-four theaters where the film is showing are said to carry smelling salts to revive those who faint. Nausea is another common occurrence. In its first week The Exorcist grossed $1.8 million (it cost $10 million to film), and some observers predict it will outgross The God-father, which brought in $105 million last year.

But the real interest in the Warner Brothers film lies not in its horror, though there’s plenty of that, but in its underlying presupposition that demon possession exists and that therefore exorcism (the expelling of an evil spirit) is necessary. Such an idea has not been widely held for many years, much less openly discussed and considered, though Protestant and Catholic groups have continued to perform exorcisms—a fact all but overlooked by the media until the release of The Exorcist.

Father Edmund G. Ryan, administrative affairs executive at Georgetown University, where the filming took place, says exorcism of a person is extremely rare in the Catholic Church. “We have no way of knowing how rare, since the records are kept secret,” he explains. The Catholic church differentiates between obsession and possession, as well. In obsession, he says, a demon enters the person’s surroundings, such as his home, but not his body. Some of the most recently publicized cases of exorcism fall into that category, he points out.

In one of those cases the home of a Daly City, California, family was exorcised (freed of a demon) last September by Karl Patzelt of the Catholic Russian Center in San Francisco. The young couple, who first noticed some unusual occurrences in 1972, moved twice during the ordeal, but without losing the demon (or demons). It (or they) set fire to chairs, towels, and wallpaper, threw objects, choked the couple, and even ate part of a sandwich, Patzelt told reporters. The only time the family experienced any relief was between 4 and 6 A.M. Patzelt, who is described by Ryan as an “arch-conservative Catholic,” performed the rite (a twenty-seven-page series of prayers and supplications for the demon to depart and never return) fourteen times in both Latin and English.

The archdiocese of San Francisco, fearing that the publicity about the exorcism will benefit The Exorcist, a film the diocesan newspaper calls “questionable,” stated that “it is highly regrettable that the story of the Bay area exorcism ever became public.” Although Patzelt disagrees with the archdiocese’s estimation of the film, he apparently agrees that the publicity is harmful, and he refuses to discuss the case with reporters.

Many priests, Ryan among them, label the film unchristian, unrealistic, and potentially harmful. In the original case on which the story is based (see February 1 issue, page 16) Ryan claims the boy experienced no physical deterioration. (In the film the little girl undergoes a horrible metamorphosis.) “The film also gives the impression that the priest, and not God through his grace, performed the exorcism. But the priest in such a situation is only a minister,” explains the priest, adding that the most unfortunate aspect of the movie is how it “obscures the Christian message.”

Georgetown University psychologist Juan B. Cortes, who unlike Ryan denies the existence of demons, fears the film will produce an exorcism-crazed populace. Although Ryan, too, fears the publicity (he has been asked if the Jesuits produced the film for promotional purposes), he admits that so far there have been fewer than fifty telephone calls to Georgetown about exorcism.

According to the chancery office in the Washington, D. C., diocese, the Catholic Church normally receives some 500 requests a year for exorcisms. Each is referred to a local priest who then investigates the case before deciding on the validity of the request. The procedure, regulated by canon law, calls for a thorough investigation of the “patient,” both somatically and psychosomatically, before exorcism is considered. “Before the priest undertakes an exorcism he ought diligently to inquire into the life of the possessed, into his condition, reputation, health and other circumstances,” warns a 1583 statement formulated at the National Synod of Rheims in France. If the investigating priest decides an exorcism is warranted, he takes the case to his bishop, who approves and assigns the task to a priest of “profound prayer life and distinct holiness,” to quote a Los Angeles priest.

Until December 31, 1972, all ordained Catholic priests were trained to be exorcists; four minor orders (porter, lector, exorcist, and acolyte) were required steps leading to the priesthood. But Pope Paul VI eliminated two of the orders, including that of exorcist.

The Protestant wing of Christianity also has its exorcists, though the form of exorcism differs from denomination to denomination. In some charismatic circles the use of exorcism is all too common. Approximately twenty priests in the Church of England perform the rite; the vicar of St. Saviour in Hampstead says he has officiated at 2,000 exorcisms in the past five years. According to author-professor John Warwick Montgomery, an out-of-print liturgical rite of exorcism exists in the Anglican and Lutheran traditions. Montgomery, who performed an exorcism about ten years ago in Canada, used a modified form of the Roman rite, eliminating the prayers to the Virgin Mary and the saints. “In my case I was fortunate,” he said. “Once was enough. Some cases require several sessions.”

For members of non-liturgical denominations the form and method of exorcism is a matter of concern. Theology professor Roger Nicole of Gordon-Conwell seminary, a Baptist, warns against the misuse of exorcism. “Some people of charismatic persuasion,” he explains, “tend to find every theological disagreement a matter for exorcism.” Although he has never been involved with an actual case of demon possession, he thinks that some “plan” would be necessary before attempting an exorcism. “Demons are not ordinary powers to be challenged lightly.”

Montgomery agrees. Before any exorcism is performed, or even considered, a complete investigation should be made. Since mental illness and demon possession are similar, thinks Montgomery, treatments for the two conditions also have certain things in common (exorcism has been called “shock treatment” by some). Contrary to Ryan and others, Montgomery calls The Exorcist a “tremendous” film that is “very Christian” and “acutely realistic.” At the heart of the film, he explains, is the voluntary substitution of the priest for the child, “which is also the heart of the Christian faith—the substitution of God for man.”

Author and professional family counselor Tim Timmons, whose book Chains of the Spirit (Canon Press) deals with the spirit realm, likewise reacted positively to the film, though he hesitated to claim it as Christian. Timmons has been involved in fifteen exorcisms, the latest for a young Christian who until her conversion practiced Satan worship. “During the first six-hour exorcism twenty-five different demons left her body,” says Timmons, “but several more sessions were needed to free her of the remaining ones.” (He identified each demon by the number of personality changes the girl went through.) Timmons, who teaches practical theology at Dallas Seminary part time and is a member of the Christian Family Life team in that city, also stresses the seriousness of exorcism. “It should be used only as a last resort. We need to guard against the when-in-doubt-cast-it-out attitude. Some people have been messed up psychologically by exorcisms that should never have been attempted,” he emphasized.

The harmful aspects of the film, believe some observers, have yet to be fully realized. Priests and ministers throughout the country report severe counseling problems with teen-agers who have seen the film; many claim to be possessed by Satan himself.

Timmons agrees that the film could be harmful since “it frightens people into realizing that demons are a reality.” At the same time, he adds, “if we could capitalize on the film and guide people into discussing the problems it raises, The Exorcist could be one of the best tools of evangelism we’ve ever had.” For example, groups in Dallas, Texas, and the metropolitan Washington area are handing tracts to viewers as they leave the theater. Timmons, who thinks the tracts approach doesn’t “scratch people where they itch,” plans a campaign through local talk shows, newspaper advertisements, and his book to use the film for Christ. “People leave the theater anxious to talk to someone with answers, and we’ve got to be ready.”

False Prophecy?

January has come and gone, but the United States has not. Therein lies the need for some tall explaining by “Moses” David Berg, secluded founder of the controversial Children of God sect. Berg had ordered all his followers out of America, predicting the country would experience the judgment of God before the end of the month.

Leaders of the Children were quoted by newspapers in various countries as saying that Comet Kohoutek would explode and America with it.

From a hideaway somewhere in Europe Berg sends out “Mo” (for Moses) letters. In the past year the letters have become more sexually oriented; and a number have been published and street-hawked for 25ȼ each.

In a coup of sorts the Children have won the approval if not the friendship of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, Libya’s back-to-the-Koran ruler. Berg wrote admiringly of him in some Mo letters last year, implying that Gaddafi may have a key role in biblical prophecy. Gaddafi has publicly commended the Children to his people several times, and the Children are apparently free to travel in the land—the only missionaries with such freedom in years. (Lebanon expelled them last year.) Also, Gaddafi reportedly invited Hosea and Faith, Berg’s son and daughter (both are in their early twenties, and both are prime visible leaders of the Children), to visit him at his home in Tripoli.

Meanwhile, two of the Children arrived in Manila last month to open a colony there, and others were seen on streets of major cities throughout Asia. But the Children’s ranks seem to be thinning. Several colonies and a number of individual members have broken with the Children in recent months, in many cases because of disillusionment caused by the Mo letters.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube