Some Significant Books of 1971: Part 3: Practical Theology

Surveying significant 1971 books in the “practical ministries” area has been an exciting and frustrating task. Exciting, because letters to thirty-six publishers brought a flood of catalogs, release notices, letters, and review copies of new books, plus even a few sets of galley proofs. Frustrating, because the sheer weight of words has made it necessary to make some tough decisions—decisions not to mention books that probably would be mentioned if only a single topic (such as church renewal) were to be surveyed in this article.

I’ve tried to establish criteria for selecting books to mention. The first has been this: if a reader has a limited budget for books, and a limited amount of time for reading, which book or books in each area seem most helpful?

But “most helpful” demands definition. Here are the questions that determine for me whether a book is helpful: (1) Does it make me think? Some books that I disagree with theologically—disagree with so drastically that I can’t accept either premises or conclusions—are still tremendously helpful because they make me probe my own theology, and push me to spell out its implications. So most assuredly many books in this review will not be safely evangelical. And in mentioning them I will not be giving my own or CHRISTIANITY TODAY’S stamp of approval. (2) Do they get toward the guts of an issue? I can’t get enthusiastic about books that seem to be illustrational jewels strung together on invisible string. I feel a need for books that examine issues in an explicitly stated and developed theological or theoretical frame of reference. Thus a counseling book that records Pastor Joe’s fifteen years of experience but does not explore the nature of counseling, the counseling relationship, and such tough questions as how biblical truth is communicated in counseling, is one I’ll quickly set aside. (3) Does it expand awareness? Here I reflect a slight aversion to things said last year by someone else but now recast and recovered for new release. I want the kind of probing exploration in print that helps me see new relationships, new areas for personal growth, new ways to apply myself in ministry.

So there are the criteria. And now, with advance apology to publishers and authors whom I have purposely or inadvertently left out in this admittedly subjective approach, here is a list of helpful books that appeared in 1971 in the practical fields.

COUNSELING Among the varied offerings in this field recently, I felt closest to Jay Adams’s Competent to Counsel (Baker). He seeks to start with biblical presuppositions, and develops what he calls a “nouthetic” approach—attempting through God’s Word in “personal conference and discussion” to “bring about personality and behavioral changes in the direction of greater conformity to biblical principles and practices.” In Human Presence (Judson) by pastor and counselor Jim Ashbrook will probably be criticized by some as too “humanistic.” But as an exploration of the deeply human interactions in counseling it is helpful and thought-provoking.

Fortress Press has a series of “Pocket Counsel Books” under the editorship of William E. Hulme. These sixty-page books on such topics as When Marriage Ends, Drinking Problem?, When Someone Dies, and Helping Your Troubled Child are designed as supplements to person-to-person counseling. Written in a non-technical vocabulary, they give insight and help to persons in need and open up the counseling conversations. I think most pastors should look over each title of the series.

Several 1971 books on death and dying are especially rich. One is Gladys Hunt’s The Christian Way of Death (Zondervan). Another is Joe Bayly’s paperback, The View From a Hearse (David C. Cook). Both are worth reading, and worth having on hand to give to those recovering from (or about to experience) death in the family. Bayly’s simple thoughts and deep faith are shared from his own experience as a man well acquainted with grief, who knows the comforts of Christ in bereavement.

Of the many marriage-counseling helps produced last year (see a CHRISTIANITY TODAY review of many of them in November 19, 1971, issue), the two most noteworthy were God, Sex, and You: An Evangelical Perspective (Holman) by M. O. Vincent and Walter Trobisch’s I Married You (Harper & Row). I’d like to share the latter with a couple either about to be married or troubled in their marital relationship. Trobisch’s narrative approach communicates basic biblical concepts about marriage and relationships in a beautiful and gentle way.

CHURCH RENEWAL I think 1972 will be a “swing” year in the renewal movement. The past has seen us move through several book waves: a wave of criticism of the institutional church, a hesitant wave seeking to develop an ecclesiology (this has by no means crested yet), and now the first swellings of a wave of reports of significant pastoral experience with renewal in the local church. Journey Toward Renewal (Judson) by William R. Nelson and William F. Lincoln is a report of several years of ministry in a Rochester, New York, Baptist church. While I won’t line up with the authors’ ecclesiology, this overview of five years’ personal struggle in a large urban church, “written for laymen and clergy who want to be used by God as change agents within traditional churches,” is bound to be helpful. (Preview: look for David Main’s Full Circle [Word] and Bob Girard’s Hang Loose, Brethren [Zondervan], both scheduled for release soon. They are excitingly written, deeply revealing accounts of pastors and churches in the process of renewal based on a solid, biblical ecclesiology.)

An interesting addition is Bob E. Patterson’s The Stirring Giant (Word). Its 307 pages draw quotes from books and periodicals and organize them under such headings as “What’s Wrong With the Church?,” “Theological Bases for Renewal,” and “Emerging Strategies For Inward Renewal.” The book suffers as any would that extracts tidbits from context and arranges them without regard to the author’s theological or theoretical orientation. But aside from the dangers of indigestion presented by such a mixture, the book also suffers by ignoring some of the conservative publishers (like Zondervan) and periodicals (like United Evangelical Action and Moody Monthly) that have presented significant renewal material and viewpoints. Still, the book is a hardy sampler you may want to have on hand.

Finally I’d like to mention Stephen W. Brown’s little work, Where the Action Is (Revell). It doesn’t offer any great new insights, but it does reveal struggles of a young pastor to develop a healthy and biblical self-image. I’m somewhat convinced that the first step toward renewal in many churches must be the pastor’s honest evaluation of just who he is—and who he isn’t.

WORSHIP Renewal thinking has been nudging us toward a reappraisal of worship, just as it has been insistently calling for a reappraisal of preaching. Evangelicals haven’t responded with much enthusiasm in either area. But two books on worship that may help us probe a little deeper are Jay C. Rochelle’s paperback Create and Celebrate! (Fortress) and James F. White’s New Forms of Worship (Abingdon). Each presents a viewpoint more liturgical than some of us have. But each does spend about a third of its space exploring the nature and meaning of worship. If worship in your church troubles you, you may not feel these books give answers, but they may point you toward some of your own.

FAMILY LIFE The past few years have brought greater emphasis on the family and its role in the Christian growth of both children and adults. None of last year’s crop of books seems to me to compete successfully with older standards, but a few do rate mention. I was most impressed with David Augsburger’s little book, Cherishable: Love and Marriage (Herald). Billed as a book “for husbands and wives who want to explore creative relationships,” it is both sensitive and potent.

Concordia has released a revised edition of Oscar Feucht’s Helping Families Through the Church. Revision has not been extensive, nor have bibliographies been carefully updated. And “the church” remains undefined. Still, the book is a standard one, and any pastor who missed it first time around will want to pick up the 1971 version. Feucht also served as editor of another project of the Missouri Synod Lutheran Family Life Committee, a book called Family Relationships and the Church (Concordia). This book, organized historically, explores family living psychologically and sociologically and is far less “practical” than Helping Families.

Finally, two of the books written for laymen as stimulants to group discussion or personal guidance should be mentioned, primarily as examples of extremes. Wallace Denton’s Family Problems (Westminster) is full of good insights but reads like many of the secular texts I’ve surveyed. On the other hand, Larry Christianson’s The Christian Family (Bethany Fellowship) seeks a biblical base for understanding the home, and locates it in the authority and function structures of the family. The result is a system containing much truth, but with that truth distorted by the failure to see that authority must be understood as a function of a distinctive relational life-style.

MISSIONS AND EVANGELISMChrist the Liberator (Inter-Varsity) contains messages from Urbana ’70, including John Stott’s expositions of the upper-room discourses and a variety of speakers on issues in world evangelization. The Third World and Mission (Word) by Dennis Clark offers a provocative challenge by an experienced, well-traveled missionary and evangelical leader. Missionary biography has had a great influence on the Church, so Helen Manning’s story of modern-day martyrdom in West Irian, To Perish For Their Saving, and John Pollock’s story of L. Nelson Bell, A Foreign Devil in China (Zondervan), rate mention too.

The best and most practical book on evangelism in ’71 is Richard Peace’s Witness (Zondervan). The book is a manual for use by “small groups who are serious in their desire to learn how to share their faith” to use during an eight-week training and sharing experience. It is one of the few to attempt to blend the supportive dynamics of the small sharing group with a clear focus on witness and personal evangelism.

YOUTH Books on youth culture and ministry deserve a category of their own. Probably the most read of the 1971 crop will be Billy Graham’s The Jesus Generation (Zondervan). Zondervan also released The Untapped Generation by David and Don Wilkerson this past year. While neither book makes a major contribution to youth culture literature, each has something to commend it. Dr. Graham has maintained good rapport with youth through the years, and his healthy concern for them and positive attitude provide a good model for other adults. The Wilkerson book comes from years of experience with teens and has many illustrations from life as well as documented data. Both books are more about youth than for youth.

Drugs are still with us, and the very brief paperback The Drug Bug by Palmquist and Reynolds (Bethany Fellowship) is a good primer for someone who wants a little practical information without in-depth discussion. Charlie Shedd offers Is Your Family Turned On? Coping With the Drug Culture (Word), which is basically a helpful potpourri of comments by young people themselves.

The big shift in youth culture marked in 1971 was toward spiritualism and the supernatural. Several of the year’s books refer to this in chapters and illustrations, but the best whole book was Stars, Signs and Salvation in the Age of Aquarius (Bethany Fellowship) by James Bjornstad and Shildes Johnson.

Several booklets under the Victor imprint of Scripture Press offer short but solid content on youth issues. Finally, Wilkerson’s Jesus People Manual (Regal) is a tough-speaking, well received book on what commitment means.

ADULTS Emphasis on the youth culture should not detract from ministry to adults. This is an area that has been revitalized, particularly by the small-group movement. Bergevin and McKinley present an updated adaptation of the Indiana Plan in Adult Education for the Church (Bethany Press), and Robert C. Leslie surveys Sharing Groups in the Church (Abingdon). Each of these is limited in value, the first by cumbersome machinery and limited goals. Martha M. Laypoldt (who earlier wrote Forty Ways to Teach in Groups) now presents a slightly schizophrenic paperback, Learning Is Change (Judson). The first part seems to be a guide for group exploration of learning, with suggestions for personal reflection and group exercises, but the book gradually drifts toward the more traditional “how to teach adults” structure for the Sunday-school teacher (as illustrated by the disappearance of both “reflections” and “exercises” in the last chapters). Still, the first eighty pages of the book are valuable and provocative. My own Creative Bible Study (Zondervan) was written as a guide to small-group and family Bible study. It is designed to help the many small groups stimulated by renewal to sink the roots of their sharing deeply into the Word of God. In a day when small groups drift so easily into a pattern of relationships limited to the horizontal, Creative Bible Study seeks to help restore and establish the vertical.

RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Professional Christian educators should make good use of the massive tome Research on Religious Development (Hawthorn), edited by Merton Strommen, which has had a major review in these pages (December 17, 1971, pp. 25–28). Two other books are significant for the questions they raise. C. Ellis Nelson’s Where Faith Begins (John Knox) explores the process by which faith is communicated. This is really vital stuff. We evangelicals need to question the transmissive “classroom model” of education that has dominated our attempts at communication, and to develop a biblically and theologically rooted model of education to replace a present system that owes more to secular educational practice than theology. I see exciting breakthroughs in Christian education when we begin to ask the right questions, and to probe the Word of God for insight, understanding, and answers. Robert Dow’s Learning Through Encounter (Judson) gives a rationale for experiential education but sees learning and growth and God all as summable in interpersonal relationships. Each of these books, from an evangelical position, has a terribly inadequate view of faith, of the goals of Christian nurture, of the Bible, and of revelation. Each still holds to a view of revelation that is personal, and not propositional, in which selfhood but not Truth is expressed. At any rate, I think Nelson particularly is important, and I hope we evangelicals will read him, and then begin to ask ourselves the questions he is exploring.

PREACHING I include this category only to assure you that it wasn’t overlooked. I did read several books on preaching, with growing discouragement. All of today’s emphasis on renewal has failed—and should fail—to push the pastor out of the pulpit. But it should also force us to ask some brutal questions about the function of preaching, how God intends us to use the spoken Word in the Church, and whether there can be a theology of preaching that flows from our understanding of the nature and purposes of the Scripture. Surely the tired old books on titles, parts, illustrations, persuasion, and so on have always begged these questions. But evangelicals have not addressed themselves to the issues. Perhaps in 1972 we’ll see some vigorous efforts to reestablish the importance of the pulpit ministry and to give some needed perspective. I certainly hope so.

Lawrence O. Richards is assistant professor of Christian education at Wheaton College Graduate School. He has the B.A. from University of Michigan and Th.M. from Dallas Seminary and is a Ph.D. candidate at Northwestern.

Twenty Questions to Ask about Sunday-School Materials

Finding the right teaching materials is a recurring problem for Sunday-school teachers, particularly those who are evangelical in conviction. The evangelical teacher finds he must reject the materials put out by most denominational and some independent publishing houses on theological grounds before he even begins to consider their educational merit. In effect, evangelicals ask publishers two questions: “What do you think of Christ?” and “Will your materials help us educate children, youth, and adults in the things of Christ?”

For a first step into the forest of available materials, here are twenty more specific questions to ask about prospective curricula. In addition, evaluators must expect to supply other criteria appropriate to their own needs and the needs of the people they teach. The first eight of the following questions should be of particular value to evangelicals. The rest are more generally applicable.

Theological Considerations

Evangelical teachers and leaders consider the Scriptures the unique and primary sourcebook in Christian education; other books, however relevant, rank as secondary sources. Evangelicals reject materials that negatively criticize the Scriptures, treat God’s power as limited, and view miracles as myths, as well as materials that encourage learners to “discover their own theology” by piecing together portions of the Scriptures and other literature. Discovery has become a vogue in secular education, but evangelicals, who believe that basic theology has already been formulated for them, use discovery techniques in Christian education only with great care. And they are wary of materials that use the familiar terms of biblical theology to express meanings significantly different from established ones; they reject outright those that use secular content to twist the meaning and intent of the Scriptures.

Some published materials present the Bible as a book that helped people of the past solve certain of their problems but is of limited use for problem-solving in our own sophisticated era. Evangelicals hold that the Bible continues to help man solve his persistent problems because Scripture offers a stable, dependable core of values. In a day in which “situation ethics” (the ethics of “it all depends …”) is taught nearly everywhere in our society, evangelicals want their instructional materials to reveal biblical answers to specific ethical and moral questions.

Evangelicals, then, will want to ask: (1) Are the materials based on the Scriptures as the major instructional source for Christian education? (2) Do they provide a faithful record of, and a friendly commentary on, biblical events and teachings, rather than an interpretation of events and teachings that is actually or potentially negative? (3) Do the materials speak with assurance of God’s power and goodness in performing miracles, including the great miracles of the Resurrection and the Virgin Birth? (4) Do they uphold the Bible’s validity in helping people solve problems today? (5) Do they emphasize the stable, dependable values that the Scriptures teach?

But proper doctrine is not the only theological consideration. Evangelicals believe that the issue of personal commitment to Christ should be raised early in the learner’s Christian education and that it should become a recurring point.

Their next questions will be: (6) Do the materials encourage the learner to commit himself to Jesus Christ as his personal Saviour? (7) Do they make it clear that the learner’s right relationship with God is a necessary precondition to his having right relationships with his fellow men? (8) Do they help those learners who have given themselves to Christ to increase their faith and trust in him?

Substance And Organization

Careful reading of the materials will help prospective purchasers judge whether details—events, facts, examples—contribute to development of main ideas and eventually to development of key concepts. In the best materials, details, main ideas, and key concepts are present in reasonable balance, none being overstressed or slighted. Tables of contents and chapter outlines help to show how selected details are used to build main ideas and key concepts, which are the fundamental elements to be learned. Obviously the materials should serve to teach important spiritual, moral, and ethical lessons. Obscure objectives should alert prospective purchasers to examine the materials with special care. The presence of unacceptable objectives should warn them against purchase.

Order or arrangement need not necessarily be chronological or traditional in some other way, but should provide both for surveying the scope of the subject matter and for “postholing,” dealing with some concepts in depth. Prospective purchasers should note what is surveyed and what is treated in depth. Worthwhile materials provide instruction in all essential biblical teachings at some time during the years they cover. Some essentials deserve repetition, or “spiraling,” in increasingly sophisticated form as students mature.

Evaluators should ask: (9) Do the materials state understandable and acceptable objectives? (10) Do they contain specific data, main ideas, and key concepts in balanced proportion and arrangement? (11) Do they achieve a focus on main ideas and key concepts to which all other content clearly contributes?

Good materials can be used and understood by most learners for whom they are intended, serving common or typical needs and interests. In this sense they are “graded.” But they also contain alternative or optional experiences for the benefit of those whose needs, interests, and abilities are uncommon or atypical—for example, the slow and the gifted learners.

Worthwhile materials avoid the superficiality and discontinuity that come from jumping around among experiences or from moving too hurriedly up important learning steps. Learning should accumulate. It may be expected to proceed in spurts interspersed with review and reinforcement. The materials should become increasingly harder, with fast pacing, slow pacing, and review apparent in the format.

To help determine worth, teachers might ask: (12) Are the materials appropriate to learners’ abilities, needs, and interests? (13) Do they cause learners to repeat important experiences and review important ideas? (14) Do the materials increase in difficulty throughout the span of years they cover?

Features Helpful In Learning

Attractive, stimulating materials prod people to learn. Whatever the general design of the instructional materials, they should foster learning by, for example, capitalizing on learners’ basic interests, fitting in with the normal developmental tasks of the age for which they are intended, stimulating learners’ desire to solve problems, recognizing their concern for tracing events and causes, and cultivating their liking for human biography. Wherever appropriate, materials should involve all the senses and include many varied learning activities. Supplementary learning aids, including maps, still pictures, films, slides, recordings, and bibliographies, should be included or suggested.

Evaluators should ask: (15) Do the materials provide a variety of ways to stimulate learning? (16) Do they contain and suggest supplementary aids to learning? (17) Do they make thrifty use of the time available for learning?

Features Helpful In Teaching

Materials should distinguish between basic, essential methods and teaching aids and more elaborate, optional methods and aids. Teachers’ guides should contain numerous practical suggestions for teaching content and should explain such procedures as grouping, case analysis, and role playing. Many teachers need help in planning teaching episodes and in developing teaching skill; that help should be readily available in the material chosen. Conscientious teachers also need means of evaluating the worth of their contribution to Christian-education programs.

And so, evaluators must know: (18) Are inexperienced teachers able to use the materials without difficulty or confusion? (19) Are teachers’ guides or teachers’ editions of the materials genuinely helpful, suggesting procedures that make teaching easier and more effective? (20) Do they contain suggestions for teacher planning and growth and for ways of evaluating teaching and learning?

The right answer to these questions is, of course, yes, but some yeses will have to outweigh others. Evaluators should note these value differences before they apply the criteria. Perhaps they will want to assign numerical weights to the questions. Although any evaluation system is necessarily subjective, using a system is more reliable than selecting materials by caprice or according to vague, general impressions. And, considering the goals and subject matter of Christian education, choosing the right lesson materials is serious business.

Ronald C. Doll is professor of education in The City University of New York. His doctorate is from Columbia University. He is author and co-author of nine books and monographs having to do with school curriculum.

Friendship for God’s Sake

Social psychologists have done a good deal of research on interpersonal attraction in general. They have done little, however, with the specific topic of friendship. We can sympathize with their reluctance to tackle this subject: friendship is something that everyone feels he knows all about but that few people can describe with precision. For me, several years of research on friendship have been well worth the effort; the rewards have more than justified the difficulties of conceiving and carrying out systematic studies.

C. S. Lewis in The Four Loves argues that friendship is the most nearly spiritual form of human love. He develops the point that this “nearness by similarity” is the reason why friendship is seldom the scriptural analogy for the relation of God to his people; the very similarity weakens the essential contrast between human and divine love. While specific biblical references to friendship between God and man are rare, the few we find are significant. They give the clear impression that being called a friend of God (or of his Son) depends upon complete obedience to him. God’s act of reciprocation is a deep revelation of his works and his nature to the man he recognizes as a friend (John 15:14, 15; James 2:23; Gen. 18:17–19).

Some biblical references to friendship denote deep affection combined with a willingness to act unselfishly and sacrificially on behalf of another person (e.g., John 11:5–11; John 15:13). Often the term friend is used in passing as a form of address, connoting little more than respect or cordiality (e.g., Matt. 20:13). The classic friendship between David and Jonathan reveals, by implication, that friends react to each other as total persons rather than as “things” or mere role occupants. It would have been easy, even natural, for David to see Jonathan as nothing more than heir apparent to the throne of a man who was trying to destroy him, and for Jonathan to see David as nothing more than a pushy peasant threatening his father’s kingship. Instead, they saw each other in breadth and depth as individuals, and their relationship is widely cited as the epitome of friendship.

Let us look at friendship from the perspective of secular social psychology. Please think of this analysis as a partially substantiated theoretical model. The validity of the general approach has been supported by research, as have some of the more specific ideas. But some of the ideas are educated guesses awaiting confirmation from field and laboratory studies. After reviewing the model, let us then explore some facets of the relation of evangelical Christianity to friendship.

Characteristics Of Friendship

The first point to be made is that friendship is a voluntary relationship. Writers from Montaigne to C. S. Lewis have stressed this, and they have been joined recently by sociologists interested in friendship as a social institution (e.g., J. G. McCall, Social Relationships, Aldine, 1970). Voluntary interdependence seems to be one identifying mark of a strong friendship. It is not merely that two people are willing to spend time together—circumstances may compel them to do so—but that they make it a point to spend time together without outside constraints. In effect, they allow their lives to overlap. The plans, decisions, and activities of one person are to some degree contingent upon those of the other. We may regard voluntary interdependence as the behavioral component of friendship. Usually, but not always, the greater the voluntary interdependence, the stronger the friendship.

Second, friendship is a reaction to a person qua person. Friendship is perhaps the least role-bound, the least normatively regulated, the least legalistic, and the least “programmed” of all interpersonal relationships. In the absence of normative definitions or formal trappings, friendship depends for its very existence upon the way the persons involved “see” or “interpret” each other. Thus friendship, more than more clearly structured relationships, has a strong and seemingly necessary phenomenological component. The partners must feel they are reacting positively to each other as individuals or as whole persons rather than to any particular set of characteristics. That is, each person reacts to the other as a person.

What does it mean to react to a person qua person? This concept has an existential ring, and seems to bear some kinship to what Buber was trying to convey in his description of the I-Thou relation (I and Thou, Scribner, 1958). Such concepts are interesting and provocative, but too nebulous to suit most data-oriented social psychologists. The person-qua-person concept becomes more tangible, however, if we think of some specific implications. Reacting to a person-qua-person implies reacting to his genuineness, his uniqueness, and his irreplaceability in the relationship.

A person may behave in stereotyped ways to fulfill role requirements, social expectations, or a particular kind of “image.” If so, it is difficult to react to the person qua person; we do not have the kind of information we need to ascertain what is genuinely “him.” However, when he departs from norms or expectations, when he behaves in situations permitting flexibility and freedom of choice, or when he talks frankly about his attitudes, ideas, and feelings, we regard these revelations as genuine and hence as a basis for reacting to the “person behind the act.”

On the other hand, we often fail to react to what is unique about a person even when we have the appropriate kinds of information. We tend to “economize” by thinking of our acquaintances in terms of classes and categories. But to react to a person as a member of a class does not do justice to him as an individual. To react to what is unique or at least out of the ordinary is to react to the person qua person.

Finally, to the degree that we react favorably to an acquaintance as genuine and unique, we are likely to find him irreplaceable as a companion. Irreplaceability is another aspect of reacting to the person qua person, and is an important part of the way people see each other when they consider themselves friends.

A third characteristic of friendship is that it involves identifiable benefits. By and large, writers have done a more convincing job of extolling the “fruits of friendship” than have social scientists. The essays of Francis Bacon and Emerson are especially insightful. Humorist-philosopher Charles Schulz carried his cast of Peanuts characters through a charming series of episodes that illustrate some of the values of friendship (I Need All the Friends I Can Get, Determined, 1964).

The classes of benefits or direct rewards of friendship that have been useful in research are stimulation value, ego-support value, and utility value.

Some people are valued as friends because they are interesting and stimulating; they have a knack for introducing us to new ideas and activities and for prodding us to expand our knowledge and perspectives. Some people are valued as friends because they are encouraging, supportive, and comforting; they have the ability to help us feel we are competent and worthwhile. Some people are valued as friends because they are helpful and cooperative; they are willing to use their own resources and abilities to help us meet our personal needs and goals.

It is sometimes said that friendship means different things to different people. This means, in part, that different people seek different kinds of benefits in their friendships. One person tends to become friends with highly stimulating people; another seeks out ego-supportive people. Moreover, a given person is likely to have different kinds of people for friends; he may be attracted to one person because of his ego-supportiveness, another because of his cooperativeness, and so on.

These different benefits may be expressed in a wide variety of combinations. In general, however, utility value seems to be the one most closely related to strong friendship. Also, women tend to consider ego-supportive value a more important aspect of friendship than do men.

A fourth characteristic is that friendship often requires patience and restraint. It is a mistake to assume that friends are invariably people with whom one gets along well all the time. Most friendships some of the time and some friendships much of the time are difficult to maintain. We have to spend a certain amount of time and energy soothing ruffled feelings, clarifying misunderstood actions or comments, and, in general, exercising patience and restraint to keep the relationship from breaking up. It is not unusual for friends to drift into situations involving conflicting goals, motives, or ideas, or occasionally to over-react to each other’s mannerisms or personality quirks. Sometimes the mark of a strong friendship is that it is difficult to maintain. This shows that the partners attach enough significance to the relationship to be willing to work at keeping it intact. They find ways of resolving or working around the tension and strain.

Human Nature And Friendship

What we have said so far helps us design research and organize information toward a better understanding of friendship. However, it says nothing about any particular philosophy of human nature. Let us think in terms of the increasingly familiar Greek words represented by our present catch-all word love—eros, philia, and agape.

Eros refers to self-centered love, love based solely on some need or desire of the one who loves. Love is extended only because the loved one is seen as capable of satisfying that need or desire. We would expect a friendship based on eros to last only as long as the loving person has the need or as long as the loved one is capable of satisfying it.

Philia refers to love based on mutual respect and devotion. It is extended to the loved one because of the particular person he happens to be. This love may be truly unselfish and self-giving, and requires only that the love that is expressed be in some way acknowledged and reciprocated.

Agape refers to unconditional love, a love that is extended to the loved one regardless of who he is or what he is like. It is love that emanates from the very nature of the loving person. It is, in a word, divine love.

Human friendship seems to be based on philia—considerably more than eros, but considerably less than agape. Much goes on in friendship that is motivated by one person’s truly unselfish interest in the other as a person qua person. It would do violence to a sizable body of data as well as to observations from daily life to say that friendship is based primarily on eros, self-centered love.

On the other hand, friendship falls far short of agape. Friendships sometimes originate in the partners’ common hatred or exclusion of another person or group. A popular and potent symbol of companionship and unity is the power salute, a gesture that clearly communicates the fact that the camaraderie within a group is based on its members’ alignment against a common foe. Aronson and Cope (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8, pp. 8–12) have reported experimental evidence strongly supporting the old adage, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Moreover, friendship can be cruelly exclusive. Friends often enhance their relationship by making it clear that certain other people are outsiders and cannot, in any sense, consider themselves part of “the group.” There may be a lot of love shared within the circle, but little is extended beyond it. There may be a lot of philia, but there is certainly no agape. The love is too exclusive to be so considered.

The rarity of agape is easy to understand if we take at face value what the Bible says about the nature of unregenerate man. For example, the words of the psalmist in Psalm 14 (“They have all gone astray.… There is none that does good, no, not one”) and of the Apostle Paul in Romans 3 (“All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”), and the realistic outlook Jesus himself expressed in John 2 (“Jesus did not trust himself to [those who believed in his name when they saw his signs] because … he himself knew what was in man”)—all this leaves no room for hope that man, relying on his own resources, will ever be capable of expressing agape. This biblical assessment is shored up by the evidence of human history, by the continued hatred and violence on the contemporary scene, and by what anyone discovers if he is honest enough to look candidly at the balance of good and evil in his own acts and motives.

The “humanistic” psychologists (e.g., Rogers, Maslow) have rightly insisted on man’s need for what amounts to agape—unconditional love—but they have wrongly insisted that man has it within his nature to create a world where such love is possible. Agape is divine love, and is ours to give only as we abide in the love of Christ through obedience to him (see John 15 and First John 3 and 4). There is a striking parallel between the qualities listed in First Corinthians 13:4–7 and those listed in Galatians 5:22 and 23. The former passage refers to attributes of love and the latter to “fruits of the Spirit.” In a number of places Christian love is yoked, explicitly or by context, with the presence of the Holy Spirit; see, for instance, Romans 5:5 and First John 4:13. The conclusion is unmistakable: The ability to express agape is imparted exclusively to fully committed Christians through the power of the indwelling Holy Spirit.

The Christian’S Mandate

Regardless of the hopelessness of human nature apart from the transforming love of Jesus Christ, Christians are commanded to love, not only their brothers, whom they know (John 15:12; 1 John 4:7), but also their neighbors, whom they often do not know (Luke 10:25–37), and even their enemies, whom they might prefer not to know (Matt. 5:43–48; Luke 6:35). Significantly, we are commanded not to love human nature but to love human beings. When we encounter a non-Christian, however sinful he may be, we are not facing someone in need of our condemnation—he is condemned already. We are facing a person for whom Christ died and who, for that reason, is completely salvageable. We are facing a person who needs God’s love. And the closest many people will ever come to experiencing God’s love is what they feel working through a committed Christian.

It is not stretching the point to say that Christians are commanded to be friends for God’s sake. Not only is the failure to be such a friend disobedient to specific scriptural commands; it probably is also one of the most serious threats to an effective evangelical outreach. Lenin is reputed to have said, “If I ever met a Christian, I’d become one.” And Nietzsche, famous for proclaiming years ago that God was dead, is also credited with saying, “Show me first that you are redeemed; then I’ll listen to talk about your redeemer.”

Because it involves an unselfish concern for another person qua person, friendship may well be, as Lewis says, the most nearly divine form of human love. But evangelical Christians must never overlook the fact that, in many respects, friendship is the most human form of divine love. New Testament exhortations to love are frequently exhortations to extend specific acts of helpfulness and support—to provide cups of cold water, to feed a hungering enemy, to assist a victimized stranger, to visit the sick and imprisoned, to rejoice with those who rejoice and weep with those who weep. And “because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the power of the Holy Spirit which has been given unto us” (Rom. 5:5), Christians have the power as well as the mandate to be the best kind of friends anyone can have.

Paul H. Wright is associate professor of psychology at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks. He has the Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Kansas.

Editor’s Note from March 03, 1972

In the weeks before Mr. Nixon left Washington for Peking, we received letters from responsible missionaries and Sinologists expressing the view that the President’s trip would be futile. They may be right, but I personally hope and pray for God’s intervention; he can turn nations and men to his ends.

I am disheartened at the fiscal irresponsibility shown by the administration and the Congress in pushing the limit of the national debt to $400 billion. Nations cannot afford to adopt programs, however good, for which they cannot pay. We have already placed programs on the books that will add billions of dollars to the budget in a few years’ time. A balanced budget and prudent fiscal management have their roots in God’s order for men. To violate them is to invite not only economic disaster but also spiritual decay.

One of our board members, (James) Roger Hull, died recently. He was chairman of the board of the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York. Among his other areas of service, Mr. Hull was a trustee of the United Presbyterian Foundation, a member of the Salvation Army New York Advisory Board, and chairman of the 1957 Billy Graham New York Crusade. We extend our sympathy to his family; “Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord.”

Theology

On the Third Day

“If christ was not raised, then our gospel is null and void, and so is your faith.”

“If christ was not raised, then our gospel is null and void, and so is your faith” (1 Cor. 15:14, NEB). That is the way Paul put it, and that is the way it has seemed to Christians through the centuries.

But in recent times many have been taking a hard look at this central proposition of the Christian faith. There has been a spate of books and articles examining the subject from a variety of angles, mostly critical. The evidence has been subjected to close scrutiny, and so have the conclusions drawn from the evidence.

A few have come out in open opposition to the idea that Jesus rose. Some of them have made extremely wholehearted statements repudiating the whole idea. But it has been much more common for people to reinterpret the evidence than to deny that it has any reality. They have gone along with C. F. Evans, who suggests that in this area “the question for ‘believing knowledge’ is not so much whether to believe but what it is which is to be believed.”

Traditionally Christians have marshalled the evidence to show that Jesus’ tomb was empty on the third day after the crucifixion. It is unreasonable to hold that foes removed the body and equally so to hold that friends took it. This shuts up to the thought of a resurrection with physical aspects. Next the resurrection appearances are examined. These are shown not to be hallucinations, and we are left with the conclusion that Jesus rose.

To many this time-honored approach is as convincing as ever. But in many circles today it is questioned. With no desire to deny the possibility of miracle, some scholars are asking, “Is this the way the evidence should be treated?” They point out that all the evidence comes from convinced believers, and they suggest that we should ask what these men were trying to say. Thus Willi Marxsen holds that “all the evangelists want to show that the activity of Jesus goes on” (The Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, p. 77; Marxsen’s italics).

If that is what the Bible writers are saying, we should, of course, accept it. But is it? Surely the empty tomb means more.

A lot depends on how we approach ancient sources. The careful historian does not simply transcribe the writers of antiquity. He weighs what they say and tries to evaluate it. For example, if he reads in some ancient writer that on a certain occasion five million people came into Jerusalem, he does not accept it simply because the statement is ancient. He says, “Jerusalem in antiquity could not have held so many. There was not the physical capacity on the site. This cannot be true.” But he will go on to ask, “Granted that the statement cannot be accepted as it stands, what does it tell us?” Clearly it tells us something about the crowd present on the occasion. It also tells us something about the writer.

I have given a fairly obvious example of a process carried on all the time by historians in one form or another. They must weigh their sources. When an ancient historian narrates something that is quite impossible, the modern scientific historian rejects the story as fact. But he does not necessarily dismiss it. He realizes that the ancient must have had some reason for his statement. So he tries to find out what it was and so to reach the reality that underlies the statement. It is something like this that modern New Testament scholars are trying to do when they examine the resurrection.

They think it highly unlikely that Jesus rose bodily. That kind of thing does not happen. They examine the New Testament carefully, comparing one resurrection account with another and testing each for consistency and probability. The result is that quite a few come to conclusions like that of Marxsen. Some are more radical; for example, Paul van Buren prefers not to speak of “the Easter event” as a “fact.” He thinks that the disciples were discouraged and disappointed before Easter, but they “apparently found themselves caught up in something like the freedom of Jesus himself” after Easter. But “whatever it was that lay in between, and which might account for this change, is not open to our historical investigation” (The Secular Meaning of the Gospel, p. 128).

All this may be made to sound both humble and convincing. It is humble, for the scholar is refusing to be dogmatic in the face of difficulties. And it sounds convincing, for when he is through he has said something that fits neatly into our twentieth century categories and world-view.

But we may well ask whether this is the right approach. Why should we regard the modern world-view as so binding? And why must our scientific historiography have the last word? Perhaps all that the objectors are really saying is that the resurrection of Jesus cannot be proved by the ordinary methods of historical criticism.

That may readily be conceded. Nobody claims that Jesus’ resurrection is just another resurrection. It cannot be “proved” if by that we mean adducing arguments to show that it fits into a neat human category. It is unique.

Of course there is a sense in which every historical happening and every historical personage is unique. There was only one Julius Caesar. There was only one Black Death. But the historian is apt to retort that this kind of uniqueness inheres in human affairs. That of the resurrection does not. Its uniqueness is different in kind.

This is, of course, true. If the resurrection of Jesus was only one of a whole class, it would not have the significance it has for Christians. Everything depends on the fact that Jesus’ resurrection is special. And that is why it cannot be “proved” by the normal canons of historical research. We have nothing with which to class it. The historian has no parallel by which to estimate its probability.

But that does not mean we cannot say anything. After all, the method of the scientific historian is not the only way of getting at truth. The scientist cannot prove that the beautiful thing is beautiful or the moral action commendable. Yet we do not doubt, either. Similarly the man of faith must be heard.

It is open to the Christian to say that the evidence demands our assent. Jesus rose from the dead, even though the scientist cannot use his normal criteria to establish the point.

The evidence for the resurrection cannot be discounted. We may agree that it does not “prove” that Jesus rose in such a way that any thinking person is bound to be convinced (as by a theorem in geometry). But it does point to an empty tomb, as Pannenberg has been insisting. And it does point to meetings between Jesus and his followers that convinced them, not that he still lived as, say, Moses lived, but that he had risen from the dead. To say that Jesus rose squares with the evidence. So far nothing else does.

LEON MORRIS

Riding the (Air) Waves

This year’s annual meeting of the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), representing 86 per cent of total religious broadcasting, was calm in comparison to last year’s stormy sessions over new gospel music. The majority of the 519 delegates seemed determined to ride the waves, not make any. Besides, there were other worries.

Congress recently passed a bill requiring all radio and TV stations to permit “reasonable access” to lowest-rate broadcast time by candidates for federal office. The NRB in a resolution asked that educational and non-commercial stations that do not air political broadcasts be exempted from the law.

Delegates also urged Congress to amend the Communications Act “to reestablish an orderly renewal procedure” with provision for “immediate hearings” in disputed cases. The move is directed at the current practice of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of permitting competitors to take over when station licenses are up for renewal. The license is awarded to the party stating in an application the best case for serving the public.

Some station operators wondered how they should respond to requests from atheist agitator Madelyn Murray O’Hair for free time under the FCC’s “Fairness Doctrine” governing controversial subjects. Guest speaker Vincent Wasilewski, president of the National Association of Broadcasters, replied that the FCC had left it up to local operators to decide whether religion itself is controversial, and that there is no obligation to answer Mrs. O’Hair’s letters.

During a panel session one night, Trans World Radio, a mission broadcaster, treated delegates to an intercontinental broadcast via satellite. Broadcasters on three continents chatted with one another live for half an hour on dual channels leased from an AT&T satellite at a cost of about $1,000. A number of Christian radio stations in the United States also listened in.

Afternoon workshops were sparsely attended; only four showed up to discuss how religious broadcasters should handle social issues. A missions seminar revealed several trends, including Far East Broadcasting Company’s help in getting nationals into broadcasting (stations are being built in thirteen provincial capitals in the Philippines). The U. S. based Rumanian Missionary Society reported that its broadcasts beamed to Rumania were getting nearly 8,000 letters per year.

As was true last year, no station managers or owners dropped in on the youth programming workshop. Disc jockey Scott Ross announced that his two-hour Jesus rock show was now on nearly eighty secular stations. His show features “message” songs, Jesus music, testimonies of name musicians, and even invitations to receive Christ. Response, says Scott, has been “fantastic.”

Although a few youth programmers reported innovative breakthroughs, there are indications that a stiff reaction to the young is building up among many broadcasters. WMBI’s Perry Straw said that Moody Bible Institute president George Sweeting handed down a “hard line” on youth and music programming after a youth show was picketed by discontented fundamentalist Paul Lindstrom of Chicago. The San Francisco-based Family Radio Network has cut back on youth programming, and owner Harold Camping has banned the use of much contemporary Christian music, as has evangelist Jack Wyrtzen on his Word of Life program. A young producer complained that his youth-oriented show was turned down by virtually every broadcaster there.

In interviews, some operators responded that they feared loss of donations if they kept pace with youth, and others admitted outright that they opposed the sounds and styles of the new young Christians.

National headliners and FCC commissioners also addressed the gathering. Senator Mark Hatfield chided those who aired political views in the name of religion, and suggested that “faith” broadcasters should spend less time begging for donations. Maintaining that 93 per cent of impact on persons is through non-verbal means, he implored the broadcasters to communicate love.

Africa: Unprecedented Response

Revival tides continue to flow high in Africa. Mission sources report that more than 15,000 new believers among the southern Ethiopia Wallamo tribe were baptized in 1971, and that Wallamo evangelists baptized more than 10,000 people from neighboring tribes. The Sudan Interior Mission has made translation of the Scriptures into the Wallamo language “a top priority project.”

SIM workers also tell of “unprecedented spiritual response” in the strongly Islamic Kano area of Nigeria—despite a cholera epidemic that wrought personal tragedy among families of national evangelists. After hundreds of persons received Christ in Kano city a Nigerian counselor commented, “Kano has never witnessed such revival before.”

“Tens of thousands of Africa’s bush people are coming to Christ,” declared Asbury evangelism professor Robert Coleman after a recent visit.

Forecasts Conservative Baptist foreign-mission head Warren Webster: “The entire Animist world of 150 million people is up for grabs in this decade; they will turn to Christ or to some ‘ism.’ The Church must keep its evangelistic task uppermost.”

The Multiplying Millions

Kuwait, a small country located at the southeastern tip of Iraq on the Persian Gulf, has the largest population growth rate, according to the latest population chart issued by the Population Reference Bureau in Washington, D. C. At its present rate of 8.2 per cent, Kuwait’s estimated 600,000 population will double in just nine years.

Only about 2 per cent of that population is Christian. The Roman Catholic Church has two parishes and five priests in Kuwait; there are no Protestant missionaries. But in Costa Rica, which pulled the number-two spot with a rate of 3.8 per cent (its population will double in nineteen years), at least thirty mission organizations are at work.

English Church Merger

In the first union of English denominations since the Reformation, the Presbyterian Church of England and the Congregational Union of England and Wales have voted to merge. The Presbyterians were already committed to union and awaited the result of Congregational voting last month: 2,133 of the 2,280 churches voted, 1,668 in favor, 465 against. The total membership supporting the merger, to become effective in October, was 82.2 per cent. Earlier, all but two of the 308 Presbyterian churches voted approval.

Some of the Congregational dissentients have already formed an association to maintain an “essential Congregationalism” in which each church is free to govern itself.

The new United Reformed Church will have a membership of 260,000.

In May, the Anglican church will vote on whether or not to link up with the Methodist church, which has already approved such a move.

J. D. DOUGLAS

Bibles And High Ups

Kenneth Taylor’s Living Bible paraphrase, Pearl S. Buck’s Story Bible, and a recent translation of the Torah were presented to the White House library by Arthur J. Goldberg, former U. S. Supreme Court justice, on behalf of the Laymen’s National Bible Committee. Goldberg, the first Jew to hold the post, was chairman of the 1971 Bible Week; President Richard Nixon was honorary chairman.

Meanwhile, Chilean Roman Catholic cardinal Raul Silva Henriquez was reported to be shipping 10,000 copies of the Bible to Communist Cuba at the “personal request” of Premier Fidel Castro. The cardinal said Castro requested the Scriptures after Henriquez presented him with a Bible during his recent twenty-five-day state visit to Chile. At last word, however, a paper shortage had delayed shipment.

Rebuilding In Love

Barn-raisings may be outdated, but in Texarkana, Texas, several Baptist churches got together for a church-raising in a show of racial brotherhood.

Last March arsonists destroyed St. Paul Baptist Church, owned by a black congregation, following student racial disturbances that closed the high school. White Baptists from Tyler, Dallas, and Texarkana pitched in with St. Paul’s people to rebuild the church; Texarkana’s white First Baptist Church donated $5,000. The arsonists were never found, and the town’s $5,000 reward for their capture also was donated to the rebuilding fund.

The walls, made out of finished spruce logs trucked in from Colorado, were raised in just two weeks. The all-volunteer—and mostly unskilled—builders plan to have the $100,000 building ready for worship next month, one year after the fire bombing.

Commented Lory Hildreth, pastor of Texarkana’s First Baptist Church: “Both races are working together, shoulder to shoulder, rebuilding in love what was destroyed by hate.”

Stop The Music

A self-styled “oobie-doobie” girl, Canadian Carol Feraci, disrupted a White House dinner honoring Mr. and Mrs. DeWitt Wallace, founders and co-chairmen of Reader’s Digest and this year’s winners of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Miss Feraci was a last-minute substitute in the Ray Conniff Singers, the after-dinner entertainment. But the guests, among them Dr. and Mrs. Billy Graham and Dr. and Mrs. Norman Vincent Peale, got more entertainment than they expected. The Canadian singer pulled a hand-lettered sign from her dress that read “Stop the Killing” and said: “Stop bombing human beings, animals, and vegetation. You go to church on Sundays and pray to Jesus Christ. If Jesus Christ were here tonight you would not dare to drop another bomb. Bless the Berrigans and bless Daniel Ellsberg.”

After Conniff ejected her and apologized, Nixon responded, “Oh, forget it. Those things will happen.”

Graham pointedly shook hands with each of the remaining singers—some of them visibly distressed by Miss Feraci’s action. “No matter how you feel, this was not the time or place,” he said.

Religion In Transit

More than 360,000 persons in North America applied for Bible-instruction courses offered in 1971 by the Seventh-day Adventist “Voice of Prophecy” broadcast, an increase of 82,000 over 1970.

The 16,300-member First Baptist Church of downtown Dallas plans to build a forty-story home for the aged, according to pastor W. A. Criswell.

Fourteen Presbyterian, Catholic, and Lutheran churches in eight California cities have formed a Sanctuary Caucus to offer refuge and meals to servicemen who don’t want to go to war.

Two records were set at the annual meeting of the General Board of the Church of the Nazarene: a budget of $7.7 million (including $4.9 million for foreign missions) and appointment of thirty-three missionaries.

A Minneapolis Jesus People congregation moved into its own church building last month. It is being purchased from the city’s First Christian Reformed Church, which has moved to the suburbs.

In memorial services for Martin Luther King, Jr., held at a Harlem Baptist Church and attended by more than 1,500, pastor Wyatt T. Walker described King as “the only authentic spiritual genius Western religion has produced” this century.

Members of the Yarmouth, Maine, Unitarian Universalist Church voted to refuse to allow the public, especially long-haired youth, to sit on the church steps and walk in the churchyard, ostensibly because of littering.

An emergency ministry to veterans of the Viet Nam war facing problems of employment, education, discrimination, disabilities, and drugs has been established by the United Presbyterian Church. With first-year funding of $20,000, it will join with other groups in a common program through the National Council of Churches.

Deaths

LEONARD CARROLL, 51, general overseer of the Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee); in Cleveland, Tennessee, of a heart attack.

GEORGE NAPOLEON COLLINS, SR., 73, bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Church in Florida and the Bahamas and president of the AME Council of Bishops; in Lake City, Florida, after an auto crash.

PAUL G. ELBECHT, 50, president of Concordia Lutheran College, Austin, Texas; in Austin, of a heart attack.

HOWELL FORGY, 73, the Navy chaplain whose exhortation “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition” during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor became a World War II slogan and song title; in Glendora, California, after a long illness.

KARL HOLFELD, 69, former president of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada; in Calgary, after a long illness.

FRANK HOUGHTON, 77, general director of the China Inland Mission (now Overseas Missionary Fellowship) during the crucial 1940 to 1951 period; in Tunbridge Wells, England, from bronchial pneumonia.

G. ELSON RUFF, 67, editor of The Lutheran, a Lutheran Church in America publication, since 1945; in Philadelphia, of a heart attack.

If the Supreme Court overrules a Wisconsin Court decision exempting Amish children from public high-school attendance, most U. S. Amish families will not comply but will leave the country instead, predicts public-education specialist Donald A. Erickson of the University of Chicago.

Clergy and Laymen Concerned, an interfaith anti-war group, has taken over a nationally syndicated radio program from the Businessmen’s Educational Fund and renamed it “American Report.” It is used by hundreds of stations.

The historic sanctuary and educational building of the Lake Avenue Baptist Church in Rochester were destroyed by fire. They were insured for $900,000.

Personalia

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference has named Baptist minister C. T. Vivian, a close associate of the late Martin Luther King, Jr., to head the SCLC’s Chicago branch. He replaces Jesse Jackson, now pushing his own new group, PUSH (People United to Save Humanity).

After three and one-half years, the sometimes besieged W. Seavey Joyce, S. J., has resigned as president of Boston College, one of the nation’s largest Jesuit schools.

Vaughan P. L. Booker, convicted of murdering his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1970, was accepted as a candidate for the Episcopal priesthood by Bishop Robert L. DeWitt of Philadelphia. He aims to become a prison inmate-chaplain.

A new spat may be brewing in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod over the refusal by the Concordia Seminary (St. Louis) board to grant tenure to Old Testament professor Arlis Ehlen. He is being released, sources say, for alleged liberal views.

Dr. Walter F. Wolbrecht, who lost his job as executive director of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod in a denominational shakeup last year, has been named president of Chicago’s Lutheran School of Theology, a Lutheran Church in America school.

Episcopal bishop Horace W. B. Donegan, 71, of the diocese covering New York City and its environs, will retire in May. Coadjutor Paul Moore Jr., will replace him.

Collins Radio engineering supervisor David M. Hodgin, a lay leader of First Christian Church, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, announced in a church service that he had quit his own job rather than force out two of his “more valuable than me” employees in a cutback of 550 persons at his plant. He wants to form a corporation based on “human dignity and full participation.”

Arizona mission vicar Harold S. Jones, a member of the Dakota (Santee) tribe, has become the first American Indian to be consecrated as a bishop of the Episcopal Church. He will serve the South Dakota diocese.

President Kent S. Knutson of the American Lutheran Church in a special message to members of the ALC’s 4,822 congregations appointed them “evangelists, all of you, each one,” in preparation for the nationwide Key ’73 evangelistic campaign.

The controversial Catholic pastor of San Francisco’s ghetto-district Sacred Heart parish, once the site of Black Panther breakfasts for children, changed jobs this month. Father Eugene J. Boyle is now director for justice, and peace—a newly created post—of the National Federation of Priests’ Councils.

A Harris poll shows SCLC’s Ralph David Abernathy as the black leader U. S. blacks respect most. Next are Mayor Charles Evers of Fayette, Mississippi, and Roy Wilkins, whose NAACP ranked first in respected organizations.

Life magazine says comedian Vaughn Meader, famous for his impersonations of President John F. Kennedy, is now “an aging Jesus freak,” following trips into the drug and occult scenes. His strange new comedy album, “The Second Coming,” about Christ’s return, rankles many radio listeners, but Meader explains, “My Jesus has a great sense of humor.”

World Scene

In Ethiopia the newly constituted 200,000-member Word of Life Evangelical Church, composed of 1,600 congregations and an outgrowth of Sudan Interior Mission work, has applied for government recognition.

Full intercommunion between India’s Mar Thoma Syrian Church and the Church of South India has been established, and negotiations are under way toward “organic union,” say sources.

Protestants and Catholics alike are victims of a renewed Communist hard line in Czechoslovakia. The regime has restricted religious education, stepped up ideological attacks, and arrested church leaders on political charges.

Christian mission work has been resumed—after a lapse of 120 years—among the “Sea Gypsies” who live on boats and on islands off the southern coast of Burma. A Burmese Baptist, a product of missionaries ousted in 1966, built a church and school on the island of Mali.

The Greater Europe Mission of Wheaton, Illinois, and the Belgium Gospel Mission of Philadelphia have merged, with the GEM assuming control. BGM’s Brussels Bible Institute becomes the sixth such GEM school; four other GEM institutes report record enrollments.

An Assemblies of God spokesman says his denomination is growing so fast in Korea that one church in Seoul now numbers 13,000 members, requiring six services and a pre-dawn prayer meeting to accommodate everybody. He adds that at least 10 per cent of the 36.5 million Koreans are believers.

The European Student Missionary Association will hold its annual conference March 3–5 at the European Bible Institute in Lamorlaye, France. About 300 youths from twenty Bible schools and fifty missionaries along with local evangelicals are expected to attend.

The Indian Parliament rejected a “Prevention of Conversion Bill” that would have virtually outlawed conversion to Christianity in India. Indian mission executive Rochunga Pudaite hailed the significant news and commended the government for “willingness to uphold religious freedom and democracy.”

The 200,000-member Presbyterian Church in Taiwan has called on Chiang Kai-shek’s government to hold parliamentary elections for the first time in twenty-five years. Other churches reportedly will join in the call.

A murder convict who recently received Christ through listening to the “Unshackled” broadcast in his Monrovia, Liberia, prison is the first person to be given clemency and his release by newly installed president William R. Tolbert, a devout Baptist.

Morris Cerullo Crusade: A New Anointing?

The pan-denominational charismatic movement pulled headlines last month at evangelist Morris Cerullo’s Seventh World Deeper Life Conference in San Diego. Crowds ranged from 1,200 at afternoon seminars to more than 3,000 at evening rallies. On the program were internationally known speakers, national evangelists from fifteen foreign countries, specialists (including an ex-Satanist leader), and Cerullo himself.

Cerullo, surprisingly unassuming in contrast to the image created by his flashy PR people, is perhaps better known abroad, where he spends 80 per cent of his time. His overseas campaigns have sometimes attracted as many as 100,000 to a single meeting.

Herb Ellingwood, Governor Ronald Reagan’s chief legal aide, relayed Reagan’s greetings to the San Diego gathering and told of the charismatic movement’s reach into the state capitol. “We have more Spirit-filled janitors than any capital in the world,” he declared, sparking laughter. Prayer groups, he said, are growing in all levels of the legislature from secretaries to attorneys and elected officials. He stated that Reagan is aware of what is happening spiritually and that the governor’s own Christian life is deepening. Ellingwood also laid down legal advice at a seminar for those operating hotlines and other drug-counsel ministries. He estimated that 300,000 youths have been delivered from drug abuse by the Jesus movement.

Pastor Chuck Smith of the widely known Calvary Chapel near Costa Mesa, California, told how his church had become a haven for thousands of youthful Jesus people. It began, he said, when he encountered a hippie Christian “pouring forth the love of God.” Out of that meeting sprouted a super-effective “House of Miracles” outreach ministry, headed by two teen-age evangelists. Seventeen of the twenty-one young men who accepted Christ the first week at the house are now in the ministry, said Smith. He went on to offer guidelines to churches pondering a response to the Jesus revolution.

One of the favorites of newsmen at the conference was a mobile anti-occult display, soon to make a forty-five-city tour in the United States. Its samples of voodoo oil, Satan-worship paraphernalia, and other items were explained by Michael Warnke, a naval medical technician who says he used to be a Satanist priest and leader of a 1,500-member witchcraft group.

Warnke, in an interview, said witchcraft rites include mocking the Christian communion and often end in sexual orgies. Selfishness, he explained, is taught as equivalent to holiness. His own conversion to Christ occurred after drug trips, and near suicide.

Cerullo bore down heavily on the theme that Satanic forces are loose in the nation. He urged his audience to go home and declare war on the devil in the name of Jesus. Aides handed out 20,000 copies of his new antiwitchcraft newspaper.

He also hammered home the theme of the week-long conclave, “The New Anointing Is Here,” declaring that God had promised an outpouring of his Holy Spirit so that spiritual breakthroughs comparable to the vast strides made in science and medicine would be experienced today. God’s healing power will be demonstrated in a way that will “supersede what the early church saw,” he predicted.

As if to buttress the point, a number of persons testified how they had been miraculously healed of assorted afflictions. A surgeon told how his son’s poor eyesight was instantly corrected during a Cerullo healing service. And 1,400 made decisions for Christ.

Cerullo and foreign nationals gave highlights of his international ministry, headquartered in San Diego: “30,000 ministers” trained worldwide to keep giving “the full Gospel” to their people; fifty-five crusades sponsored monthly in scores of countries; effective literature-oriented outreach in Israel.

Cerullo says that he accepted Christ at age 14 in an orthodox Jewish orphanage, and that in recent years his ministry has brought hundreds of Israelis to Christ. A Pentecostal, he estimates that 60 per cent of those in his American audiences are not old-line Pentecostals, and that up to 30 per cent are Catholics.

The Troublesome Ten

Prophecy buffs are talking about recent additions to the European Common Market that bring its membership to ten countries. Some dispensationally-minded Bible students believe that a ten-nation alliance, composed of ten nations once a part of the old Roman empire, will have a central place in a seven-year period of war and tribulation leading to Christ’s second coming to earth. They also believe, however, that the Church will be raptured from the earth before the trouble begins. The teaching is based on interpretations of passages in Daniel and Revelation.

Prophecy analyst-author J. Dwight Pentecost of Dallas Theological Seminary believes that a literal ten-nation alliance is necessary, and that the Common Market ten may or may not be the “required” ones. Because of splintered history, it may take more than ten Western nations to come up with the correct ten revived Roman powers, he says.

At any rate, some prophecy students aren’t making any long-range plans.

Handclasps And Prayers

“America needs to repent” was a note sounded repeatedly, if somewhat obliquely, at the latest of the Washington prayer breakfasts, now attended by some 3,000 influential people annually. The note was not sounded as clearly as a country preacher would give it, but most breakfasters in the huge ballroom of the most prestigious hotel in the nation’s capital should have caught it.

“We have not arrived.” said Congressman Albert H. Quie of Minnesota in opening the program. “We are a gathering of sinners.”

Board chairman Arthur F. Burns of the Federal Reserve System carried forward the theme with readings from Ecclesiastes and Micah that warn of judgment as well as offering hope.

Mayor Walter Washington pleaded for unity and reconciliation, and said he found it hard to understand why the nation finds it so hard to help those who are poor or alienated. He closed by asking the audience to join hands around the tables as an expression of spiritual determination in the presence of their leader.

President Nixon said the breakfast “symbolizes the strength of America,” adding that if participants had not recognized their shortcomings “we would not be here.” He observed that to the everlasting credit of the United States it did not use nuclear blackmail when it could have, and that “we helped our enemies until now they are our major competitors.” But he went on to deplore the fact that the two great wars in this century in which some 20 million died were fought between “Christian” nations.

“Are we on God’s side?” the President asked. He said that while he appreciated prayers for his forthcoming journeys to China and the Soviet Union, he felt that intercession ought to be made primarily “that this nation will be on God’s side.”

Senator Harold Hughes of Iowa then got up to give the closing prayer and prefaced it with a request that his hearers clasp hands again. “Jesus also stretches his hand to you,” said Hughes. “Take it! Let him into your life.”

Several cabinet members and governors were present with their wives for the February 1 event, along with a number of international dignitaries, including a leading Irish government official. Business and civic leaders, professional athletes, and noted evangelical leaders from all over the country made up the audience. Every place was taken. The Washington Hilton served a menu that featured quiche lorraine.

Billy Graham read from Philippians 2 and voiced a reminder that the Bible promises a permanent peace. Christians, he declared, will have a fourth day to celebrate along with Christmas, Good Friday, and Easter, when God intervenes in human history and ushers in Utopia.

DAVID KUCHARSKY

The Jesus Movement Under Theological Scrutiny

An analysis of the Jesus people by the Archbishop of Canterbury highlighted a three-day conference in New York last month. It was the first time the contemporary phenomenon has come under scrutiny at a major theological meeting, convened in Riverside Church.

In a sermon at Lincoln Center, Archbishop Michael Ramsey cited three ways in which people today are seeking Jesus: through social action, through mystical experience, and through the gift of the Holy Spirit.

A number of participants seemed to presume that the Jesus movement today embraces such musical and dramatic expressions as Superstar and Godspell. Those involved deny any connection, and indeed point to profound theological differences. Some Jesus people have picketed Superstar performances.

The conference was sponsored by an Episcopal organization, the Trinity Institute. The director, Dr. Robert Terwilliger, asserted that the Jesus movement has rediscovered the historic Christ who has been rejected by the church. “The time has come to think again about the whole doctrine of redemption as it is being forced upon us,” he said. But with regard to Jesus people who emphasize the filling of the Holy Spirit, he warned that “instant experience, whether it’s sexual or religious, is transitory.”

DARRELL TURNER

Baptists, More Or Less

They’re smiling these days around American Baptist headquarters in Valley Forge. The $15.2 million budget income for 1971 was the largest in the history of the 64-year-old denomination, report officials. An economically imposed ban on sending out foreign missionaries was lifted. And a middle-of-the-road evangelical was nominated to fill the office of general secretary—the ABC’s top staff post, vacant for more than a year.

The nominee is Dr. Robert C. Campbell, dean and professor of New Testament at the American Baptist Seminary of the West, Covina, California. Nomination is tantamount to election, to be held at Denver in May.

Campbell holds degrees from Westmont College, Eastern Baptist Seminary, and the University of Southern California. Writing in his statement of faith, he says, “Our sense of estrangement is met by a vital confrontation with the living God and a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.”

Meanwhile, ABC officials are pondering the significance of action taken by an ABC-related school. Twenty-year-old Eastern Baptist College (enrollment 595) on the western edge of Philadelphia has dropped its middle name. “The dropping of the word Baptist does not diminish our commitment to Jesus Christ as an evangelical and conservative institution of Christian higher education,” insisted President J. Lester Harnish. Rather, the change reflects the fact that the board, student body, faculty, and staff include many non-Baptists, he said.

Spokesmen emphasized that the change in no way dissociates the college from the ABC. “We should not, however, give the false impression of full denominational underwriting,” they added. The ABC gave only $2,000 toward the school’s $2 million budget last year, a financial officer explained, and individual ABC churches accounted for about $50,000. Actually, he commented, the denominational label hurts more than it helps. So from now on it’s simply Eastern College.

Jewish Furor: Jesus (Again)

Rabbi W. B. Silverman of Kansas City’s Temple B’nai Jehudah, one of the nation’s leading Reform congregations, believes that the best defense is an offense.

In December, responding to the Jewish students in his congregation, Silverman set up some forums on Christianity designed to help both students and adult members of his congregation defend themselves against the Jesus onrush. The first program, featuring Lyle Murphy of Calvary Bible College, led to a heated controversy among local Jews.

The editor of the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle found Murphy’s language “offensive.” Murphy included in his speech such statements as, “The gift of life is the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Silverman, however, said he found Murphy tactful and dignified. Although the controversy, which made news in many of the country’s Jewish newspapers, continued through January, the congregation supported Silverman’s judgment. “We should seek the truth,” the rabbi said, “no matter how controversial it might prove.”

The temple is planning another such forum on February 23: “Jesus Freaks, Jews, and Judaism.” The panel will include members of the Jesus movement, a Jewish student, and a Protestant minister, as well as Silverman and two laymen.

Silverman claimed that his students had been “harassed and heckled” in cafeterias and school buildings by fiery young believers, some of them Jewish Christians. When asked if he had lost many young people to Christianity, Silverman replied, “A few—here and there.”

CHERYL A. FORBES

Christian Zeal Miffs Soviets

Over-eager American tourists in the Soviet Union came close to provoking an international incident last month. One was a Lutheran congressman, Earl F. Landgrebe of Indiana. Landgrebe, a Republican, said he was picked up by Soviet police and interrogated for two hours after he had distributed Scriptures.

Ten students from Oral Roberts University were detained by Soviet customs agents for six hours because they tried to bring in quantities of Christian literature and records in the Russian language.

Soviet authorities confiscated the materials the students were carrying as well as a small number of Scriptures that Landgrebe had not yet given away.

The congressman was part of a seven-member House Education Subcommittee delegation that visited the Soviet Union in January while Congress was in recess. The House members were supposed to be studying Soviet education. Landgrebe readily admitted he had given away about 300 Russian-language copies of Scripture. He said some people wept and kissed the Bibles. The night before he was to leave the Soviet Union, he said, he decided to distribute what he had left. After he gave away two copies of the Gospel of Matthew in front of a theater, a young woman who Landgrebe said was obviously shadowing him called a policeman, and the U. S. legislator was taken into custody.

No official charges were placed against Landgrebe, but the Soviet newspaper Izvestia subsequently accused him and two other subcommittee members of “promoting anti-Soviet agitation, abusing Soviet hospitality, and threatening Soviet-U. S. cultural relations.”

Congressman James H. Scheuer, a Democrat from New York was expelled after he visited several Soviet Jews seeking to emigrate to Israel. He and Congressman Alphonso Bell, a Republican from California, were accused of aiding Zionists.

Landgrebe said he distributed only Bibles because the U. S. State Department had told him beforehand that Soviet authorities were leary of the content of literature brought into the country. The Soviet government has always forbidden the importation of quantities of foreign literature except without special permission. But tourists are generally allowed to bring in several books or Bibles, even if they are to be given away. Most Americans who have visited the Soviet Union say visitors are clearly warned about the literature restrictions upon entering and are told to declare openly what printed materials they are carrying.

A spokesman for the Oral Roberts students said Soviet authorities had overlooked about a dozen Bibles and two records with Russian hymns. These, he said, were passed out to Protestant congregations in Leningrad and in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev. The group spent more than two weeks in the Soviet Union.

Christians who visit the Soviet Union almost invariably think of taking Scripture only in the Russian language, which is just one of a number of languages used in the Soviet Union. When they distribute Russian Scriptures in areas where another language predominates, they inadvertently aid the “Russification” promoted by the Kremlin but resisted by Soviet minority groups.

One mission source reports distributing 12,000 Russian Bibles and 182,000 Gospels in the Soviet Union in 1971, only a fraction of the total estimated input by many agencies and individuals.

Meanwhile, the Soviet Radio Network has been featuring a lengthy attack on what it calls the Roman Catholic Church’s “anti-communist campaign,” leading some observers to speculate that another anti-religion campaign has begun.

Churches And The ‘New Poor’

One year ago churches in the Seattle, Washington, area, along with two United Methodist-supported agencies, Fellowship of Christian Urban Service (FOCUS) and Ecumenical Metropolitan Ministry (EMM), formed Neighbors in Need (NiN) to help feed the 100,000 unemployed workers there.

These middle-class, highly-skilled professional people suddenly found themselves “the new poor” (as sociologists named them) when Boeing Aircraft’s work force was cut by almost two-thirds over a two-year period. Government help for Seattle, considered the area hardest hit by aerospace cutbacks, with unemployment at 12 per cent, twice as high as the national average, was almost nonexistent. Welfare officials refused to provide both food stamps and foodstuffs simultaneously to one area; “it’s never been done before,” they reasoned. Many of the unemployed couldn’t afford food stamps once unemployment compensation ended.

During 1971 NiN distributed more than $1.5 million worth of goods, often spending as much as $10–12,000 weekly. Churches and farms in the area donated some of the foodstuffs, said the Reverend Harold Perry, a United Methodist and administrative director of NiN. There have also been gifts from churches and organizations throughout the country—from New York, California, Florida, and the Midwest, he said.

Now foreign churches are getting involved. Five tons of rice was donated by Japanese Christian churches and organizations through NiN. The Japanese YMCA co-ordinated the gift with the Seattle-area YMCA, and the Reverend Sadao Ozawa of the United Church of Christ of Japan traveled to Washington on what Perry called “a mission to the various food banks throughout the state to dramatize the need for food.” Ozawa also made a symbolic donation in Seattle of the actual gift.

The Japanese gift is the first foreign aid to the depressed Seattle—and the first for the nation. But, Perry said, “there have been other inquiries. Soon we may be receiving gifts from other foreign churches.”

CHERYL A. FORBES

Youth for Christ: It’s a Young World

NEWS

Youth for Christ International has gone a long way since its founding in 1945 with Billy Graham as its first fulltime staff evangelist.

Into thirty-eight other countries, to be exact. And negotiations are under way to establish YFC ministries in twelve additional countries soon, reported YFC president Sam Wolgemuth at last month’s annual staff convention in New York—the largest such meeting in YFC history. Nearly 800 staffers and 100 wives from various nations, predominantly the United States, gathered for training, updating, and swapping of notes.

Old-timers remarked about the striking youthfulness of the majority of staffers, many of them sporting long hair, mustaches, and mod apparel. They reflected YFC’s apparently successful attempt to keep abreast of the times. As one speaker noted. 52 per cent of the world is under 25. Indeed, more than half of Hong Kong’s four million population are teen-agers, many of them still in the city’s 315 high schools, declared Daniel Ee, YFC’s man in Hong Kong.

YFC’s overseas work is almost as old as its domestic operations, and relies heavily on national leadership. Nationals have been in charge for the last thirteen of YFC’s twenty-five years of work in northern India. Director Gaston Singh is assisted by a full-time staff of forty. There are YFC Campus Life clubs in 116 high schools, and each club has about 150 members, says Singh. Additionally, there are clubs for older, Western-oriented youths in twenty cities. Two-thirds of the budget is raised within India, he adds.

Indians established YFC in West Pakistan in 1964 and more recently in Nepal. Witness and training teams travel regularly into Burma; up to 4,000 have turned out for rallies. In 1965 one hundred young Ceylonese received YFC training in India, then returned home and set up a thriving ministry that is today self-supporting and led by thirty staffers.

Australia, another early YFC target, has twelve full-time and fifty part-time workers. They sponsor two dozen rallies, including YFC’s biggest worldwide: a Melbourne rally that consistently attracts thousands.

YFCers in Holland recently bought an old barge and turned it into a floating coffeehouse to reach young people in towns along the many canals.

Arab YFC witness teams based in Lebanon have carried the Gospel to Syria and Jordan and even as far as Afghanistan. Beirut YFCers have banded together with other Christian groups in an alliance known as Ichthus and next month will mount a citywide outreach campaign.

In 1968 an international YFC council was formed on a “one nation, one vote” basis, thus “cutting our umbilical cord to the U. S.,” says Jim Wilson, executive director of the Geneva-based council. The well-liked Wolgemuth, however, was elected international president at both the 1968 meeting in Jamaica and last year’s triennial on Cyprus. He also heads U. S. YFC.

One Way, Brother

Bob Ross of Pilgrim Publications in Pasadena, Texas, came across this photo of a long-haired 19-year-old youth with uplifted index finger. The youth is not one of the contemporary Jesus people flashing the “one way” sign but famous preacher Charles Haddon Spurgeon in 1854 when he was pastor of New Park Street Chapel in London.

Some budget and staff ties to the U. S. remain unbroken, and other forms of cooperation exist. The Michigan YFC unit and its counterpart in France have sort of adopted each other. Last year Michigan sent Freeway, a music-witness team, to France for three months. The team rapped and performed in high schools, averaging three a day, reportedly the first evangelical group to gain such success.

YFC “Teen Teams”—forty-eight so far—have been traveling abroad since 1961. A racially-mixed team known as the Vital Union, led by staffers Bruce and Mitzie Barton, recently returned from a four-month tour in northern Europe. The team held forth in high schools by day, in churches and rallies by night, sometimes sparking chain reactions.

The student body president of the Narvik, Norway, high school received Christ in a team meeting, says Mrs. Barton. He led six others to Christ within two months, formed a singing group, and is now touring in Sweden.

Germany, however, was something else, she says. Many students the team rapped with in religion and English classes were Marxists who criticized the Americans. “We had to keep telling them we were representing a person—Jesus—not the church, Christianity, or America,” she explains.

The integrated teams are chosen on the basis of ability and Christian commitment. Rules of conduct are tough: no dating, conform to local customs and eating habits, keep cameras out of sight, write home often. Pay is $25 per week, and members must raise their own support. The Vital Union’s trip cost each member about $1,800 in expenses.

Meanwhile, things continue to hum on the home front. There are 1,000 full-time workers, 2,500 part-timers, clubs in 2,000 schools, an award-winning magazine (65,000 circulation), and a budget of $2 million. Top-rated music teams, complete with rock repertoire, reach 500,000 students a year each. Increasingly, emphasis is more on persons and less on rallies and programs, with extensive involvement with delinquents and ghetto youngsters.

Perhaps YFC’s biggest headache is organizational. Power is vested at the local level in autonomous boards, sometimes resulting in policy clashes—and setbacks. Older hands around YFC tend to hold out for autonomy, but the young are pressing for centralization, claiming it will help the cause of progress. Insiders predict the young will win their way. Several veteran staffers quit this month over the issue.

Top News

In the annual Religion Newswriters Association (RNA) poll, members rated “emergence of the Jesus people” as the top religion news story of 1971.

The next four choices, in order: defeat of the congressional prayer amendment; the U. S. Supreme Court decision banning direct aid to parochial schools by several states; the synod of Catholic bishops at Rome; and use of religious themes in music and drama (Jesus Christ Superstar and Godspell for instance).

Experts reviewing 1971 religious events on the CBS “Year in Religion” television show concurred. They said that a “yearning for religious values” by young people keynoted the year’s religious news, and that it would continue.

Trinity’S Red Ink Evaporating

There are signs that Trinity Evangelical Divinity School and its undergraduate counterpart Trinity College, both in Deerfield, Illinois, will survive an acute financial crisis that has caused a lot of floor-pacing by school officials for months. The crisis was brought on in part by rapid expansion over the past few years, according to a Trinity financial officer. To make matters worse, he says, President Nixon announced his tighter economic policy on the day before the kickoff of a Trinity fund drive.

There were other reasons too, say insiders. The schools, related to the Evangelical Free Church (EFC), have attracted many non-EFC students, and certain segments of the EFC membership complained about having to subsidize the competition, in effect. Also, there was a backlash against the mildly radical People’s Christian Coalition, a small unofficial campus group that recently published a controversial newspaper, the Post American.

Facing a projected deficit of nearly $1 million for the current academic year, and feeling that his denomination did not recognize the severity of the crisis, Trinity president Harry L. Evans resigned early in the fall quarter. His move jolted the EFC’s governing boards into a series of huddles. Under the leadership of EFC president Arnold T. Olson they resolved to keep the schools open, to prod the churches to fulfill lagging pledges of support, and to seek other funding. Evans withdrew his resignation.

Early this month seminary dean Kenneth S. Kantzer reported in an interview that more than half the money needed to erase the deficit has already come in, with the academic year less than half over.

Hang Loose, Pastor!

She was standing over by the wall, alone, while the rest of the congregation mingled about after the evening church service. The pastor moved over to her side and gently said: “It’s really getting you down, isn’t it?” That was all the encouragement this teen-ager needed to pour out her confusion and fears. Then, through counsel and prayer, the pastor was able to help her toward emotional and spiritual healing. Others in the youth group soon heard about the incident, and the message spread quickly: “The pastor really cares—you can talk to him.” The secret of this man’s increasingly effective youth ministry is simple: he is available. Or, as the young people in his church express it, “He knows how to hang loose.”

Pressed by a demanding schedule and a demanding congregation, many pastors miss valuable opportunities to reach out to the confused, questioning young people in their church family. The minister who rushes around doing “church work” often communicates to the young an impersonal attitude that turns them off. And so at an important decision-making time of their lives, teen-agers who need their pastor’s counsel and concern hear a busy signal that tells them, “He hasn’t time; try later.”

Most young people will not force themselves on their minister, particularly to talk about problems that are not clearly defined in their own thinking. It takes time to talk about feelings, and they would rather say nothing than be pressured by a hurried “get to the point” attitude.

Pastors who talk a lot about their youth programs, but don’t take time to listen to a struggling teen-ager soon lose their young people. But a pastor who takes the time to measure young people’s feelings, stated or not, will find he has a growing youth ministry—and the cooperative prayer support of young people who come to care about him.

Without cutting into the hours needed for sermon preparation, pastoral calls, denominational work, and administrative details, a busy pastor can generate an aura of interest and relaxation that will open many worthwhile opportunities for teaching and counseling the young. Availability is the key, and there are several ways to communicate it.

Stop the “going through the line” ritual, at least for a few Sundays. Going to the foyer to greet people at the close of a worship service may elicit nice comments like, “I enjoyed the service,” or “That was a wonderful sermon, pastor,” but it seldom provides opportunities for constructive pastoral care. “Keep the line moving” is an inviolate part of the ritual, and people will not hold up the line to talk to the pastor. They will be polite and say the right words, no matter how they feel inside.

But when a pastor occasionally stays at the front of the sanctuary or stands off to one side, he says by his action, “I’m free to talk.” Young people will notice this (so will adults who feel that they shouldn’t be taking the pastor’s time) and come over to talk with him. They can relax, knowing they are not holding up a line. And they will feel a sense of privacy, even if only to make an appointment.

It’s good experience, anyway, for the church members to be responsible for seeking out visitors and inquiring about the welfare of one another. People can be encouraged to see this as part of their ministry, instead of designating Christian care as the minister’s job.

Another way to tell teen-agers you have time for them is to attend their meetings simply out of interest, not as an answer man or a special guest. One pastor thought his church needed to hire a youth director to help hold the young people. He felt his own Sunday afternoons should be spent on the preparation of his evening message, not at the young people’s meetings. But when he did start attending the meetings, just to relax and listen, his relationship with the young deepened, his pastoral ministry to them became more effective, and he still got his sermons ready on time. When a youth director was hired, it was to help with a growing youth ministry, not to stop an exodus.

Whenever young people congregate before or after meetings, a pastor need not hesitate to join them and share something of himself. If he listens thoughtfully, comments understandingly, and above all is genuinely loving, he will find that the young people want to talk to him. A word of caution, however: the minister who thinks he is fun to be with or is really as young at heart as they are will soon lose his young people’s respect. Without putting on professional airs, he should realize that he is older—and maturer—than they and act like it. Flip statements and jokes may get laughs but won’t get teens to respond to him as a pastor.

When calling on a young person, the pastor should be relaxed. This is easy if he enjoys being around young people. But even if he finds them hard to understand, a quiet, casual manner communicates, “I have time for you.” He can get immediately into the reason for his call because his attitude has communicated the sense of relaxation that most people try to accomplish with small talk.

When speaking, the pastor should look at the young person, not around the room or at others. He should try to understand what the youth is saying and sense what he is feeling, then speak directly to that. If there are others around, he should concentrate on one person at a time. One pastor had to turn his back on a very vocal mother in order to talk to her son. By doing that, he communicated to the boy, “I’m interested in you.” Another pastor learned to say, “I hope to be able to visit with you and Mr. Smith some evening soon, but right now I want to talk to Mike.”

Being available is a “right now” kind of ministry. Adults may be willing to wait until next week for an appointment with the pastor, but young people’s problems are immediate. They are growing and changing, and they need to make psychological and spiritual adjustments as questions and problems arise. A teen-ager’s problem that could be cleared up in five minutes now may crop out more severely later on and take months to resolve. A pastor can neither effect nor communicate a “right now” availability when he is also implying, “I am very busy.”

Some pastors feel they must show the church members just how busy they are doing the Lord’s work and earning their pay. Those who are able to overcome this need to demonstrate busyness, communicating instead a relaxed attitude of availability, find that the response from young people and adults alike is far more impressive than a frantic pace. Pastoral results in the lives of people builds a strength into the church that no amount of programming can give.

Hang loose, pastor!—ROGER C. PALMS, American Baptist campus minister, East Lansing, Michigan.

Ideas

Choice Evangelical Books of 1971

Evangelicals published more than a thousand new books last year treating religious topics or aspects. In addition there were hundreds of new editions, reprints, and translations, most notably of the whole Bible. Elsewhere in these pages and in the next two issues, we are discussing many of them, along with significant non-evangelical works, in a series of six survey articles.

Here we want to call special attention to fifty nonfiction titles. (See the survey articles and past and future book-review sections for more information on most of the titles.) These works are (1) new (we will mention some choice reprints next issue), (2) by evangelicals (some of whom prefer the designation “orthodox”), and (3) for the general reader (rather than the specialist). We do not claim that our choices are the “best” books meeting these criteria, but we deem them worthy of your consideration. Almost all these titles should be in every congregation’s library, and individuals should have many of them for reading, reference, and lending. We hope publishers will make even more of them available in inexpensive paperback editions than they already have.

Before looking at topics, we honor five titles that deserve an especially wide audience. In this election year, it is fitting to take note of three of the many good books on the relation of the Christian to society. In Conflict and Conscience (Word), Senator Mark Hatfield has collected many of his recent speeches and writings. He is not defending his Senate votes on particular issues, for which he claims no infallibility, but rather is dealing with broader principles applicable to all Christians. The second is by theologian-ethicist Carl F. H. Henry, CHRISTIANITY TODAY’S editor-at-large, who has collected some of his recent essays under the title of one of them, A Plea for Evangelical Demonstration (Baker). The title of another essay indicates the kind of demonstration he urges: “Personal Evangelism and Social Justice.” The most practical book is by Winnie Christensen, a housewife, who though she cannot devote full-time to social issues wants to do something. Avoid Caught With My Hands Full: Opportunity in My Community (Harold Shaw) if you want to be at ease with your inaction.

In addition to the pressures of modern life that afflict all men, most Christians bear the added stress of believing erroneously that they have no excuse for being tense. You may not be troubled, but we all know those who are, and so we all should read what a practicing psychiatrist and fervent evangelical, Quentin Hyder, has to say in The Christian’s Handbook of Psychiatry (Revell).

If it seems odd to you that a book with chapters on “Interior Decoration,” “Food,” and “Clothing” should be considered religious, all you need to do is dip into a few pages to see why Hidden Art (Tyndale) by Edith (Mrs. Francis) Schaeffer belongs in every Christian home. Giving numerous imitable examples, she convincingly shows that concern for beauty in every dimension of life, even the most commonplace, should be a characteristic of the children of God.

The setting for the primitive Church and the course of its first forty years are ably presented by F. F. Bruce in New Testament History (Doubleday). Other aids for particular Bible books are Luke: Historian and Theologian (Zondervan) by I. Howard Marshall, Commentary on the Gospel of John (Eerdmans), a definitive work by Leon Morris, and Philippians: An Expositional Commentary (Zondervan), preaching at its best by James M. Boice. Able reflections on the doctrine of Scripture are presented by Clark Pinnock in Biblical Revelation (Moody) and by Kenneth Hamilton in Words and the Word (Eerdmans). Tradition is not just a category of Catholic thought; its effect on the formation and interpretation of Scripture is splendidly elaborated by F. F. Bruce in Tradition: Old and New (Zondervan). To round off books on the Bible, we heartily commend two guides that should motivate more group Bible study: Creative Bible Study (Zondervan) by Lawrence Richards and It’s Alive: The Dynamics of Small Group Bible Study (Harold Shaw) by Gladys Hunt.

The study of the history of Christianity receives a tremendous boost by the publication of The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100–600) (University of Chicago) by Missouri Lutheran scholar Jaroslav Pelikan. A brief introductory survey, From Christ to Constantine (Inter-Varsity) by M. A. Smith, and a survey by countries of more recent times, A Global View of Christian Missions (Baker), by J. Herbert Kane, both meet needs. Two narrowly focused studies are White Sects and Black Men in the Recent South (Vanderbilt) by David Harrell, Jr., and A Foreign Devil in China (Zondervan), John Pollock’s biography of our executive editor, L. Nelson Bell, chiefly on his missionary days.

Particular doctrines of theology are discussed at length by G. C. Berkouwer in Sin (Eerdmans), Paul Jewett in The Lord’s Day (Eerdmans), six Baptists in Tongues (Le Roi) edited by Luther Dyer, and twenty-two speakers at the Jerusalem Conference on Biblical Prophecy in Prophecy in the Making (Creation House) edited by Carl F. H. Henry. Prospects for various areas of scholarly endeavor are considered by eleven professors in Toward a Theology for the Future (Creation House) edited by Clark Pinnock and David Wells. Philosophy is represented by Arthur Holmes in Faith Seeks Understanding: A Christian Approach to Knowledge (Eerdmans) and in Jerusalem and Athens: Critical Discussions on the Philosophy and Apologetics of Cornelius Van Til (Presbyterian and Reformed) edited by E. R. Geehan, which has among its twenty-five contributors such evangelical luminaries as Dooyeweerd, Berkouwer, Packer, Jewett, Montgomery, and Holmes.

Evangelical interest in the arts is awakening from its slumber, and those who have long lamented our aesthetic poverty note the stirrings with joy. The previously mentioned Hidden Art is joined by a study of Rouault: A Vision of Suffering and Salvation (Eerdmans) by William Dyrness, a splendid collection entitled Adam Among the Television Trees: An Anthology of Verse by Contemporary Christian Poets (Word) edited by Virginia Mollenkott, and the unprecedented Imagination and the Spirit: Essays in Literature and the Christian Faith Presented to Clyde S. Kilby (Eerdmans) edited by Charles Huttar. A youthful philosopher, Stephen Evans, has shown how modern literature can be used creatively for an evangelistic presentation in Despair: A Moment or a Way of Life? (Inter-Varsity).

Not only has there been a resurgence of helpful writing on the arts; the long evangelical neglect of ethics, especially as it relates to society, is at an end also. Besides the three books mentioned at first, we welcome two systematic approaches: that by Norman Geisler of Trinity in Ethics: Alternatives and Issues (Zondervan), and a too brief work by Bernard Ramm, The Right, the Good, and the Happy (Word). The Scot William Barclay continues his amazing literary output with Ethics in a Permissive Society (Harper & Row). Two books on social issues are Vernon Grounds’s Revolution and the Christian Faith (Holman) and Our Society in Turmoil (Creation House), sixteen essays on such subjects as space, computers, crime, drugs, poverty, and race, edited by Gary Collins.

Christians can have severe problems, and so there is a need for the previously mentioned Christian Handbook of Psychiatry; but counseling for normal living is needed also. Man in Transition (Creation House) by Gary Collins is an introduction to the psychology of normal development of children, youth, and adults. God, Sex, and You (Holman) by M. O. Vincent, The Paradox of Pain (Harold Shaw) by A. E. Wilder Smith, and The Christian Way of Death (Zondervan) by Gladys Hunt are top books on their topics.

By now our readers are no doubt well aware of the “Jesus revival,” especially among youth. See our assistant editor Edward Plowman’s The Jesus Movement in America (David C. Cook) and Roger Palms’s The Jesus Kids (Judson) for reports on the movement. For more understanding of youth today, read Ted Ward’s Memo For the Underground (Creation House) and David and Don Wilkerson’s The Untapped Generation (Zondervan). Billy Graham’s sermons to The Jesus Generation (Zondervan) are selling briskly. Finally, many Bible translators modestly describe their efforts as paraphrasing. To see a real paraphrase, dip into the argot of the youth culture as found in Letters to Street Christians (Zondervan) by Jack Sparks and Paul Raudebusch, identified as “Two Brothers from Berkeley.” It won’t sound like Paul, but it is his doctrine.

Zeal need not be confined to youth. Interest in missions and evangelism among all evangelicals remains higher, along with the prerequisite need for continual congregational revitalization. The vast outpouring of books on “church renewal” over the past decade is helpfully excerpted in The Stirring Giant: Renewal Forces at Work in the Modern Church (Word) edited by Bob Patterson. Some of the implications of the changing world scene politically are explored in The Third World and Mission (Word) by Dennis Clark. The stirring and informative messages at the giant Urbana missionary convention at the end of 1970 were published under the title Christ the Liberator (Inter-Varsity). Richard Peace offers an up-to-date book with an old-fashioned-length title: Witness: A Manual for Use by Small Groups of Christians Who Are Serious in Their Desire to Learn How to Share Their Faith (Zondervan).

Once you’ve read these books, you will have your appetite whetted for more. For that purpose obtain Encounter With Books: A Guide to Christian Reading (Inter-Varsity) edited by Harish Merchant, an annotated bibliography on a wide range of topics.

All Christians owe a debt of gratitude to their brethren who have written these books. Although the books reflect the diversity of interests and views in the body of Christ, in various ways they can help God’s people to glorify him more. But to accomplish this these books must be read, thought about, and translated into and through our thoughts and actions.

We close with a word of appreciation to the publishers of these fifty books, many of whom have year after year placed several titles among our choices. Keep it up! Special commendation is due to Creation House and Harold Shaw, which are very young, yet together have eight titles among our fifty choices. Perhaps some other now little-known houses will rise up this year and do likewise.

Mahalia Jackson

The authentic Christian note, Mahalia Jackson once said, is joy. During her life, which ended January 27, she faithfully sang this truth.

Born in a shanty sixty years ago, Miss Jackson became known as the world’s greatest gospel singer. She never sang in nightclubs or shows and consistently resisted the efforts of such men as Louis Armstrong to turn her into a blues singer. “Blues,” she said, “are the songs of despair. Gospel songs are the songs are hope. When you sing gospel you have the feeling there is a cure for what’s wrong, but when you are through with the blues, you’ve got nothing to rest on.”

Throughout her career, the gospel singer performed in store-front churches, revival tents, and some of the most famous concert halls in the world. Before each performance she spent time in prayer and Bible reading “to give me inner strength,” Miss Jackson said.

She also frequently sang for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Mahalia Jackson hoped “that my singing will break down some of the hate and fear that divide the white and black people in this country.”

Miss Jackson’s life was not easy. She was born in poverty and knew the anguish of black people. Both her marriages ended in divorce. Yet she was happy, not bitter. She worked for freedom and refused to despair. The words from “I Can Put My Trust in Jesus,” which in 1952 won her an award from the French Academy of Music, explain why she lived as she did:

When my burden gets so heavy

And it seems I can’t go on,

And my pathway gets so dreary

I can’t tell the right from wrong,

Jesus’ voice I hear within me

Whispering, “Child, rely on me.”

She did; her faith recorded in song is her legacy.

Viet Nam: No Way?

Despite recurring reports of Hanoi’s plans for new military buildups and offensives, there is reason to think that the Communist Vietnamese are running out of military leverage. The South Vietnamese are showing admirable military capabilities. And the Red strategists in Southeast Asia must have a somewhat uneasy feeling about the talks between the United States and Communist China. They perhaps are a bit more dubious now about how quickly Communist China would come to the rescue in the event of a showdown.

Given that situation, the only leverage left to the Communist Vietnamese is the American prisoners of war they are holding. Without them, a rapid disengagement might well be possible.

The Communists seem determined not to release the prisoners. Could it be they feel that they can use the prisoners to get at the Paris peace talks what they could not get on the battlefield?

If so, this leaves the United States with little room to move. President Nixon has vowed not “to join our enemy to overthrow our ally. If the enemy wants peace, it will have to recognize the important difference between settlement and surrender.” This position suggests indirectly that the prisoners may be the price we have to pay. Christians must hope and pray for another way.

It may be providential and not merely coincidental that President Nixon has prepared to leave for China right at the beginning of Lent. If ever the Christian world should be in a spiritual mood, this is the time.

Consumers And Creativity

This year many Americans will have the chance to see a magnificent display of arts and crafts from the Soviet Union. There are nearly 1,500 objects, both ancient and modern, in the exhibit. It opened in Washington last month and now moves on to Los Angeles, Minnesota, Chicago, Boston, and New York.

Somewhat surprisingly, the show includes a generous sampling of Christian creativity from bygone days. The opiate of the people seems to have produced something worthwhile after all.

The most spectacular piece is a fourteenth-century icon depicting Elijah and the fiery chariot in brilliant red coloring (egg tempera). It is a flat wooden panel measuring about four by four feet that has been hanging on the wall of a Soviet museum. The icon is one of several of similar size that Soviet officials, strangely enough, saw fit to include in the American exhibition; other panels show St. Demetrius of Thessalonica and the Archangel Michael. St. Nicholas is prominent also.

Also displayed prominently are two exquisitely decorated books that arc labeled “Gospels” but are in all likelihood complete Bibles. One measuring about ten by sixteen by four inches has covers of gilded silver with a filigree of precious stones. It dates back to the sixteenth century. The other, larger and made of wood, velvet, and chased silver, is said to have been bound in 1683.

The exhibit is part of a cultural-exchange program that has been going on between the Soviet Union and the United States since 1959. The counterpart American show, which was to have opened in Tbilisi on January 24, is billed as “Research and Development, U.S.A.” It is reported to reflect the American “consumer economy” by presenting such items as a Princess telephone, a fiberglass canoe, a Lincoln Continental, a copying machine, a computer system, a home hair dryer, a snowmobile, and an electric toothbrush. Frank Shakespeare, director of the U. S. Information Agency, said that “what we are attempting to do is reflect the fact that much of the production of the United States is oriented to the needs of the consumer, and that we are a consumer-oriented people.” He might have said more accurately that the orientation is to the wants of Americans.

To compare the two exhibits is disheartening. What good is served by showing off our gadgetry? Why do not Christians in places of responsibility use their influence to make American exhibits in the Soviet Union reflect something of this nation’s biblical heritage?

The Price Of Water

“Pure water is the best of gifts that man to man can bring,” quoted the Spectator in 1920. Unfortunately, pure water is getting harder and harder to find. But Denmark and Greenland have come up with a promising idea that will make such a gift possible again.

The Danish government has begun marketing pure ice from Greenland’s ancient glaciers and icebergs, and samples were revealed last month in Washington, D. C., at the opening of a Smithsonian exhibition, “Greenland—Arctic Denmark.” Greenland’s ice is probably the last unpolluted water. Anders Georg, press consul for the Danish embassy, said that although the market for the million-year-old ice is still slight, his country hopes the need will rise—and it probably will. When it does, Denmark and Greenland will be ready to sell.

One day glacier water might become an expensive commodity. But its price will never approach that paid by Christ for the water he gave to a Samaritan woman in an encounter at a well.

Buying Our Way Out?

A plan to reimburse farmers in Turkey who agree to stop growing opium recalls some history from that part of the world. For several hundred years, the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire was one of the most prosperous and advanced nations in the world, standing at the forefront of learning, commerce, and military science. The Byzantine currency, called the solidus, was the standard for international trade during many centuries, until successive devaluations made it unreliable.

Largely because of their wealth, the Byzantines never lacked foreign enemies—Russian and Asiatic barbarians to the north and east, highly civilized Arabs and Persians to the south and southeast, avaricious Italians and belligerent Franks on the west. For centuries the Byzantine armies were better organized and equipped than their rivals. But Constantinople was a commercially minded capital, and its leaders realized that it was more economical and less disturbing to the domestic scene to buy off the Empire’s enemies rather than fight them. Some barbarian peoples were hired to fight for Byzantium, others were bribed not to fight against her.

This “subsidy” or tribute system worked well enough for a time, but the barbarians kept raising the ante, until the Empire’s finances could no longer stand the strain. Increasing foreign expenditures with no corresponding increase in productivity led to the devaluation of the solidus. Rapidly increasing taxation still failed to produce the money to pay ever-increasing tribute subsidies. Then the barbarians came to collect by force. The imperial army, victim of decades of neglect, was unable to hold them off.

Among the many contributors to the fall of East Rome, which opened much of Europe to Muslim conquest, her practice of trying to buy herself out of difficulties instead of facing them is certainly prominent.

Given the current world situation, subsidies to Turkey for not growing opium may appear to be the most practical solution, particularly if some stringent means of enforcement are built in. But if it sees this as a long-term policy, the United States stands to lose.

The Christian And Good Works

In Acts 9:36 Tabitha (Dorcas) is described as a believer, as one who “was full of good works and acts of charity.” The Apostle Paul speaks of the need for “good deeds” on the part of believers. James says that Father Abraham’s faith was completed or made manifest by works.

No one is saved by his good deeds; salvation is by faith plus nothing. But saving faith, if it is genuine, produces good works. Some Christians who recognize the need for works that will show the world they are Christ’s own are not aware that effective service for Christ must rest on three pillars: regeneration, consecration, and motivation.

Works offered to God by those whose hearts have not been transformed are not acceptable because they are not based on a right relationship. Good works will therefore never save anyone. But for those who have been regenerated, a life without good works is an anachronism. Good works begin with the new birth.

The second pillar supporting a life of good works is consecration. Indeed, the first and the best good work is not something we do for somebody else but what we do with ourselves. A life of service will flourish and reach its highest potential when it has been preceded by the Christian’s commitment to Jesus Christ as the Lord of his life. Paul stresses this in Romans 12 when he beseeches believers to present their bodies as living sacrifices unto God. When the Christian does this, two things happen: he serves his own interests best, for by this commitment he does what God wants him to do in order to have the best kind of life; and by accepting the will of God for his life, he becomes the servant of men, able to minister to them in the most beneficial way.

The third pillar on which the life of good works rests is motivation. Many people do good deeds for wrong reasons. Why I do something is as important as what I do. From the biblical standpoint, good works should be motivated by love of God, which in turn causes me to love men. Loving both God and men, I do what I ought to do toward both God and men, whether or not it fits into my accepted pattern of likes and dislikes. Love is the right reason for a life of good works.

God rewards his people according to their good works. Although we are not saved by works, our reward in heaven will be based upon those works we do after we have been regenerated and justified. Paul declares that “every man’s work shall be manifest.… It shall be revealed by fire.… If any man’s work abide … he shall receive a reward” (1 Cor. 3:13, 14). And a man’s work will abide if it is built on the pillars of regeneration, consecration, and right motivation.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube